There was extra hatred because they were getting in the way of Tom’s Patriots Perfection.I hate the Chiefs so much. More than the Ravens and Steelers even.
TB12, let’s do this shit.
There was extra hatred because they were getting in the way of Tom’s Patriots Perfection.I hate the Chiefs so much. More than the Ravens and Steelers even.
TB12, let’s do this shit.
Whitehead may have broken his collarbone today in the first game.73 for KC also limping
Tb has a shot with these OL injuries
You are in luck on the cap front. Those Clark, Jones and Mathieu contracts, what fun!It's going to be really hard to beat KC until age and/or the salary cap do their thing. You put them in 2001 - 03 and they might not make it out of the 2nd round.
If only his disease of abuse gave a shit about his football motivation. Get well soon, Josh.
Cap could catch up to them quickly. THey're $20mn over the cap for next year with 9 guys accounting for over $157 million.It's going to be really hard to beat KC until age and/or the salary cap do their thing. You put them in 2001 - 03 and they might not make it out of the 2nd round.
jags had a bad qb with a big contract; doesn’t seem similarIn the long run, not a horrific loss for Buffalo like the Jags suffered three years ago and never recovered in part because they obsessed over losing that game.
Yes, not the same trajectory. More along the lines it is easier to wash away a blow out than a game you give away. Didn’t hear again from the Vikings after they blew that game against the Falcons in 98.jags had a bad qb with a big contract; doesn’t seem similar
Lol, great minds think alike.Early draft kings line. KC -3.5
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...Reid’s mask looks more like a feed bag.
This is the state that elected Hawley (and Blunt).Again, how is kanas city allowed to have this many fans?
Along somewhat similar lines, when Tim Duncan’s Spurs swept LeBron’s Cavs in 2007, that made it 4-0 at that point for Duncan. It took until the current season for LeBron to get back in range to tie, still down 5-4. Also many recent men’s tennis Grand Slam finals have been like this, with the three greatest players of all time jockeying for the alltime 1/2/3 positions.No doubt. I was more making the point that Mahomes losing this one would mean that Brady necessarily gets to a number that seems absolutely insurmountable. Mahomes could win this year and never get back but if you are going to challenge Brady’s records you sort of have to get a running start, which Mahomes will have done if he wins this one.
I mean, they were a 3 point favorite against the Bills and I think the Bucs would smoke Buffalo, so it seems about right for a team basically playing an away Super Bowl against an opponent they beat by 3 at a time they were struggling.Can't believe KC is opening up as just a 3pt favorite.
Brady throwing 3 picks in the second half mindfucked LaFleur into putting more faith in his defense than he should, thus leading to a horrific decision to kick the FG.Another stat showing how shockingly bad LaFleur’s FG decision was.
Packers' FG decision.
Search terms on @pfref covering 1994-present:
1) Team trails by 4 to 8 points.
2) 4th down
3) In red zone
4) Between 2:00 and 3:00 left in 4th quarter.
In 115 situations matching those terms, teams attempted a field goal in 3 of them before today.
That is a pretty damning statistic and is likely to be LaFleur’s coaching legacy unless he can squeeze out a title in the final years of Rodgers’ career.Another stat showing how shockingly bad LaFleur’s FG decision was.
Packers' FG decision.
Search terms on @pfref covering 1994-present:
1) Team trails by 4 to 8 points.
2) 4th down
3) In red zone
4) Between 2:00 and 3:00 left in 4th quarter.
In 115 situations matching those terms, teams attempted a field goal in 3 of them before today.
The rule does make sense...assuming the ref makes the call immediately then there will be waving and whistles that could have a direct and immediate impact on what comes next.The Allen sideline play right before halftime. Was the first time I have seen that type of play reviewed since the scenario is so rare, but was not aware the play is not reviewable.
D for Diploma, baby!Shannon Sharpe gives Brady a D for his performance yesterday.
Interesting stat I just saw (that in no way lets Lafleur off the hook, but is nonetheless interesting):
Yesterday was the 7th time in Brady's career that he has gotten the ball with between 2 and 3 minutes left on the clock, up by a single score, with the opponent having all 3 timeouts. It was the first time that Brady's offense closed out the game on that possession. In fact, his teams were only 3-3 in those 6 games.
HA. One was earlier this year and they lost (to the Bears).How many of those prior 6 did he have a shitty OC; how many did he coach himself?
You can quibble with whether it was a D or maybe a C. It wasn't any better than that with 3 critical interceptions.Shannon Sharpe gives Brady a D for his performance yesterday.
Pete Carroll got pilloried for throwing a pass on the goal line in the Super Bowl...that was nowhere near the insane decision that this was. I've been trying to think of a more indefensible coaching decision in a big game over the years...so far I can't.Another stat showing how shockingly bad LaFleur’s FG decision was.
Packers' FG decision.
Search terms on @pfref covering 1994-present:
1) Team trails by 4 to 8 points.
2) 4th down
3) In red zone
4) Between 2:00 and 3:00 left in 4th quarter.
In 115 situations matching those terms, teams attempted a field goal in 3 of them before today.
What was Rodgers then, an F?You can quibble with whether it was a D or maybe a C. It wasn't any better than that with 3 critical interceptions.
The only metric Brady was better than Rodgers at was winning the game. An important metric in the big picture, but they weren't playing one on one.What was Rodgers then, an F?
Aside from EPA/play and QBR, but sure. I mean, as long as we're just reading the box score without context.The only metric Brady was better than Rodgers at was winning the game. An important metric in the big picture, but they weren't playing one on one.
Rodgers completed 68% of his passes for 380 yards and 3 touchdowns and a pick. Brady was at 55% for 100 less yards and threw three picks. Tampa won the game, but Rodgers played significantly better than Brady.
Yes, QBR is a rock solid way to evaluate how a quarterback played.Aside from EPA/play and QBR, but sure. I mean, as long as we're just reading the box score without context.
Better than total yards and completion percentage. Brady was also better by yards per attempt.Yes, QBR is a rock solid way to evaluate how a quarterback played.