I was about to post something similar. As exciting as it would be to get Johnson in New England, I think it would be a very difficult job for him to change the culture of the locker room, reinvent the offense, develop young players, and all the other things he'd need to do as a head coach. He would need to assemble a stellar staff around him, but that might be tough for a first-time head coach going into an organization at rock bottom. I love the idea of Vrabel putting together a great coaching team from his contacts as a player and coach, especially if they get someone like Josh McD to run the offense, and spending his time creating a culture of toughness and winning that has been absent this year.Vrabel. I love Johnson, but we really need someone who isn't learning on the job this time.
So a question I have for the "can't haven't a guy learning on the job" voters... Why? Do you think this is a potential playoff team? Wouldn't an empty roster full rebuild be exactly when you can afford to let a talented coach learn on the job?
It's not a fundamental opposition to first time coaches. Its an opposition to a first time coach with this team right now. Mayo was a first time coach and never established a culture. he was over his head. I feel like you can survive that for one season but another risks taking this franchise to ny jets level of long term dysfunction. I feel like the team needs someone who will step in and on day one lay down the law and get this team refocused. A coach who on day one know how to handle media, handle rosters, handle in game decisions.So a question I have for the "can't haven't a guy learning on the job" voters... Why? Do you think this is a potential playoff team? Wouldn't an empty roster full rebuild be exactly when you can afford to let a talented coach learn on the job? Or is it a philosophical opposition to any first time coach ever?
Why on earth should they interview Matt NagyI vote for reopening the search. Vrabel and Johnson are defensible candidates, but neither is a slam dunk like, say, hiring Parcells was. I have less heartburn over Johnson than Vrabel--at least there we know it isn't driven by sentimentality or the belief that there's some Belichick/Brady magic to be recaptured by getting the band back together. But I don't know why we aren't talking to Brian Flores, Matt Nagy, Spags, or considering some of the coaches who we haven't discussed and don't have a bye this week like Vance Joseph or Joe Brady, the latter of whom used to be a QB coach.
Introverted sounds somewhat like Bill Walsh. I’ll take another one of him all day and twice on Sunday. If Ben Johnson goes somewhere else and kills it, we’ll feel terrible if we had a chance to get him with a really good offer. Vrabel would be a big improvement over Mayo I’m sure, but Johnson might be sensational.Voted Vrabel. Couple reasons:
1. Now that Mayo is gone, there are plenty of stories the last couple days regarding the overall lack of discipline and unseriousness of his leadership, which makes what Vrabel brings to the table appealing.
2. If Ben Johnson is as introverted as reported, I'm not sure that's what the team needs after Mayo.
He’s a pretty good coach with some decent offensive/playcalling abilityWhy on earth should they interview Matt Nagy
What is it exactly you’d say we do here?Impossible for me to say unless I could talk to these guys. Otherwise I'm making a choice based largely superficial observations and media narratives.
Not fun, I know.
Isn’t the obvious answer that the team is going to need the next HC to develop the young talent already here and whatever Wolf comes up with in the draft?So a question I have for the "can't haven't a guy learning on the job" voters... Why? Do you think this is a potential playoff team? Wouldn't an empty roster full rebuild be exactly when you can afford to let a talented coach learn on the job? Or is it a philosophical opposition to any first time coach ever?
Oh, I'm quite aware!What is it exactly you’d say we do here?
I think the difference between all of the non Bills / Chiefs / Ravens teams in the AFC is minimal at best. Is this a potential playoff team? In a year the Texans Chargers Broncos and Steelers occupied 4 slots? Yes. The AFC is the weakest it's been since the early 90s.So a question I have for the "can't haven't a guy learning on the job" voters... Why? Do you think this is a potential playoff team? Wouldn't an empty roster full rebuild be exactly when you can afford to let a talented coach learn on the job? Or is it a philosophical opposition to any first time coach ever?
What is it exactly you’d say we do here?It's all so predictable and lame.
What is it exactly you’d say we do here?
grab Johnson
Yeah, right there and bonus points for getting pre-angry: another SOSH skill I’ve harnessed and refined personally!Oh, I'm quite aware!
