Wild Card Weekend Gamethread

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,682
Yeah, that's not going to happen. But he's got a lot of growing up to do and a lot to learn about being a pro.
Wouldn't be surprised to see a holdout by him for a new contract. I'd totally explore the possibility of putting his name out there to see what kind of interest it would drum up. He is a diva and is going to look to break the bank for.someone that is a me first guy.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
It's delicious, all of it. I'm glad Giants are gone. But in the wake of Miami, running bare chested pre-game, Francesa promising a win, and the hole in wall -- it's too big an ask of Santa.

NY Post online generating some quality headlines about this one. Can't wait till both tabloids hit the streets tomorrow. Then come the calls to WFAN.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,569
Somewhere
Wouldn't be surprised to see a holdout by him for a new contract. I'd totally explore the possibility of putting his name out there to see what kind of interest it would drum up. He is a diva and is going to look to break the bank for.someone that is a me first guy.
hopefully the Patriots will be there to take advantage of this future situation

 

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,680
I don't care at all about the stupid boat photos, but that shirtless pregame stuff was lame.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,569
Somewhere
I can't really hate on the non-Eli Giants. The presence of a Manning is like a black hole upon which no hate can escape.
 

Rudy's Curve

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2006
2,333
Chris Mueller – ‏@ByChrisMueller

#Steelers assistant coach Joey Porter has been put in the back of a cop car in the south side for an altercation with a police officer

Just those tough Pittsburgh Steelers! Unfortunately for Porter, the people in charge of enforcement were actually competent this time.
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,543
the Giants had the Packers for 29 minutes of this game. But thanks to drops and overall a one-dimensional offense, only 6 points was really nothing. Then Rodgers got hot again and the Giants couldn't stop anything, while the Giants had multiple fuck-ups on both special teams and turnovers.

Even if the Giants capitalized on all their opportunities and scored 28 points, I'm not sure they would have won this game. For starters, don't allow that Hail Mary, that was stupidly easy shit.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,132
Pittsburgh, PA
It will be hard to for me to be convinced that there is a safe, text book, way to deliver a blindside hit with minimal possibility of injury.
I recognize you've already been through an extended conversation about this, and clearly don't relish another, so I'll just leave it at this:

- There is no way to have a contact sport like this, predicated as it is on physical dominance at many points, and not have to draw boundaries on that contact (with resulting enormous gray areas)
- Even plenty of supposedly non-contact sports have frequent injuries, as I surely don't have to remind you. The key is preventing life-altering brain injuries.
- I would argue there is nothing problematic about "blindside" hits over and above "recipient-aware" hits, so long as they are within the rules (particularly in avoiding hits to the head or hits that use the helmet to deliver the impact). For the same reason that drunk drivers survive wrecks at much higher rates than their victims: they're relaxed and don't tense up in anticipation.
- Where I suspect we agree is the need to encourage rugby-style "wrapping-up" tackles, which are more about controlling the opponent's body than trying to truck on through somebody. So many of the "big hits" in the NFL are actually sub-optimal for the purpose of, you know, getting the ball-carrier to the ground, and that kinda drives me nuts.
 

Brand Name

make hers mark
Moderator
SoSH Member
Oct 6, 2010
4,415
Moving the Line
For the fourth time in Packers playoff history, they had 2 players with 100+ yards receiving on the day. Keith Jackson and Robert Brooks did it to the 49ers in 1996, Greg Jennings and Jermichael Finley did it in Rodgers' playoff debut in Arizona in 2010, but then Davante Adams and Randall Cobb have done it twice in the last 3 seasons. In both cases, Cobb finished with exactly 116 yards receiving, with a very similar catch percentage: 71.4% on 5 recptions/7 targets today, 72.7% with an 8 of 11 hauled in against Dallas 1/11/15.

