USMNT: Hold My Beer

Silverdude2167

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 9, 2006
4,112
Amstredam
Yeah, legendary result. England consider themselves the stewards and top exponents of the game and their team is eternally top 10, sometimes top 5, in Elo rankings. For all of our meaningful progress in building a national soccer culture and development program, we are a relative small fry. How do you think they're feeling today? Go browse the ThreeLions subreddit if you want a sense. And however they're feeling, we should be feeling the opposite. Do you remember last time we played them in a World Cup?



And this wasn't one of those scoreless draws where we withstood a 90-minute siege, either. We weren't being bombarded and having our goalie stand on his head or getting bailed out by defensive block after block. No, we took the game to them, neutralized their attack with some impressive tactics, and created the better of the chances. So, yeah, be happy. It's OK to give yourself permission to be happy.

"you can't draw yourself to advancement in the knockout stage" -- I'm sure I don't have to tell you how frequent it is that matches go to penalty shootouts, and you know what happens then? One team wins the shootout. Ask Croatia from the last world cup: they beat Denmark in the R16 on penalties, beat Russia in the QF on penalties, and then was tied with England in regulation before beating them in extra time. Not conceding goals is a very important part of the game, and one which we have not been good at at this level.


The fuck is this? I don't recall seeing you around these parts over the last 5 years as we picked ourselves up from the swamp of Couva, rebuilt the program with a youth movement of talent who ended up being world class in their own right, filled holes in from some brilliant dual-national recruiting, and slowly forged a team together basically out of nothing. You show up at the moment they're really tested having no idea of the team's narrative arc, and think you can write it for them, negatively, after 90 brilliant minutes vs England? Which was collectively probably the best they've ever played? FOH with that nonsense.

This wasn't "let's have the same core ride again" like in 2014. This team has, for years now, been trying to find the right chemistry with each other, been trying to achieve consistency - same with very young players and young teams in any sport the world over. The first time Yunus Musah stepped on a field for the US, in a friendly against Wales in November 2020, everyone's eyes bugged out seeing the MMA midfield for the first time and how they absolutely bossed the game. For the first time, things clicked and we basically had the run of the place against a Welsh team that is - to be clear - very, very good, roughly our peer by ranking and result. And you know what? We didn't score that day either. But the building blocks were there, and that's what's important. We've gotten plenty of empty results, I'd rather have real predictors of future success.

Our progress was measured over the last 5 years mostly by Mexico, our real pacing challenge. The depths of the post-Couva lows were set by our losses to them in the 2019 Gold Cup final and then a subsequent friendly, where we largely got slapped around. That was basically the last time anyone heard from most of the players who played those games. Instead, our future team spent time building up chemistry, which went well enough that when the A-team faced them in the Nations League final in June 2021, we basically stunted on them aside from an early error by Mark McKenzie. Then our B-team did it again a month later in the Gold Cup, with a heroic defensive effort for 120' and a late-in-extra-time winner off a set piece. And the momentum continued into World Cup Qualifying, where we played basically the best match I've ever seen the USMNT play in our home game vs Mexico in Cincinnati - we slapped them around for 90 minutes, and the 2-0 scoreline frankly flattered Mexico. Everything that our talent predicted that we should, someday, be able to do, our guys went out there and did.

But it hasn't all been a bed of roses. We've had collapses, we've had failures to score, we've had boneheaded errors. We're a very, very young team, I think the youngest at the WC by some distance. That means inconsistency, as it always does in any sport. We had a shocking loss to Panama, we had Canada largely dominate two games against us, we had a disappointing showing in our finale in Costa Rica. Oh, and we had a game in the Azteca where Mexico was running scared, Gio Reyna put the fear of god into them with a run where he dribbled the entire team, but they somehow managed to keep us out of the net for 90 minutes and drew 0-0. Sound familiar? Point is, we've seen this team grow. If you've been following them the last few years, you've watched a team coalesce from nothing, from a bunch of raw teenagers, who do things like talk about their fish tank for their 3 minutes of fame. We've watched Antonee Robinson go from "too raw for a call-up" to "too good to leave off the field". Sergino Dest now pays attention at least 80% of the time, a massive improvement. And our entire team is still young, young enough that they'll continue to improve, this isn't the best they'll get individually, nevermind as a team that knows how to play with each other.

