The HC Search

Status
Not open for further replies.

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
54,314
I'm just happy they at least heard Johnson's vision.

I suspect that these candidates provide a stark contrast to each other so they will be implicitly making a stylistic choice on which we can base our mountains of speculation about what is to follow.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
27,287
I get your point: Vrabel has real coaching experience and some level of success. But it’s funny because none of us would sign on for 54-45 and 2-3. And if he does exactly that here, while we will all have some enjoyable moments, we also will all want him fired.
If that happens and we want him fired, presumably Maye will be entering his prime, and the next coach will get to have a fully loaded Drake Maye at the peak of his powers. There would be some excellent options for HC at that point. I'd sign up for that winning percentage right now (which would be 56-46 over six 17-game seasons) because I think that it will take a couple of years to get up to speed. So say it goes like this over the next six years:

2025: 7-10
2026: 9-8

That's 16-18. That means over the next four years they'd go 40-28 (.588), which would be an average of 10-7, and several playoff appearances. Then he gets fired and the next guy gets a team with a prime Drake Maye and a good enough roster to be a playoff team. Presumably they'd then be able to take the team to the next step.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
38,752
Who was on the Zoom call for the Pats? Robert, Jonathan and Wolf? Sounds crazy but what about including Drake Maye? Not as though he’s like a years into their careers established QB like Brady or Peyton Manning, but I bet he’d prepare and ask some good questions. Too late anyway.
I think you can't really do that... if you pick the guy he likes you skew their power structure, if you pick the other guy, you set up an awkward situation and create friction.
 

brendan f

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2019
388
I suspect that these candidates provide a stark contrast to each other so they will be implicitly making a stylistic choice on which we can base our mountains of speculation about what is to follow.
I think it's going to be more a reflection of how much power they yield to Wolf. If they really want him running the front office, it seems like he and Johnson are at the very least familiar with each other and could potentially partner together, whereas Vrabel is more likely going to want his own guy.
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
61,419
San Andreas Fault
I think you can't really do that... if you pick the guy he likes you skew their power structure, if you pick the other guy, you set up an awkward situation and create friction.
Yeah, probably no way. Just that it would be desirable to have a guy who has actually coached or played the game on the call. Wonder exactly who was on the call.

Edit, Diana, can’t you give us more!
 

streeter88

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 2, 2006
2,115
Melbourne, Australia
I get your point: Vrabel has real coaching experience and some level of success. But it’s funny because none of us would sign on for 54-45 and 2-3. And if he does exactly that here, while we will all have some enjoyable moments, we also will all want him fired.
From where we’re sitting right now, 54–45 actually looks pretty good… Especially if it’s trending up as others have mentioned already. There are pros and cons to either Vrabel or Johnson…

On the other hand it would be great to have a HC who knew how to design and run an offense, but the phase that was most broken this past year was the defense. If Mayo could’ve even delivered a 20th ranked defense he would still be employed.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
96,057
Oregon
I'm curious when people here think the Pats will announce their choice for next HC.
If it's Johnson, they can't realistically do so until after the Lions complete their season. (I mean, they could ... but I can't imagine Johnson would like that.)
If it's Vrabel, they can do so by the end of the weekend.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,530
If we don't hear it's Vrabel by early next week that is pretty strong signal it is Johnson.
 

k-factory

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2005
1,980
seattle, wa
The cynical side of me thinks they wait till tomorrow just to make it seem like Johnson was a serious candidate before announcing Vrabel but I hope Johnson really did blow them away and this is a legit consideration.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
50,108
Hartford, CT
You’d expect the Krafts to toss the bone to Schefter to create the perception of a horse race/genuine deliberation. But the Galaxy Brain take is that it is too obvious to funnel that through Schefter since everyone knows he has a direct line to them, so why not use another reporter.

Or who the hell knows!
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
35,316
The cynical side of me thinks they wait till tomorrow just to make it seem like Johnson was a serious candidate before announcing Vrabel but I hope Johnson really did blow them away and this is a legit consideration.
The Jets having already interviewed Vrabel and today getting into Rooney rule compliance makes me wonder if Vrabel to NE is not as much of a done deal as I thought. I figured Jets would be waiting for Glenn but idk.
 

Myt1

educated, civility-loving ass
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 13, 2006
44,695
South Boston
Yeah, people point to the "oh Jon was calling people during the year to ask about how to support a coach"... I mean, ok?

