2024 NFL Draft 2nd and 3rd round gamethread: Baruch atah Adonai WITH SPOILERS

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,984
Paul and Kingsley are not low ceiling guys. They're the exact opposite. Paul is one of the best pass protectors in this years class. If his run blocking was on par he would've been drafted already. Kingsley is 21 and has outstanding athletic ability. I'm taking one of those guys before I even think about who Drake is throwing it to.
I didn't say Kingsley had a low ceiling. But he's raw, no? Taking an inexperienced young tackle that likely won't start immediately right after taking Drake Maye (I'm happy with that pick) carries some pretty significant error bars. That's a ton of bust potential for the #3 and #34 picks.

And if Patrick Paul has such a high ceiling after starting like 50 games at LT in college, why didn't someone take him last night?
 

Eck'sSneakyCheese

Member
SoSH Member
May 11, 2011
10,471
NH
I didn't say Kingsley had a low ceiling. But he's raw, no? Taking an inexperienced young tackle that likely won't start immediately right after taking Drake Maye (I'm happy with that pick) carries some pretty significant error bars. That's a ton of bust potential for the #3 and #34 picks.

And if Patrick Paul has such a high ceiling after starting like 50 games at LT in college, why didn't someone take him last night?
Because the other guys were better?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,092
I didn't say Kingsley had a low ceiling. But he's raw, no? Taking an inexperienced young tackle that likely won't start immediately right after taking Drake Maye (I'm happy with that pick) carries some pretty significant error bars. That's a ton of bust potential for the #3 and #34 picks.

And if Patrick Paul has such a high ceiling after starting like 50 games at LT in college, why didn't someone take him last night?
Maybe, but if you bust on Maye you're in trouble either way.

To me the thing is.... if you told me one of: Suamataia/McConkey/Coleman/etc. etc. made a pro-bowl in the next 3-4 years.... I'd bet heavy on Suamataia. There are some potentially good WRs here... I don't think there are any #1 difference maker types. I think you're looking at either guys just as raw at their position as Suamataia, or guys with ceilings that look more like #2 WRs. Given this team is not competing in 2024-25 anyway, I'd much rather chase guys who could be top guys at their position in the 2nd, even if it takes a year or two. I think without the need to get a QB next year you'll be in much better position to get a WR who has true #1 difference maker potential in the draft.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,987
Dallas
Paul has some technique issues in pass pro + will never be a good run blocker. Specifically he stops his feet and gets complacent allowing for secondary moves. He also can overset and let guys get inside on him. Run blocking wise he just doesn't get the right leverage and doesn't have a ton of power. If you can clean up his pass pro though you get top 12 kind of pass pro at LT in theory but he will be a bottom 5-10 run blocker. @ehaz
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,987
Dallas
Yeah Sua is a bet on athleticism, size, length, etc. Would I make that bet? No. But I get it if an NFL team does. Even your OL experts are torn on him. Personally I chase high floors with OTs and Sua isn't that. I chase ceiling with WRs.
 

Eck'sSneakyCheese

Member
SoSH Member
May 11, 2011
10,471
NH
Paul has some technique issues in pass pro + will never be a good run blocker. Specifically he stops his feet and gets complacent allowing for secondary moves. He also can overset and let guys get inside on him. Run blocking wise he just doesn't get the right leverage and doesn't have a ton of power. If you can clean up his pass pro though you get top 12 kind of pass pro at LT in theory but he will be a bottom 5-10 run blocker. @ehaz
You don't think an NFL program can cleanup some of the run blocking stuff to make him at least adequate? Genuinely asking, not trying to be wise.
 

shoosh77

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2009
4,411
New Canaan, CT
Outside of specialists, QB and Center, you basically need two of everything. Take the highest rated player on the board even if it’s Cooper DeJean. Studs are studs, even if you don’t have high level Tackles and WRs right now.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,092
Yeah Sua is a bet on athleticism, size, length, etc. Would I make that bet? No. But I get it if an NFL team does. Even your OL experts are torn on him. Personally I chase high floors with OTs and Sua isn't that. I chase ceiling with WRs.
Yeah, he's definitely risky, but age and physical tools.
I know Thorn likes him whose O-line takes I generally trust, has him as OT6 and graded as a potential impact player. Notes he needs to be brought along and a PA scheme would help him,
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,987
Dallas
Yeah, he's definitely risky, but age and physical tools.
I know Thorn likes him whose O-line takes I generally trust, has him as OT6 and graded as a potential impact player. Notes he needs to be brought along and a PA scheme would help him,
I trust Thorn too. Lance Z is also very much an OL guy and he has Sua as more of a 4th round kind of prospect. Consensus is around 40-45. I am more like pick 85. It just depends on how much you think you can develop guys and if you need to play him right away.
 