So yeah, dude, we're all happy to be here. Happy that we could qualify with a bunch of kids, after the disaster that our over-the-hill veterans wrought last time around. Happy that we could show our potential in a few key games along the way, rise to the occasion more often than not. Happy we could work out the bugs and inevitable setbacks, get through some injuries. And we're damned happy that when really put to the test, going up against a team with absurd talent like England, we could go toe-to-toe and give as good as we got. Because England is a team where their fans can only be happy with a trophy and are fucking miserable on all other occasions, and that's just a no-fun way to go through a sports fandom. Whereas the USMNT has been on a steady, if inconsistent, rise for the last 30+ years, and keeps getting better and better, and anyone who's been following the team for more than a week can measure its progress at times like these. It is rewarding to follow this team, to see where it's going, and where it's going to bring soccer in America to. Stories like those of Matt Turner, Shaq Moore, Ethan Horvath, are the kind of underdog storylines we can all root for, as opposed to the England team full of guys who were anointed as the next-big-thing at age 13. This team is for people who can dream on a squad, dream on a performance, dream on a world where we're a player in world football. If you don't want to dream - if you want to jump straight to "entitled, never-happy fan" - then hop right the fuck off the bandwagon, nobody will miss you.
This is 100% my favorite post ever.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
29,087
I think we should be happy with a draw.
However we have grown past minnow status, this is a side that should be competitive.

Definitely wouldn't look to England fans for how to feel. English fans are remarkably bad. They think that they should have won every match and they tend to to pay no attention to outside teams and have no idea what the quality is.

I spend some time on PL team forums and you'd be shocked how many people on there have zero idea of who anybody outside the PL is.

England has the biggest gap between volume/expectations and Knowledge/realism of any fanbase in the world
 

Jimy Hendrix

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 15, 2002
5,259
I’ve been unimpressed so far with Yedlin and Shaq Moore off the bench at RB. I hope either Dest has played himself into 90min fitness or we see Scally as next man up for that substitution and he can give something.
 

Titans Bastard

has sunil gulati in his sights
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
13,729
I want to add one more thing: the lack of end product in the England game was frustrating, but USMNT was not at all playing boring soccer. I mean, I know it's subjective, but most of us have seen A LOT of USMNT games and a lot of soccer games in general.

This team was balling out. They were circulating the ball well, they were combining and breaking defensive lines with back-of-the-heel flicks and no-look backheels. Tyler Adams was performing at a build-him-a-statue level of epic. This wasn't a hang-on-for-dear-life tie. This was a performance, if you know where to look.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
49,777
This was a performance, if you know where to look.
Hopefully we have a few more games to go but I'm looking forward to your post-mortem and where we will be looking for improvement in the next 4 years.

We should start planning SoSH WC Bashes in 2026 now.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
29,087
Is there any reason to believe this link? Basically says that the team wants more Reyna and tensions are rising.
Nobody other than Wynalda has come out that strong, but a lot of people saying something is wrong going on between those 2 including Jimmy Conrad who is considered pretty clued in.
 

67YAZ

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2000
6,704
Maybe. But this def smells like Wynalda making himself the center of a story again.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
49,777
Someone was on SiriusXM's soccer channel post-game yesterday saying some of the same things. I missed who it was, but I know it was a former US player, so it's possible it was Wynalda.
 

SocrManiac

Tommy Seebach’s mustache
SoSH Member
Apr 15, 2006
7,131
Somers, CT
Media and former players trying up to drum up shit after an effort like that would prove the US is closing the gap to England in all phases.
 

wonderland

lurker
Jul 20, 2005
448
I can’t help but think about the number of times Reyna has gone off injured as a factor even with five subs. With a win or go home situation here, I wouldn’t be surprised if he started or at the very least played 30 minutes.
 

