Trevor Story has signed with the Boston Red Sox

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,870
Maine
Is there any scenario where Story opts out and the Sox don't add year 7 to nullify it?
Sure. Maybe one in which Yorke and Mayer have both arrived and taken over the middle infield and the Sox would prefer to have the money to lock up Casas or Houck or someone like that.
 

Otis Foster

rex ryan's podiatrist
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
1,712
I don't believe he's committed to anything explicitly. It's still just reporters and pundits reading the tea leaves and making assumptions at this point.
I was wondering the other way around, that Bloom has had preliminary conversations with Boras that lead him to believe it's going to be a long shot to keep X, and that Story is significantly a hedge against that.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,470
Oregon
So a contract lower than expected means a team overpaid and a contract higher than expected would also mean team overpaid? ;)
The way this thread is trending, by the end of the day half the board will be hoping he opts out ... if just because it's better for the team
 

koufax32

He'll cry if he wants to...
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2006
9,106
Duval
A thank you to the folks here who have posted or shared links about the positive and negative effects of Coors Field. Yet another reason why this place is the best.

As far as how FA contracts go, this is a pretty good one. Just add a 100 ops+ guy in RF who plays pretty good defense, and the lineup is looking really good.

Imagine if they had signed Suzuki too? Man…
 

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
921
So a contract lower than expected means a team overpaid and a contract higher than expected would also mean team overpaid? ;)
What thread are you reading? Is anyone saying he is overpaid with this deal? I'm certainly not making that argument. I'm happy the sox got him at a contract lower than expected. I hope the reason for the lower than expected contract is the sequence of signings not problems with his elbow.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,899
Sure. Maybe one in which Yorke and Mayer have both arrived and taken over the middle infield and the Sox would prefer to have the money to lock up Casas or Houck or someone like that.
Don't you take the option & trade him in that scenario?
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,470
Oregon
Is there any scenario where Story opts out and the Sox don't add year 7 to nullify it?
He'll be 33 when he can opt out. The way trends are going in baseball, nullifying it pays him for his age 34-35-36 seasons.

The Sox might be fine with him opting out
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Depends on the market and who might be interested in a 33 year old middle infielder owed ~$60-65M for three years.
If he opted out, there's a good chance he knows his market is a lot higher than 3/60-65.

I don't really get the point of the player option for Story. If he's great, the Sox add on another year. If he's not, he doesn't opt out.

edit: the 7th year at $20 mil isn't so bad. I guess that's the point.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,214
A thank you to the folks here who have posted or shared links about the positive and negative effects of Coors Field. Yet another reason why this place is the best.

As far as how FA contracts go, this is a pretty good one. Just add a 100 ops+ guy in RF who plays pretty good defense, and the lineup is looking really good.

Imagine if they had signed Suzuki too? Man…
Agreed. Story/Suzuki would have fit this team’s needs like a glove (on paper, at least). But the addition of Story should help this team tread water for the first half of the season when we’ll hopefully have guys like Sale, Paxton, Casas, etc. joining. Chaim will surely scour the league for a RF upgrade and there will probably be more options as the season unfolds.
 

Niastri

Member
SoSH Member
This isn't OOTP baseball. Xander has said he has no interest in moving off of SS, and managing people is part of managing a baseball team. Unless Xander changes his mind, I do not envision this happening.
True, but I wouldn't be surprised if Bogaerts gets a day off every week and half a day off at DH periodically. This would give Story time at SS, to keep Story sharp and get some value out of his superior glove.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,899
True. But for some teams, paying a free agent 3/70-75 might be more interesting to them than paying the same guy 3/60-65 and giving up a prospect or two.
But even if it's a mid-tier prospect that wouldn't stop the Red Sox from opting in.

A mid-tier prospect is more than nothing.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,334
Passan says opt out after Y4. Looks like he’ll be here for a while and a hedge against X leaving. Great move.
I know when raised as an option in the off-season thread people doubted story would move to second, but this always made sense in part because Of the hedge you allude to above. I hope they resign X…and they are better situated for that discussion now.

optionality is not often a benefit of a six year $140 mil deal but in this case it was
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,170
Imaginationland
If he opted out, there's a good chance he knows his market is a lot higher than 3/60-65.

