I'm sure BB evaluates this exactly as you said, I just think based on his past statements and roster usage it's very unlikely he comes to the conclusion that they don't need a dedicated long snapper (although the above point about the rule changes is a valid one). I'll see if I can find the press conference, I think he talked about someone (DeOssie?) being a full time long snapper and how it changed punt protection schemes or how teams started rushing the punter differently and forced the changePedroKsBambino said:On the first point, you're oversimplifying.... for example, I think he's say offensive and defensive players regularly divide their time between those tasks and special teams, for example. It's not 'just' about roster spots or about practice, it's about flexibility. If you don't think he values that, ok..I just disagree. Part of why I don't expect Nink to be the longsnapper all year is practice time---part is injury, and the biggest reason is he's likely not good enough a longsnapper. I do think the Pats do the analysis, though, on each of those things rather than seeing them as unrebuttable assumptions.
Again on the draft notes, you're asking a different question than the one I posed. I don't think there's a shadow of a doubt that Belichick values incremental value everywhere, including specialists (not that anyone questioned that in this thread). I do think there's a question about whether Belichick would rather use that spot a different way if he lost very little value in doing so---which was, of course, where I started.
http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4701225/belichick-goes-deep-with-snapper-talk
This is the one I was thinking of, he talked about it last year as well in the presser sn mentioned.
Couple possible thoughts on Aiken from my POV is 1) that they might want to see what they end up with on the ps at a couple of spots before deciding where to make another cut and Aiken is less likely to be claimed 2) he was iirc making more than the vet minimum, so might be a way to get him at a lower salary 3) they are willing to go with Nink for a week to avoid guaranteeing Aikens salary and possibly bring on a lower cost or better option later on, possibly via the practice squad