well playedIt's clearly having an impact on the draft picks, they've really struggled.
well playedIt's clearly having an impact on the draft picks, they've really struggled.
JT's Dad admitted that he would probably trade his son for AD, and then in follow-up interview, JT said that he would trade himself for AD.Genuine question: for all the schadenfreude here about how the Lakers' youngsters are getting messed up by the rumor mill, is it possible that the Celtics have underachieved relative to expectations this season in part for that same exact reason? I mean, everyone knows everyone is potentially on the block and sacrifice-able in Ainge's quest to get better, and most Celtics fans would eagerly lose even Tatum to get (and keep) AD.
Agreed.JT's Dad admitted that he would probably trade his son for AD, and then in follow-up interview, JT said that he would trade himself for AD.
So no, I don't think it's affecting JT.
As for JB, I think he's soaking it all in.
Besides, there's a difference between teams exploring trades and having the best player of your team try to jettison you for someone else. Antonio Daniels (who apparently does NO games) made this point on the radio yesterday. It kind of sucks when your teammate says that you're not good enough to win with.
Hopefully, 75 years from now, CHB's grandson is writing a book called, "The Curse of Lavar".STRAIGHT INTO MY VEINS
The Lakers "trade my son they'll never get a championship. ... LeBron James without Lonzo is not going to win a championship in L.A. I guarantee that."
They didn't land LeBron. He moved himself there. He is the GMthe monumental feat that was landing Lebron
You're right to be skeptical. They are a tire fire.Outside of the monumental feat that was landing Lebron the Lakers haven't been any better under Magic and Pelinka than they were with Buss and Kupchak. Think about their last 18 months for a moment. In the 2018 offseason alone they failed in their pursuit of a second star, mismanaged their funds in free agency, and chose the wrong veteran free agents. They bungled their trade pursuits of Paul George, Kawhi and AD. They chose Ball and Ingram over Russell and Randle. Has anything gone right? They are basically down to this offseason to right the ship and I'm skeptical.
Yeah I’m not sure how much credit the front office gets for “LeBron said he was going to sign with you and you didn’t say no.”They didn't land LeBron. He moved himself there. He is the GM
Carmelo on the Lakers is too perfect. Can't happen soon enough.
Good drafting of Hart and Kumza, other than that not much. If you ask Laker fans Kuzma is better than Tatum right now (no seriously, they actually think that)Outside of the monumental feat that was landing Lebron the Lakers haven't been any better under Magic and Pelinka than they were with Buss and Kupchak. Think about their last 18 months for a moment. In the 2018 offseason alone they failed in their pursuit of a second star, mismanaged their funds in free agency, and chose the wrong veteran free agents. They bungled their trade pursuits of Paul George, Kawhi and AD. They chose Ball and Ingram over Russell and Randle. Has anything gone right? They are basically down to this offseason to right the ship and I'm skeptical.
Outside of the monumental feat that was landing Lebron the Lakers haven't been any better under Magic and Pelinka than they were with Buss and Kupchak.
They are going to be a playoff team this year and will make some noise if they play like they did when they were healthy earlier this season. This summer they have room for a max contract in a year when there are are several legit max contract players available. They'll be fine.The Lakers were the 2 seed in the West before LeBron got hurt.
That's true. But before Lebron got hurt, the Lakers had a better record than the Celtics. The point is, with Lebron, they are a high quality playoff team. Without him, they are garbage.(see Cleveland, 2018 versus 2019)Lakers were not the 2 seed before Lebron got hurt. DEN, GSW, and OKC all had better records
I'm not sure that Magic is really up for the job, though. He's been played by NO and by Jerry West across town. It's a mystery to me why Buss didn't give the GM job to West.
This is well put. He moves there for non basketball reasons as much as anything else. He is making all these shows now etc.They didn't land LeBron. He moved himself there. He is the GM
They did get out of that horrid Mozgov contract and also got the Kuzma pick, so it was at least something. But they certainly sold low on Russell, who is looking more like what was envision when he was drafted.They dumped Russell for nothing.
I don't know how you can draw any conclusions when everything they have been doing is geared for this summers FA and trade market. They are exactly where they expected to be with a bunch of young players and a bunch of one-year veterans to bridge the gap until they can utilize their cap space this summer. The only attempt that was made was one that had no chance of occurring in closing an AD deal prior to the Celtics being involved but it didn't cost them anything to try.Outside of the monumental feat that was landing Lebron the Lakers haven't been any better under Magic and Pelinka than they were with Buss and Kupchak. Think about their last 18 months for a moment. In the 2018 offseason alone they failed in their pursuit of a second star, mismanaged their funds in free agency, and chose the wrong veteran free agents. They bungled their trade pursuits of Paul George, Kawhi and AD. They chose Ball and Ingram over Russell and Randle. Has anything gone right? They are basically down to this offseason to right the ship and I'm skeptical.
You mean by winning a Championship? That is the Lakers only goal over the next 4-5 years. How are deals that accomplish that goal, like the ones made in Miami and Cleveland, ever considered a bad deal?I can't see the Lakers tenure ending any different that his previous stops. Forcing the team to make bad deals to help him out RIGHT NOW and then walking away leaving a mess.