There is not real leg work you can do on a coaching search that tells you anywhere near as much as .... actually interviewing a guy and having him present his plans for your franchise.
Yeah, there are a ton of “I’m sure thats” going on that assume better process, mostly because bad processes are circularly bad. :)

Is stuff happening behind the scenes that fans don’t know about, and has it been going on for some X period of time? Indubitably. Should we really have confidence that it has been smart, good, productive process (gestures vaguely at the last five years)?
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
37,671
People keep mentioning a floor with Vrabel like its a good thing.

I know what it or a "floor raiser" is in the context of outcomes but I am not sure that applies here. Exactly zero coaches guarantee wins of any sort or any number. So that isn't real. And if we are saying that a coach will get competent enough play, I am not sure that's a fun team to root for.

If I am hiring a coach to win at the highest level I want the ceiling raiser. Floor raisers manage retail franchises. Ceiling raisers get rings.
There’s no floor on team performance, but Vrabel has demonstrated that he’s a competent head coach; Johnson hasn’t. The “floor” for Johnson is Jerod Mayo 2.0; the floor for Vrabel is higher than that. Shouldn’t be a major consideration, but could be a tiebreaker if you’re undecided between the two.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
37,671
They might wait until Monday for various reasons, but it would probably leak Sunday night
My guess is that there will be leaks when reference checks begin, and we’ll have guys like Schefter, et al., reporting with higher confidence that Vrabel (or Johnson) is the Pats’ guy a day or two ahead of the formal announcement.

The Jets having already interviewed Vrabel and today getting into Rooney rule compliance makes me wonder if Vrabel to NE is not as much of a done deal as I thought. I figured Jets would be waiting for Glenn but idk.
This is why you don’t run a weeks-long search. The Jets job is uniquely unattractive, but I expect both Vrabel and Johnson will have offers in hand from other teams by the end of next week. The Pats could and should have crammed a couple more interviews into their process, but they had to move at a pace that would be unthinkable for such an important job search in another industry. They certainly didn’t have time to go hire a new GM first.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
48,060
Melrose, MA
There’s no floor on team performance, but Vrabel has demonstrated that he’s a competent head coach; Johnson hasn’t. The “floor” for Johnson is Jerod Mayo 2.0; the floor for Vrabel is higher than that. Shouldn’t be a major consideration, but could be a tiebreaker if you’re undecided between the two.
Your larger point is correct (Vrabel more of a known quantity with a proven track record), but Johnson this year and Mayo last year are not really similarly situated. Johnson is a highly sought after coaching candidate who is currently one of the best offensive coordinators in the NFL.

Johnson has 13 years of experience as an NFL assistant coach and 3 years as a college assistant before that. In the NFL he has been an offensive assistant, assistant QB coach, TE coach, assistant WR coach, WR coach, offensive QC coach, passing game coordinator (1 year), OC (3 years).

Jerod Mayo, by contrast, had 5 years as an inside linebackers coach in the NFL before the Pats gave him the head coach job last year. Given the wierdness of the way the Pats hand out coaching titles, it is reasonable to think he had more reasonaibilities as an assistant coach than the title would suggest. In 2023, he was a sort of co-defensive coordinator of a good defense. But we know he was not the playcaller and we know that BB is a defensive guru who probably hads a lot to do with that success.

All of which is to say... Mayo was virtually assured to fail and Johnson is not.

A better downside comp for Johnson is probably Josh McDaniels. He had 5 years with the Pats in various assistant coaching roles before becoming OC, which he did for 3 years, before getting his first head coaching job, where he faceplanted.

Anyway, personally I want Vrabel but I am not going to be upset if the hire Johnson.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
49,208
Here
They’ll probably need a decision by Monday. Vrabel appears to be holding off on taking other interviews, but once he starts that, there’s a risk you could miss out on both. They’ll also need to be sure Johnson would 100% take the job if offered. Vrabel and Johnson are 2 higher end coaching candidates, they can’t really afford to lose out on both.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
48,060
Melrose, MA
They’ll probably need a decision by Monday. Vrabel appears to be holding off on taking other interviews, but once he starts that, there’s a risk you could miss out on both. They’ll also need to be sure Johnson would 100% take the job if offered. Vrabel and Johnson are 2 higher end coaching candidates, they can’t really afford to lose out on both.
Yes. The past choosing Vrabel over Johnson, or vice versa, or even decide to hire someone else (although that seems highly unlikely at this stage), is not how this process goes wrong.

