Xander Bogaerts Offense : Warmer than Orlando in January

Status
Not open for further replies.

ScubaSteveAvery

Master of the Senate
SoSH Member
Jul 29, 2007
8,329
Everywhere
Tim Britton's article on the struggles Bogaerts and Bradley, Jr got me thinking about Bogaerts' offense this season and how lost he looks sometimes.  Here is an excerpt:
 
After play Friday night, both Bogaerts and Bradley acknowledged their recent struggles. Bogaerts has been perplexed by his inability to hit pitches in his self-described “happy zone,” out over the plate.
 
“I’m missing too many pitches,” he said. “This is the big leagues. You can’t be missing so much.”
 
Assistant hitting coach Victor Rodriguez knows why Bogaerts is missing them.
 
“He’s gotten away from the middle of the field,” Rodriguez said. “When he gets away from the middle of the field, he tends to cut his swing, and that’s when he’s missing those balls. When he’s staying through the middle and focusing on the big part of the field, the head of the bat stays through … and he’ll square those balls up.”
 
Bogaerts’ power has long been from the left-center gap to the right-field line. Rodriguez wonders if the Green Monster has proven a bit too tempting in the early-going for the shortstop.
 
“That wall is very dangerous,” he said. “It can easily get you away from what you’re trying to do. It does it to [Dustin Pedroia], and he’s been here for a long time.”
 
This led me to take a look at his heat maps and spray charts to visualize Rodriguez' position that the Green Monster is becoming too alluring for Bogaerts.  In particular, I wanted to look at what happened in between April and May, since Bogaerts' May has been slump filled.  This is not supposed to be a sky-is-falling post, but more of a look to find out why Bogaerts is slumping so badly, and to figure out what adjustments can be made to return him the powerhouse that he was in the minors.
 
Pitchers are feeding Bogaerts outside pitches like crazy this year:

 


In April and May he has been getting fed pitches low and away. Pitchers have been more reluctant to come inside on him, which makes sense, because in the gifs below he has been hitting well against inside pitches.  Right away we can see the source of his struggles based on Rodriguez' observation that Bogaerts is starting to try and pull the ball over the Monster. It is hard to pull outside pitches and make them go far. When looking at the bottom third of the zone, pitchers have started locating the ball below the strike zone in May, moving pitches that were in the lower third strike zone, to bottom of the zone. 
 
I made two gifs (one for April and one for May) that overlays his swing rate zone map and batting average zone map to get a idea of where in the zone he swings a lot and where in the zone he gets hits:

 

 
The gifts show why pitchers like to pitch him outside: he swings a lot at those pitches, but doesn't produce hits.  In both April and May the inside of the plate has clearly been Bogaerts' sweet spot.  In fact both his home runs have come on inside pitches.  What is a little troubling is that the middle and outside upper third of the zone has been a trouble spot for him.  I would expect him to take middle up pitches and give them a ride.  The good(ish) news is that he doesn't whiff on them, so at least he is making some contact in that part of the zone.  Bogaerts mentioned that he's missing pitches 'out over the plate' in May, but this isn't really true.  The middle-in and middle-middle part of the zone are the only parts where he is producing hits in May. His issue is swinging at pitches on the outside part of the plate pulling them.  
 
If we look at his spray charts from April and May, we see a distinct trend to pull the ball:
 

 
In April, a lot of ground balls were pulled (hmmm) but balls put in play to the outfield have a fairly even distribution. There are more line drives to the left part of the field, but this isn't too concerning since there is a nicely distributed cluster of line drives, ground balls, and fly balls to right field.  This has changed in May:
 

 
The only balls put in play to right field have been 4 fly balls and 1 pop up.  He is still hitting a ton of ground balls to the left side of the field, and those balls hit in the air to left field started turning more into fly balls, likely from trying to pull outside pitches.  And just to confirm, here is a line chart showing how his tendencies have shifted to more of a pull hitter, despite seeing the same number of outside pitches: 
 

 
The magnitude of breaking pitches being pulled in May could be a SSS issue, but since he is now pulling all offspeed/breaking pitches more, its possible he's starting to cheat on the fastball and getting himself even more ahead of off speed pitches. 