For the fourth time in Packers playoff history, they got 2 players with 100+ yards receiving on the day. Keith Jackson and Robert Brooks did it to the 9ers in 1996, Greg Jennings and Jermichael Finley did it in Rodgers' playoff debut in Arizona in 2010, but then Davante Adams and Randall Cobb have done it twice in the last 3 seasons. In both cases, Cobb finished with exactly 116 yards receiving, with a very similar catch percentage: 71.4% on 5/7 today, 72.7% on 8/11 against Dallas 1/11/15.

The back page of the daily news, multiple boat references and also the wall.
I was hoping they'd go for GIANTS LOSE BY A YACHT, myself.
 

Hoodie Sleeves

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 24, 2015
1,204
- Where I suspect we agree is the need to encourage rugby-style "wrapping-up" tackles, which are more about controlling the opponent's body than trying to truck on through somebody. So many of the "big hits" in the NFL are actually sub-optimal for the purpose of, you know, getting the ball-carrier to the ground, and that kinda drives me nuts.
This argument always bugs me.

NFL tackles are different than Rugby tackles because keeping a player from moving forward is almost (if not as) important as getting him to the ground. A guy dragging you 4 yards in rugby before going down isn't a big deal, in football it gives the other team another 4 downs. NFL players tackle the way they do because it's the optimal balance between stopping a player from gaining more yardage, and ending the play by downing him. Forcing rugby style tackling would fundamentally alter the way the game is played, and probably require increasing the yardage requirement from 10 to 15-20 yards.

If that's the only way to make the sport safer, that's fine, but the argument that they should just "tackle better" is ridiculous. Wrap-up style tackling is only the optimal strategy when the player has already past the first down marker.

Oh, and yes, Joey Porter is a terrible human being, so I'm not surprised that he's in legal trouble yet again.
 

Vinho Tinto

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 9, 2003
7,067
Auburn, MA
This argument always bugs me.
Oh, and yes, Joey Porter is a terrible human being, so I'm not surprised that he's in legal trouble yet again.
Yep, he and drama appear to be a lifetime marriage. Nothing will top getting a gunshot wound to the butt while in Denver for the annual Colorado - Colorado State game.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,413
Southwestern CT
This argument always bugs me.

NFL tackles are different than Rugby tackles because keeping a player from moving forward is almost (if not as) important as getting him to the ground. A guy dragging you 4 yards in rugby before going down isn't a big deal, in football it gives the other team another 4 downs. NFL players tackle the way they do because it's the optimal balance between stopping a player from gaining more yardage, and ending the play by downing him. Forcing rugby style tackling would fundamentally alter the way the game is played, and probably require increasing the yardage requirement from 10 to 15-20 yards.

If that's the only way to make the sport safer, that's fine, but the argument that they should just "tackle better" is ridiculous. Wrap-up style tackling is only the optimal strategy when the player has already past the first down marker.

Oh, and yes, Joey Porter is a terrible human being, so I'm not surprised that he's in legal trouble yet again.
Utter nonsense.

Leading with your helmet has nothing to do with an "optimal balance between stopping a player from gaining more yardage and ending the play by downing him." Honestly, that's an embarrassingly stupid statement on the face of it.

A lot of NFL players use bad tackling technique. They do this because instead of focusing on making a tackle, they are attempting to deliver a punishing hit. And in the perverse world of NFL football, the ability to deliver punishing hits on a consistent basis will result in that player being rewarded. (See Burfict, Vontaze.) The league is making half-hearted attempts to dial these hits back, but they also understand that violent hitting is a key part of the overall appeal of the NFL, which is why the rules (and the enforcement of those rules) seems so arbitrary.
 

Hoodie Sleeves

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 24, 2015
1,204
Utter nonsense.

Leading with your helmet has nothing to do with an "optimal balance between stopping a player from gaining more yardage and ending the play by downing him." Honestly, that's an embarrassingly stupid statement on the face of it.