I don't really get the point of the player option for Story. If he's great, the Sox add on another year. If he's not, he doesn't opt out.

edit: the 7th year at $20 mil isn't so bad. I guess that's the point.
It's a simple as in four years Story might see himself as worth more than 2/40 (or however it's structured), while the Red Sox might not see him as worth 3/60. It's real straightforward if Story is a perennial all star or if he gets hurt a bunch and is replacement level, but it very well might not be that black and white.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,362
Miami (oh, Miami!)
In this case I think it’s better to say “impatient.” Dumb would be believing that the Sox were fine as constituted before this signing, or unaware of how the competition has been improving…
I mean, the competition always adds players, so we have to add players too. The Yanks in particular have just added and added and added - they must have like 400 players!

(In recent years, I've been shifting to "dumb.")
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,031
What thread are you reading? Is anyone saying he is overpaid with this deal? I'm certainly not making that argument.
No...follow along--

Generally speaking if a player gets a contract higher than everyone expected the basic thought is that someone overpaid. And now, because of this thread, we can add the thought that if the contract is lower than we thought then somehow we also paid too much.

I was having a bit of fun with the idea that a contract lower than expected is somehow an issue.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,470
Oregon
No...follow along--

Generally speaking if a player gets a contract higher than everyone expected the basic thought is that someone overpaid. And now, because of this thread, we can add the thought that if the contract is lower than we thought then somehow we also paid too much.

I was having a bit of fun with the idea that a contract lower than expected is somehow an issue.
IMSITOK
 

TapeAndPosts

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2006
581
The more I think about it, the more I like the structure of the Red Sox having a 7th year option that can override the player’s opt-out after year 4. We get the player’s age 29-32 years for sure. Then if Story’s been great and wants to test free agency at age 32, we can pick up the option and have him for years 33-35, effectively a 3-year deal. If he opts out and his performance has been more borderline, we can let him go. It’s a nice veto on the opt-out with a relatively low marginal cost of one more year.

Free agent deals for All-Star-quality players to, but not beyond, their mid 30s is generally how far my comfort zone stretches, so this seems just right to me. I’d like to see more team options in response to player opt-outs like this.
 

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
44,902
Mtigawi
I love this deal. Flex your financial muscles on premium positions where there is an absolutely finite supply. Use your hustling resources to fill the outfield where there is a greater supply and more room for error.

* except for Pablo Sandoval. Fuck him and that deal.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,675
FWIW: by the Baseball Trade Simulator (methodology here), here are the trade values of this offseason’s big bats at the deals they signed (in order of positive to negative value):

Correa: 15.2
Freeman: 2
Schwarber: 2
Canha: 0.8
Rizzo: 0
Taylor: -1.6
Marte: -5
Garcia: -5.9
Story: -7
Baez: -17.4
Semien: -21.9
Seager: -28.2
Castellanos: -33.7
Bryant: -76.4 (lmao)

So, Correa’s weird deal aside, the Story signing is on paper a far better value than the other shortstop contracts.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,988
Isle of Plum
I love this deal. Flex your financial muscles on premium positions where there is an absolutely finite supply. Use your hustling resources to fill the outfield where there is a greater supply and more room for error.

* except for Pablo Sandoval. Fuck him and that deal.
Yes and yes.

Others have complimented the seemingly very reasonable overall term but the former financial engineer in me loves the structure itself: it’s such a clever risk hedge that shares between the parties and I’m not aware of something implemented this way
 

Bongorific

Thinks he’s clever
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,444
Balboa Towers
I love this deal. Flex your financial muscles on premium positions where there is an absolutely finite supply. Use your hustling resources to fill the outfield where there is a greater supply and more room for error.

* except for Pablo Sandoval. Fuck him and that deal.
Thumbs up emoji

A great middle infield glove that can rake at less than $25m per? Those players don’t grow on trees. This deal makes me happy happy.
 

Minneapolis Millers

Wants you to please think of the Twins fans!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,753
Twin Cities
It’s interesting/odd that the Sox can override Story’s opt out by adding just one year at a lower annual value than the rest of the deal. The better Story plays, the less value that opt out really has for him. (I’d have wanted a $25M/year add-on.).

It’s almost like he wants the team to have an incentive to keep him longer. Hey, maybe he really wants to be here!!
 

BravesField

New Member
Oct 27, 2021
258
Let's not forget the 20 SB last year. Hopefully Duran can make the team to give us at least 2 guys who can run.
 

allmanbro

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
363
Portland, Maine
I haven't been able to find any direct study of this, but someone must have looked into some version of it in some similar situation, but: how many more plays would we actually expect to be made with Story SS/Xander 2b as opposed to Xander SS/Story 2b. How many more balls are hit to SS than 2b, and how do we figure out the number either is likely to make? I'd bet the FO has a pretty specific model of this. I would also not be surprised if it turns out not to make as big of a difference as one might expect. Positioning matters too, which complicates it: Presumably Story can be shaded towards the middle more than normal against RHH to make up some for Xander's range.
 

