This would be the deluxe version of the Yorke Priester trade.Mayer/Chandler ... does either side (or both) need to add more?
This would be the deluxe version of the Yorke Priester trade.Mayer/Chandler ... does either side (or both) need to add more?
I think it would be fair value, but also think the Pirates would ask for more, just because pitching is so scarce right now.Mayer/Chandler ... does either side (or both) need to add more?
If the brain-trust decides the team needs another right handed outfielder, I'd rather have them target Lane Thomas, who should be much cheaper, is a better defender, and has just one year left on his deal, so as to not block any of the young players coming up. Thomas over this career has hit lefties well: .302/.366/.514 with the platoon advantage for a 140 wRC+, but .223/.290/.391 against righties for an 87 wRC+. He can play all three outfield positions, with a reputation of being around league average in center, with a very strong arm. He also stole 32 bases last year. Cleveland is looking to trade Thomas in an effort to reduce the team's salary.I'm very much warming to the idea of trying to swing a deal for Seiya Suzuki. There was a report that the Cubs were "determined to deal him". He is a RH bat, great OBP guy. Some pop, some speed. Could likely play LF in Boston. Not a terrible contract and only for two years. And as someone else mentioned, Yoshida is a weird fit on this team but still a very good hitter. IF his shoulder is healthy and he could at least play some games in LF, especially at Fenway, these two Japanese guys could be on base a lot. It also wouldn't hurt their pursuit of Sasaki. The Sox do have a pretty good recent history with Japanese pitchers, as well as a handful of Japanese speaking trainers and strength and conditioning coaches.
I‘d be absolutely fine with Lane Thomas as well.If the brain-trust decides the team needs another right handed outfielder, I'd rather have them target Lane Thomas, who should be much cheaper, is a better defender, and has just one year left on his deal, so as to not block any of the young players coming up. Thomas over this career has hit lefties well: .302/.366/.514 with the platoon advantage for a 140 wRC+, but .223/.290/.391 against righties for an 87 wRC+. He can play all three outfield positions, with a reputation of being around league average in center, with a very strong arm. He also stole 32 bases last year. Cleveland is looking to trade Thomas in an effort to reduce the team's salary.
I’m with you on Seiya depending on the cost. He has continually gotten better after a slow start and you’d be getting his age 30/31 seasons without having to make a major commitment beyond that.I'm very much warming to the idea of trying to swing a deal for Seiya Suzuki. There was a report that the Cubs were "determined to deal him". He is a RH bat, great OBP guy. Some pop, some speed. Could likely play LF in Boston. Not a terrible contract and only for two years. And as someone else mentioned, Yoshida is a weird fit on this team but still a very good hitter. IF his shoulder is healthy and he could at least play some games in LF, especially at Fenway, these two Japanese guys could be on base a lot. It also wouldn't hurt their pursuit of Sasaki. The Sox do have a pretty good recent history with Japanese pitchers, as well as a handful of Japanese speaking trainers and strength and conditioning coaches.
I think you're right, unless they decide Rafaela is starting in CF with Duran in LF, in which case Thomas could be added to DH or play OF against lefties and play the role of pinch runner as well.I don’t think Thomas is a good fit; there isn’t room on the roster for yet another player with such an extreme split; a sub 700 OPS against RHP makes him redundant to Refsnyder.
I think they are throwing some cold water on Seiya being traded? I wonder if teams are keeping their Japanese star players until Sasaki picks a team? I'd think the Cubs have a story to pitch him.I’m with you on Seiya depending on the cost. He has continually gotten better after a slow start and you’d be getting his age 30/31 seasons without having to make a major commitment beyond that.
I thought there was zero chance of him coming here before, but now that I know he's looking for a place where he can hide from the media, I think the chances are somehow below zero.Sasaki’s agent just said he’d be open to a smaller market team because of the media so that
really opens up where he might wind up. SD is 6th largest city but is pretty relaxed. LA is obv massive.
LOVE THIS. That would be a really interesting move, would love to hear more opinions on this.Reporting today out of San Diego saying the Padres will not be over the luxury tax threshold in '25. They're already over and don't have a lot of options to save money.