Eck'sSneakyCheese

Member
SoSH Member
May 11, 2011
10,471
NH
Yeah Sua is a bet on athleticism, size, length, etc. Would I make that bet? No. But I get it if an NFL team does. Even your OL experts are torn on him. Personally I chase high floors with OTs and Sua isn't that. I chase ceiling with WRs.
I look at Kingsley and I see discount Penei Sewell. I'm probably wishcasting but damn do we need a cornerstone there.
 
Apr 7, 2006
2,597
I think WR is a massive need and the remaining OT are not worth taking at #34. I'd go WR (AD Mitchell, Ladd McConkey, Troy maybe) then Blake Fisher or some other developmental tackle (the Yale guy) later, and then make it an OT double-dip at the beginning of Day 3.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,469
Outside of specialists, QB and Center, you basically need two of everything. Take the highest rated player on the board even if it’s Cooper DeJean. Studs are studs, even if you don’t have high level Tackles and WRs right now.
You obviously know nothing about football or you're implying the Falcons strategy is incorrect.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,164
I think WR is a massive need and the remaining OT are not worth taking at #34. I'd go WR (AD Mitchell, Ladd McConkey, Troy maybe) then Blake Fisher or some other developmental tackle (the Yale guy) later, and then make it an OT double-dip at the beginning of Day 3.
Day 3 OT have a miniscule hit rate. I'd much rather double dip at WR on day 3 or RB/TE. If you pass at OT today I think we should punt to 25 draft and take one in first rd then. I don't think Maye should see the field next season so let Brisset deal with the poor OL play. This season should be all about building for 25 and beyond.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,092
I think WR is a massive need and the remaining OT are not worth taking at #34. I'd go WR (AD Mitchell, Ladd McConkey, Troy maybe) then Blake Fisher or some other developmental tackle (the Yale guy) later, and then make it an OT double-dip at the beginning of Day 3.
Day 3 OTs probably don't even make the roster out of camp though.

This is to me the big problem. You MIGHT get a starting OT (probably on the right) in the early 3rd. Any later than that... probably not. Tackles just simply go earlier than WRs because there are far fewer of them who have any kind of top end upside. Honestly... I could see based on how this draft has gone, all 4 of Suamataia, Paul, Fisher and Amendjie going in the 2nd.

Edit- looking around at some of the new Mocks today, seems like everyone has 3-5 OTs off the board before 68. Which ones vary, but unless you're okay with taking the 5th or 6th best OT on your board.... probably need to take him in the 2nd somewhere.
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,911
Most first rounders who sit a whole year were drafted by playoff teams with very good to great entrenched QBs. I understand not wanting to rush Maye, or not going into the season with the idea to play him right away, I'm right there with you guys. I don't understand hoping he never sees the field and entering 2025 without a clue of his ability to play in the NFL.
There were nine QBs who started all 17 games last year. Seven of those nine were playoff bound. I think most teams going into the year, even with the intention of having a QB who starts all 17 games, will more than likely start their backup for some games. I'd be shocked if Maye didn't get some starts next year, either out of necessity or by way of superior talent.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,092
Raheem Morris thought this was a Superflex league.
THis would be funny by itself, but given that the Falcons have under Fontenot drafted like it's fantasy (RBs top 10, TE top 5, trade up for WRs) it's extra funny
 

MuppetAsteriskTalk

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2015
5,454
Outside of specialists, QB and Center, you basically need two of everything. Take the highest rated player on the board even if it’s Cooper DeJean. Studs are studs, even if you don’t have high level Tackles and WRs right now.
This is where I'm at. BPA (accounting for positional value) unless it's very close between one or more available players, then you can use current roster need as the tiebreaker.
 

Dollar

Member
SoSH Member
May 5, 2006
11,206
I'm all in on one of Cooper DeJean, Ladd McConkey, or Keon Coleman. LET'S GO
 

Zincman

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
441
New London
If I were the Pats GM, and I am not, I would realize this is a 3 yr rebuild and I would start by building both fronts. An outstanding OL can make a lot of players look better than they are. That's the place to start.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,811
Oregon
If I were the Pats GM, and I am not, I would realize this is a 3 yr rebuild and I would start by building both fronts. An outstanding OL can make a lot of players look better than they are. That's the place to start.
Nice try, Eliot
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,810
If I were the Pats GM, and I am not, I would realize this is a 3 yr rebuild and I would start by building both fronts. An outstanding OL can make a lot of players look better than they are. That's the place to start.
“Offensive linemen are weapons” - Jim Harbaugh
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,276
The whole "200,000 here now" Goodell said---there's no way there's that many in that crowd. He must mean participating in all the draft stuff.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,092
34 and 231 for 41 and 88 (or 91)? Makes a lot of sense, should still be WR and OT options at 41, but GB could use Newton or DeJean