At his age, absent a guarantee for more than $6mm, is it better for Revis to sit and collect $6MM, and then hope to come back a year later, (and a year older/rustier) and then sign a short-term contract for probably short dough, OR play in '17 for a short-money incentive-laden 1 year deal, on a good team (Pats) that could use him wisely, and then assuming he plays reasonably well, sign a better deal after that?