We're halfway through the season

uk_sox_fan

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 11, 2006
1,273
London, England
Nah, the first time was more accurate, just consider a 2-1 series win the equivalent of holding serve. NY is up 2-1 but Boston gets to 'serve' two of the three remaining regular season 'games' (series).
Agreed - the second analogy is more like being up 2 mini-breaks in a 10-point tie-breaker.
 

uncannymanny

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2007
9,080
I heard some numb nut host on a NYC Sports Radio show this morning say that even though they are 5 games back, the Yanks had the division in hand because they play the Sox 1 more times H2H. It seems to me a pretty silly basket to put your eggs in -- to assume you can beat another team 8 out of 10 times simply because you won 6 out of 9.
It’s the same reason the Yankee media will fall back on the loss column when they’re behind, as if those games they haven’t played are just guaranteed wins that the league hasn’t done them the honor of handing over yet. It’s bargaining. It has to be because of x, y, z out of their control, it can’t possibly be because they aren’t the best team.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,481
Rogers Park
Nah, the first time was more accurate, just consider a 2-1 series win the equivalent of holding serve. NY is up 2-1 but Boston gets to 'serve' two of the three remaining regular season 'games' (series).

Also this analogy needs to also include a second simultaneous match for each team where BOS is destroying their inferior opposition and NY is exchanging service holds, I believe they are 11-11 against TAM/BAL now to BOS's 19-6.
Boston really benefited by running up the score against TB in all those April games before the Rays got their act together. NESN has been ridiculing TB all year because they traded Steven Souza or something, but that looked to me then like a pretty good roster, and it's only looked better since.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,027
He wants to enjoy this year’s team now, without worrying about the post season? Probably can put a ‘yet’ at the end there, dynomite’s call. So many of us are ‘yes, but’ fans, like, early in the season it was ‘yes, but they haven’t played any good teams yet.’ Now it’s ‘yes but how will the postseason go?’
I totally get it. The Sox have never had a 100 win season in my life. It looks good this year, and I want to enjoy it. We are seeing something really special.

It’s really great that the Y’s and others are right up there. Great seasons have great competition. I think back to the Celtics 1984 with that great Laker team in an amazing 7 game series.

I’ll worry about October in October. Oh, how I love October baseball.
Yeah, thanks. This actually makes way more sense now--and also now that Al Zarilla reminded me to whom I was responding.

Enjoying the national past time as it was meant to be. Innovative. Jarring... But there might be something to it.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,220
Portland
Boston really benefited by running up the score against TB in all those April games before the Rays got their act together. NESN has been ridiculing TB all year because they traded Steven Souza or something, but that looked to me then like a pretty good roster, and it's only looked better since.
I was thinking the same thing while watching the Rays game today. Aside from ownership, the rest of the front office knows what they are doing. They got rid of Longoria at the right time, and made great deals for Eovaldi and Ramos.

And Kevin Cash is a boss. He has been masterful managing the pen.
 

SirPsychoSquints

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
5,013
Pittsburgh, PA
They have the Sox much higher on that front (18%) than BP (10%) and Fangraphs (13.5%). I wonder how that's happening.

They each give 100% to make the playoffs (or near enough). They each give similar odds to win the division, so it's not about being in the coin flip game.

It's about their estimate of the Sox's strength. 538 rates the Sox as the best team going forward (essentially a 3 way tie with HOU/NYY), BP rates them as 4th (behind HOU/NYY, essentially tied with CLE), and Fangraphs rates them as 5th (meaningfully behind HOU/NYY/CLE, also behind LAD). You can see it in the number of wins each projects, 108, 105 and 106, respectively.

538's ELO is definitely relying more on current season results than the other two systems are - if not entirely on current season results at this point.
 

TomTerrific

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
2,702
Wayland, MA
538 has moved us past the Astros as WS favorites.
I really have to question how 538 is computing this. Can we all agree that the big advantage Houston has over both BOS and NY is the 50+% chance that those two will have to play each other in the division series? And those three teams are rated the three best according to 538's ELO rankings. In the meantime, Houston gets probable-90-game winner Cleveland.

