Seems weird to put the location of the interview in the tweet. Who cares?
BUT WHAT DOES IT MEAN
BUT WHAT DOES IT MEAN
The restaurants are definitely better in Boston than Patriot Place outside of Davio's.Seems weird to put the location of the interview in the tweet. Who cares?
BUT WHAT DOES IT MEAN
I'd suspect that's the case and it's clearly a self-inflicted wound by the Krafts. It was pretty obviously a bad "aftermath" look, as though someone read the SOSH thread and said, "Um...."Not going to speak for Commander Shears, but Glenn might have seen his addition to the list as an attempt by the Krafts to deflect criticism after the Leftwich/Hamilton interviews and/or he's heard through the grapevine that everything else is a formality and Vrabel's going to be the coach
I 100% think it was a reaction (whether ass covering or legitimate) to Albert Breer spending a good portion of time on TV and twitter ripping the Krafts for a sham process and basically saying that it is not a well run organization and the inevitable Vrabel hire won't fix anything. Kraft pretty clearly listens to press/fans and does not like bad coverage.I'd suspect that's the case and it's clearly a self-inflicted wound by the Krafts. It was pretty obviously a bad "aftermath" look, as though someone read the SOSH thread and said, "Um...."
Leftwich and Hamilton interviewed at the same time with Matt Groh in the Delta Lounge at Logan so they wouldn't have to go back through security. Vrabel interviewed in Kraft's guest room where he'll stay the night so he's ready to sign the contract the minute the zoom with Ben Johnson ends tomorrow morning.@MikeReiss
One possibility on the Boston piece here: Owner Robert Kraft lives in Chestnut Hill, and perhaps having Mike Vrabel at his home as part of the interview adds more of a personal dynamic to it.
***
I wonder whether Leftwich and Hamilton visited Kraft at his home
The Infrastructure was primarily "Bill and Ernie do it" for 25 years, and it kinda stopped working some years ago, especially after Adams left.I like Breer but he’s going a little unnecessarily hard at the Pats. Hamilton and Leftwich are “flouting the Rooney Rule.” The Pats infrastructure is a “mess.” I’m not disagreeing that the Pats may be working backwards from concluding Vrabel is the guy. But there are reasonable alternative explanations to most of those things (you can’t interview any current coaches in person this week, the infrastructure has been the same for 25 years and worked pretty well most of that time).
I like Bedard less but he is right that the Krafts not wanting to lose out on their preferred candidate isn’t exactly a some miscarriage of justice. The whole thing is kind of a compromise.
Eh, I dunno, we are process humping the shit out of this. A good process isn’t the goal. It’s hiring good people.The Infrastructure was primarily "Bill and Ernie do it" for 25 years, and it kinda stopped working some years ago, especially after Adams left.
I will also say I think it's pretty silly to argue that they can't do the same real process as everyone else, because they might lose the guy who has been unemployed for more than a year.
I may be over indexing for “we need new blood,” but I’ll be damned if I don’t think we need to turn the page pretty damn near completely and get truly new blood.Really? I think McDaniels was a tremendous OC here. I'd take him back in a heartbeat.
There is a Davios at Patriots Place? Huh. I had no idea. I've been to the one in Lynnfield and thought it was excellent.The restaurants are definitely better in Boston than Patriot Place outside of Davio's.
The suggestion is that he declined because he didn’t think the interest was legitimate, but rather a Rooney Rule CYA after the Pats kicked off their process by interviewing two black coaches who haven’t been in the league since 2022.I’m not sure what your suggestion is here - Glenn declined. The pat’s didn’t cancel
Processes matter because it isn't just about finding the right people, it's also about a whole bunch of other processes. The Patriots aren't a mess because BB was suddenly a different person, it's because all of the internal processes broke down. They stopped bringing in outside ideas and fresh people, they stopped evolving their scouting, they bought into the idea that there was a mythical Patriots Way.Eh, I dunno, we are process humping the shit out of this. A good process isn’t the goal. It’s hiring good people.
Vrabel is one of the top two candidates this cycle. The fact that nobody sniffed him last year is immaterial. He is going to be hired by someone and possibly in our division. I get not wanting to miss out on that.
Now I want some of those cheesesteak spring rolls.There is a Davios at Patriots Place? Huh. I had no idea. I've been to the one in Lynnfield and thought it was excellent.
But also they lost almost all the really good talent they had. Listen, I get that good processes often result in good results. But I think we are also way overestimating how much Robert and Jonathan personally need to know new ideas and new ways of doing things. For instance, I’ve been advocating that they bring in a Howie Roseman president of football operations type. In truth, there are only so many of those kinds of guys out there. But if they did? I would hope that Robert and Jonathan would be trusting him to be bringing in the people with new ideas and philosophies, not doing it themselves.Processes matter because it isn't just about finding the right people, it's also about a whole bunch of other processes. The Patriots aren't a mess because BB was suddenly a different person, it's because all of the internal processes broke down. They stopped bringing in outside ideas and fresh people, they stopped evolving their scouting, they bought into the idea that there was a mythical Patriots Way.
