I don't see a fit for Turner. He's not really appreciably better than the current DH (98 OPS+ for Turner vs 97 OPS+ for Masa) and isn't as defensively viable or versatile as Romy or Westbrook (he'd be taking one of their roster spots). Unless the Jays were giving him away for next to nothing, it's probably not worth the cost for the minimal gains.Not to get too nostalgic, but adding Turner and Eovaldi would be pretty ideal. Turner has had two great months and two awful, but can still hit lefties which is all he’d be needed for. Eovaldi solidifies the rotation and is a guy you’d want starting a must win game.
Yoshida is 243/314/373 career vs LH, Turner is 285/353/459 this year. That’s why I’d want him.I don't see a fit for Turner. He's not really appreciably better than the current DH (98 OPS+ for Turner vs 97 OPS+ for Masa) and isn't as defensively viable or versatile as Romy or Westbrook (he'd be taking one of their roster spots). Unless the Jays were giving him away for next to nothing, it's probably not worth the cost for the minimal gains.
The other point is that Turner is unlikely to cost a lot - he isn't the best RH bat they could acquire but if the price is reasonable they get a guy who can fill a need and is known entity in terms of how he fits within the clubhouse etc. They don't need Turner per se but someone with a bit of seasoning who can still produce vs LH pitching feels like an obvious and fairly cheap role to fill.Yoshida is 243/314/373 career vs LH, Turner is 285/353/459 this year. That’s why I’d want him.
I’d platoon him at DH, get him a bunch of at bats at 1b, PH vs lefties (for any number of guys). It’s not a huge role and I wouldn’t give up a ton but I’d take him over Jamie Westbrook; the team gives away too many at bats against LHP.
Same here. Doesn;t even have to be Turner. Veteran RHB who can hit LHP and wont suffer if he isn;t playing every day. As far as Turner goes, he'd also be the backup 1Bman.Yoshida is 243/314/373 career vs LH, Turner is 285/353/459 this year. That’s why I’d want him.
Ideally, a DH platoon would include someone who you can comfortably play in the field once in a while. Yoshida hasn't played an inning in the outfield this year and they seem afraid to even try (and with the other options, that's understandable). Turner has played some defensively but he's more or less limited to 1B at this point. That's not really ideal when you already have a number of positions in the lineup you want to play platoon with (as they have recently with the MI and outfield). Replacing Westbrook with Turner means you're playing David Hamilton (or Dom Smith or both) more frequently against LHP. I'm not sure that's a net gain.Yoshida is 243/314/373 career vs LH, Turner is 285/353/459 this year. That’s why I’d want him.
I’d platoon him at DH, get him a bunch of at bats at 1b, PH vs lefties (for any number of guys). It’s not a huge role and I wouldn’t give up a ton but I’d take him over Jamie Westbrook; the team gives away too many at bats against LHP.
I have no objection to a veteran RHB. I think that player needs to be more defensively viable/flexible than 39 year old Justin Turner. In other words, his function on the roster has to be more than just platooning with Yoshida.Same here. Doesn;t even have to be Turner. Veteran RHB who can hit LHP and wont suffer if he isn;t playing every day. As far as Turner goes, he'd also be the backup 1Bman.
I'm not going to take anything he did last year as indicative of a surefire capability going forward. Not for someone his age.I think you aren't giving Turner quite enough credit here. He's taken some innings at third this year, and acquitted himself alright at 2b last season. There definitely were some fatigue issues toward the end of 2023, and his current slump is pretty concerning, so I don't think he's the ideal candidate (I've convinced myself that's Paredes but I'm not sure if he's worth the likely cost), but I do believe he'd be an acceptable upgrade over Westbrook. Romy and Rafaela being so versatile definitely makes potential defensive alignments work more smoothly.
Agree. Turner to me is the prefect intersection of would help x would not cost much.“Once Casas is back” could be quite a while from now, but what happens in the interim? In a perfect world with zero injuries, maybe there is no room for a guy like Turner down the stretch, but if everyone is suddenly healthy at that point, seems like an ok problem to deal with.
Bottom line to me is that this team is not good against LHP and should look to find ways to improve that.
This is an interesting question.I’ve been thinking about which of the Big 3 would I be ok with trading in the right scenario. And it would have to be a killer opportunity to get a top flight #1 type SP who is locked up for a few years.
Assuming the trade was similar for each of Mayer, Anthony, and Teel, who would you be most ok with trading?
This is my thinking exactly - I do think there's a certain logic to getting a RH DH/OF/1B type, like a Mark Canha or a Miguel Andujar, but they'd be tough to fit onto the roster in the near term - I guess you'd send Romy down in that scenario? Seems sub-optimal but maybe I'm overthinking it.The tough part with improving the offense is that the Sox have two all stars as well as others performing as above average regulars with Casas also returning so I'm not sure benching anyone other than Yoshida is easy to do.
Wouldn’t the immediate move to be send Westbrook down? After that, I would think Smith’s job would be in jeopardy (assuming the acquired player can play first).This is my thinking exactly - I do think there's a certain logic to getting a RH DH/OF/1B type, like a Mark Canha or a Miguel Andujar, but they'd be tough to fit onto the roster in the near term - I guess you'd send Romy down in that scenario? Seems sub-optimal but maybe I'm overthinking it.
