Under the radar: how has pitch speed measurement changed?

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
16,853
I had heard that the radar devices used to measure pitch speed have changed over the years, but had idea how much or when they changed. I thought this question and answer on billjames.com was really interesting:

In the documentary "Fastball," the filmmakers estimated that Nolan Ryan’s fastest pitch ever as recorded by 1970s technology, registered 101 in the 1970s, but would have registered 110 by today’s methods. The difference? 1970s pitch velocity was measured as it crossed the plate. Pitches today are clocked very close to their release point.
Asked by: evanecurb

Bill James Answered: 9/19/2021

"I have not seen the documentary you refer to... but I don't know that I would go so far as to assert that Ryan threw 110; that seems to me to be pushing the evidence to Ryan's advantage. If he threw 101 on the radar guns available at that time, that was probably one pitch, you know? Next pitch might have been 98.

This is my understanding of it. ..and those who made the documentary you refer to probably had a tighter grip on some of this than I do, and I encourage you to watch it if you are interested in the subject.

But TV networks got radar guns about 1977 or 1978, and we started to see radar readings then. Ryan (and Goose Gossage) would throw 97 and 98, sometimes 99, on those guns. There was a key moment in the post-season, 1980 or 1981, when one of the networks was using a NEWER model of radar gun. . . .I kind of half-remember the brand names, so i won't get into that. . . but one of the networks had been provided a new radar gun which was getting faster readings, 2 or 3 MPH faster. Jim Palmer said something about not believing the gun, which triggered backlash from the company which had provided the new guns, and they explained that it was the OLD readings that were wrong; THEIR readings werre actually the first ones that were right, because they were picking up the ball sooner, and, since it decelerates as it travels, they got higher readings. I believe that they threatened to sue, the network had to apologize for Palmer's comment, and the newer radar guns, which got faster readings, took over the market, by 1983.

BUT THIS STORY THEN REPEATED ITSELF TWO MORE TIMES. When I joined the Red Sox in late 2002 and started sitting in the scout seats, there were two styles of guns that the scouts used, so that you would look to your right and the scout there would have a reading of 94, and then you would look to your left and the scout would have a reading of 91. So you would look to see whether it was a JUGS gun or the other one, Pro-something.

Well, the scouts unified around the faster guns within a year or so. But ten years later, this happened AGAIN; the guns got faster again. They got faster readings because they were picking the ball up sooner, closer to the pitcher's hand.

So Ryan's 97-98, sometimes 99 in 1977 and 1978. . .what is that now? It's AT LEAST 104, maybe 106, not sure I'm going to buy 110.

But Ryan by 1978 was past 30, and he had thrown more than 2,000 major league innings, and his biggest strikeout seasons were behind him. So is it possible he was a couple of MPH faster in 1972? Sure.

As I say, I have not seen the documentary, but I have not seen the evidence that would justify pinning Ryan's pitch at 110. But suggesting that today's pitchers throw harder than anybody did in the 1970s.. . . .I don't see the evidence for THAT, either. "

Note: the documentary discussed is on Amazon Prime and came out 5 years ago:
View: https://www.amazon.com/Fastball-Kevin-Costner/dp/B01D99U9LI


I haven't seen this film, so I don't know exactly what it says or how accurate it is.

The way pitch velocity is measured has clearly changed a lot over the past few decades. And who knows, it will probably change again. Presumably each time the radar machines change, the measurement becomes more accurate, but it then becomes impossible to compare against previous radar readings without being adjusted somehow. But what adjustment can be made?

Did Nolan Ryan really throw faster than anyone else ever?
How fast would the fastballs of Pedro, Clemens, etc. be with the current radar equipment?
How does today's 97 mph fastball compare with a 97 mph fastball from 1999?
 
Last edited:

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,805
The pitchers are definitely faster today because literally everyone is better athletically than they were in 70s. Players run faster, hit the ball harder and jump higher than their predecessors, and that naturally includes throwing the ball harder. That is the evolution of sports science across all athletic endeavors. People who want to believe Nolan Ryan threw a baseball 110 mph are the same people who probably belive Bo Jackson ran a 4.10 40. People who desperately want to believe that the elite athletes of their youth are better than best athletes of today, when basically all science and analytical evidence suggests the contrary.