Looking closer at their rankings I am even more suspicious. The top 7 ranked teams exactly match in order the top 7 teams with the highest chances of winning the WS, as though each has an equally hard path to the WS trophy. It's as if they are simulating out the regular season using their ELO numbers, but then NOT simulating the playoffs but only using the rating in some context-free way. Strange.

EDIT: And this is taking 538's rankings at face value, which there might be concerns about as SPS noted above
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
53,841
Boston really benefited by running up the score against TB in all those April games before the Rays got their act together.
Or....the Rays didn't get their act together in April because they were playing Boston. It's the baseball equivalent of the chicken or the egg.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,481
Rogers Park
Or....the Rays didn't get their act together in April because they were playing Boston. It's the baseball equivalent of the chicken or the egg.
You're right, of course.

But we came a Joe Kelly meltdown away from sweeping the first two series against them, and they've been well over .500 since the second half of April — or, expressed differently, they've fought back to .500 after falling into a 4-13 hole.

(Of course, they've just lost consecutive games to the Orioles, so who knows...)
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,681
Can we all agree that the big advantage Houston has over both BOS and NY is the 50+% chance that those two will have to play each other in the division series?
Put simply, that advantage is all but certain* to be given to the team that finishes with the best overall record, a race that Boston currently enjoys a 7 game lead over Houston and likely 4 to 5 games over NYY. If the Red Sox or Yankees finish ahead of the Astros, Houston will be pushed into that 2 vs. 3 ALDS matchup with the AL East runner-up.

(* all but certain since neither the Indians or the second wild-card team is likely to finish ahead of BOS, NYY or HOU).
 

SirPsychoSquints

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
5,013
Pittsburgh, PA
I really have to question how 538 is computing this. Can we all agree that the big advantage Houston has over both BOS and NY is the 50+% chance that those two will have to play each other in the division series? And those three teams are rated the three best according to 538's ELO rankings. In the meantime, Houston gets probable-90-game winner Cleveland.

Looking closer at their rankings I am even more suspicious. The top 7 ranked teams exactly match in order the top 7 teams with the highest chances of winning the WS, as though each has an equally hard path to the WS trophy. It's as if they are simulating out the regular season using their ELO numbers, but then NOT simulating the playoffs but only using the rating in some context-free way. Strange.

EDIT: And this is taking 538's rankings at face value, which there might be concerns about as SPS noted above
It's not that they play each other, it's that one of them has to win a 1 game playoff to get to that stage of the playoffs.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,375
Put simply, that advantage is all but certain* to be given to the team that finishes with the best overall record, a race that Boston currently enjoys a 7 game lead over Houston and likely 4 to 5 games over NYY. If the Red Sox or Yankees finish ahead of the Astros, Houston will be pushed into that 2 vs. 3 ALDS matchup with the AL East runner-up.

(* all but certain since neither the Indians or the second wild-card team is likely to finish ahead of BOS, NYY or HOU).
https://www.thoughtco.com/how-mlb-playoffs-work-321331

The team with the top record in the league plays the winner of the WC matchup in the division series. So if Boston finishes with the top record, and NY wins the WC game, Boston gets NY and Hou gets Cle.

So how much of an advantage is it for the Sox to finish with the best overall record while NY plays in the WC game, if they likely will have to play the Yankees in the division series?

I still want that first place overall, for in it comes the guarantee of not having to play in the WC game. But it wouldn't set Boston up against Cleveland, I don't think.
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,681
https://www.thoughtco.com/how-mlb-playoffs-work-321331

The team with the top record in the league plays the winner of the WC matchup in the division series. So if Boston finishes with the top record, and NY wins the WC game, Boston gets NY and Hou gets Cle.

So how much of an advantage is it for the Sox to finish with the best overall record while NY plays in the WC game, if they likely will have to play the Yankees in the division series?

I still want that first place overall, for in it comes the guarantee of not having to play in the WC game. But it wouldn't set Boston up against Cleveland, I don't think.
Yeah, sorry, I misread the format and got that twisted around.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
The Red Sox just passed Houston in run differential, now lead the majors at +178.

