Is Craig the most capable to replace Brown's on-ball pressure?if Brown is limited, Hauser will take most of those minutes.
It’ll probably be PP but depends on how competitive the series are.Some context. Last season Pritchard got by far the most minutes. I don't see that changing. Hauser was seemingly less playable.
Regular season MPG:
PP - 28.4 (+27% vs last year)
Sam - 21.7 (-1% vs last year
Luke - 18.6 (+19% vs last year)
Last year regular season:
PP - 22.3
Sam - 22.0
Luke - 15.6
Last year playoff run:
PP - 18.7 (-16% vs regular season)
Sam - 14.9 (-32% vs regular season)
Luke - 10.2 (-35% vs regular season)
Yeah it's interesting to look at the game log and by series data.It’ll probably be PP but depends on how competitive the series are.
FYI, Sam played more than PP v DAL and PP played only 6 more minutes than Sam v IND.
I think the bolded is the key sentence. Who has the game and the usage to really make hay on targeting PP? We know that was a Jimmy Butler specialty, but who can do that this year as effectively, knowing PP's relative strengths on D? I'm not sure Brunson or Mitchell or Garland are as much a threat mainly due to their lack of size advantage. Cade Cunningham maybe could, but I think the C's can scramble away from that easily enough since the Pistons don't really have great options behind CC.I think Pritchard has earned the status where you don't hold him back for fear of being targeted, but instead wait for it to happen and adjust if necessary. I'm not sure who I'm worried about targeting him from potential opponents in the first two rounds, the way I'd be concerned about Mitchell targeting him in the ECF.
I'm also a little concerned about Kornet being targeted in the playoffs, but that's not backed up by statistics or anything, I just think of all the times that quick guys get him isolated and go right past him. I could see Trae or Brunson cooking him over and over.
Kornet's also a candidate for JB overflow minutes. They could play KP and Al together a lot, play Luke with Tatum, and try to always have a KP/DWhite/Al/Jrue lineup out there when Tatum isn't playing. Lots of options.Pritchard played the most last year and is more improved than Hauser, so it seems very likely he wins the smalls minutes battle. The wildcard is if Jaylen is seriously limited, Hauser may get more overflow minutes from that than Pritchard does.
Kornet is a wildcard. He’s the most improved, but his minutes last year were mostly because KP was hurt. If KP and Al stay healthy, it’s hard to see him getting a ton of run. On the other hand, I would expect him to get 5-10 mpg when Tatum is playing without Jaylen because the Tatum/Kornet 2-man game is really really effective.
Feel like PP, Hauser and Kornet are all much better players than last year. PP has definitely been on the floor against top competition.. not sure he's been all that exposed? But I get that the playoffs change things.For purposes of this poll, Al Horford is not a bench player. I'm going with Kornet for now, but I can see Hauser getting it. PP got exposed on defense last year and I fear the same this year.
This is exactly where I am, unfortunately.Hauser is a wing
Brown is a wing
so I’m going Hauser
Same here. If Jaylen were to miss the playoffs that would change things, same if we lost a big, but as is I don’t know how this would be anyone but Pritchard.PP played more minutes per game than Horford this season.
He played the most regular season and post season minutes of anyone in the poll last year, has by far the most minutes this season, just had his best year, and is likely going to win 6th man of the year.
Matchups and injuries can obviously change things, but I don't really understand the poll.
I very much doubt this.Pritchard will get his minutes in end of quarter situations, against backup guards, and when Cs are down big or up big.
The chart of a past All Star turned into a Glue Guy? A reminder that Brad isn't going to have an easy time moving Jrue.
Let's just hope he picks it up a bit in the playoffs and is a do-it-all glue guy, rather than someone ready for the glue factory.The chart of a past All Star turned into a Glue Guy? A reminder that Brad isn't going to have an easy time moving Jrue.
I fully expect Jrue to repeat last years trend of coasting for much of the regular season simply because he could with so much talent and scoring around him…..to playing a larger role on both sides of the ball in the playoffs. No B2B’s and plenty of rest leading up to the first round should bump all of the veterans energy level upward.Let's just hope he picks it up a bit in the playoffs and is a do-it-all glue guy, rather than someone ready for the glue factory.
This playoff run might look different than last year's, hard to expect a repeat performance from Jaylen and Jrue. Tatum will probably have to be the clear cut #1 guy every series (at least beyond round 1), PP will have to play a bigger role, and KP will have to stay healthy.
Agreed. And, a healthy KP is a big difference from last year (and yes, I know the data this year with him was mixed). Celtics likely have more health variance than many contenders, between JB's knee, Jrue and Al's ages, and KP. One injury can change that calculus, and small things can turn playoff games and thus playoff series. There are no sure things.I fully expect Jrue to repeat last years trend of coasting for much of the regular season simply because he could with so much talent and scoring around him…..to playing a larger role on both sides of the ball in the playoffs. No B2B’s and plenty of rest leading up to the first round should bump all of the veterans energy level upward.
I got the sense in watching last night's game that Jrue and PP did well against Banchero because they both got up into his comfort zone and made it hard for him to dribble. I feel like Banchero is a bit like early Jaylen Brown: excellent in space, but a bit loose with his handle. All the bigs -- KP, Al, Luke -- dropped off him and made it easy for him to take what he wanted. JH and PP made that much more difficult.Pritchard should play 30+ mins/game against Orlando. He totally opens up the offense, on and off ball, and he also was (shockingly) totally fine defending Banchero.
