Tom Brady is retiring

JOBU

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 22, 2021
6,347
I’m ok with Brady being a part owner. Raiders fans hate this man. This has got to piss the fuck out of raiders fans… so naturally, im on board.

I really know one Raiders fan. He is convinced that the “Tuck Rule” is an absolute sham and it was the league trying to stick it to Oakland. He is convinced that if the raiders win that game they go on to win the Super Bowl and have a dynasty. Usually at that point I ask him “how the tuck rule game made the raiders lose the Super Bowl the following year??” That always shuts him up.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
44,813
This has got to piss the fuck out of raiders fans. I’m ok with this. They hate this man.

I really know one Raiders fan. He is convinced that the “Tuck Rule” is an absolute sham and it was the league trying to stick it to Oakland. He is convinced that if the raiders win that game they go on to win the Super Bowl and have a dynasty. Usually at that point I ask him “how the tuck rule game made the raiders lose the Super Bowl the following year??” That always shuts him up.
And Brady’s presence will just make them think of that play even more. Win win.
 

E5 Yaz

Transcends message boarding
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
83,762
Oregon
Can a part owner of a team being a broadcaster? I mean, the game-site team meets with the coaches and key players; I can't imagine being comfortable sharing stuff with the owner of a team you have to face.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
18,542
I’m ok with Brady being a part owner. Raiders fans hate this man. This has got to piss the fuck out of raiders fans… so naturally, im on board.
Yeah, it's like Ben Dreith (may he RIP -- Rot in Pieces) buying a share of the Pats.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
6,408
Imaginationland
I’m ok with Brady being a part owner. Raiders fans hate this man. This has got to piss the fuck out of raiders fans… so naturally, im on board.

I really know one Raiders fan. He is convinced that the “Tuck Rule” is an absolute sham and it was the league trying to stick it to Oakland. He is convinced that if the raiders win that game they go on to win the Super Bowl and have a dynasty. Usually at that point I ask him “how the tuck rule game made the raiders lose the Super Bowl the following year??” That always shuts him up.
I know a few, and it's one of the more baffling things out there. The Raiders had to play on WC weekend and were underdogs in the road in the divisional round of the playoffs. And they made the super bowl the following year. This news just makes me smile.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
28,630
I’m ok with Brady being a part owner. Raiders fans hate this man. This has got to piss the fuck out of raiders fans… so naturally, im on board.

I really know one Raiders fan. He is convinced that the “Tuck Rule” is an absolute sham and it was the league trying to stick it to Oakland. He is convinced that if the raiders win that game they go on to win the Super Bowl and have a dynasty. Usually at that point I ask him “how the tuck rule game made the raiders lose the Super Bowl the following year??” That always shuts him up.
Isnt the obvious answer that Gruden would still be the coach so he wouldn’t be able to take Bill Callahan’s lunch money from the other sideline?
 

JOBU

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 22, 2021
6,347
Isnt the obvious answer that Gruden would still be the coach so he wouldn’t be able to take Bill Callahan’s lunch money from the other sideline?
Sure. And Grady Little was going to lead the Red Sox to back to back titles in 2003-2004.