Just being hyperbolic.All Cris Collinsworth does is hyperbole, I don't know how he can say he hates it.
But he also brings up the Butler play whenever possible, so he gets a pass.All Cris Collinsworth does is hyperbole, I don't know how he can say he hates it.
They'll snap it take 1 step then throw it over the WR head.they may have a punt return or 2 seconds and that's it.
Intentional grounding and Green Bay gets an untimed down if this were the Okie State refs.They'll snap it take 1 step then throw it over the WR head.
Apparently, what Sam Bradford did tonight was one of the most impressive things a football player has done.All Cris Collinsworth does is hyperbole, I don't know how he can say he hates it.
He's now gone 14 games without a passer rating of 100+. I think the sample size is big enough that questions regarding a possible decline are legitimate. You're right, though, a guy that relies so much on mobility and sheer arm talent will always be more prone to being affected by age and injury.I get that Rodgers makes some unbelievable plays on the move, and has had some great seasons, but I really don't understand the "he's the only guy definitely better than Brady" meme. His mechanics (always throwing off his back foot) and body language (pouts a lot) seemingly leave a lot to be desired. Don't really see him as a great leadership-type, either. At 32, and relying a lot on his athleticism, are we starting to see a slight decline?
Ka'Deem Carey though…"Jeremy Langford" just does not sound like a running back name.
This is my take too. He looks great; it's unbelievable that both the Rams and Browns passed on him.Wentz looks the real deal, the team hasn't put up a ton of points but he makes all the throws; can loft it over the top, gun it into a tight window and throw on the run. Way too early to make this claim, but I find it hard to believe that Goff is going to end up being better.
Ehh. I don't think the Browns were wrong to pick up a 1,2,3,4 in exchange for trading down 6 slots from 2 to 8.This is my take too. He looks great; it's unbelievable that both the Rams and Browns passed on him.
Completely agree. Helps to have the punt out of the endzone. Less push from the high endzone camera.This game is a piece of shit, but yes please to more of the camera angle they used on Eddie Royal's punt return for a TD. A high shot from behind the punter, you could see all the blocks being set up and where the lanes were forming. Much better than the normal side angle where you don't know who's about to come into the picture.
This game is a piece of shit, but yes please to more of the camera angle they used on Eddie Royal's punt return for a TD. A high shot from behind the punter, you could see all the blocks being set up and where the lanes were forming. Much better than the normal side angle where you don't know who's about to come into the picture.
If Wentz is legit they'll be in the battle I suspect. Defence is really good but shallow at CB and LB, I will never understand the decision to dump Rowe. They dressed 3 corners today, WTF man.Is Philly legit? With that defense, they look like a team that can hang with Dallas and NY for the division.
And is a Walter Payton award winner.What's Cutlers contract like? Can they divest themselves of him and maybe trade for a young hotshot QB that grew up and played college ball in Illinois?
I think you're letting the Browns off too easy. I suspect people in NFL circles were pretty sure the Rams wanted Goff by the time the Browns dealt the pick, so the trade was fundamentally a bet against Wentz -- if he becomes a league-average QB by his second or third year, his value will swamp the value of the picks the Browns got in return, unless they fall ass-backwards into the next JJ Watt or something.Ehh. I don't think the Browns were wrong to pick up a 1,2,3,4 in exchange for trading down 6 slots from 2 to 8.
You can't be too results oriented in evaluating draft trades. Wentz may turn out to be great or he may not. But you have to judge trade decisions based on the information available at the time to teams. The Browns did not know which QB would fall to #2 at the time. And while both Goff and Wentz were intriguing in certain ways, each also had significant question marks and neither was anywhere close to a Luck level QB prospect.
That was a smart trade by the Browns no matter how Wentz turns out.
I think you're letting the Browns off too easy. I suspect people in NFL circles were pretty sure the Rams wanted Goff by the time the Browns dealt the pick, so the trade was fundamentally a bet against Wentz -- if he becomes a league-average QB by his second or third year, his value will swamp the value of the picks the Browns got in return, unless they fall ass-backwards into the next JJ Watt or something.Ehh. I don't think the Browns were wrong to pick up a 1,2,3,4 in exchange for trading down 6 slots from 2 to 8.
You can't be too results oriented in evaluating draft trades. Wentz may turn out to be great or he may not. But you have to judge trade decisions based on the information available at the time to teams. The Browns did not know which QB would fall to #2 at the time. And while both Goff and Wentz were intriguing in certain ways, each also had significant question marks and neither was anywhere close to a Luck level QB prospect.
That was a smart trade by the Browns no matter how Wentz turns out.
I think you're letting the Browns off too easy. I suspect people in NFL circles were pretty sure the Rams wanted Goff by the time the Browns dealt the pick, so the trade was fundamentally a bet against Wentz -- if he becomes a league-average QB by his second or third year, his value will swamp the value of the picks the Browns got in return, unless they fall ass-backwards into the next JJ Watt or something.Ehh. I don't think the Browns were wrong to pick up a 1,2,3,4 in exchange for trading down 6 slots from 2 to 8.
You can't be too results oriented in evaluating draft trades. Wentz may turn out to be great or he may not. But you have to judge trade decisions based on the information available at the time to teams. The Browns did not know which QB would fall to #2 at the time. And while both Goff and Wentz were intriguing in certain ways, each also had significant question marks and neither was anywhere close to a Luck level QB prospect.
That was a smart trade by the Browns no matter how Wentz turns out.