That's good, right?
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
Houston is just 5 games clear of the last wildcard spot.
Yeah, in the middle of some injuries and a slump. I wouldn't worry too much if I were them though, Seattle is a mirage. I can't put a lot of faith in a team that's 20 games over .500 with a -1 differential...if anything in baseball is unsustainable, that's it.
 

NoXInNixon

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 24, 2008
5,299
You're all just assuming the MFY win the WC game. Anything can happen in one game. The Sox could end up facing the A's in the DS, which is a much better outcome than facing the Indians.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,660
Additionally, whichever team wins the WC would be down a good starting pitcher.
Not necessarily. There's good reason to think the Yankees will treat it like a bullpen game. I think they'd be happy to do something like...

Severino - 2 IP
Green - 2 IP
Robertson - 2 IP
Britton - 1 IP
Betances - 1 IP
Chapman - 1 IP

...which lines up Severino for starts in ALDS Games 2 and 5.
 

SirPsychoSquints

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
5,013
Pittsburgh, PA
Not necessarily. There's good reason to think the Yankees will treat it like a bullpen game. I think they'd be happy to do something like...

Severino - 2 IP
Green - 2 IP
Robertson - 2 IP
Britton - 1 IP
Betances - 1 IP
Chapman - 1 IP

...which lines up Severino for starts in ALDS Games 2 and 5.
I think that would represent a step forward in strategy, and I'd like to see teams do that kind of thing, but I doubt they would do so absent Severino blowing up (like last year).
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,330
Southwestern CT
Not necessarily. There's good reason to think the Yankees will treat it like a bullpen game. I think they'd be happy to do something like...

Severino - 2 IP
Green - 2 IP
Robertson - 2 IP
Britton - 1 IP
Betances - 1 IP
Chapman - 1 IP

...which lines up Severino for starts in ALDS Games 2 and 5.
I understand your logic, but unless they have been doing this during the season, I do not see the Yankees (or the Sox or any team in that situation) committing to such a wild change in strategy for a one game wildcard playoff.

They will use a starter and try to get 6-7 innings from him as always.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,715
I'd actually do the bullpen thing in a wild card game, but with CC going one time through the order to start. I have no idea if NY would actually do this or not.

Keep in mind since it's a single game 'series', you don't have to put most of your SPs on the roster, so NY could put maybe 10-11 relievers on the team if they wanted.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,660
I understand your logic, but unless they have been doing this during the season, I do not see the Yankees (or the Sox or any team in that situation) committing to such a wild change in strategy for a one game wildcard playoff.

They will use a starter and try to get 6-7 innings from him as always.
A lot of it should depend on how that final BOS/NYY series goes, and whether they're playing for anything.

I can't say that I see your evidence for a team's bullpen usage in the postseason mirroring the regular season, especially in the modern era. The Yankees have an historically good pen for a reason.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
53,841
Not necessarily. There's good reason to think the Yankees will treat it like a bullpen game. I think they'd be happy to do something like...

Severino - 2 IP
Green - 2 IP
Robertson - 2 IP
Britton - 1 IP
Betances - 1 IP
Chapman - 1 IP

...which lines up Severino for starts in ALDS Games 2 and 5.
Why is there "good reason" to think they'd do something they haven't done all year? I'm not doubting you, just wondering why you think that.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,330
Southwestern CT
A lot of it should depend on how that final BOS/NYY series goes, and whether they're playing for anything.

I can't say that I see your evidence for a team's bullpen usage in the postseason mirroring the regular season, especially in the modern era. The Yankees have an historically good pen for a reason.
My reasoning is very cynical.

Unless they are in a strong position (like BB with the Patriots) professional coaches tend to be incredibly risk-averse. And in a one-game playoff after a great season, this will be accentuated. Because the last thing Boone will want is to be vulnerable to the media/fans saying that he tried a “reckless strategic shift instead of staying with what worked all year long.”