So what needs to happen? Ideally he takes a page out of Pedroia's book and sprays anything outside for a line drive to right field.  From the looks of Bogaerts' hit charts, he is a similar hitter to Pedroia in that he crushes inside pitches, but still sees a ton of pitches outside.  I've felt that Pedroia's success is due to the fact that pitchers have to come inside to him eventually because he will just punch outside pitches to right field all day for hits.  If Bogaerts can start doing that I think we will see him become a much more complete hitter. Line drive singles to right field aren't as sexy as bombs over the wall, but a hit is a hit and maybe he needs to relearn that. 
As always, thanks to Jnai and Brooks Baseball for these awesome charts. 
 

ALiveH

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
1,104
Great illustration of SSS: after last night's HR Bogaerts jumped up from 14th best (MLB-mediocre) to 10th best (slightly above average) OPS among all MLB SS with at least 125 ABs.
 
I'm not worried at all about his offense once he gets settled in.  This is nothing compared to Pedroia's early struggles.  Once Bogaerts puts together a little hot streak he'll be top-5 offensive SS in MLB as a 21 year old.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
I tend to agree, AliveH. I don't doubt his skills with the bat and await a hot strak. It's good they've determined that part of the issue is a correction to his mental approach.

Great post, SSA. You should get paid for work that good.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,713
Savin Hillbilly said:
The hot streak may already be here: he's riding a six-game on-base streak and is hitting .318/.375/.591 over that stretch.
 
Was about to post the same thing.  Very good opening post, but the timing is a bit odd.  Particularly after his first HR over the monster last night. Xander isn't really slumping now, and overall for the year, his .262/.366/.376/.742 is pretty good for a SS (especially a 21 year old one).
 
Hopefully his performance with RISP improves as the year goes on.  And hopefully Farrell doesn't hit him 8th anymore. 
 

IdiotKicker

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
10,816
Somerville, MA
I'm probably less concerned about Xander than any other position player on the Sox not named Pedroia. At least offensively. Defensively, as we've discussed, there's clearly some work to do, but the only way to find out if he can do it is to give him the reps.
 

ScubaSteveAvery

Master of the Senate
SoSH Member
Jul 29, 2007
8,329
Everywhere
radsoxfan said:
 
Was about to post the same thing.  Very good opening post, but the timing is a bit odd.  Particularly after his first HR over the monster last night. Xander isn't really slumping now, and overall for the year, his .262/.366/.376/.742 is pretty good for a SS (especially a 21 year old one).
 
Hopefully his performance with RISP improves as the year goes on.  And hopefully Farrell doesn't hit him 8th anymore. 
 
The timing was driven more by the article leading me to look into things - nothing else.  
 

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
6,836
The great thing about Xander as I've watched him this year is that it appears he hasn't really adjusted yet and is still feeling out his best approach at this level (as confirmed by this article).  Also, it appears he has missed some of his pitches when getting into hitter's counts.  Despite these struggles, he is still the 10th best offensive shortstop at the age of 21 in a rookie year, which I believe is due to his excellent plate approach. .  
 
Long and short, if this is him "slumping very badly" we are going to be in for a show for the next 10 years.  
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
Excellent and informative post, SSA.

It's got nothing to do with what Bogaerts did yesterday or last week, or sample size. Facts are facts. Now we can watch to see if there's a change in approach by X, followed by a change in approach by the pitchers. It's great to be able to follow this information in detail. Thanks again.
 

mauidano

Mai Tais for everyone!
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2006
35,920
Maui
:bravo: Unbelievable effort there SSA!  Fascinating when you take the time and look at it.  Glaring for sure with X is the GB's pulled.  GREAT work.
 

