How about if I put it this way:
Quarterback #1 has a dreadful offensive line, but an all world #1 receiver, a very, very good #2 receiver, and a very good running back. He goes 27/40 for 246 yards and a pick, gets sacked 6 times, and his team loses by 13 at home.
Quarterback #2 has a dreadful offensive line, his #1 and #2 receivers are hurt, his #1 and #2 running backs are both hurt. He goes 24/35 for 235 yards and a pick, gets sacked once, and his team wins by 13 on the road even though the guy playing the #1 dropped 3 passes.
Not to mention QB2 is 24 years old and playing in his 2nd season, and QB1 is 36 years old and is in his 12th year.
I don't see how any of that which I just wrote is controversial.
Which one had a better game?
The two seam routes he hit to Henry, the two balls that Agholor dropped (one on the sideline, and one for a first down over the middle) the long third down conversion to Agholor, and the come back route after a scramble to Bourne were as good as any pass that Colt threw last night.
I swear I'm watching a different game than some folks some nights. Did people not see, I don't know, the first 5+ years of Tom Brady's career where it was dink/dunk/game manage to victory? Mac ain't Tom, but Jesus, outside of 2007, this type of game is what we saw almost week in and week out for a long, long time.