Papelbon's Poutine said:
And that chart doesn't include Rusney.
That's an older chart.
The moderators split the AAV chart out from this thread.
It can be found here: http://sonsofsamhorn.net/topic/85624-red-sox-2015-aav/
Papelbon's Poutine said:
And that chart doesn't include Rusney.
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/baseballinsider/kansas-city-royals-tough-choices-tough-trades-stay-top-alex-gordon-met-blog-entry-1.1993831Papelbon's Poutine said:
Are you speculating on that on your own or did you read that somewhere? I find it tough that either would be.
MakMan44 said:Josh Johnson had his option declined by the Padres. I seriously doubt he wants to attempt to rebuild value in Fenway but he'd be such a great low risk signing.
EDIT: For the record, his option was for $4 million and the Padres still turned that down. I'd sign him to that deal in a JM heartbeat.
Because it's a no risk move for a team with a payroll as large as the Red Sox's. If you catch lighting in a bottle, fantastic. If not, 4 million is a drop in the pond for the team.nattysez said:
Why? Since the end of the 2010 season, he's pitched 56 major-league games, including zero last year. When he pitched for Toronto in 2013, he put up a 6.20 ERA over 16 starts.
I could see an argument for signing him to a minor league deal to see if he's got anything left, but anything more than that seems like a terrible idea.
MakMan44 said:Josh Johnson had his option declined by the Padres. I seriously doubt he wants to attempt to rebuild value in Fenway but he'd be such a great low risk signing.
EDIT: For the record, his option was for $4 million and the Padres still turned that down. I'd sign him to that deal in a JM heartbeat.
Johnson wouldn't even be ready to go until the end of April or so. Plenty of time to see what the young pitchers who stick around can do, and I tend to doubt all of them are going to be effective enough to stick around. If they are, and Johnson is healthy and effective as well, I think that's a pretty good problem to have.Papelbon's Poutine said:
I guess if you could get him to agree to a MiL deal with a payout if he makes it to the bigs and he makes his money on incentives, it might not be a horrible decision. But I think it would depend on what the Sox are doing with all those arms in AAA and AA, trading them, promoting them, moving them to the bullpen. Because right now all the slots are full and if you sign someone like Johnson for a make good/get healthy deal, you need a spot for him. I'm not sure the opportunity cost lost is worth the possible upside he bounces back to the guy he was three years ago.
Johnny Manziel, I was under the impression that was the new "cocaine heartbeat" meme.Rasputin said:
JM = Junior Mint?
If he's in a position where people are declining chump change options, he should be in a position to accept a minor league make good deal.
This is, I'm not sure we have room in the Pawtucket rotation for a reclamation project.
All other things being equal the point would be that the sox are very RHH heavy and Miami need a 2b.MakMan44 said:I don't see much a difference in their respective games. Maybe Yelich ends up with better power numbers than Mookie down the line, but right now I think the only significant difference between the two is that Yelich is probably much better on defense. I just don't see the point of the swap.
RochesterSamHorn said:Just throwing this out there before the hot stove becomes heated with relevant posts. Doesn't a trade of Mookie Betts for Christian Yelich make complete sense?
I remember hearing how the Red Sox love Yelich, who can play any outfield position, is a LH bat, and is a meticulous, patient hitter. The Marlins have a hole to fill at 2b along with a leadoff hitter. I hate to give up Mookie, but the bottom line is I'd rather have Yelich in the outfield than Betts.
Moosbrugger said:For those that would trade Betts. I wonder who you would have leading off for the Sox in '15.
Ellsbury was missed badly last year, and it wasn't for his fielding or power. I just don't see any candidates other than Betts without a trade.
lxt said:I'm kind of looking forward to seeing an OF of Betts, Castillo and Victorino (At least while he's healthy). The OF will be a place for doubles to go and die. If JBJ can learn to hit next season in AAA then that would even be a better OF, one where baseballs go to die, 2016 may be a lot of fun to watch.Naturally, I'm talking from a defensive perspective as I have no idea how well they'd do offensively. Lot of speed on the base paths. Man would Papi and Nap love to have two or three on base each time they got up.
Marrero and JBJ in the same lineup, is something other pitchers would beg to pitch against.Rasputin said:
Marrero, Pedroia, Bradley up the middle is going to be my binky until they pry it from my cold, dead hands. If you had Castillo and Betts out there with JBJ, pitchers would be begging to come here.