Soxfan in Fla

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2001
7,187
Last night I was wondering where his power was. 2 pitches later he blasted the homer. He has such a good approach at the plate that I think he will be a very good hitter in the long run. Bradley Jr. is the guy that concerns me more.
 

ScubaSteveAvery

Master of the Senate
SoSH Member
Jul 29, 2007
8,329
Everywhere
I edited the opening post because I accidentally posted Middlebrook's heat map for May instead of Bogaerts. It didn't really matter since the maps looked the same..
 
Thanks Rev for the hat tip on that. 
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Sooo... he's pretty good?

Is he the 2nd best hitter on the Redsox at just 21? He's always adjusted quick in the past. His OPS+ is at 116 now.
 

Zedia

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
7,009
Pasadena, CA
In six months when the narrative is "moving to third allowed Xander to relax and hit", we should remember that this turnaround started before they even signed Drew.
 

IdiotKicker

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
10,816
Somerville, MA
Xander's swing seems to be somewhat of a hybrid between Manny and Pujols.  His hands seem to get through the zone very quickly, very reminiscent of Manny, with a pretty similar load as well.  On the back-end, he does seem to have a bit more of an uppercut, as well as a two-handed finish that is pretty similar to Pujols.  Looking at Pujols spray charts for this year, you can see that Pujols has a very similar distribution to Xander, and I think a lot of it has to do with his swing finish, because with that slight uppercut, his natural inclination will be to rollover on balls that are on the outside half of the plate.  Manny's strongest attribute was his ability to take pitches on the outside half of the plate for line drives to right-center, which he was able to do with a much flatter swing through the zone.  I don't know if Xander is ever going to do that on a regular basis, but he does have the setup and start to be able to do so if he wants to make adjustments in that fashion.  I think the more likely course is that he stays more towards Pujols' spray charts, with most of his power and most hits coming to left-field with RF being used when necessary.
 

ScubaSteveAvery

Master of the Senate
SoSH Member
Jul 29, 2007
8,329
Everywhere
I looked at the updated charts from when I started this thread.  He's been on a bit of a tear lately, and I wanted to see if he was making adjustments, getting pitched differently, or both. 
 
Here is the heat map from May 18-May 22 (but probably no including today's game):
 

 
Pitchers aren't going low and away as often over the last week.  That very bottom corner of the map still gets a lot of action, but overall he has been seeing a lot more pitches in the middle of plate than before.  Its possible that this is by design or just mistake pitches by pitchers (probably both).  
 
Here is his swing rate map:
 

 
One area that shows an adjustment is the down and away section.  Anything down and away, and outside the zone, he has refused to swing at. The one pitch he saw down and away and in the zone, he swung at, but still refusing to expand his zone in a trouble spot shows progress. He is still susceptible to pitches middle of zone and outside, and middle and up outside the zone.  What this map also shows is that he loves swinging at inside pitches, especially pitches up and in. 
 
In terms of having success swinging the bat: 
 

 
Up and in has been a particularly successful spot, and he has collected hits middle-down in the zone, which is an area of the zone he hadn't turned into hits previously.  On outside pitches, he took one of those the other way (yay!) for an RBI single and the one up and away he punched to right field as well (yay x 2!). So on 2 out of 3 pitches outside and off the plate he took them the opposite way for a hit.  And a very large majority of the others, he didn't swing at, especially those down and away.  This shows an advancement in approach, even with the SSS concerns. 
 
And finally, the spray chart shows less ground balls to the left side of the field (and one of those was a rocket that was knocked down for a double play):
 

 
His continuation of the hot streak is a result of both less pitches outside, giving him more opportunities in the fatter part of the plate, and him punching pitches outside the opposite way.  The latter shows an adjustment of not cheating and waiting on those outside pitches. 
 
 
 
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Xander is now hitting .362/.431/.586 in 65 PA since the beginning of the Minnesota series on May 13. Most of the BA is BABIP-driven (.432 over that stretch). But those of us watching the games know that the BABIP spike, while of course unsustainable, is not fluky: he's hitting the ball hard, a lot, which also explains the .224 ISO.
 
