That's now at least six interceptions on the season that absolutely should never have happened, after the two yesterday (one through Gronk's hands on a perfect pass, and the other when Burkhead was clearly held and no flag). People with no context are going to look at his passing stats and say, man, he's been pretty bad (for him) this year. Here's his actual passing stat line, and also what it should be assuming that five of the six INTs in question were caught, and the other (the one yesterday to Burkhead) was simply overturned by a properly called defensive penalty:
Actual: 351-537 (65.4%), 4,105 yds, 7.64 y/a, 25 td, 11 int, 95.4 rating
Should be: 356-536 (66.4%), 4,200 yds, 7.84 y/a, 25 td, 5 int, 101.0 rating
I'm not even taking into consideration potential yards and touchdowns he could have had, if some of these passes were caught and not turnovers, because the Pats were marching deep in opposing territory at the time. But still, his "should be" line is much better than his "actual" line, mainly due to these six INTs that never should have been, and weren't Brady's fault. They all count, and that's the way it goes, but when evaluating whether a player is "slipping" simply by looking at his stats...well...the real performance is different than the stat line.