Of course, this same risk-aversion also causes managers to have an early hook in the postseason, which can lead to an outcome very similar to a bullpen game. The key difference is there’s no way that Boone starts the game saying he’s pulling his starter after two no matter how well he’s pitching. If he does that and they lose, he’ll be roasted. For good reason.
 
Last edited:

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,715
They basically bullpenned last year's Wild Card game (admittedly by necessity after Severino was terrible in the 1st) and they have a deeper pen this year. I don't think whether they've done it this season or not matters, a one game winner take all situation is different, but again I don't know if they'd actually do it.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,660
Why is there "good reason" to think they'd do something they haven't done all year? I'm not doubting you, just wondering why you think that.
1. The 2018 Yankees are probably the best bullpen in history.
2. Assuming he's not hurt and is still their ace in October, not burning Severino in a Wild Card game makes their ALDS rotation a lot better (starting Severino twice instead of Sabathia/Tanaka twice).
3. There's more rest built into the postseason than the regular season.

I mean, I have no idea what they'll do. But I'd probably do that if I were Boone.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,715
1. The 2018 Yankees are probably the best bullpen in history.
2. Assuming he's not hurt and is still their ace in October, not burning Severino in a Wild Card game makes their ALDS rotation a lot better (starting Severino twice instead of Sabathia/Tanaka twice).
3. There's more rest built into the postseason than the regular season.

I mean, I have no idea what they'll do. But I'd probably do that if I were Boone.
I agree, add in that both Severino and Tanaka have started wild card games in the past three seasons and neither has done especially well. CC one time through the order, then give it to the pen.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,330
Southwestern CT
They basically bullpenned last year's Wild Card game (admittedly by necessity after Severino was terrible in the 1st) and they have a deeper pen this year. I don't think whether they've done it this season or not matters, a one game winner take all situation is different, but again I don't know if they'd actually do it.
What would they have done if Severino was lights out at the start of the game? They leave him in, right?
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,660
My reasoning is very cynical.

Unless they are in a strong position (like BB with the Patriots) professional coaches tend to be incredibly risk-averse. And in a one-game playoff after a great season, this will be accentuated. Because the last thing Boone will want is to be vulnerable to the media/fans saying that he tried a “reckless strategic shift instead of staying with what worked all year long.”

Of course, this same risk-aversion also leads managers to have an early hook, which can be very similar to a bullpen game. The key is how they get there. Because, if Severino is the starter and pitches two dominant innings, there is no way Boone risks pulling him and setting himself up as the fall guy.
I can see the risk-aversion argument. OTOH, it could flow in the other direction too — Why would you start Severino in a Wild Card game when he had an 81.00 ERA in last year's game? (To use the logic of the New York Post.)
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,715
What would they have done if Severino was lights out at the start of the game? They leave him in, right?
Yes, but given what happened in that game plus NY's pen being even deeper this year, I think it's a much stronger consideration, and also CC showed last postseason how good he can be for 3-4 innings.
 

SirPsychoSquints

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
5,013
Pittsburgh, PA
1. The 2018 Yankees are probably the best bullpen in history.
2. Assuming he's not hurt and is still their ace in October, not burning Severino in a Wild Card game makes their ALDS rotation a lot better (starting Severino twice instead of Sabathia/Tanaka twice).
3. There's more rest built into the postseason than the regular season.

I mean, I have no idea what they'll do. But I'd probably do that if I were Boone.
I think this is good reason to think it's a good idea. I am disputing that there is good reason to think the Yankees will act on it.
 