Green Monster said:Fun read and pure speculation. Tim Dierkers predicts the landing spots for the top 50 FA's
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/11/2014-15-top-50-free-agents-with-predictions.html
Red Sox: Shields, Liriano, Headley
Yankees: Scherzer, Hanley, Grilli
Cubs: Lester, Martin, Robertson, Masterson, Peavy
Tigers: Miller
I disagree with some of these.Green Monster said:Fun read and pure speculation. Tim Dierkers predicts the landing spots for the top 50 FA's
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/11/2014-15-top-50-free-agents-with-predictions.html
Red Sox: Shields, Liriano, Headley
Yankees: Scherzer, Hanley, Grilli
Cubs: Lester, Martin, Robertson, Masterson, Peavy
Tigers: Miller
Tyrone Biggums said:I disagree with some of these.
Red Sox: Lester, Headley (even though I prefer Panda if you make me choose)
Yankees: Shields Scherzer Robertson
Dodgers: Miller
Cubs will spend and drive up prices for the big 3 arms but it's going to be interesting between the Yankees and Sox this offseason.
I think Ervin Santana will turn out to be better value than Shields. I'd be happy with Santana Masterson and Miller. That would probably be about 33M next year.Hank Scorpio said:I really hope the Red Sox just wrap up Lester and trade for another starting pitcher as soon as possible. All this Shields speculation is making me sick to my stomach.
Even more infuriating is that people continue to call him "Big Game" - even after he sucked throughout the entire playoffs.
Agreed 100% with this. I just don't see why Lester isn't the #1 option.Hank Scorpio said:I really hope the Red Sox just wrap up Lester and trade for another starting pitcher as soon as possible. All this Shields speculation is making me sick to my stomach.
Even more infuriating is that people continue to call him "Big Game" - even after he sucked throughout the entire playoffs.
The Boomer said:Lester, Headley and a trade for Cueto (or an available quality starter in their prime), some bullpen arms and I'd be happy.
The Boomer said:Lester, Headley and a trade for Cueto (or an available quality starter in their prime), some bullpen arms and I'd be happy.
That's almost worth seeing.Snodgrass'Muff said:
I'd be doing back flips if they pulled this off. That's not to say they can't, or won't, but this has to be seen as pretty close to the best case scenario for the off season.
Holland, Davis, and Hererra it ain't.ivanvamp said:I think the bullpen can probably be handled largely from within. Tazawa, Uehara, Layne, Britton, Mujica, Hembree, Wilson. That would probably be a solid enough pen.
Plympton91 said:Holland, Davis, and Hererra it ain't.
CaskNFappin said:Marrero and JBJ in the same lineup, is something other pitchers would beg to pitch against.
soxhop411 said:if we are going after Tomas, I would assume this means Mookie or Castillo will be traded?
soxhop411 said:if we are going after Tomas, I would assume this means Mookie or Castillo will be traded?
I think the concern with Tomas needing a year in the minors is if he'd be willing to do that versus picking a team that assures him of being on the ML roster day one. If he is ok with a year of AAA to tune up then he's a great fit for Boston. Victorino and Cespedes are on one year deals. So is Napoli and Ortiz is an option. Assuming Castillo and Betts are CF/RF, you would still need LF, 1B, and possibly DH for the 2016 Sox.Rasputin said:
When I had a concern about signing Tomas earlier, folks rushed to assure me that he was going to need a year in the minors, which means he could very well be a Napoli replacement/Papi insurance.
ivanvamp said:Sox' needs:
#1 SP
#2-3 SP
3b
bullpen arm
veteran C
I think the bullpen can probably be handled largely from within. Tazawa, Uehara, Layne, Britton, Mujica, Hembree, Wilson. That would probably be a solid enough pen. 3b should come down to Headley or Panda, but I'd still like them to explore Beltre.
SP is the key. You pencil in Buchholz, Kelly, RDLR. Lester should be the #1 target, for reasons Tyrone Biggums pointed out. Lester is everything they want/need. Then you have all kinds of time to go get a #2-3 SP, by sign or by trade.
They have the money. Lester, Liriano, Headley, for example (though I'm not a big Liriano fan).
SP - Lester, Buchholz, Liriano, Kelly, RDLR
RP - Tazawa, Uehara, Layne, Britton, Mujica, Hembree, Wilson
C - Vazquez
1b - Napoli
2b - Pedroia
3b - Headley
SS - Bogaerts
LF - Cespedes
CF - Castillo
RF - Victorino
DH - Ortiz
Bench - veteran C, Craig, Betts (super sub who plays nearly every day, somewhere), Holt
Lineup:
Betts (let's say he's in for Victorino this day)
Pedroia
Ortiz
Cespedes
Napoli
Headley
Castillo
Bogaerts
Vazquez
Good power with Ortiz, Cespedes, Napoli, Castillo, Bogaerts.
Good speed with Betts, Pedroia, Castillo.
Good defense all over the field.
That team right there immediately competes for a division title.