USMNT Summer 2024: Beauty is in the Eye of the Berhalter

rguilmar

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
2,499
It's funny that Bielsa is now being lauded as a great international manager, because he was a complete flop when he managed Argentina, despite having an absolutely loaded squad (Batistuta, Crespo, Veron, Aimar, Riquelme, Saviola, Kily Gonzalez, Claudio Lopez, Sorin, Zanetti, Ayala, Walter Samuel, Simeone, Ortega, etc.). Argentina won nothing under Bielsa and had their worst modern performance at the World Cup when they couldn't get out of the group stage in 2002.
The way Bielsa likes to set his team up was such a bad fit. I love Juan Ramon Riquelme, he’s one of my favorite players ever, but it’s hard to think of a less “Bielsa” type of player than him (Javier Saviola possibly being one). Simeone is definitely a Bielsa player though. Since then he’s chosen jobs at clubs/countries that are better suited to his style. Chile and Athletic Club in particular stand out. I actually think this Argentina is better suited to him.

Anyways, basically every manager has a flop or two. It’s more of a question of what they learned from it. If any club or nation wants a manager without a performance blemish, it’ll be a long coaching search.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,845
It's funny that Bielsa is now being lauded as a great international manager, because he was a complete flop when he managed Argentina, despite having an absolutely loaded squad (Batistuta, Crespo, Veron, Aimar, Riquelme, Saviola, Kily Gonzalez, Claudio Lopez, Sorin, Zanetti, Ayala, Walter Samuel, Simeone, Ortega, etc.). Argentina won nothing under Bielsa and had their worst modern performance at the World Cup when they couldn't get out of the group stage in 2002.
Every manager has flops, though I think the idea of the flop with Argentina is mostly based on one bad WC rather than his whole time there.

In Copa 99 their only losses were Colombia (where his players missed 3 penalties) and dominant champion Brazil which was the closest match Brazil played all tournament.
They finished 1st in WC qualifying
The WC was rough, we don't have xG for that era, but they struggled to score and went out at 1-1-1 in the Group of Death.
Even then the federation kept him on. He almost completely rebuilt the side throwing out a bunch of the aging players and building with more youth.
He had a great 2004 Copa, making it pretty easily to a final with Brazil and losing only on penalties.
HE managed at the 2004 Olympics where Argentina thoroughly dominated in winning a gold.
Then he resigned on top, because..... Bielsa is a crazy person.

Bielsa left Argentina with the best win rate of any Argentina manager since Stabile in the 1950s. He was an excellent manager for them, let down by performance/luck in a single tournament.

Then he went to Chile and rebuilt their program from the ground up.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
24,227
Pittsburgh, PA
Let's posit that Bielsa is that mythical creature, an effective and value-add international manager. Is there another one? Who is getting the whole to equal more than the sum of its parts? If we just say "whoever won the world cup", that's more down to the player pool and execution, right? How can we even judge the relative merits of how the manager set them up tactically and with player selection? If we're good at that, though, if spotting it is a skill that smart fans can acquire, then there ought to be someone else whose team outperformed their talent level, right? Not just necessarily someone who won hardware, therefore they're a great NT coach?

Like, I think you can argue that Marsch's Canada outperformed their talent at Copa America, but we're uncomfortable with drawing that conclusion, aren't we?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,845
Let's posit that Bielsa is that mythical creature, an effective and value-add international manager. Is there another one? Who is getting the whole to equal more than the sum of its parts? If we just say "whoever won the world cup", that's more down to the player pool and execution, right? How can we even judge the relative merits of how the manager set them up tactically and with player selection? If we're good at that, though, if spotting it is a skill that smart fans can acquire, then there ought to be someone else whose team outperformed their talent level, right? Not just necessarily someone who won hardware, therefore they're a great NT coach?

Like, I think you can argue that Marsch's Canada outperformed their talent at Copa America, but we're uncomfortable with drawing that conclusion, aren't we?
I think the key to evaluating international managers it to look at long terms against good opponents. which is tough because:
1. Terms tend to be short
2. Tournaments are really swingy and we tend to put a lot of emphasis on winning them which can often be luck based.

It's easy to evaluate a manager based on 30 weeks of work or 50 or 100 at the club level because the competition is the same for their peers, luck balances out more, and they can make more impact.

For a lot of managers the best way to evaluate them is.... how well do they succeed across all their top opponent games, what are the underlyings (ie scored, allowed, xG) and how does that compare to any other manager who had the pool before.

I think where a lot of international managers earn their pay is.... picking the players. The hardest thing is figuring out what works and being willing to drop the "names" for the player who fits better.

But yeah, overall it is much tougher to determine impact of managers, but also.... all soccer is to some extent players. Pep gets called best in the world... but he also only manages places where he'll have the best talent. He had a great quote about Bielsa in 2022

"Give him my Barcelona and you will see how he will win titles," he said. "Give me Leeds, with all due respect to the Leeds players, but I would still be in the Championship."