Jimy Hendrix

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 15, 2002
5,259
Wynalda would love for a different USMNT World Cup personnel scandal to displace our current all-timer, I suppose.
 

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
539
I had no confidence in the US producing mildly competent performances after the two warm up games against Japan and Saudi Arabia. Based on those teams' results in the tournament, I think I was underestimating both squads, but, the US play was terrible. So, watching these last two games has been a welcome relief.

Why not start Reyna and have a full set of subs to come in as needed?

Does anyone think Wright has outperformed Sargent?

With the current squad, would playing a false 9 up front be more effective? Having Sargent/Wright on the field instead of Reyna, Aaronson, Musah, etc seems like a poor use of available talent.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
49,777
Wynalda would love for a different USMNT World Cup personnel scandal to displace our current all-timer, I suppose.
Ah yes--that's right. It was Wynalda on the radio because he referenced not playing against Brazil.

The host was "Tell me what your impressions were of the game" and the FIRST thing he mentioned was Reyna not playing. The host even tried to bring him back saying "the US just outplayed England and your first comment is about Reyna?"
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
17,299
Pittsburgh, PA
Someone was on SiriusXM's soccer channel post-game yesterday saying some of the same things. I missed who it was, but I know it was a former US player, so it's possible it was Wynalda.
Heard that same clip as I drove home from the bar. Whoever-it-was (I don't recall) said that he'd "try to get to the bottom of it", because they argued that something had to be up, that if you're of the talent level Reyna is, and you've played 12 of 180 minutes so far, most anyone in that position would be in the manager's office having it out with them. So it was total speculation, maybe with some logic behind it but they didn't have any hard info, they made that much clear.

Seemed like a lot of nonsense to me, because Occam's Razor says that Reyna's carrying a knock and was only barely healthy, and they've been good at keeping enough of a lid on it that word hasn't gotten out. We all know that Gio Reyna isn't shy about showing his disappointment on the field when shit is not to his liking, and we haven't seen that petulance out of him.

I’ve been unimpressed so far with Yedlin and Shaq Moore off the bench at RB. I hope either Dest has played himself into 90min fitness or we see Scally as next man up for that substitution and he can give something.
Here's the thing, you're not wrong, but every time I've watched Scally on Gladbach, he's solid and puts in the hustle on D, he's got ideas going forward, he's got some finesse... and then 2-3 times per game, he absolutely falls asleep on the cut or run he needed to be picking up, and has to be bailed out by his CBs. Totally understandable if you're 19 years old and not like a Gio Reyna level savant, right? But we don't have the luxury of having him bailed out by our CBs, we're relying on our RB to do his job.

Moore wasn't great yesterday against Jack Grealish, but his history with us (mostly at the 2021 Gold Cup, to be fair) is "reliable on the defensive side, can put in a cross but isn't changing the game offensively", and that's what we need out of our backup once Dest is gassed. We'd hoped Cannon would be that by now but he kinda fell off the trajectory, and Yedlin was that at one point but fell off from that level. And Iran's Grealish-level guy plays on the other side of the field. So maybe Moore is good enough? I won't be upset if we give Scally a shot, but if we're protecting a late lead I'll feel better about Moore than about the alternatives.
 

67YAZ

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2000
6,704
Another point to toss into the Gio discourse -

Weah has been really good & done everything asked of him. He put in a fantastic defensive shift yesterday. And he has our only goal so far this tournament.

Gio coming in during the Wales match should have happened, but many folks are looking past a well performing Weah as if Gio is going to single-handedly change the US’ attacking performance.
 

GB5

lurker
Aug 26, 2013
499
Interesting spot they are in:

On one hand after the draw came out or even a day before the tourney started if you gave the US the current situation, beat Iran and you are through, I am pretty sure they all would have signed for it.
However I see a lot of “well if they can’t beat Iran then they don’t deserve to go through..”