I mean... they lost the talent and didn't replace it because..... they didn't follow good internal processes. So now they are going to hire a guy (even if qualified) without following good processes, and HOPE that he creates new internal processes? That is always going to be a problem with having a bad process. How do they know he can do that, and how do they know how those processes (if he even suggested any) are better than the ones other people might put in place, without finding out what they are.But also they lost almost all the really good talent they had. Listen, I get that good processes often result in good results. But I think we are also way overestimating how much Robert and Jonathan personally need to know new ideas and new ways of doing things. For instance, I’ve been advocating that they bring in a Howie Roseman president of football operations type. In truth, there are only so many of those kinds of guys out there. But if they did? I would hope that Robert and Jonathan would be trusting him to be bringing in the people with new ideas and philosophies, not doing it themselves.
if the Krafts think Vrabel might be the guy to do that from a coaching perspective—hiring innovative coordinators, bringing along a smart personnel guy above him—I think that’s fine. I’m just not convinced that the only path to modernizing this franchise is ownership agonizing over 13 different coaches.
I don't think that's what those advocating for a legit process are advocating.I’m just not convinced that the only path to modernizing this franchise is ownership agonizing over 13 different coaches.
Wait that's a thing? Yes please!Now I want some of those cheesesteak spring rolls.
Local butcher Bucciariellis occasionally makes cheesesteak sausage…it worked.Now I want some of those cheesesteak spring rolls.
So I’ll put forth a rose-colored glasses optimistic take on this “process”:I like Breer but he’s going a little unnecessarily hard at the Pats. Hamilton and Leftwich are “flouting the Rooney Rule.” The Pats infrastructure is a “mess.” I’m not disagreeing that the Pats may be working backwards from concluding Vrabel is the guy. But there are reasonable alternative explanations to most of those things (you can’t interview any current coaches in person this week, the infrastructure has been the same for 25 years and worked pretty well most of that time).
I like Bedard less but he is right that the Krafts not wanting to lose out on their preferred candidate isn’t exactly a some miscarriage of justice. The whole thing is kind of a compromise.
You can apparently order them onlineWait that's a thing? Yes please!
He already has 5 interviews scheduled for this weekend. Given he declined it, I don't think he's real interested in coming here anyways but his time is limited before they begin prep for next week.I think he probably assumes that the late request indicates a lack of real interest. I doubt it he just decided to not to take an interview for one of the most attractive jobs in because it came a couple hours after the Raiders request.
Few were ready for Bill’s departure.Bad process over time leads to bad results, because you make less and less informed decisions.
The media is playing games.I like Breer but he’s going a little unnecessarily hard at the Pats. Hamilton and Leftwich are “flouting the Rooney Rule.” The Pats infrastructure is a “mess.” I’m not disagreeing that the Pats may be working backwards from concluding Vrabel is the guy. But there are reasonable alternative explanations to most of those things (you can’t interview any current coaches in person this week, the infrastructure has been the same for 25 years and worked pretty well most of that time).
I like Bedard less but he is right that the Krafts not wanting to lose out on their preferred candidate isn’t exactly a some miscarriage of justice. The whole thing is kind of a compromise.
Meh, they didn't add Glenn until AFTER Breer's comments (and he declined)... they didn't run this like a real NFL search, and it's fine for people like Breer to criticize it.The media is playing games.
"This is a sham like last time!"
"Well, this time they have 2 of the top candidates interviewing and requested the 3rd. They're actually conducting interviews. It's not the same at all."
"So they're bringing in guys because people think they're good candidates? How about digging a bit deeper with some lesser known guys?"
"Well, they had guys like Pep Hamilton and Leftwich too."
"Those were shams!"
"So the Patriots should ignore the NFL rule?"
This isn't some accounting firm bringing in 10 new grads for interviews and no one knows anyone. I would wager most professional sports teams and major college all teams have a top target or two. These candidates are all public figures.
Yup. I have been a supporter and set aside much cynicism for the Krafts, and let’s not forget they likely pull a rabbit out of a hat and end up with a strong candidate here.Meh, they didn't add Glenn until AFTER Breer's comments (and he declined)... they didn't run this like a real NFL search, and it's fine for people like Breer to criticize it.
Edit- I get it, people really want to be positive about the team after a really rough couple of years, but even if you like Vrabel as your number 1 guy, it is fine to recognize that the Patriots are not running a full search, which is very unusual in the NFL, and that there are benefits to good process, and as such people who cover the team and the league SHOULD call them out for it.