I'm a bit surprised at how good he looked on both ends, but he definitely needs minutes (Joe is much smarter than I, and clearly saw this too as the game went on).
He was awesome yesterday. His fingerprints were all over that third quarter.I fully expect Jrue to repeat last years trend of coasting for much of the regular season simply because he could with so much talent and scoring around him…..to playing a larger role on both sides of the ball in the playoffs. No B2B’s and plenty of rest leading up to the first round should bump all of the veterans energy level upward.
I think there was another factor, not just about how those two guarded Banchero. Orlando plays rock-fight defense all the time. The Celtics dont. I think it took the Celtics a bit to adjust to Orlando's style, and once they realized that the refs were calling (or not calling) the physical play roughly evenly at both ends, they removed Orlando's "advantage" on Orlando's defensive end, and completely neutered Orlando's already-weak offense by giving them a taste of their own medicine in Orlando's offensive end. It seemed to me (with sound off) that there were dozens of "contacts" by players on both teams that "could have been called fouls," as they say.I got the sense in watching last night's game that Jrue and PP did well against Banchero because they both got up into his comfort zone and made it hard for him to dribble. I feel like Banchero is a bit like early Jaylen Brown: excellent in space, but a bit loose with his handle. All the bigs -- KP, Al, Luke -- dropped off him and made it easy for him to take what he wanted. JH and PP made that much more difficult.
Agreed. I posted this in the broader playoff thread last night which aligns with what you are saying here.I think there was another factor, not just about how those two guarded Banchero. Orlando plays rock-fight defense all the time. The Celtics dont. I think it took the Celtics a bit to adjust to Orlando's style, and once they realized that the refs were calling (or not calling) the physical play roughly evenly at both ends, they removed Orlando's "advantage" on Orlando's defensive end, and completely neutered Orlando's already-weak offense by giving them a taste of their own medicine in Orlando's offensive end. It seemed to me (with sound off) that there were dozens of "contacts" by players on both teams that "could have been called fouls," as they say.
I had texted a friend something along the lines of "C's beating Magic at their own game, as long as no one gets hurt." Then Tatum hit the deck. I'd prefer that the Celtics dont have to deal with more than 4 or 5 games of this. That said, it's a good tune-up for the times ahead.
It seems like Orlando's strategy was to push things physically on both ends of the court (I thought there were a number of very physical picks, but only one was called as an offensive foul, I think. The refs let a lot go. In some cases -- the Tatum wrist, the PP charley horse -- that physicality resulted in injuries. I would expect that Brad would be sending a reel showing all that to the league office, perhaps with a reminder that the defending champs deserve a bit more of a tighter whistle.
So Orlando got big games out of their big guns with PB+FW outscoring the Jays 59-33; they got favorable whistles (or lack thereof); they shot well above their 3P%; and yet, they lost by 17. Yikes.
Yeah this isn't gonna be the series for Hauser. Hauser is the one player in the top 8 who doesn't create his own offense (even Horford gets occasional post-ups against small guards), his shot is entirely generated off of drive and kicks when the defense is in rotation. Orlando is a terrific defensive team that always switches and never double teams if they can help it. Even when they are beat, they'd rather commit the foul and force the refs to blow the whistle than give up open 3s. In particular, Tatum being out means Orlando is more than happy to just switch and dig in 1v1, which means no open looks for Hauser. He's has been OK defensively, he's one of many guys getting cooked by Banchero whenever the situation arises.i don’t think hauser is playing poorly. the magic aren’t giving him open looks, he’s a guy who is the last domino in the chain reaction of things happening on offense and the magic seem to be doing a good job of preventing it from getting to the point where he has a shot. 3 shots in 2 games. i think his defense has been good
Seemed to me he was having a tough time with Banchero, but he wasn't the only one.i don’t think hauser is playing poorly. the magic aren’t giving him open looks, he’s a guy who is the last domino in the chain reaction of things happening on offense and the magic seem to be doing a good job of preventing it from getting to the point where he has a shot. 3 shots in 2 games. i think his defense has been good
yeah i wouldn’t say getting beat by a very good player who has 3 inches and prob 30 pounds on him is necessarily indicative of poor play it’s just a tough matchup for himSeemed to me he was having a tough time with Banchero, but he wasn't the only one.
I wonder whether Scheierman would be better than Hauser in this particular series.Yeah this isn't gonna be the series for Hauser. Hauser is the one player in the top 8 who doesn't create his own offense (even Horford gets occasional post-ups against small guards), his shot is entirely generated off of drive and kicks when the defense is in rotation. Orlando is a terrific defensive team that always switches and never double teams if they can help it. Even when they are beat, they'd rather commit the foul and force the refs to blow the whistle than give up open 3s. In particular, Tatum being out means Orlando is more than happy to just switch and dig in 1v1, which means no open looks for Hauser. He's has been OK defensively, he's one of many guys getting cooked by Banchero whenever the situation arises.
Kornet is similar in that he never gets his own shot, but he looks a step slow and is getting pushed around inside. He'll have a better time against either the Knicks or Pistons.
He’s probably in the section of the bench surrounded by a box that says “Break glass in the case of emergency”.I wonder whether Scheierman would be better than Hauser in this particular series.
Right now Hauser playing is more "status quo" obviously than Baylor, and I think that's what you need in this series. We don't need to raise an apparent ceiling, but the floor, and Hauser's defense and comfort playing with the top 6 is much more importantI wonder whether Scheierman would be better than Hauser in this particular series.