This isn’t Algeria. Algeria was a well below average team with nothing to play for,US should more than expect to beat them.

Iran is a fully functional squad, capable of more or less dominating Wales from start to finish which the US couldn’t do. They have 4 goals through two games, the US has one.

The is also the nightmare scenario for the hardcore soccer fans vs the newbies who pop up every four years. “You didn’t win one game in the WC, all you had to do was beat Iran, do they even have soccer in Iran, and you couldn’t do it.” What are we doing here..Soccer is not a credible sport in the US.
All that is coming if they don’t win this game.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
49,777
Interesting spot they are in:

On one hand after the draw came out or even a day before the tourney started if you gave the US the current situation, beat Iran and you are through, I am pretty sure they all would have signed for it.
However I see a lot of “well if they can’t beat Iran then they don’t deserve to go through..”

This isn’t Algeria. Algeria was a well below average team with nothing to play for,US should more than expect to beat them.

Iran is a fully functional squad, capable of more or less dominating Wales from start to finish which the US couldn’t do. They have 4 goals through two games, the US has one.

The is also the nightmare scenario for the hardcore soccer fans vs the newbies who pop up every four years. “You didn’t win one game in the WC, all you had to do was beat Iran, do they even have soccer in Iran, and you couldn’t do it.” What are we doing here..Soccer is not a credible sport in the US.
All that is coming if they don’t win this game.

Everything you say makes logical sense. However the USMNT has different goals and a different ceiling now. They should expect to beat a team like Iran or they need to seriously reevaluate the program.

Also, the US pretty thoroughly outplayed Wales and had 59% possession. Against Iran, Wales had over 60% possession and Iran didn't score until Wales was down to 10 men. They outshot them by a good amount, but a lot of that was late, and yes, they did put 2 past Pickford. One after it was 4-0 and the other a PK in the 103rd minute, they all count, but they have 0 goals in 11v11 "competitive" play and they're on their backup keeper.

I am an "any given day" kinda guy, but the US should win this game.
 

Joe D Reid

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
3,935
I mean who do you put him in for? Maybe up front as a false 9? I like the way the midfield is operating
Yeah, at the moment we don’t really have a striker even when we play a striker. I wouldn’t even mind Weah up top with Reyna replacing him. Let 1000 passes bloom.
 

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
539
I mean who do you put him in for? Maybe up front as a false 9? I like the way the midfield is operating
I asked the false 9 question earlier because they need to find a way to get their best players on the field. Sargent/Wright playing while Renya/Aaronson sit makes no sense.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
47,759
I want to add one more thing: the lack of end product in the England game was frustrating, but USMNT was not at all playing boring soccer. I mean, I know it's subjective, but most of us have seen A LOT of USMNT games and a lot of soccer games in general.

This team was balling out. They were circulating the ball well, they were combining and breaking defensive lines with back-of-the-heel flicks and no-look backheels. Tyler Adams was performing at a build-him-a-statue level of epic. This wasn't a hang-on-for-dear-life tie. This was a performance, if you know where to look.
There were so many moments of passing out of the back, into tight spaces up the sideline and through the midfield, where I reflexively tensed up just waiting for the obvious turnover and then…they would find the next pass, work it upfield, find a switch.

I mean, how long did we suffer through whole matches of nobody showing for anybody and Michael Bradley having no outlet but to turn around and fire it 40 yards back to the keeper who then had no outlet but to fire it back upfield 60 yards?
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
47,759
I’m no tactician but I’d plug in Reyna for Wright in a heartbeat. I don’t fancy 90 minutes of crosses into tight windows on Tuesday. Would like to see another skilled playmaker available when Pulisic makes his runs in from the wing. An extra give and go partner, etc. We need more clever runs from the 18-25 area into the box. Reyna can help with that kind of dynamism more than the true strikers.
 