In all seriousness, it's just that people dig in with who they want to be head coach, based on all the trivialities I mentioned. Then spend the next several years bitching and moaning because "their" guy didn't get hired. It's all so predictable and lame.
Then hire Josh McCown who has a history with Drake Maye. Comes from a similar system too.If I were part of the Kraft hive mind, I would look to hire Vrabel and I would want Vrabel to hire a Brian Griese type for OC.
Should be something Carolina related given he and Maye are both UNC alums? High Country Offense?Johnson, and I can’t wait to hear what the offense that he unleashes on the NFL, first revolutionary one since Walsh’s west coast offense, is called.
Exactly why I voted Vrabel. But as many people have said already, perhaps the better long-term solution is Johnson who brings his own system, and then is allowed to grow and develop it at the same time as developing Drake Maye, and builds a program and staff over time.Here's the thing: The question was posed as to what we would do if we were Kraft.
If I'm 84 at the start of next season, my resume has been tarnished a bit the past few years, and I don't want to end my ownership on a downslide, I'm more likely to "rebuild" with someone who I know can elevate the program in the short term rather than risk it with another first-time head coach.
But that's just me ... if, as the question asked, I were Kraft.
If I'm me, I'd grab Johnson
Because he has issues developing a young QB in Tua and maybe you don’t want someone from the BB tree either.I really don't understand why they aren't interviewing Flores. Very accomplished, and I think 2nd time as HC is a great opportunity (see Bill Belichick).
That seems like a weird reason not to interview someone has arguably the best resume of the group. He got the most out the least and he would help the NFL’s mission to improve diversity in the head coaching ranks. Tua is a mediocre QB. Tua might not think so, but his performance is mediocre. I could care less about Ryan Whoever. Also, I wonder if a hotshot OC candidate would value the opportunity to have control over that side of the football under a defensive coach and with a promising young QB. I would be much more concerned about former players’ opinions about Flores if they came come players after Flores’ head coaching time in Miami. People learn stuff.Also Fitzmagic didn’t exactly have the best things to say, especially about the end of his tenure or coaching staff he’d be able to bring:
https://www.masslive.com/patriots/2025/01/he-became-a-dictator-ex-qb-warns-nfl-teams-about-former-patriots-coach.html
As an aside, the schedule (on paper) is ridiculously favorable, especially at home. Competence alone will get them to 7+ wins IMO. They could have a real shot to win 10-11 games but be a total pretender (like the Steelers this year).I'm penciling the Pats in for median probable wins next year of something like 4-6, whether the HC is Vrabel, Johnson, or the sweet lord Jesus himself
Well put, no Flores needs explanation and I hope one of the scribes gets it. Side note omg is Giardi up Vrabels ass? He should do some actual good and do colon check while he’s in there.That seems like a weird reason not to interview someone has arguably the best resume of the group. He got the most out the least and he would help the NFL’s mission to improve diversity in the head coaching ranks. Tua is a mediocre QB. Tua might not think so, but his performance is mediocre. I could care less about Ryan Whoever. Also, I wonder if a hotshot OC candidate would value the opportunity to have control over that side of the football under a defensive coach and with a promising young QB. I would be much more concerned about former players’ opinions about Flores if they came come players after Flores’ head coaching time in Miami. People learn stuff.
Just like everyone who gets fired, Flores has to account for what happened and offer a version of events that indicates he has learned and evolved. These are some serious performance and management issues for an HC, particularly if you are drafting or developing a new QB. They don't have to be fatal, but it's something to consider.That seems like a weird reason not to interview someone has arguably the best resume of the group. He got the most out the least and he would help the NFL’s mission to improve diversity in the head coaching ranks. Tua is a mediocre QB. Tua might not think so, but his performance is mediocre. I could care less about Ryan Whoever. Also, I wonder if a hotshot OC candidate would value the opportunity to have control over that side of the football under a defensive coach and with a promising young QB. I would be much more concerned about former players’ opinions about Flores if they came come players after Flores’ head coaching time in Miami. People learn stuff.