The ways this process could go wrong is if the Pats can't land one or both of their top choices, whether because of salary or commitments to how they will invest in the team, or because they are trying to meddle in the filling out of a coaching staff, or because they are more committed to keeping Wolf in a top role than they are to either of their top coaching candidates, etc. (I'm not negative on Wolf the way some are, but if he's not on the same page as the new coach it will be a mess).
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
49,208
Here
Yes. The past choosing Vrabel over Johnson, or vice versa, or even decide to hire someone else (although that seems highly unlikely at this stage), is not how this process goes wrong.

The ways this process could go wrong is if the Pats can't land one or both of their top choices, whether because of salary or commitments to how they will invest in the team, or because they are trying to meddle in the filling out of a coaching staff, or because they are more committed to keeping Wolf in a top role than they are to either of their top coaching candidates, etc. (I'm not negative on Wolf the way some are, but if he's not on the same page as the new coach it will be a mess).
I’m pretty confident Vrabel wants the gig, all signs are there. The tricky thing now is if they prefer Johnson, how do they navigate this? Probably a private call to Johnson with an ultimatum on a very quick decision, which might not be totally fair, but is necessary. And then you’re also relying on that info not leaking to potentially scare away/piss off Vrabel.
 

amfox1

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2003
6,984
The back of your computer
I’m pretty confident Vrabel wants the gig, all signs are there. The tricky thing now is if they prefer Johnson, how do they navigate this? Probably a private call to Johnson with an ultimatum on a very quick decision, which might not be totally fair, but is necessary. And then you’re also relying on that info not leaking to potentially scare away/piss off Vrabel.
The Pats can only move to Johnson if they are absolutely sure he'll take the job. Losing out on Vrabel and Johnson is a disaster. Because of that, I'd expect Vrabel to be the pick and I'd expect the decision by the end of the weekend.
 

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,514
I’ve been thinking that the timeline is a problem here - Vrabel being able to be 100% locked in now is worth quite a bit in being certain you get one of your top two choices. If they deeply prefer Johnson it’s probably worth the risk, but if it’s like 55% preference then I could understand weighing Vrabel’s immediate availability to sign as an important consideration. I am certain Kraft does not want to be Colts McDanielsed.

Separately, I favor Johnson but I don’t really understand the ceiling takes as they relate to Vrabel. He simply doesn’t have a long enough track record for me to say he can’t be a ceiling raiser. Granted they’re puff pieces, but most of what has been reported about his approach to coaching and running a team leaves plenty of room for him to wind up elite. If it’s purely a matter of wanting the HC to be the one designing the new offensive philosophy I get the ceiling take, but it feels absurd to me to think Vrabel has a lower chance of being an elite coach than Johnson. We really don’t know enough to know that imo.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
16,893
Looks like it's a go for Vrabel if true.
View: https://twitter.com/DMRussini/status/1878071142461641034

Lions OC Ben Johnson interviewed well with the Patriots but plans to meet with other teams. Meanwhile, the Patriots are pushing for a quick resolution to their HC search, per source. Many around the league expect a decision this weekend.
Maybe both sides are reasonably sure it isn’t going to end in a deal, but Johnson wanted a practice interview, and the Pats wanted to be able to say they did a search. Win-win.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
37,671
Yes. The past choosing Vrabel over Johnson, or vice versa, or even decide to hire someone else (although that seems highly unlikely at this stage), is not how this process goes wrong.

The ways this process could go wrong is if the Pats can't land one or both of their top choices, whether because of salary or commitments to how they will invest in the team, or because they are trying to meddle in the filling out of a coaching staff, or because they are more committed to keeping Wolf in a top role than they are to either of their top coaching candidates, etc. (I'm not negative on Wolf the way some are, but if he's not on the same page as the new coach it will be a mess).
I lean toward Johnson over Vrabel, so I certainly didn’t mean to suggest he’s comparable to Mayo. (That said, your reading of my post is fair; it was inarticulate on my part.) I only meant to make the point you did here — Johnson hasn’t been a head coach, so there’s a non-zero chance he totally sucks at it, whereas Vrabel has demonstrated competence in role.

Honestly, this is a lot like CEO searches at a lot of companies — do you hire the rockstar marketing or finance executive who has never had the big job, or do you hire the guy who was CEO of a similar company and had a solid but unspectacular track record? In the NFL, I lean toward the rock star; there’s less to be said for middle of the road performance in sports than in other fields of endeavor. But it really comes down to this particular rockstar cooordinator versus this particular experienced coach, and I don’t really know enough about either to offer a judgment. I’m a little surprised how many people here have strongly held preferences for one or the other.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
28,651
Unreal America
If it’s purely a matter of wanting the HC to be the one designing the new offensive philosophy I get the ceiling take, but it feels absurd to me to think Vrabel has a lower chance of being an elite coach than Johnson. We really don’t know enough to know that imo.
Agree. This forum prooves out the old adage "no one knows anything" every day. All these definitive takes about floors and ceilings are kinda silly.