Arroyo Con Frijoles

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
1,084
Weah is the more natural fill in at center forward, and I'm all about it. I'm not sure there's anything he can't do that our #9 options can in the game we're anticipating.
 

SocrManiac

Tommy Seebach’s mustache
SoSH Member
Apr 15, 2006
7,131
Somers, CT
If Iran sits down and the US needs to break down a low block, Sargent/Wright are unlikely to provide much in the way of value. They aren’t targets. The US will need to maximize their creativity.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
17,299
Pittsburgh, PA
Not so sure I'd say Wright isn't a target guy. Maybe he's not a "stays between the posts" kind of Giroud type, but he's doing plenty of target-man stuff here:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQUbWHq3KLg

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulNDTrwyUoA


Antalyaspor is not facing a low block from that many teams, so I don't have much on that. Wright certainly seems best on the break or when doing hold-up as part of a counter. But he's got some headers hammered home, some fox-in-the-box movement stuff.
 
Last edited:

rguilmar

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
845
In a vacuum I’m all for having Weah as the 9 and Gio on the field. That being said, that is so far outside of what the US has done to this point and it seems like a major change, probably too much to just throw out there in the World Cup. I can’t recall all of the previous camps, but injuries probably denied the staff the possibility to even try it out in the unlikely event that it was ever considered. I’m about as far as Gregg defender on this board and I do have my seemingly endless criticisms of him, but this isn’t very high on the list at this point.

Speaking of criticizing Gregg, I’ll also take a wait-and-see approach regarding the Reyna controversy. It feels like something being stoked by one questionable source in Wynalda (I think other reports stem from him). I think he does have contact with Reyna the Elder which does give this Wynalda rumor some legs, but it’s entirely plausible that a young Gio Reyna feels good enough to play but the medical staff thinks otherwise, or at least that it comes at some risk to Gio. Honestly he didn’t look 100% fit in his cameo.

I’m pretty pleased with what has happened so far and am a little surprised at some of the criticisms of the USMNTs performance. The games weren’t perfect, and the second half against Wales was a bit disappointing, but I saw two games where the US played well enough to win. I’m not saying that they absolutely deserved to win, but performances where the most unfair result would have been a loss by the US. 2 points at this point isn’t ideal, but the performances justified two non-losses which I will definitely take. Soccer is a funny game, and the US could very easily be sitting on 6 points without being considered overly lucky. Hell, I was even impressed by GGGs tactical wrinkle against England.

A win or go home against Iran isn’t the worst thing in the world. I’m not sure Iran will totally bunker. They looked much better coming out of their shell against Wales. It won’t be a high line or anything like that, but they will have triggers to press the US like they did against Wales. Having both Azmoun and Taremi on the field made a major difference for them too, and I’m not sure a completely defensive performance with that lineup works. It’s possible Azmoun isn’t totally fit and Quieroz has to make a change, but I think Iran will play more attacking than most people think. Whatever the case, I doubt I’ll be sleeping much between now and Tuesday.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
29,087
So some genius fairly high up in USSF decided to show support for the protesters in Iran by removing the symbol of Allah from the Iranian flag in social media posts. The Iranians are obviously upset. Technically this is likely a violation of FIFA rules that is punished by a 10 match ban. Probably won't happen but they already deleted them and I assume USSF will be forced to issue an apology, but something to watch

View: https://twitter.com/JeffreyCarlisle/status/1596884807513882624?t=aGEgn8JFnALRwuB6sSLuOA&s=19
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
49,777
So some genius fairly high up in USSF decided to show support for the protesters in Iran by removing the symbol of Allah from the Iranian flag in social media posts. The Iranians are obviously upset. Technically this is likely a violation of FIFA rules that is punished by a 10 match ban.
It's a violation that could lead to a 10 match ban because of a social media post?

The team gets banned? The person that tweeted?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
29,087
It's a violation that could lead to a 10 match ban because of a social media post?