SirPsychoSquints

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
5,013
Pittsburgh, PA
What I'm suggesting wouldn't be so different from what they actually did in game 5 of the ALDS against CLE, which was another single game winner-take-all situation.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/CLE/CLE201710110.shtml
It's pretty different - they waited until he gave up 4 singles in a row in the 5th to pull him. They managed that the same way most teams are managing their postseason games these days - quick hook on a non-elite starter and leaning on your best relievers.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,715
It's pretty different - they waited until he gave up 4 singles in a row in the 5th to pull him. They managed that the same way most teams are managing their postseason games these days - quick hook on a non-elite starter and leaning on your best relievers.
But they had already ridden their bullpen pretty hard at that point too, so they only used two relievers to get through 4.2 innings. Pulling CC after 9 batters instead of 18 isn't a massive jump, especially with a deep and pretty well-rested pen.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,715
Heh, this will not happen, but a full bullpen game with Britton starting the 1st would be a pretty funny implicit shot towards Showalter, who famously didn't use him in 2016 when he was the best reliever in baseball.
 

uncannymanny

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2007
9,080
It would take a big, brass set for Boone to do this IMO. Hell get killed if he pulls an effective Severino after 2 because he’s looking ahead to a DS game 5 and they lose the play in. Even if he survives it, it’ll dog him forever.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,715
I don't think they would do it with Severino, and if they did do it, the decision would come more from the front office than from Boone.
 

SirPsychoSquints

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
5,013
Pittsburgh, PA
I don't think they would do it with Severino, and if they did do it, the decision would come more from the front office than from Boone.
I guess there's a couple different scenarios. Are they in contention for the division going into the last weekend? If so, the starter will be determined by how the rotation shakes out - if that's CC, they're more likely to do some version of heavy reliance on the bullpen.

Are they locked into the WC slot by then? If so, won't they just line up Severino for the WC game and play it straight?
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,715
Are they locked into the WC slot by then? If so, won't they just line up Severino for the WC game and play it straight?
They might, I'm just saying I'm not sure I would. It also depends how their pitchers match up specifically against the team they'd be playing, though.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Fucking pinch me. And keep the historical comps coming. This could go sideways via injury, but greatness has to be recognized. They closed out against a team 23.5 games out of first place in apex predator fashion.

Cashman is gonna Cashman. He now is probably the third most famous alum of his high school — but may rank first in aptitude.

Sometimes you reach the Break and a GM has done all he could and he fairly says, it’s up to the players to perform. Now it’s up to Dombrowski to perform. Maybe the right thing is doing something; maybe the right think is doing nothing. It’s not easy in this instance, but Dombrowski has to shine.
Bumping this because I appreciate and am thankful for what DD has done.

Watching him and Cashman work this deadline is a treat. Worthy competitors.

And yes — 2/3 comps would be interesting. Is this as good as it ever was?
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,375
On pace to win 112 games. Best run differential. Most runs scored. Second fewest allowed. Two legit MVP candidates. Young guys playing well. Adding quality veterans to the mix. Sale is dominant. Price coming into form. Injuries are an issue but they're working through them.

Incredible performance 2/3 of the way through the season. I won't say that if they don't win the World Series it'll be a disappointment or a "failure" because we all know how hard it is to get that done, and there are VERY worthy competitors to have to go through. and baseball is baseball.

But man this team is just crushing it in every way right now. It's unbelievable to watch.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,075
Concord, NH
What I like best about the team is the completeness. There isn't a glaring hole, really, anywhere. They have a winning record in just about any split besides games where they scored fewer runs than the opponent. And they've done it consistently since spring training. They can beat a team in all kinds of different ways, and that, IMO, is the secret sauce formula for the playoffs.
 

timlinin8th

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2009
1,521
I don't think they would do it with Severino, and if they did do it, the decision would come more from the front office than from Boone.
That may be, but fairly or not Boone will be the face of those moves, just as Kevin Cash is getting credit in Tampa for all the part juggling working out despite it being clear the FO has been heavily involved in a lot of those decisions as well.

If they try that on the field and fail, the one getting destroyed in the papers will be Boone.
 

AB in DC

OG Football Writing
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2002
13,629
Springfield, VA
What I like best about the team is the completeness. There isn't a glaring hole, really, anywhere.
This is really the key. I don't know if they're the "best" team in the league, but they are clearly the most balanced. The Yankees have an iffy rotation, the Indians have a dumpster-fire bullpen, and the Astros lineup has massively underperfomed compared to last year. Whereas the Sox are at or near the top in all three categories, with plus defense all over the field (especially with Kinsler). This is a solid, solid team.