This is more or less true. I think Magic/Pelinka are dubious...but not the shitshow of Kupchak/Buss -- that was a disaster. You're right that in essence with maybe a mis-step or two (Zubac, I agree..maybe that's debatable -- couldn't they have waited until after they have signed a 2nd star and then have the right to overpay him? Or, if they don't get that star, sign him?) they've basically done what they had to do. Clean house; clear salary; get one (huge) star; have the path to a 2nd star; and a decent supporting cast around them; they've also drafted well with late picks in Kuzma and Hart. And they made a good signing in Rondo and even the bad signings (Lance, primarily) were just one-year deals, so they're on course. But the Lance and Beasley signings; not signing shooters; not just trading Russell but trashing him on the way out; and drafting Lonzo when Fox and Tatum were available (I'll even fixate more on Fox than Tatum -- Magic was a point guard -- shouldn't he of all people have known better? and I say that as someone who likes Lonzo better than most). Again -- none of that is devastating -- Ball and Ingram and Kuzma keep progressing; they sign a star; and they're in the thick of it after having been dead during the Kupchak/Buss era. But when Jerry West kills every single deal right across town and Magic seems to have more than a bit of that old school "give me real hard ass players, not these fancy modern 3 point shooters", I think there's reason to doubt.I don't know how you can draw any conclusions when everything they have been doing is geared for this summers FA and trade market. They are exactly where they expected to be with a bunch of young players and a bunch of one-year veterans to bridge the gap until they can utilize their cap space this summer. The only attempt that was made was one that had no chance of occurring in closing an AD deal prior to the Celtics being involved but it didn't cost them anything to try.
I suspect the Lakers would be very happy if his tenure ends as it did elsewhere -- is this serious?I can't see the Lakers tenure ending any different that his previous stops. Forcing the team to make bad deals to help him out RIGHT NOW and then walking away leaving a mess.
I mean, Lebron is worth 50 wins almost all by his lonesome.I don't know how you can draw any conclusions when everything they have been doing is geared for this summers FA and trade market. They are exactly where they expected to be with a bunch of young players and a bunch of one-year veterans to bridge the gap until they can utilize their cap space this summer. The only attempt that was made was one that had no chance of occurring in closing an AD deal prior to the Celtics being involved but it didn't cost them anything to try.
Were there really people who expected LeBron to keep these kids around? We discussed this last summer and it would be the polar opposite of what LeBron has done at every stop. With or without Davis this Lakers team will almost surely be overhauled by draft night, no?He probably has some intel lonzo is getting traded
The Dodgers I think is more of a passive investment, they have a huge front office.How does Magic have time for the Lakers, Dodgers and his business interests? Does he have a lot of assistants or something?
i hear Kemba wants to re-sign with the Hornets, but to me he'd be an ideal LeBron side-kick -- very complementary skill sets.So assuming AD is traded somewhere else, Durant resigns or goes to NY, Kryie stays in Boston...are we looking at a Kemba/LeBron/Cousins trio as the foundation of the next LA run?
any Klay murmurs? dad, family LA-basedSo assuming AD is traded somewhere else, Durant resigns or goes to NY, Kryie stays in Boston...are we looking at a Kemba/LeBron/Cousins trio as the foundation of the next LA run?
Should've just used the word. Took me a couple seconds.You guys have no sense of humor![]()
Has Magic ever shown he can evaluate talent? Plus in terms of a GM, even if he loved Lonzo, his biggest failing was telegraphing it so much.(I'll even fixate more on Fox than Tatum -- Magic was a point guard -- shouldn't he of all people have known better? and I say that as someone who likes Lonzo better than most).
Pierce was right. Magic admitted that is what he told his players. Be professionals.Funny moment during the ABC Lakers/Sixerz pre-game. The host and Billups and Jalen were very emphatic that Magic had to re-assure and encourage the remaining Lakers players from the aborted AD rumors that they were wanted. Pierce busted in and was like 'hey, you bring in LeBron, this is what you get' and that the players were supposed to be pros and didn't need hand holding because it's a business. The rest of the panel was not having the Truth's take. Pierce doubled down, this is the business and this is the Lakers, deal with it.
Isnt this why they got Lonzo, though?I thought Zach Lowe made a really interesting point in his piece last week about LeBron and the Lakers offense. His point was that LeBron is clearly strategically conserving energy during games, both on not trying on defense and also taking offensive plays off. This is a problem for the Lakers offense, because when LeBron is differing to other players; such as let Ingram get the ball at the top of the key and go ISO, LeBron often just stands in the corner. For most NBA players, when they don't have the ball they are setting screens, cutting to the basket, prowling around the perimeter, etc. LeBron doesn't do a lot of that, he just stands there, conserving energy.
This is particularly a problem because it prevents LA from getting into a rhythm or flow offensively. Either the Lakers' best player is dominating the ball and creating for others; or he is standing around just spacing the floor. It's difficult for the Lakers to get their offense in gear when one guy isn't working hard off the ball. This may not have been a problem when he was playing with a creator like Kyrie, but for a guy like Ingram or Lance Stephenson, they need the aid of LeBron's gravitational pull to be efficient on offense.
Well Lonzo can't shoot and doesn't really get to the rim in the half-court so he isn't really creating for everyone. That being said, even if you have a guy like Harden running the show, they still often need everyone on the court to be engaged in the offensive set in order to achieve maximum efficiency.Isnt this why they got Lonzo, though?
Sorry, Im dumb.Well Lonzo can't shoot and doesn't really get to the rim in the half-court so he isn't really creating for everyone. That being said, even if you have a guy like Harden running the show, they still often need everyone on the court to be engaged in the offensive set in order to achieve maximum efficiency.
Perhaps, but since he is shooting 32.9% from three point range, I am not sure this is the most efficient use of him.Sorry, Im dumb.
I didn't mean Lonzo. I meant Rondo. Wasn't Rondo supposed to take the ball handling duties off of Lebron so he could do exactly that - sit in the corner and space - while Rondo created the halfcourt offense?