A lot of NFL players use bad tackling technique. They do this because instead of focusing on making a tackle, they are attempting to deliver a punishing hit. And in the perverse world of NFL football, the ability to deliver punishing hits on a consistent basis will result in that player being rewarded. (See Burfict, Vontaze.) The league is making half-hearted attempts to dial these hits back, but they also understand that violent hitting is a key part of the overall appeal of the NFL, which is why the rules (and the enforcement of those rules) seems so arbitrary.
Could you please point out where I said anything about leading with your helmet?


I was talking about "truck[ing] through guys" - which is why I quoted that section. The NFL as a sport values stopping an opponent's forward progress as much as getting him to the ground. That alone eliminates the possibility of dragging players to the ground being an optimal tackling strategy. As long as short amounts of field position are important, knocking people over is going to be an important strategy.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,413
Southwestern CT
Could you please point out where I said anything about leading with your helmet?


I was talking about "truck[ing] through guys" - which is why I quoted that section. The NFL as a sport values stopping an opponent's forward progress as much as getting him to the ground. That alone eliminates the possibility of dragging players to the ground being an optimal tackling strategy. As long as short amounts of field position are important, knocking people over is going to be an important strategy.
That may have been what you were talking about, but it's not the context of the discussion that you responded to.

The conversation that you inserted yourself into began because of a number of hits during the game that were about leading with the helmet and not wrapping versus leading with the shoulder and wrapping. (Which you equated to being like a rugby tackle.) The simple fact is that there's a lot of bad technique in the NFL today, and the hits that people were discussing are a part of that.

But even if I take the context out of the larger discussion, I still think your point is nonsense. "Trucking through someone" with a big hit but not wrapping up is not done for the reasons you claim. It's done because big hits are encouraged and rewarded - period.
 

Nator

Member
SoSH Member
Yep, he and drama appear to be a lifetime marriage. Nothing will top getting a gunshot wound to the butt while in Denver for the annual Colorado - Colorado State game.
Former NFL punter Chris Kluwe shares a lovely Joey Porter anecdote in the comments section of the Deadspin story.
Fuck Joey Porter. He’s an asshole and I hope he gets his balls gnawed off by weasels.

My rookie year, we were playing the Steelers week 15 or 16, and I’m trying to warm up for the game (context: I have a torn ACL in my kicking leg, so it was kind of a shitty time), when this fuckwit comes up, an hour and a half before the game, and tries to tell me that I can’t use the Steelers’ half of the field to warm up (meanwhile, their punter is on our side of the field, warming up with no problems, because we weren’t dickheads). I told him to fuck off, and then he starts acting like he’s stretching and tries to bump into me while I’m going through my motion. Darren Bennett comes tearing in off the bench (we had him on the roster in case I couldn’t punt), and almost throws down on Porter right there (my money would’ve been on Bennett). The refs come over, tell me I have to go back over to my side, and after some arguing where I tell them I’m well within my rights to be on the Steelers’ 40 yard line (since the rules dictate a 10 yard buffer zone at midfield that the kickers/punters can use), I tell them fine, I’ll go over to my side and just kick balls at the Steelers linebackers until I’m warm, which I proceeded to do.

Sadly, Porter did not trip over one of the balls raining down on his warmup spot and tear his own ACL, but it wasn’t for lack of trying on my part.
Link to article.
http://deadspin.com/report-joey-porter-arrested-after-altercation-outside-1790961209
 

Rudy's Curve

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2006
2,333
height of yinzer creativity
Yes, I am mad your team has carte blanche to helmet spear/commit unsportsmanlike conduct with playoff games on the line/stomp on opposing players/blindside block punters, etc. with no repercussions but that's just those tough, blue collar Pittsburgh Steelers. I guess that just makes me a jealous hater.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,569
Somewhere
Too bad the Stillers didn't have their fixer handy for this occasion.

