Of note….Mark Davis has no heirs. Wonder if Brady has first right of refusal and is playing the long game.
Of note….Mark Davis has no heirs. Wonder if Brady has first right of refusal and is playing the long game.
Why is Jets Raiders so hot? Just Rodgers and degenerate Jets fans?https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/tom-brady-patriots-gillette-stadium-return-honoring-ticket-prices-hottest-ticket-2023-nfl-season/
How high do we think the ticket prices go? $3K?
He owned them as a player, and now he owns them after he’s done playing.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/37709945/tom-brady-reaches-agreement-buy-ownership-stake-raidersDavis, though, had no comment when asked if Brady finally admitted to him if the Tuck Rule play was actually a fumble.
And Brady’s presence will just make them think of that play even more. Win win.This has got to piss the fuck out of raiders fans. I’m ok with this. They hate this man.
I really know one Raiders fan. He is convinced that the “Tuck Rule” is an absolute sham and it was the league trying to stick it to Oakland. He is convinced that if the raiders win that game they go on to win the Super Bowl and have a dynasty. Usually at that point I ask him “how the tuck rule game made the raiders lose the Super Bowl the following year??” That always shuts him up.
Yeah, it's like Ben Dreith (may he RIP -- Rot in Pieces) buying a share of the Pats.I’m ok with Brady being a part owner. Raiders fans hate this man. This has got to piss the fuck out of raiders fans… so naturally, im on board.
More like Robert Kraft inviting Eli Manning in as a Pats minority owner.Yeah, it's like Ben Dreith (may he RIP -- Rot in Pieces) buying a share of the Pats.
I know a few, and it's one of the more baffling things out there. The Raiders had to play on WC weekend and were underdogs in the road in the divisional round of the playoffs. And they made the super bowl the following year. This news just makes me smile.I’m ok with Brady being a part owner. Raiders fans hate this man. This has got to piss the fuck out of raiders fans… so naturally, im on board.
I really know one Raiders fan. He is convinced that the “Tuck Rule” is an absolute sham and it was the league trying to stick it to Oakland. He is convinced that if the raiders win that game they go on to win the Super Bowl and have a dynasty. Usually at that point I ask him “how the tuck rule game made the raiders lose the Super Bowl the following year??” That always shuts him up.
Isnt the obvious answer that Gruden would still be the coach so he wouldn’t be able to take Bill Callahan’s lunch money from the other sideline?I’m ok with Brady being a part owner. Raiders fans hate this man. This has got to piss the fuck out of raiders fans… so naturally, im on board.
I really know one Raiders fan. He is convinced that the “Tuck Rule” is an absolute sham and it was the league trying to stick it to Oakland. He is convinced that if the raiders win that game they go on to win the Super Bowl and have a dynasty. Usually at that point I ask him “how the tuck rule game made the raiders lose the Super Bowl the following year??” That always shuts him up.
Sure. And Grady Little was going to lead the Red Sox to back to back titles in 2003-2004.Isnt the obvious answer that Gruden would still be the coach so he wouldn’t be able to take Bill Callahan’s lunch money from the other sideline?