MtPleasant Paul

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2015
169
So much for the idea, pedaled around since l'affaire Mookie, that John Henry won't spend. Looking forward to the CHB's next column.

A big benefit of this deal for Story is that he gets to play with a contender. So many previous big money deals have been given by desperate, often ill-run, teams that don't contend - viz the Alex Rodriguez, Albert Pujols, Mike Trout, Giancarlo Stanton and Alverado contracts and, possibly the new Correa and Bryant ones.

The Story deal is a prototype for what the Red Sox might offer to Xander this winter - 6 years at $140,000,000. They are the same age.
 

Diamond Don Aase

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 16, 2001
1,094
Merrimack Valley
A big benefit of this deal for Story is that he gets to play with a contender. So many previous big money deals have been given by desperate, often ill-run, teams that don't contend - viz the Alex Rodriguez, Albert Pujols, Mike Trout, Giancarlo Stanton and Alverado contracts and, possibly the new Correa and Bryant ones.
I realize that his repeated struggles with control can be frustrating but I had no idea that Jose Alvarado’s arbitration raise from a million dollars was so onerous.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,837
Honolulu HI
Love the signing - but as long as he can still play short - you'd have to think this sets up 2022 as the end of Xander's tenure in Boston.
I've always loved Xander but he is never going to be worth what he thinks he's worth because he simply isn't the defender that he thinks he is. And his Jeter-esque insistence to stick at short is really the nail in the coffin for his Boston career, even more so now that Story is on the team.
Honestly, I think it's pretty ridiculous that they are willing to cater to him this year - but there is no way (barring Story's arm falling off) that the team can commit to any future with him at SS past 2022. Story is a far, far better defender, and if the Sox don't see X in their longterm plans (which I'm guessing they don't) I'm not sure why Cora shouldn't just insist he move this season. I get that it would do some short-term damage to the clubhouse culture, but I also feel like X is not inherently, a trouble maker and while he'll be pissed initially, he'll eventually adjust and adapt. At this point, the worst case scenario (other than a catastrophic injury to Story) is probably signing X long-term with a promise to allow him to replicate what his idol did to the Yankees and decimate this team's defense at short throughout his 30s.
 

Farty Barrett

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2012
49
Does it make more sense for the better defender to switch positions in this case? Im thinking Javier Baez moving around the infield for the Cubs when Russell was playing lots of short and Castro at 2nd. Baez was always the better SS but was athletic enough to play all over when it helped.
Because I’d be concerned with Xander moving to the other side of the base. Im aware the move from SS is down the spectrum, but the angles, coverage and footwork would all need adjustments.
He’s maybe not the best guy for the move to 2nd base. Third base on the other hand makes a ton of sense, as does LF. But he’ll make that decision next year.
 

MtPleasant Paul

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2015
169
I realize that his repeated struggles with control can be frustrating but I had no idea that Jose Alvarado’s arbitration raise from a million dollars was so onerous.
My bad - Nolan Arenado. Also, add Corey Seager to the list of long-term contracts given by noncompetitive teams.
 

TapeAndPosts

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2006
581
I am having a fantasy where after Xander and Trevor work together for a lot of the season and get used to being DP partners, then maybe X has to miss a week or two and Story plays short, and everyone sees how good Story is there, and Xander volunteers to exchange positions. Like it’s one thing to be pushed aside by a new guy, but maybe it’s easier to switch roles with a teammate and partner you’re already comfortable with. Combine that with an extension for Xander at slightly higher AAV than Story and maybe we are all set until Mayer gets here.

I know it’s more likely Xander opts out and leaves after this year, and Story puts us in a good position for that. But a guy can dream.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,837
Honolulu HI
Does it make more sense for the better defender to switch positions in this case? Im thinking Javier Baez moving around the infield for the Cubs when Russell was playing lots of short and Castro at 2nd. Baez was always the better SS but was athletic enough to play all over when it helped.
Because I’d be concerned with Xander moving to the other side of the base. Im aware the move from SS is down the spectrum, but the angles, coverage and footwork would all need adjustments.
He’s maybe not the best guy for the move to 2nd base. Third base on the other hand makes a ton of sense, as does LF. But he’ll make that decision next year.
Considering how little time we have till the start of the season, I guess that might make some sense. That said, I think the bigger concern is that Xander’s recent comments suggest he’s probably not willing to consider a change, and it doesn’t seem like that’s likely to change in a year. With Story now in the fold, under no circumstances should the Sox consider signing Xander long term unless he’s willing to move.