The team gets banned? The person that tweeted?
Nobody will get banned because FIFA never enforces any of those but it's multiple official statements from an official channel so... Probably the whole team if they went by letter of law. Especially given the statements that it was planned and not just some PR person going rogue
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
49,777
Nobody will get banned because FIFA never enforces any of those but it's multiple official statements from an official channel so... Probably the whole team if they went by letter of law. Especially given the statements that it was planned and not just some PR person going rogue
So just playing along--say the team gets a 10 match ban. How does that actually work? They forfeit Nations League? If they forfeit and therefore don't advance in tourney, and they have no qualifiers to play for the WC, where are the games coming from?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
29,087
So just playing along--say the team gets a 10 match ban. How does that actually work? They forfeit Nations League? If they forfeit and therefore don't advance in tourney, and they have no qualifiers to play for the WC, where are the games coming from?
Hypothetically... The US would forfeit their 3 matches in WC 2026 as the host.

Of course it's silly because that clause never gets invoked. Probably a fine and Infantino gets on TV to say that the USSF is a disgrace for being racist and Islamophobic and Iran and Qatar take a victory lap
 

JOBU

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 22, 2021
5,505
Great just poke the bear. Last thing we need right now is to give the Iranian soccer team some bulletin board material.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
17,299
Pittsburgh, PA
I hope the players are arranging with Iranian players behind the scenes to jointly kneel at the start of the game, as a prayer for peace in Iran. Something demonstrative but where they don't go too far in making a show of support for the protesters specifically (but everyone gets the message). Where FIFA can't claim it's some sort of political statement, because it's identical to what went on for years in the top leagues (and especially the EPL) after all the George Floyd protests. And it's not something that they wear, so FIFA doesn't have the usual leg to stand on to sanction them.

Odds of something like that happening are probably pretty low, but it would be a Tommie Smith and John Carlos-level statement that I think would be viewed as both appropriate and courageous.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
29,087
I hope the players are arranging with Iranian players behind the scenes to jointly kneel at the start of the game, as a prayer for peace in Iran. Something demonstrative but where they don't go too far in making a show of support for the protesters specifically (but everyone gets the message). Where FIFA can't claim it's some sort of political statement, because it's identical to what went on for years in the top leagues (and especially the EPL) after all the George Floyd protests. And it's not something that they wear, so FIFA doesn't have the usual leg to stand on to sanction them.

Odds of something like that happening are probably pretty low, but it would be a Tommie Smith and John Carlos-level statement that I think would be viewed as both appropriate and courageous.
There is zero indication that the Iranian players want that. It's just another example of Americans suddenly caring about what is going on in the world and making it about them.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
17,299
Pittsburgh, PA
I'm not sure either of us know what the Iranian players want, but from what I've seen they'd like to express solidarity and also would like to not be thrown in prison when they get home. I'm sure it's a delicate situation to be in.

Calling a (hypothetical) expression of solidarity "making it about them[selves]" is an odd and uncharitable choice of how to frame it, though. Maybe the Iranians would prefer nothing of the sort be done because of their own personal risk assessment, but I doubt they would view an offer of doing something like that to be a self-centered gesture.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
29,087
I'm not sure either of us know what the Iranian players want, but from what I've seen they'd like to express solidarity and also would like to not be thrown in prison when they get home. I'm sure it's a delicate situation to be in.

Calling a (hypothetical) expression of solidarity "making it about them[selves]" is an odd and uncharitable choice of how to frame it, though. Maybe the Iranians would prefer nothing of the sort be done because of their own personal risk assessment, but I doubt they would view an offer of doing something like that to be a self-centered gesture.
The Iranian team has played 2 matches, they have given dozens of interviews. If they had any interest in protesting their government they have had ample opportunity. The idea that they were just waiting for the US (widely despised in Iran) to show their them how is the worst kind of American white savior bullshit.
 

candylandriots

unkempt
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 30, 2004
11,590
Berlin

candylandriots

unkempt
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 30, 2004
11,590
Berlin
OK I missed a few, doesn't really change the point that the Iranian team as a whole hasn't shown any intention for a mass statement and certainly wasn't waiting on the USMNT to get involved
I don't disagree with your point that the Iranians don't need the US to "help" them, but I think it's pretty clear from their actions, and in some cases, words, that they seem to genuinely care about the situation. Of course none of us know for certain what their private views are, but let's put it this way...has any Iranian player in Qatar come out in favor of the regime? I think the answer to that question is probably the most instructive of their views. I don't know if it's fair for us to criticize this or that player's lack of public statement on the issue, as we have no idea who is in a safe enough position to be openly critical.

