You must be new here. We'll talk later if needed.Just so I know for the future, what’s board etiquette on no hitters? Say what you want we don’t give a shit or don’t you dare unless you want to be shunned?
You refer to them as a 'thing'.mentioning in progress no hitters
You're learninghm? I didn’t post until after the single
You shouldn't have needed to ask.hm? I didn’t post until after the single
I think I'm missing something: Cleveland had a hit in the second; the Red Sox had a hit in the third. And someone was worried about no-hit protocol?You're learning
I hear you but I also hear the school of thought that superstition is stupid. Personally I’m ambivalent but not trying to cause any waves.You shouldn't have needed to ask.
Cleveland hitters are pretty good. Two runs will not be enough.Sweet offence there.
Sure it will. The way Houck is going, two will be plentyCleveland hitters are pretty good. Two runs will not be enough.
I was asking for future referenceI think I'm missing something: Cleveland had a hit in the second; the Red Sox had a hit in the third. And someone was worried about no-hit protocol?
Great. Now The Wave.I hear you but I also hear the school of thought that superstition is stupid. Personally I’m ambivalent but not trying to cause any waves.
I've been trying to think of something better, but I think this is the answer.Just wondering: Is scoring on a balk and a home run the most diametrically opposite ways to get two runs?
Something like this.Imagine if Duran tried that fake steal of home with Ted at the plate.
Phrasing!I hate defensive positioning
I miss singles up the middle