I get that it's stupid to do this today given that they don't have a coach and the offseason hasn't begun. But if they only win four or even six games against that schedule given what we know today... yikes.
Yes, hence my stupid comment.That's fair. And I'll admit I didn't bother to look at the schedule before throwing that 4-6 thing out there.
Footnote this that those other teams also haven't had their offseasons yet, either. It may no longer be such an easy schedule by October
Same here. A question: What source actually said that Josh McDaniels would come in as Offensive Coordinator? Is is just speculation?I voted Johnson, but will be completely fine with Vrabel.
I think it’s mostly writers speculating.Same here. A question: What source actually said that Josh McDaniels would come in as Offensive Coordinator? Is is just speculation?
I would say the idea that the “5-6 best coaches are offensive minds and not CEO’s” is ridiculous and obviously not just overselling.The Athletic pod was talking about this too. Mays favors going for the offensive mind who is also a great leader of men. I might be misremembering but I believe he preferred Ben Johnson to Vrabel. Sando strongly believed to go with Vrabel as a floor raiser and a guy who can raise the ceiling too. His words not mine. Vrabel you know you get a good culture. Mays counter argument is that there is a cap on how far those teams can go vs the offensive minded head coach like: Andy Reid, Sean McVay, Kyle Shanahan, Matt LaFleur, Kevin O’Connell, etc.
While it wasn’t expressly said, I think Mays would frame it like, “While there are different types of coaches in the NFL the highest ceiling and top 5-6 coaches are offensive minds and not CEO types.”
Mays is overselling the argument and the degree to which way you can be an elite coach. I prefer an offensive minded coach all else being equal but with Vrabel and Johnson it’s not. I prefer Johnson over Vrabel in a vacuum for this team. I’m leaning Vrabel though because I don’t think they have the infrastructure for any rookie head coach to thrive right now. I don’t believe it can happen in a year - probably a 2-3 year process. They need Vrabel to give them some stability while they go through a lot of growing pains.
I think McDermott/Allen is kind of the benchmark you hope for with Vrabel/Maye. A QB that can develop and thrive even with a bunch of mediocre (or subpar) offensive coordinators and a boring defensive head coach.Also, Sean McDermott has weathered OC changes fine in Buffalo. And the Harbaughs are the definition of CEO coaches…same thing.
ATL is up/down swing gameAs an aside, the schedule (on paper) is ridiculously favorable, especially at home. Competence alone will get them to 7+ wins IMO. They could have a real shot to win 10-11 games but be a total pretender (like the Steelers this year).
Home:
Falcons
Bills
Panthers
Browns
Dolphins
Giants
Jets
Raiders
Steelers
There is one great team on that list, two mediocre teams (Falcons & Steelers), and six trash teams. They won't go 8-1 at home because they suck as currently constituted, but there is a path to 6+ home wins there.
Road:
Ravens
Bills
Bengals
Dolphins
Saints
Jets
Bucs
Titans
Two great teams, two mediocre teams, four trash teams. Three or four road wins wouldn't be crazy.
I get that it's stupid to do this today given that they don't have a coach and the offseason hasn't begun. But if they only win four or even six games against that schedule given what we know today... yikes.
I’m not sure this is fair to Vrabel tbh. He had a Hall of Fame-level RB, but never a top tier QB. I don’t think Vrabel was ever in position to demonstrate his ceiling.Beyond many other good points already made that I won't rehash, Johnson vs Vrabel seems like a classic ceiling vs floor decision. Maybe I've been spoiled by 20 years of unprecedented success but I've got a strong ceiling preference.
This is a tremendous point that I hadn't really contemplated. It does make a lot of sense that Vrabel is better positioned to be THE voice in the organization while the rot gets fixed.I’m leaning Vrabel though because I don’t think they have the infrastructure for any rookie head coach to thrive right now.
Agreed. As a Johnson over Vrabel guy the @SMU_Sox point is pulling be back (though it’s also why I’m Flores first).This is a tremendous point that I hadn't really contemplated. It does make a lot of sense that Vrabel is better positioned to be THE voice in the organization while the rot gets fixed.