Yup. Brees hasn’t looked great at all.The Saints have looked as vulnerable as the Pats over the past month.
There seem to be no power teams. LAR, NO, KC, NE, Hou all with weaknesses. The maybe 'best' team currently, LAC, just got dominated by Bal last nite. Pats take care of business next week v NYJ, get a bye and a home game and see what happens.The Saints have looked as vulnerable as the Pats over the past month.
They better keep him.I wonder if they can get a 1st from Tampa or Jacksonville for him.
LOL is that true? Imagine if Colts/Titans get flexed to Sunday night. Last game of the season and three possible outcomes!Steelers can get in if they beat the Bengals and Colts/Titans tie on SNF.
Who said this, Tomlin?"I thought we were playing two teams. I thought we were playing the (opponents) and the striped shirts... I haven't seen anything like in 18, 19 years in the league.... I'm sure I'm getting fined already, so i care not to say anything more. But something has to be done about that. That's ridiculous."
Could be any coach, any week, I supposeWho said this, Tomlin?
Was the response “nobody cares”?Could be any coach, any week, I suppose
But it was Todd Bowles today
It’s not a 1 back league anymore.DotB, bigger travesty?
Ingram getting touches over Kamara
Gore getting touches over Drake
Howard getting touches over Cohen
Murray getting touches over Cook
Which is true, but why would you give any of the first guys carries in key situations?It’s not a 1 back league anymore.
In this game Ingram is a more than good enough option in a goal line situationWhich is true, but why would you give any of the first guys carries in key situations?
Here's my order:DotB, bigger travesty?
Ingram getting touches over Kamara
Gore getting touches over Drake
Howard getting touches over Cohen
Murray getting touches over Cook
I'd have gone with Murray over Cook first because Murray is slower than I am.Here's my order:
Ingram over Kamara
Murray over Cook
Gore over Drake
Howard over Cohen
Good enough or impossible to tackle? I think I would choose the latter there, everytime.In this game Ingram is a more than good enough option in a goal line situation
This list is perfect and unequivocally correct.Here's my order:
Ingram over Kamara
Murray over Cook
Gore over Drake
Howard over Cohen
It is for the teams that have great running backs. I don't see anyone stealing significant carries from Zeke Elliott, Todd Gurley, Saquon Barkley, Christian McCaffrey....It’s not a 1 back league anymore.
This isn't inaccurate, but Kamara is so slippery and impossible to tackle. He always finds the holes. And he's incredibly fast. Ingram getting more carriers than Kamama is malpractice. Getting them at the goalline should result in an immediate firing.I'd have gone with Murray over Cook first because Murray is slower than I am.
That's the only decision I had an issue with, so I can see it going either way. Ingram is at least a serviceable running back. Murray is useless except for when Cook needs a breather.I'd have gone with Murray over Cook first because Murray is slower than I am.
It was, but he didn't wallop him. That wasn't as bad as the Bears' reaction.And that's an absolute cheap shot on Trubisky by Harris
4.56 40. I think he’s much more shifty than he is fast.This isn't inaccurate, but Kamara is so slippery and impossible to tackle. He always finds the holes. And he's incredibly fast. Ingram getting more carriers than Kamama is malpractice. Getting them at the goalline should result in an immediate firing.
He apparently reaches top speed faster than any other back in the NFL. He's plenty fast. And quicker than anyone. On top of that, I'm not sure his balance is human.4.56 40. I think he’s much more shifty than he is fast.