On the year, he's one good game from cracking the .800 OPS mark.
 
He's got a tough job ahead of him wresting the RoY from Abreu and Tanaka, but he's on the right track.
 

YouDownWithOBP?

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
1,966
Randolph, Ma
Savin Hillbilly said:
Xander is now hitting .362/.431/.586 in 65 PA since the beginning of the Minnesota series on May 13. Most of the BA is BABIP-driven (.432 over that stretch). But those of us watching the games know that the BABIP spike, while of course unsustainable, is not fluky: he's hitting the ball hard, a lot, which also explains the .224 ISO.
 
On the year, he's one good game from cracking the .800 OPS mark.
 
He's got a tough job ahead of him wresting the RoY from Abreu and Tanaka, but he's on the right track.
 
and there it is. 296/388/425/813 on the year after tonight's 3 for 5 game, with all three hits on line drives. Might he get an All-Star selection now? 
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
YouDownWithOBP? said:
 
and there it is. 296/388/425/813 on the year after tonight's 3 for 5 game, with all three hits on line drives. Might he get an All-Star selection now? 
 
Even before this he had the third highest OPS among qualified short stops.  Same with wRC+ and wOBA.  It's kind of tough to make an argument that he isn't the third best offensive short stop in the game so far this year.  His OPS would be 4th among third basemen, FWIW.  His wRC+ and wOBA would both be third.  The bat is already very solid.  Thinking that he's only 21 and could (and probably should) get better is exciting as hell.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,494
Not here
If you were presented with an even money bet right now on whether Bogaerts wins an MVP in his career, which side do you take?
 
Try as I might, the only argument I can come up with for taking the side that he won't win one is Mike Trout.
 

TSC

SoSH's Doug Neidermeyer
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2007
12,291
Between here and everywhere.
Rasputin said:
If you were presented with an even money bet right now on whether Bogaerts wins an MVP in his career, which side do you take?
 
Try as I might, the only argument I can come up with for taking the side that he won't win one is Mike Trout.
 
Eh. 90% of X's value will be tied in to his offensive production for his position. A high percentage of Trout's value comes from his defense, which isn't as easy to quantify for the old school MVP voters.
 
X would have a much easier path to an MVP than Trout (Triple Crowns aside).
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,806
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
TheShynessClinic said:
 
Eh. 90% of X's value will be tied in to his offensive production for his position. A high percentage of Trout's value comes from his defense, which isn't as easy to quantify for the old school MVP voters.
 
X would have a much easier path to an MVP than Trout (Triple Crowns aside).
 
Sure, but we aren't talking about Manny Machado here. Trout has OPS'ed close to 1.000 every year he's been in the league. If Xander ever came close to matching that kind of offensive output, we'd all be doing cartwheels. 
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,623
02130
These are sort of inherent when X s compared to other shortstops or it's noted that his OBP is 16th in the majors, but it's worth noting that league OBP is at its lowest point since 1972. That makes his raw numbers even more impressive. 
 
Using b-ref's tool, if you adjust his current line to a neutral AL park in 2009 (just five years ago), he comes out at: .314/.407/.445.
 

epraz

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 15, 2002
6,187
Toe Nash said:
These are sort of inherent when X s compared to other shortstops or it's noted that his OBP is 16th in the majors, but it's worth noting that league OBP is at its lowest point since 1972. That makes his raw numbers even more impressive. 
 
Using b-ref's tool, if you adjust his current line to a neutral AL park in 2009 (just five years ago), he comes out at: .314/.407/.445.
 
In 1997, Nomar's rookie season, Nomar hit .306/.342/.534.  Right now, Xander's at .296/.388/.425.  But Xander's OPS+ is actually higher (125 to 123).  And Xander's two years younger.
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,677
NY
Even more than before I think it's going to be a big mistake to move him to 3B.  He looks a lot more comfortable both at the plate and in the field and he's playing very well.  Now is not the time to shake things up and have him try to get comfortable at 3B.  But yes, I know that ship has sailed.
 