Now I don't totally believe that because Bielsa while a genius wears out his club teams so you get 2-3 years to turn over the side or he'll break them (which is why I think he's a great INT fit, he packs a lot of development into a small time and then the players go home with his film lessons but don't get the brutal physical training).
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
55,478
Like, I think you can argue that Marsch's Canada outperformed their talent at Copa America, but we're uncomfortable with drawing that conclusion, aren't we?
How well did they actually perform? In their final 2 games more than half of the minutes were played 11v10 in their favor, and they only won those minutes 1-0.

Lost 2-0 to Argentina, outshot nearly 2-1, only 37% possession.
Beat Peru 1-0, playing the last 38 minutes 11v10, were still outshot, and out possessed.
Tied Chile 0-0, playing 75% of the game 11v10, and still only winning possession 53-47.

They did what they needed to, and played better in the semis, but they were pretty meh, scoring 1 goal in group stage despite all that time playing up a man.
 

Titans Bastard

has sunil gulati in his sights
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
14,663
Just because Gareth wasn't the right manager for England at Euro '24 doesn't have much bearing IMO whether he would be a good fit for the USMNT. More importantly, Southgate's biggest strength is developing an entire program. If we give him 6 years to shape the MNT program then I'm on board for sure.

In addition, I don't think he would be a terrible manager for the USMNT. In other words, his flaws at Euro '24 included being loyal to certain players, in addition to tactical rigidity and conservative approach among other things. Those issues won't all be problems if he was given a new pool of players and had the relative player quality deficit he'd have with the USMNT at major tournaments. Now, if he rolls into the Gold Cup in a deep set 5-4-1, then no, he would not be a good choice. But we could do A LOT worse, and I've been railing against his manager performance over the last 2 years.
I don't really understand what developing an entire program is supposed to mean for this job. You call in players, you manage the locker room, you decide the lineups and tactics. The biggest problem that Berhalter had was that his teams tended to lack ideas in the attack and everything about Southgate seems the same — good locker room vibes, solid defensive structure, attackers underperforming their potential.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
55,478
Yeah, to me, Southgate seems like a rich man's Berhalter. I think, like other sports, when a change in manager is made because teams didn't do well, you don't go with someone that's essentially the same type.
 

Zososoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2009
9,624
South of North
I don't really understand what developing an entire program is supposed to mean for this job. You call in players, you manage the locker room, you decide the lineups and tactics. The biggest problem that Berhalter had was that his teams tended to lack ideas in the attack and everything about Southgate seems the same — good locker room vibes, solid defensive structure, attackers underperforming their potential.
Southgate is widely credited for reshaping the goals for English player development and the methods to achieve those goals. Most notably, Southgate emphasized producing substantially more technical players. Your job description is that of manager, not the NT equivalent of Technical Director like I was alluding to.

You and @DJnVa could very well be correct that Southgate doesn't help the USMNT all that much, and I'd agree that bringing him in to improve performances for the '26 World Cup is less likely to be successful than if the time horizon for measurement is the '30 WC.

But I'd also argue two additional points. First, that any improvement Southgate can make to American player development systems would be extremely good for the medium and long term, and second, that even another stodgy unimaginative manager could improve performances, merely due to the fact that said manager (Southgate or otherwise) presumably wouldn't have the same loyalty to certain players and would bring a fresh set of eyes to the same problem.

TO BE CLEAR, he's not my first, second, or third plausible choice for the job. I'm just trying to rationalize the potential hire.
 

67YAZ

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2000
9,636
Well, he’s never managed for a club more than 2 years. I guess that’s perfect for our timeline.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,845
Well my shortlived hope that Crocker wasn't going to be same as the old boss are waning.
3 managers, all with significant MLS ties, 2 have never had success at a high level, the 3rd has had epic collapses with 2.5 years at every non-MLS stop......
I hope that Giannone got fed this by Garber (he's a reputable reporter so no way he made it up) to push his guys... otherwise it tells me that either:
1. We are setting our sights for the absolute bottom of the barrel (and likes have an MLS requirement) or
2. Nobody reputable has interest in the job.
 

67YAZ

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2000
9,636
Just bumping with no news…which is surprising based on the intensity of Vieira rumors a week ago. But probably a good thing in terms of running a rigorous process.

It also makes me think Renard is deep in the mix since he probably wouldn’t get into negotiations and definitely not announce anything until after the Olympics.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,845
Just bumping with no news…which is surprising based on the intensity of Vieira rumors a week ago. But probably a good thing in terms of running a rigorous process.

It also makes me think Renard is deep in the mix since he probably wouldn’t get into negotiations and definitely not announce anything until after the Olympics.
Current rumors are Henry and Renard, both of whom are at the Olympics are on the short list
 

Jimy Hendrix

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 15, 2002
6,193
Current rumors are Henry and Renard, both of whom are at the Olympics are on the short list
Just saw Henry arguably get outcoached by Marko Mitrovic at the Olympics, not too excited by him. Won 3 - 0 anyhow, of course, but I don't see it going as well for him if he's coaching the US against France and not the other way around.
 