Agree with all of this.Yup. I have been a supporter and set aside much cynicism for the Krafts, and let’s not forget they likely pull a rabbit out of a hat and end up with a strong candidate here.
That said, the Aaron Glenn interview request only after the shambolic interview accusations? Its kind of ick, makes you look weak and reactionary, and further emphasizes that those first interviews really were a sham.
Agree with @DJnVa that there’s a certain breathy ’what about the children!’ nature to Breers coverage though.
I agree with the last part. I think offensive coordinator issues will be a major concern with Vrabel both to start and year to year.I don't think it simply comes down to one player either, but AJ Brown had 1456 yards for Philly in his first season which is more than Tennessee's Top-3 receivers in 2022 (the immortal triumvirate of Woods, Okonkwo, and Burks) had combined. It was a colossal, franchise shifting blunder.
Anyway a person likes to cut up the blame pie is up to them, but I'd put whatever motivational magic is at 0% of that pie.
This doesn't make sense at all. Them being public figures doesn't mean their coaching philosophies and problem solving approaches are public knowledge. Jayson Tatum is a public figure but his public persona is as PR as possible - by design, because people are allowed and want to do that - and the Patriots had a long term HC that was famously short and dissembling in front of the media. It behooves coaches to hide what they do and their tendencies and how they approach the game because opponents can and will exploit those things for advantages. And the NFL is supposed to prevent tampering - so clearly we know the Patriots haven't had any chance to talk to any of these candidates to get their true thoughts on things.This isn't some accounting firm bringing in 10 new grads for interviews and no one knows anyone. I would wager most professional sports teams and major college all teams have a top target or two. These candidates are all public figures.
Yeah, also... they are public figures because they are really good at football coaching... would you not want to know what they thought about your football team and players? I mean, how much would a team pay to have BB come in and tell them what he thought the best way to maximize their players on defense was? Or for Andy Reid to come in and tell them how he'd move their offense forward. HC interviews aren't just about finding the best guy to be your coach, it's also about getting basically free high level consulting that you can't buy, and free outlines of various plans.This doesn't make sense at all. Them being public figures doesn't mean their coaching philosophies and problem solving approaches are public knowledge. Jayson Tatum is a public figure but his public persona is as PR as possible - by design, because people are allowed and want to do that - and the Patriots had a long term HC that was famously short and dissembling in front of the media. It behooves coaches to hide what they do and their tendencies and how they approach the game because opponents can and will exploit those things for advantages. And the NFL is supposed to prevent tampering - so clearly we know the Patriots haven't had any chance to talk to any of these candidates to get their true thoughts on things.
I'm not arguing that interviews are the end-all and be-all, but it just strikes me as so absurd that you'd be hiring a guy to think for your team and speak to your team without inquiring as to how he thinks or speaking to him.
I think there are far more people who want to be negative about the team and the Krafts because of how the last few years have been.Edit- I get it, people really want to be positive about the team after a really rough couple of years, but even if you like Vrabel as your number 1 guy, it is fine to recognize that the Patriots are not running a full search, which is very unusual in the NFL, and that there are benefits to good process, and as such people who cover the team and the league SHOULD call them out for it.
How can anyone possibly make that determination? They are interviewing a guy widely believed to be the hottest commodity, and a guy that has ties to the organization and fans love, but I don't think we can state they are the best available and neither can the Patriots without running a full search.I think there are far more people who want to be negative about the team and the Krafts because of how the last few years have been.
My overall perspective is that I’m not losing my mind about the direction of the team. I’m just not. They are 12 months out from moving on from the greatest coach in history and I never expected that to be some smooth process.
Obviously this season was very bad and kind of doomed from the start. But I don’t think being a little sentimental about what Bill had built or trying to see what in Year 1 AB (After Bill) was worth carrying over from his system was horribly misguided or indicative of rot. In some ways it’s sensible and natural. And we should probably be encouraged that they didn’t double down on the Mayo promise and spend 2-3 years doing the McDaniels/Patricia thing the Raiders and Lions did.
As for their performance this year, they got the QB right and that was by far the most important thing. Now they are hoping to find a coach and are interviewing the best two available. Do I really need to be angry? Things could be better obviously but they could also be a LOT worse.
Listen, Ken Wisenhunt is clearly the best contender, why would a team interview some young DC from Minnesota?How can anyone possibly make that determination? They are interviewing a guy widely believed to be the hottest commodity, and a guy that has ties to the organization and fans love, but I don't think we can state they are the best available and neither can the Patriots without running a full search.
They have to be the two best candidates because they're the only two serious candidates they're interviewing ... duhHow can anyone possibly make that determination? They are interviewing a guy widely believed to be the hottest commodity, and a guy that has ties to the organization and fans love, but I don't think we can state they are the best available and neither can the Patriots without running a full search.