Also having a laugh at the idea of Joey Porter partying with Pitt undergrads on the South Side.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,445
deep inside Guido territory
The Giants took out their frustrations at getting drubbed by the Green Bay Packers on the jumbo jet that carried them home — forcing London-bound travelers to wait more than three hours while the mess got cleaned up at Newark Airport, a Brooklyn man told The Post on Monday.

Mark Kropf said he was waiting to board United Airlines Flight 934 out of Newark when “the pilot came out and asked for everyone’s patience, and shared where the plane came from and that the plane needed extra help repairing and cleaning the interior.”

Another 30 minutes passed and the gate agent told us it was the Giants that destroyed the biz class cabin, and we saw service personnel walking countless seat cushions off the plane,” Kropf wrote in a message via Twitter.

“Upon entering the business class cabin, the cleaning scent only partially masked the alcohol smell. I had popcorn, chewing tobacco and other food crumbs on my seat.”

According to the FlightAware Web site, Flight 934 is a Boeing 767-400 that was previously used for United Flight 2237, which arrived from Green Bay, Wis., at 2:17 a.m.

Flight 934 was scheduled to depart for London’s Heathrow Airport at 8:30 a.m., but didn’t take off until 11:47 a.m., 3 hours and 17 minutes late.

http://nypost.com/2017/01/09/giants-trash-airplane-following-embarrassing-playoff-blowout/
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,075
New York City
What a bunch of babies. It's good to see the team taking all of Odell's immature antics and doubling down on it.

Trashing a plane like they are The Who in the 1970s at Gramercy Hotel?(or whatever hotel they have trashed) That's just sad.
 

Erik Hanson's Hook

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 20, 2013
1,081
This just re-establishes the fact that the Giants have been a faux good organization since the 1980's. Their fans like to pound their chests over two fluke Super Bowl victories, but when I think of the Giants since 1986, I think of Trey Junkin...blowing that playoff lead in SF...the Minn game in '97...the Ravens embarrassing them in the Super Bowl...and now this...not to mention Scott Norwood should have made that kick.

The Yankees are a great organization that deserves our respect. The Giants? No. They're a regional team that has been mediocre for most of the last 20 years. They've been under .500 three times out of the last four seasons. Before that, they went 9-7 twice, which is our worst record since 2001. Meanwhile we're going 12-4 or better.

Sorry. Sore spot. But I don't think the Giants are a top-tier org at all. They got lucky twice, otherwise they'd not be talked about.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Since the 80's ended the Giants have gone to 4 Super Bowls, won 3 Super Bowls, and made the playoffs 11 times while playing at a .531 clip. They haven't been comparable to the BB/Brady era Pats and they've become mired in mediocrity as Eli has aged/become bad, but they've been a pretty good franchise.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,075
New York City
This just re-establishes the fact that the Giants have been a faux good organization since the 1980's. Their fans like to pound their chests over two fluke Super Bowl victories, but when I think of the Giants since 1986, I think of Trey Junkin...blowing that playoff lead in SF...the Minn game in '97...the Ravens embarrassing them in the Super Bowl...and now this...not to mention Scott Norwood should have made that kick.

The Yankees are a great organization that deserves our respect. The Giants? No. They're a regional team that has been mediocre for most of the last 20 years. They've been under .500 three times out of the last four seasons. Before that, they went 9-7 twice, which is our worst record since 2001. Meanwhile we're going 12-4 or better.

Sorry. Sore spot. But I don't think the Giants are a top-tier org at all. They got lucky twice, otherwise they'd not be talked about.
They are tied for third of all time in Super Bowl wins, tied with the Pats and Packers. Their SB win in 2008 was flukey but they won it. And I know, my argument is "count the rings". But they have been better than a faux good organization. They have been a great organization. Their 1986 team was a pretty incredible one. I don't think anyone thinks of Trey Junkin or that Minnesota game when the Giants are thought about. They think about Lawrence Taylor, beating the Pats, or Norwood's miss.