Nite Vizhun UV

proctological researcher
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2002
4,646
Shakedown Street
glennhoffmania said:
Even more than before I think it's going to be a big mistake to move him to 3B.  He looks a lot more comfortable both at the plate and in the field and he's playing very well.  Now is not the time to shake things up and have him try to get comfortable at 3B.  But yes, I know that ship has sailed.
 
I'm not sure it has. Is Drew, with his 15-20 MiL at bats, really going to step into the lineup in June and produce anywhere near Brock Holt's .769 OPS? When Drew does join the club, he may be seeing time on the bench for a while.
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Nite Vizhun UV said:
 
I'm not sure it has. Is Drew, with his 15-20 MiL at bats, really going to step into the lineup in June and produce anywhere near Brock Holt's .769 OPS? When Drew does join the club, he may be seeing time on the bench for a while.
 
I find it 100% impossible to believe that they're going to pay Drew $10M-ish to sit on the bench. Platoon, maybe; ride the pine vs. RHP, no. The decision to sign him was a decision to move Xander to third for the rest of this season (unless they turn sellers and move Drew to a contender).
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,268
San Andreas Fault
Nite Vizhun UV said:
 
I'm not sure it has. Is Drew, with his 15-20 MiL at bats, really going to step into the lineup in June and produce anywhere near Brock Holt's .769 OPS? When Drew does join the club, he may be seeing time on the bench for a while.
That's not the way businesses do things, and baseball is a business. You spend $10 million on an asset, you use it. Not saying Holt won't continue to get playing time, but Drew will play a lot once he gets back to like 80-90%.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,872
Maine
Nite Vizhun UV said:
 
I'm not sure it has. Is Drew, with his 15-20 MiL at bats, really going to step into the lineup in June and produce anywhere near Brock Holt's .769 OPS? When Drew does join the club, he may be seeing time on the bench for a while.
 
I would hope that the Red Sox will not rush Drew up just because of the contract and his seniority, and that until he starts hitting in Pawtucket such that he looks better than Holt (or Holt cools off to below replacement level), he stays in Pawtucket.  If that means he's down there until June 15 or June 20 instead of coming up on Monday when he's eligible, so be it.  If his signing was about making the 2014 team better and winning games, then the Drew/Bogaerts combo has to be assured of outperforming Bogaerts/Holt.
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Lose Remerswaal said:
Of course there's a good chance they made an agreement with Drew that he wouldn't have to spend more than 10 days in the minors
 
Although really from Drew/Boras' POV there's no upside to rushing things at this point, is there? In terms of his offseason market, I would think they'd rather he start out hot on June 15 than cold on June 1.
 

SumnerH

Malt Liquor Picker
Dope
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
31,999
Alexandria, VA
Al Zarilla said:
That's not the way businesses do things, and baseball is a business. You spend $10 million on an asset, you use it. Not saying Holt won't continue to get playing time, but Drew will play a lot once he gets back to like 80-90%.
 
Uh, what?  Good businesses understand sunk costs.  You deploy your best available assets, regardless of how much they originally cost to acquire.  To the extent that baseball doesn't do this, it's out of ego, stubborness, embarrassment, or something of that ilk, not business sense.
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,268
San Andreas Fault
SumnerH said:
 
Uh, what?  Good businesses understand sunk costs.  You deploy your best available assets, regardless of how much they originally cost to acquire.  To the extent that baseball doesn't do this, it's out of ego, stubborness, embarrassment, or something of that ilk, not business sense.
Sounds good in theory, but remember, e.g., Barry Zito? They kept rolling him out there, even when they could afford a better pitcher, to the bitter end. He finally came up big in '012. Not to worry, It'll be moot because Drew will produce.
 