What I don't super understand is the desire to bring in another 2B, particularly one who has team control beyond this year. If you don't think the current group is adequate, then why not just wait until Grissom is back? Or hell, just give Yorke the shot, he's over 100 PAs in Worcester and still hitting well (and has to be added to the 40-man this off-season anyway). Either way, I'd rather save the trade chips for pitching help than someone like India or Rodgers.
(I will note that I'm already on record as saying Grissom is the guy who's effectively the odd man out and he's the one to trade. I will also note that he is exactly the kind of player Jerry Dipoto loves to trade for.)
I assume Westbrook goes down when Grissom returns (unless he and Valdez have flip-flopped again) and Smith is DFA'd when Casas returns. I guess you could just keep Grissom in Worcester when he's back if you bring in another hitter, but that would further reinforce the idea that he's expendable to me.Wouldn’t the immediate move to be send Westbrook down? After that, I would think Smith’s job would be in jeopardy (assuming the acquired player can play first).
Yes the stupid Mets had to get back into contention.The tough part with improving the offense is that the Sox have two all stars as well as others performing as above average regulars with Casas also returning so I'm not sure benching anyone other than Yoshida is easy to do. Alonso is probably off the market with the Mets back in contention which leaves a lot of teams really needing Guerrero since right handed difference maker bats are all the rage now.
India is cost prohibitive unless they flipped him this off-season and recovered some of the depth back. Their stacked system is a great problem to have.
I'm looking for two relief arms and a starter. Upgrades are upgrades.
Speaking of whom - he appears to be good again.What I don't super understand is the desire to bring in another 2B, particularly one who has team control beyond this year. If you don't think the current group is adequate, then why not just wait until Grissom is back? Or hell, just give Yorke the shot, he's over 100 PAs in Worcester and still hitting well (and has to be added to the 40-man this off-season anyway). Either way, I'd rather save the trade chips for pitching help than someone like India or Rodgers.
Yorke is on fire, no doubt. Problem with him and also Matthew Lugo is the season-long stretches of ineptitude that have plagued them. But maybe this last 100 PA is the real Yorke! Impossible to know yet.Speaking of whom - he appears to be good again.
www.baseballamerica.com/stories/drake-baldwin-axiel-plaz-headline-10-statcast-standouts-july-15/
"The key takeaways from the last chart are Yorke’s 92.7 mph average EV (3.7 mph above MLB average) and his 105.9 mph 90th percentile EV (1.9 MPH above MLB average), as well as all the solid gold coloring on his chase rates. This isn’t a weak-hitting, bloop singles guy; far from it. Yorke has found a way to tap into average-to-plus raw power, leveraging plus-plus plate discipline with very good contact skills. The underlying data would strongly suggest that Yorke has recaptured his top 100 form. "
Presumably, if/when they reach the point where they're ready to add Yorke to the 40-man, they're going to have cleared out some of the middle infielders already on the roster. Westbrook is an easy DFA when they need his roster spot. Any of Hamilton/Valdez/Grissom/Gonzalez could be traded in the next few weeks (or the off-season). Of course, so could Yorke.Yorke is on fire, no doubt. Problem with him and also Matthew Lugo is the season-long stretches of ineptitude that have plagued them. But maybe this last 100 PA is the real Yorke! Impossible to know yet.
Adding him to the 40 man is a tough proposition though when you've already got like a bakers dozen middle infielders on the 40 man, several of who have longer and more illustrious track records of success than 100 PA of nuclear activity in the launching pad that is Worcester.
Man, I've been a Yorke pessimist for a minute, but that sounds fantastic.Speaking of whom - he appears to be good again.
www.baseballamerica.com/stories/drake-baldwin-axiel-plaz-headline-10-statcast-standouts-july-15/
"The key takeaways from the last chart are Yorke’s 92.7 mph average EV (3.7 mph above MLB average) and his 105.9 mph 90th percentile EV (1.9 MPH above MLB average), as well as all the solid gold coloring on his chase rates. This isn’t a weak-hitting, bloop singles guy; far from it. Yorke has found a way to tap into average-to-plus raw power, leveraging plus-plus plate discipline with very good contact skills. The underlying data would strongly suggest that Yorke has recaptured his top 100 form. "
Does Worcester help the EVs? Or just the results?Yorke is on fire, no doubt. Problem with him and also Matthew Lugo is the season-long stretches of ineptitude that have plagued them. But maybe this last 100 PA is the real Yorke! Impossible to know yet.
Adding him to the 40 man is a tough proposition though when you've already got like a bakers dozen middle infielders on the 40 man, several of who have longer and more illustrious track records of success than 100 PA of nuclear activity in the launching pad that is Worcester.
I am pretty sure he's the main piece that's going to go out in any deadline deal.Man, I've been a Yorke pessimist for a minute, but that sounds fantastic.
I’d say him or Hamilton, yeah.I am pretty sure he's the main piece that's going to go out in any deadline deal.