Can't they hire based on the virtual interview? I get it's fun to take the measure of a man and see how he stares into the distance, but they don't really have to do that; they have the means to reference check this to death and probably ask Johnson to submit whatever materials are relevant.So how does this play out from here?
They interviewed Vrabel yesterday. Ben Johnson is on the docket virtually today. Aaron Glenn turned them down. They interviewed Leftwich and Hamilton on Tuesday, but they appear to be longshot candidates.
Let's say Johnson knocks it out of the park and they decide they to continue the process with him. If I'm understanding the rules correctly they can't bring Johnson in-person until the Lions are knocked out of the playoffs or, I think, if the Lions make the Super Bowl he could come in during the bye week prior to SB week. Either way, that's a fairly long time and a lot of the openings are going to be taken. I understand the position is attractive but would Vrabel hang around for up to a month in limbo and run the risk that other vacancies fill before Kraft makes a decision on him vs. Johnson?
I guess if Minny/Tampa lose this week they can ask for permission to talk to Coen/Flores? But then I think you kind of run the risk they turn you down much like Aaron Glenn did.
Nope. They lose Vrabel if they wait that long to decide. And likely lose Johnson as well. A decision is going to be made after the Johnson interview in all likelihood. And I'm pretty sure it will be Vrabel.I understand the position is attractive but would Vrabel hang around for up to a month in limbo and run the risk that other vacancies fill before Kraft makes a decision on him vs. Johnson?
I believe Johnson would be able to in-person interview again starting on MLK Day.So how does this play out from here?
They interviewed Vrabel yesterday. Ben Johnson is on the docket virtually today. Aaron Glenn turned them down. They interviewed Leftwich and Hamilton on Tuesday, but they appear to be longshot candidates.
Let's say Johnson knocks it out of the park and they decide they to continue the process with him. If I'm understanding the rules correctly they can't bring Johnson in-person until the Lions are knocked out of the playoffs or, I think, if the Lions make the Super Bowl he could come in during the bye week prior to SB week. Either way, that's a fairly long time and a lot of the openings are going to be taken. I understand the position is attractive but would Vrabel hang around for up to a month in limbo and run the risk that other vacancies fill before Kraft makes a decision on him vs. Johnson?
I guess if Minny/Tampa lose this week they can ask for permission to talk to Coen/Flores? But then I think you kind of run the risk they turn you down much like Aaron Glenn did.
Pretty much. There's also the chance that, in the meantime, Vrabel continues his interview tour and gets snapped up by the Raiders or Jets or someone else.So how does this play out from here?
They interviewed Vrabel yesterday. Ben Johnson is on the docket virtually today. Aaron Glenn turned them down. They interviewed Leftwich and Hamilton on Tuesday, but they appear to be longshot candidates.
Let's say Johnson knocks it out of the park and they decide they to continue the process with him. If I'm understanding the rules correctly they can't bring Johnson in-person until the Lions are knocked out of the playoffs or, I think, if the Lions make the Super Bowl he could come in during the bye week prior to SB week. Either way, that's a fairly long time and a lot of the openings are going to be taken. I understand the position is attractive but would Vrabel hang around for up to a month in limbo and run the risk that other vacancies fill before Kraft makes a decision on him vs. Johnson?
I guess if Minny/Tampa lose this week they can ask for permission to talk to Coen/Flores? But then I think you kind of run the risk they turn you down much like Aaron Glenn did.
Oh, now we‘re really just making a mockery of the Rooney Rule.I believe Johnson would be able to in-person interview again starting on MLK Day.
Not if the Lions win. If the Lions advance to the NFCCG, they cannot interview him until the following week.I believe Johnson would be able to in-person interview again starting on MLK Day.
I have no idea of the process and how these interviews go but I'd think if you were hiring a position as important as an NFL head coach, you'd want to bring the serious candidates into your building. The candidate would also probably want to visit and check out the facilities, surrounding area where he'd be moving his family and all that. "You'll love the Red Wing diner, Ben!"Can't they hire based on the virtual interview? I get it's fun to take the measure of a man and see how he stares into the distance, but they don't really have to do that; they have the means to reference check this to death and probably ask Johnson to submit whatever materials are relevant.
Agreed. They appear to have tunnel vision on one guy. But, we have all been wrong before making assumptions about what they are thinking."Open to be blown away" is the sort of phrasing that makes me question this wole process.
Right. "We already told Vrabel he has the job, but we're open if you've got some photos of him or something...."."Open to be blown away" is the sort of phrasing that makes me question this wole process.
Sure, we have to be somewhat careful not to take these reports as wholly indicative of their internal process, but at the end of the day they're (seriously) interviewing two candidates, so it is what it is.Agreed. They appear to have tunnel vision on one guy. But, we have all been wrong before making assumptions about what they are thinking.
If it is leaked that they hired Vrabel later this afternoon or sometime tomorrow, we'll have our answer.