I do think that it's much more unlikely that Vrabel oversees a disastrous mess, given his experience. But at the same time, shit happens. I also think it's not improbable that he surpasses the success he had in Nashville.

Vrabel would be a fine choice, and the range of outcomes is wide.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
28,651
Unreal America
It kinda blows my mind that, of all fanbases, some Pats fans look at Vrabel's six years and conclude there's little-to-no chance that he surpasses his prior performance.

6-10, 7-9, 7-9, 11-5, 5-11. That guy might get us to the playoffs, then we'll need to find someone else to take us to the next level.
 

GlucoDoc

New Member
Dec 19, 2005
89
It kinda blows my mind that, of all fanbases, some Pats fans look at Vrabel's six years and conclude there's little-to-no chance that he surpasses his prior performance.

6-10, 7-9, 7-9, 11-5, 5-11. That guy might get us to the playoffs, then we'll need to find someone else to take us to the next level.
This! Some people assume Vrabel won't progress in his coaching ability, but Johnson, with NO prior HC experience, will excel. We don't know either, but the likelihood of Vrabel progressing is probably greater than Johnson succeeding as a first time coach. This is where the personal assessment of these two candidates by Kraft & Co. is essential in getting a sense for each.
 

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
7,311
Looks like it's a go for Vrabel if true.
View: https://twitter.com/DMRussini/status/1878071142461641034

Lions OC Ben Johnson interviewed well with the Patriots but plans to meet with other teams. Meanwhile, the Patriots are pushing for a quick resolution to their HC search, per source. Many around the league expect a decision this weekend.
Ugh it’s so over. I was hoping they would go for Johnson but this clearly sounds like Vrabel. I hope I‘m wrong about the offense. In 2025, culture and discipline mean nothing if you don’t have an innovative and explosive offense. If you are just hoping to “keep it close” and ”make some plays at the end” you are not winning a Super Bowl.

I’m grasping at straws here but this report suggests the Raiders stuff is for Johnson is to put pressure on NE

 
Last edited:

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
35,735
Bedard's reply to a reader's grabbag question about whether Johnson runs a West Coast offense:

Johnson's offense, I think, is WC based but melded with a lot of different things. Johnson actually borrowed a lot from McDaniels as well, and the two have a relationship. I don't rule out Josh being his OC as well.
 

Bertha

Member
SoSH Member
May 3, 2016
232
I am hoping for Johnson. His downside would be failing to manage a large organization. His offensive IQ is outstanding and his floor for his improving our offense is not low. I presume that offensive IQ translate to a lot of ideas how defenses can counter good offenses. His overall floor is lower because Peter principle could apply. Vrabel is the steady ex-CEO as Mauf noted. There is no guarantee a Vrabel hiring helps the offense, although his floor is a less-dysfunctional team than Mayo had.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,702
Isle of Plum
It kinda blows my mind that, of all fanbases, some Pats fans look at Vrabel's six years and conclude there's little-to-no chance that he surpasses his prior performance.

6-10, 7-9, 7-9, 11-5, 5-11. That guy might get us to the playoffs, then we'll need to find someone else to take us to the next level.
Nm…
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
16,893
It kinda blows my mind that, of all fanbases, some Pats fans look at Vrabel's six years and conclude there's little-to-no chance that he surpasses his prior performance.

6-10, 7-9, 7-9, 11-5, 5-11. That guy might get us to the playoffs, then we'll need to find someone else to take us to the next level.
This! Some people assume Vrabel won't progress in his coaching ability, but Johnson, with NO prior HC experience, will excel. We don't know either, but the likelihood of Vrabel progressing is probably greater than Johnson succeeding as a first time coach. This is where the personal assessment of these two candidates by Kraft & Co. is essential in getting a sense for each.
I voted Johnson, but I don’t presume either of them will be great or mediocre. Who knows? I don’t particularly think two playoff wins in six years is a glittering resumé, but of course he could do better next time à la BB, Tito, KC Jones.
 

NDame616

will bailey
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
2,620
Anyone else wondering about the karmatic train of Johnson and the Pats agreeing on a deal to be finalized after the season, Vrabel signs elsewhere, everyone else signs somewhere and....the Lions swoop in and convince Johnson to stay a few more years?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.