Edit: that the players are young and likely much more exposed to life outside Iran than the typical Iranian, it would be more surprising to me if they weren't in favor of the protests.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
17,299
Pittsburgh, PA
I'll add that the US is "widely despised" by the Government of Iran, because that's part of their original claims to legitimacy; the beliefs of the average Iranian are far more mixed, in poll after poll. In a trivial but illustrative example, the authorities paint US and Israeli flags at the entrances to buildings, so that people have to step on them, and lots of passers-by assiduously avoid stepping on them.

All the protest organizers have said publicly that they don't want the US to overtly give material support to the movement, they want it to be organic, and not have people questioning whether it's really some CIA-backed plot. Fair enough. But that's a far cry from "soccer players with billions of eyes on them shouldn't make a gesture of solidarity".

I don't know where you're getting "white savior bullshit" and "[not like they're] waiting for the USMNT to get involved". The protests have been going on for months now, they're not "waiting for" anything. At the same time, in a controlled media environment, average Iranians have a more-limited ability to find out the truth of what's happening - to discern whether it enjoys mass support or is (as the regime surely claims) the work of a few isolated provocateurs. Gestures by their national team are a big deal in that regard. Whether they'd find a modest supportive gesture by the USMNT to be helpful or not, I can't say, I'm just saying I hope we've offered.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
29,087
I'll add that the US is "widely despised" by the Government of Iran, because that's part of their original claims to legitimacy; the beliefs of the average Iranian are far more mixed, in poll after poll. In a trivial but illustrative example, the authorities paint US and Israeli flags at the entrances to buildings, so that people have to step on them, and lots of passers-by assiduously avoid stepping on them.

All the protest organizers have said publicly that they don't want the US to overtly give material support to the movement, they want it to be organic, and not have people questioning whether it's really some CIA-backed plot. Fair enough. But that's a far cry from "soccer players with billions of eyes on them shouldn't make a gesture of solidarity".

I don't know where you're getting "white savior bullshit" and "[not like they're] waiting for the USMNT to get involved". The protests have been going on for months now, they're not "waiting for" anything. At the same time, in a controlled media environment, average Iranians have a more-limited ability to find out the truth of what's happening - to discern whether it enjoys mass support or is (as the regime surely claims) the work of a few isolated provocateurs. Gestures by their national team are a big deal in that regard. Whether they'd find a modest supportive gesture by the USMNT to be helpful or not, I can't say, I'm just saying I hope we've offered.
I'm talking about the National team. If they were kneeling before games then yes, it would be a nice supportive gesture to say "hey is it cool if we kneel as well", but when the team as a unit has NOT done those things, it's not really a supportive gesture, it's an outsider stepping in and saying "hey we know what you should do", and in particular it's Americans, who have a long history in that part of the world of saying "hey we know what you should do" right before they make things worse. The whole point is that the starting point of the whole thing isn't "hey the Iranian team is doing a thing, let's support them" it's "I want to show my opinion on this so let's do something". Same as the original thing which was the flag, nobody asked them to do that, they chose to. And they did it in a way that was likely insulting to a number of Iranians who don't support the current regime.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
17,299
Pittsburgh, PA
I think I'm going to decline to continue this tangent.

In any case I doubt that FIFA will do anything about the flag nonsense, since that was quickly rectified and an apology issued. They want obedience, they don't want the financial loss from the US being kicked out of big tournaments.