IIRC, a few seasons ago MLB changed how they were going to register pitch velocity, electing a system that measured the ball closer to where it was released from the pitcher's hand as opposed to halfway to home plate. This was believed to artificially inflate how fast pitches were being reported, which led to a small uptick in average pitching velocity across the league.
 

terrynever

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 25, 2005
21,717
pawtucket
The pitchers are definitely faster today because literally everyone is better athletically than they were in 70s. Players run faster, hit the ball harder and jump higher than their predecessors, and that naturally includes throwing the ball harder. That is the evolution of sports science across all athletic endeavors. People who want to believe Nolan Ryan threw a baseball 110 mph are the same people who probably belive Bo Jackson ran a 4.10 40. People who desperately want to believe that the elite athletes of their youth are better than best athletes of today, when basically all science and analytical evidence suggests the contrary.

IIRC, a few seasons ago MLB changed how they were going to register pitch velocity, electing a system that measured the ball closer to where it was released from the pitcher's hand as opposed to halfway to home plate. This was believed to artificially inflate how fast pitches were being reported, which led to a small uptick in average pitching velocity across the league.
Kliq, I mostly agree with your take on this with one caveat. There were only a few pitchers throwing really hard in the 1970s so hitters were not able to time them with much success, like you see in today’s game, where many hitters start to lock in on 100 mph after a few pitches. They see way more hard throwers than in the old days.

George Brett, though, you could see him timing Gossage’s shit because Goose had no second pitch that hitters had to respect. Ryan had two or three other pitches, as did JR Richard.

Modern pitchers are bigger and faster, for sure, but the javelin-tossing techniques used at pitching academies have added velocity just in the last 10 years.
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
16,853
The pitchers are definitely faster today because literally everyone is better athletically than they were in 70s. Players run faster, hit the ball harder and jump higher than their predecessors, and that naturally includes throwing the ball harder. That is the evolution of sports science across all athletic endeavors. People who want to believe Nolan Ryan threw a baseball 110 mph are the same people who probably belive Bo Jackson ran a 4.10 40. People who desperately want to believe that the elite athletes of their youth are better than best athletes of today, when basically all science and analytical evidence suggests the contrary.

IIRC, a few seasons ago MLB changed how they were going to register pitch velocity, electing a system that measured the ball closer to where it was released from the pitcher's hand as opposed to halfway to home plate. This was believed to artificially inflate how fast pitches were being reported, which led to a small uptick in average pitching velocity across the league.
Where is all this science analytical evidence that you refer to?

The point is, the measuring devices have changed, and that means the velocities of pitchers from earlier areas should be adjusted upward. The only question is how much. In his response, Bill James suggests Ryan threw at least 104, and probably faster.

The 110 mph figure was suggested by the documentary, and rejected by James. I mean if you read what he said, that's all pretty clear, and your response doesn't really address that, it just comes off as "Blah blah old people blah."

Your last paragraph is weird, because it basically just repeats what Bill James says in his response, but without the concept that the radar measuring devices have changed multiple times over the years, not just once.
 

GoJeff!

Member
SoSH Member
May 30, 2007
2,033
Los Angeles
People often assert this with very little evidence

View: https://youtu.be/8COaMKbNrX0
The weird thing about that TED talk is that despite his framing, modern athletes are better, faster, stronger, and he says as much in the presentation.

Sure, technology is responsible for a lot of the extreme advances, but in his own examples, GOAT-level athletes have been surpassed by modern athletes when you level the technological playing field. He shows that Eddy Merckx has only lost the hour record by 800 feet when the technology is kept constant. But that's 800 feet more than EDDY MERCKX, the most dominant biker of all time.

The second part of the talk is that a larger pool of athletes and more specialization is responsible for athletic improvement. Okay, but it is still athletic improvement. Maybe training doesn't matter as much as we think, but the top athletes today are clearly much better.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,314
I think people overestimate how much training has changed over the decades. Yes, junior high and high school and college programs in general are more consistently modern, and I’m sure many athletes are benefitting from starting training at 14 rather than 18 or 22.

But, all the training techniques used come out of the 50s and 60s. Plus, the drugs were as good, if not better than.