CFB 2023 Conference Championships: A thread enjoying five major conference championship games for the last time

canderson

Mr. Brightside
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
39,725
Harrisburg, Pa.
FSU and Michigan winning puts them in the can only take 1 of Alabama, Georgia and Texas
Georgia is done. It all hinges on Florida State and their 3rd string QB not having the night of his life.

If they win and the committee puts Alabama over Texas who kicked their ass in their own stadium - well whatever.
 

JCizzle

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2006
20,933
Georgia is done. It all hinges on Florida State and their 3rd string QB not having the night of his life.

If they win and the committee puts Alabama over Texas who kicked their ass in their own stadium - well whatever.
Yep. The SEC doesn't deserve a spot if FSU wins. Tough break, but Texas winning in Bama should matter.
 

loshjott

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2004
15,016
Silver Spring, MD
If FSU and Michigan win they are in and GA (and Texas) are out. If one loses, it’s GA vs Texas for the last spot. There’s no way AL is out.
 

jablo1312

New Member
Sep 20, 2005
1,016
draftkings has odds up on teams to make the playoff: Alabama -650, Texas -250, FSU +160, UGA +550
 

JokersWildJIMED

Blinded by Borges
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2004
2,754
Yep. The SEC doesn't deserve a spot if FSU wins. Tough break, but Texas winning in Bama should matter.
Best conference in the country, by far, doesn’t deserve its winner in…nonsense…I get the SEC hate but it’s not rational or fair. The ACC is atrocious and an undefeated record in the ACC is not as good as 12-1 in the SEC
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,396
AZ
Whenever you have tied teams at the top, and there are arguments about which to take, and one has won head to head, I have always thought it’s kind of a mixed analysis. On the one hand, head to head should matter. But on the other hand, if your only loss was the team that also has an argument to be in, by definition, it is a very good loss. I think if you say Texas should be in, then Alabama has the best loss of the season. Same with Georgia.

That’s Alabama’s problem. How do you say their h2h win over GA puts them ahead of GA, if TX’s win against ALA doesn’t put them ahead of ALA.

Which is just a long way of saying, I just don’t see how ALA can be in over TX. Only way I put ALA through is if FSU is out.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
21,120
Whenever you have tied teams at the top, and there are arguments about which to take, and one has won head to head, I have always thought it’s kind of a mixed analysis. On the one hand, head to head should matter. But on the other hand, if your only loss was the team that also has an argument to be in, by definition, it is a very good loss. I think if you say Texas should be in, then Alabama has the best loss of the season. Same with Georgia.

That’s Alabama’s problem. How do you say their h2h win over GA puts them ahead of GA, if TX’s win against ALA doesn’t put them ahead of ALA.

Which is just a long way of saying, I just don’t see how ALA can be in over TX. Only way I put ALA through is if FSU is out.
Bama just won the SEC championship and beat a team that had won 29 straight. They’re in.
 

axx

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,145
Whenever you have tied teams at the top, and there are arguments about which to take, and one has won head to head, I have always thought it’s kind of a mixed analysis. On the one hand, head to head should matter. But on the other hand, if your only loss was the team that also has an argument to be in, by definition, it is a very good loss. I think if you say Texas should be in, then Alabama has the best loss of the season. Same with Georgia.

That’s Alabama’s problem. How do you say their h2h win over GA puts them ahead of GA, if TX’s win against ALA doesn’t put them ahead of ALA.
Which is why you put Texas in instead of FSU.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
That’s Alabama’s problem. How do you say their h2h win over GA puts them ahead of GA, if TX’s win against ALA doesn’t put them ahead of ALA.

Which is just a long way of saying, I just don’t see how ALA can be in over TX. Only way I put ALA through is if FSU is out.
The argument would be that Alabama's h2h win over GA was in the SEC championship game, so it carries more weight than an early September game.
 

JokersWildJIMED

Blinded by Borges
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2004
2,754
Whenever you have tied teams at the top, and there are arguments about which to take, and one has won head to head, I have always thought it’s kind of a mixed analysis. On the one hand, head to head should matter. But on the other hand, if your only loss was the team that also has an argument to be in, by definition, it is a very good loss. I think if you say Texas should be People’s anti Alabama bias is coming out but the SEC has dominated the
Bama is in. Arguing to exclude the SEC winner which just beat the 2-time reigning champion, on a 29 game winning streak is nuts.

Pundits are doing it to generate controversy but it’s not going to happen.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,161
Hingham, MA
Texas was ranked ahead of Bama coming into tonight. Their win wasn’t against a team as good as Georgia; but they won by 4 touchdowns. I don’t see how you can move Alabama past them. The fact that the committee had Texas 7 Alabama 8 coming into tonight matters. Right?
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,135
Unreal America
Texas was ranked ahead of Bama coming into tonight. Their win wasn’t against a team as good as Georgia; but they won by 4 touchdowns. I don’t see how you can move Alabama past them. The fact that the committee had Texas 7 Alabama 8 coming into tonight matters. Right?
Nothing matters but the SEC’s birthright to get at least one CFP spot every year.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,396
AZ
Bama just won the SEC championship and beat a team that had won 29 straight. They’re in.
The argument would be that Alabama's h2h win over GA was in the SEC championship game, so it carries more weight than an early September game.
Yeah, we do this most years so I know what the arguments always are. I am just trying to say why these presumptions are inconsistent and kind of arbitrary.

If ALA deserves to be in notwithstanding losing to TX, why doesn’t GA deserve to be in notwithstanding losing to ALA. if ALA’s win is better because it’s later, isn’t GA’s one loss the best loss you can have?

Alabama is in because they just had this amazing win. If the win was so amazing why isn’t GA’s case even stronger?

I’m not advocating one way or other. It just gets presented as so obvious when really it gets very circular. Last year we have to worry about it I guess.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,569
Alabama would kick FSUs ass. So would Texas. At some point reasonableness has to come into this decision if we want the playoff champion to be the best team.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,161
Hingham, MA
I can actually buy Georgia being out, I guess, despite 29 straight wins coming into today. I’m on board with Michigan, Washington, Bama, and Texas.

Edit if Michigan loses then I think you have to take Georgia over FSU