SumnerH

Malt Liquor Picker
Dope
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
31,999
Alexandria, VA
Al Zarilla said:
Sounds good in theory, but remember, e.g., Barry Zito? They kept rolling him out there, even when they could afford a better pitcher, to the bitter end. He finally came up big in '012. Not to worry, It'll be moot because Drew will produce.
 
I'm not saying baseball doesn't do it, I'm saying the fact that they don't is a sign that baseball isn't always run like a good business.
 

uncannymanny

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2007
9,097
Al Zarilla said:
Sounds good in theory, but remember, e.g., Barry Zito? They kept rolling him out there, even when they could afford a better pitcher, to the bitter end. He finally came up big in '012. Not to worry, It'll be moot because Drew will produce.
 
Well, on the flipside you have players like Kei Igawa.
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,268
San Andreas Fault
SumnerH said:
 
I'm not saying baseball doesn't do it, I'm saying the fact that they don't is a sign that baseball isn't always run like a good business.
OK. I was going to come back with which way do you think the Red Sox will go, but don't want to keep this tangent going. Hopefully, it is moot and Drew is good like last year. 
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
I hope everyone is not suggesting "average D, small sample size offense Brock Holt" should play over "exceptional D, large sample size offense Stephen Drew." It's not going to happen. The Sox understand all the metrics and to think that they're going to bench the guy they just signed for $10 over a callup who is on a good run right now is shortsighted. And its got nothing to do with sunk cost. Every dime committed on the roster is a sunk cost, because its a committed dollar. They signed Drew for $10M because they think he's a player that is going to perform in the acceptable range of a $10M free agent player, which is better than a guy like Brock Holt. If he struggles out of the gate, they're going to give him time to figure it out. He's a known commodity whether any of us like the actual production or not. The Sox like what he projects to do and they're going to give him a long leash to figure it out.
 
The best you can hope for with Holt is he stays up as the utility guy, but since he's a lefty and Herrera is a switch hitter, that isn't guaranteed since Drew might be sitting against lefties.
 
Edit: I'm not looking it up, so if Holt has some crazy reverse split with lefties, then I'd guess he'd be a better option than Herrera.
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,677
NY
PaulinMyrBch said:
I hope everyone is not suggesting "average D, small sample size offense Brock Holt" should play over "exceptional D, large sample size offense Stephen Drew." It's not going to happen. The Sox understand all the metrics and to think that they're going to bench the guy they just signed for $10 over a callup who is on a good run right now is shortsighted. And its got nothing to do with sunk cost. Every dime committed on the roster is a sunk cost, because its a committed dollar. They signed Drew for $10M because they think he's a player that is going to perform in the acceptable range of a $10M free agent player, which is better than a guy like Brock Holt. If he struggles out of the gate, they're going to give him time to figure it out. He's a known commodity whether any of us like the actual production or not. The Sox like what he projects to do and they're going to give him a long leash to figure it out.
 
The best you can hope for with Holt is he stays up as the utility guy, but since he's a lefty and Herrera is a switch hitter, that isn't guaranteed since Drew might be sitting against lefties.
 
Edit: I'm not looking it up, so if Holt has some crazy reverse split with lefties, then I'd guess he'd be a better option than Herrera.
 
You're totally correct, and now that the deal is done that's what they should do.  The bigger question that was debated around the time of the signing is/was whether the team is better with Bogaerts at SS, a combo of WMB and Holt at 3B, and spend that $10m on something else.  With the way Bogaerts is playing now I think it's at least up for debate at this point.  Basically the FO has decided that for 2/3 of a season, Drew represents about a 2 win advantage over the current options.  I hope that they're right but I just don't see it.
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,677
NY
Find a salary dump for a C, 3B, OF or SP.  We don't know all of the conversations that go on behind closed doors so we have no idea who's really available. 
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,432
glennhoffmania said:
Find a salary dump for a C, 3B, OF or SP.  We don't know all of the conversations that go on behind closed doors so we have no idea who's really available. 
 