Titans Bastard

has sunil gulati in his sights
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
14,663

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,845
I'm not sure I believe that Matarazzo would take the USMNT job, but I am somewhat more inclined to believe it after I learned that Hoffenheim's sporting director — who was reportedly close with Matarazzo — was pushed out of the club this week.
I basically had him completely off my board on the assumption that:
1. Nobody quits a top third Bundesliga job and Europa League for USMNT
2. He said pretty recently in interviews that while he might have interest much later at this point he was a club guy.

Now if the guy who brought him in at Hoffenheim is gone, and he feels like he's being dangled to be fired at the first losing streak.... maybe he reconsiders?
 

Pesky Pole

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2001
2,841
Phoenixville, PA
Interesting article….could it be true?

Poch to the USMNT?

“Former Tottenham and Chelsea head coach Mauricio Pochettino is a top target for the U.S. men’s national team opening, according to multiple sources briefed on the coaching search.

The sources said that the federation was still considering multiple candidates as of last week, but Pochettino is seen by some as the favorite in the pool, and U.S. Soccer is engaged in conversations with his camp.”
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
24,227
Pittsburgh, PA
https://x.com/MenInBlazers/status/1823903813658427727

MIB is about as tied in as it gets for corporate shilling... so I assume it's done
I don't think Roger generally has good sources at USSF... but he's also posting an image of the guy wearing a US Soccer shirt as he's standing next to him, and saying "it's done", so it's not like he isn't talking to him, either.

If we get him, I'll be stoked. We sure as hell aren't doing any better on short notice like this.

edit: note to self, send Adriana Lima a fruit basket
 

Titans Bastard

has sunil gulati in his sights
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
14,663
I was much more optimistic about this process than most of you negative nancies out there, but I didn’t expect them to be able to bring in someone this big.

It will be nice to usher in an era of good feelings, albeit one that will be brief, because now that a very unpopular manager is gone it’s time for the fan base to decide which players to turn on.

Btw @rguilmar surely we aren’t giving too much credit to CONCACAF Edgar…

View: https://twitter.com/concacafedgar/status/1811762127784272070
 

Pesky Pole

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2001
2,841
Phoenixville, PA
An amazing get for the USSF. It will be interesting to see the concessions just for fun but every one will be worth it. After the women’s gold medal, this is about as good a next domino as we could have hoped for.
 

rguilmar

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
2,499
I was much more optimistic about this process than most of you negative nancies out there, but I didn’t expect them to be able to bring in someone this big.

It will be nice to usher in an era of good feelings, albeit one that will be brief, because now that a very unpopular manager is gone it’s time for the fan base to decide which players to turn on.

Btw @rguilmar surely we aren’t giving too much credit to CONCACAF Edgar…

View: https://twitter.com/concacafedgar/status/1811762127784272070
Sorry, meant from Fabrizio. Edgar has good insight into players, especially dual nationals. Romano for the “official” moves though.
 

OCST

Sunny von Bulow
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2004
25,476
The 718
I’m surprised that Poch would damage his own marketability by taking this job. His Chelsea gig didn’t tarnish his rep imo- he was starting to get a tune out of that grab bag of players and I think the CW is that he did a good job and Chelsea is a loony bin- but even if he succeeds here he’ll have the stink of national team coach on him.

Maybe he figures half a cycle sets him up for LFC if Slot stumbles, I don’t know. It just feels like he took a step backwards.
 

SocrManiac

Tommy Seebach’s mustache
SoSH Member
Apr 15, 2006
8,947
Somers, CT
I'm with @Titans Bastard. Who are we complaining about next now that the manager is off limits for awhile?

It will be intriguing to see if Poch's style can translate to a national side with limited training time available. We saw some more complicated systems this summer from Austria and Switzerland, so it isn't off the table.
 

rguilmar

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
2,499
Poch is pretty committed to his 4-2-3-1.
Could we be looking at a Musah/Adams pivot with Gio as the 10?
Could be. The good news with the hiring of Poch, or at least a portion of it, is that he is from outside the US Soccer sphere and will bring new ideas with him, and that all players start “fresh”. He’s going to have different ways of evaluating and utilizing players. The Yunus/Adams/Johnny/Weston crew will be tried out in the double pivot. He might settle on a pair, he might mix and match depending on other parts or opponent, he might try something totally different.
 

OCST

Sunny von Bulow
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2004
25,476
The 718
one obvious upside is the players don’t get to call the shots. No player in that locker room has enough juice to take on a manager with the stature of Poch.
 

Titans Bastard

has sunil gulati in his sights
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
14,663
one obvious upside is the players don’t get to call the shots. No player in that locker room has enough juice to take on a manager with the stature of Poch.
From what I’ve heard from someone who would know, the players weren’t exactly “calling the shots” but the atmosphere had gotten too collegial and there were objective signs of complacency.

Tyler Adams recently said in the press that they could benefit from a more “ruthless” manager and I believe he was referring to someone who could come in and stamp out the complacency and bad habits exhibited by some players on the team.

It’s kind of funny. After GioGate people assumed that Berhalter would lose the locker room because players wouldn’t like him. Instead he ended up losing full control of the locker room because they felt too comfortable around him.

I was thinking someone like Vieira would be able to come in and restore order, but this is even better.