Cherington addressed that: the market hadn't heated up yet enough to find a worthy pick-up signed with another team. Reading between the lines, they didn't want to wait and be out of it by the time the market matured, so they made a move that seemed worthwhile.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
Back to Bogaerts.  He is turning into Nomar of 1997, so even if the season is lost, we at least have confirmation that we've got a middle of the order shortstop or third baseman to count on for at least the next half decade.  That's worth celebrating.
 
Now that he's at the top of the order, how long before they decide to switch him and Pedy?  It probably doesn't matter much, I guess.  But the best overall hitter should hit 3rd. 
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,677
NY
Reverend said:
 
Cherington addressed that: the market hadn't heated up yet enough to find a worthy pick-up signed with another team. Reading between the lines, they didn't want to wait and be out of it by the time the market matured, so they made a move that seemed worthwhile.
 
Well we know that Hundley was available.  Whether he would've been an upgrade worth making that deal for is another question.  I still don't see how Drew will be the difference between staying in the race and falling too far back.  If they stayed in the race without him, they'd have more flexibility to make moves closer to the deadline. 
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
glennhoffmania said:
 
You're totally correct, and now that the deal is done that's what they should do.  The bigger question that was debated around the time of the signing is/was whether the team is better with Bogaerts at SS, a combo of WMB and Holt at 3B, and spend that $10m on something else.  With the way Bogaerts is playing now I think it's at least up for debate at this point.  Basically the FO has decided that for 2/3 of a season, Drew represents about a 2 win advantage over the current options.  I hope that they're right but I just don't see it.
The last few weeks of Bogaerts makes you wonder if they'd sign Drew if today if they had not already. It sure looks as if they might have jumped the gun, but the X of the last few weeks was missing early in the season, so its understandable. 
 
I wasn't crazy about the signing, and I'm less crazy after watching X consistently the last 4 nights. But having said that, 2 weeks ago Holt was off the radar and WMB was battling an injury, so I get it.
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,677
NY
Rudy Pemberton said:
There's really no evidence that the Sox are looking to upgrade AJP, whose 94 OPS+ is pretty much right in line with expectations. Hundley certainly isn't any better.

Re: Drew being the difference between staying in the race and falling too far back..who is making the claim that that's why they made the deal?

They are farther out now than when they signed him; but it's a move that clearly upgrades the offense and defense, and it doesn't cost the team any prospects.
 
AJP's OPS+ isn't the only issue.  In my opinion he's been terrible on defense.
 
Re: staying in the race vs. falling too far back, I was responding to Rev's post that I quoted, in which he gave a very reasonable interpretation of Ben's statement.  Did you read the post that I quoted?
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Plympton91 said:
Back to Bogaerts.  He is turning into Nomar of 1997, so even if the season is lost, we at least have confirmation that we've got a middle of the order shortstop or third baseman to count on for at least the next half decade.  That's worth celebrating.
 
Now that he's at the top of the order, how long before they decide to switch him and Pedy?  It probably doesn't matter much, I guess.  But the best overall hitter should hit 3rd. 
Id rather bat X second as the higher OBP guy to get him the extra marginal at bat.
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,677
NY
Smiling Joe Hesketh said:
 
How about, now that the kid is in a groove and appears comfortable out there, we just leave him the hell alone for a while?
 
Exactly.  And this is why I made the initial comment earlier today about how it's too bad that he now has to move to 3B just as he's getting comfortable.
 

Alcohol&Overcalls

Member
SoSH Member
Plympton91 said:
Back to Bogaerts.  He is turning into Nomar of 1997, so even if the season is lost, we at least have confirmation that we've got a middle of the order shortstop or third baseman to count on for at least the next half decade.  That's worth celebrating.
 
Now that he's at the top of the order, how long before they decide to switch him and Pedy?  It probably doesn't matter much, I guess.  But the best overall hitter should hit 3rd. 
 
Most lineup simulations say to hit the best hitter 2nd, IIRC - it's contrary to popular concept. Of course, the difference is fractions of a run per year, so the team will likely stick with what players are comfortable with.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.