How about Kutter Crawford for Dylan Cease and Robert Suarez? BTV has that as an overpay by Boston due to Suarez having negative value and Cease being a free agent after '25. SD needs cheap MLB talent, particularly in the rotation. Sox can flex their financial muscle to upgrade the rotation with Cease and install Suarez as their closer. SD would save about $21M in this deal. And I think SD would be more open to this type of deal if they do land Sasaki.
Pair that deal with a Fried/Burnes signing and the rotation would be Fried/Burnes, Cease, Houck, Bello, Giolito and the back end of the bullpen being Suarez, Chapman, Slaten, Hendricks, Whitlock
Reupping this.Moving Whitlock to the bullpen should help add 1 more "top end RP" to the pen.
I'd be thrilled if the Sox over this winter:
1) sign Burnes/Fried
2) trade for Crochet (depending on the cost).
3) sign another high-leverage RP
4) have Crawford/Criswell bounce between rotation and swingman roles as injuries require.
[SP1]/Houck/Crochet/Giolito/Bello -- that's a playoff caliber rotation I think can handle the Yankees and Os next year.
With all the kids on the way from AAA, I'm willing to bet on 2 out of 3 of Story/Grissom/Casas being healthy and the lineup having enough juice without a free agent signing. And given the successes of top prospects this year like Jackson Chourio and Jackson Merrill, I'd be tempted to give Campbell a runway in spring training to begin the season in the OF. If needed, a RH bat should be available at the trade deadline -- they always are.
Why wouldn’t San Diego just trade them for prospects? They both have value.Reporting today out of San Diego saying the Padres will not be over the luxury tax threshold in '25. They're already over and don't have a lot of options to save money.
How about Kutter Crawford for Dylan Cease and Robert Suarez? BTV has that as an overpay by Boston due to Suarez having negative value and Cease being a free agent after '25. SD needs cheap MLB talent, particularly in the rotation. Sox can flex their financial muscle to upgrade the rotation with Cease and install Suarez as their closer. SD would save about $21M in this deal. And I think SD would be more open to this type of deal if they do land Sasaki.
Pair that deal with a Fried/Burnes signing and the rotation would be Fried/Burnes, Cease, Houck, Bello, Giolito and the back end of the bullpen being Suarez, Chapman, Slaten, Hendricks, Whitlock
Yes, that would be more traditional, but I think the Padres are in an odd spot -- unlike most teams looking to cut costs, I don't think this is a full scale rebuild. They've got Machado, Tatis, Xander (whoops), Musgrove, Darvish under contract for years, a budding star in Merrill, and just took the Dodgers to Game 5 of the NLDS last year.Why wouldn’t San Diego just trade them for prospects? They both have value.
If I’m San Diego, in order to give the Red Sox Dylan Cease for Kutter Crawford, they’re taking Xander back. I’m sure as hell not adding a reliever that was in the all star game last year that’s only making $10 million.Xander (since you mentioned him, dynamite):
Last 2 years with Boston:
2021 (28): .863 ops, 129 ops+, 5.0 bWAR, $20m
2022 (29): .833 ops, 131 ops+, 5.9 bWAR, $20m
First 2 years with San Diego:
2023 (30): .790 ops, 117 ops+, 4.4 bWAR, $25m
2024 (31): .688 ops, 92 ops+, 1.2 bWAR, $25m
And they're on the hook for NINE (!) more seasons at $25m apiece, through his age 40 season.
YIKES
They've also been quite willing to wheel and deal, Brad Stevens-style. Like trading for Soto, and then turning around and trading him to the Yankees a year later, and then using part of that return (Thorpe) to get Cease. I mean think about that, for one year of Soto they got two years of Cease plus two years of Michael King.Yes, that would be more traditional, but I think the Padres are in an odd spot -- unlike most teams looking to cut costs, I don't think this is a full scale rebuild. They've got Machado, Tatis, Xander (whoops), Musgrove, Darvish under contract for years, a budding star in Merrill, and just took the Dodgers to Game 5 of the NLDS last year.
They probably feel their window is still open and are looking to compete while reducing costs. Trading a few high priced assets for a few much cheaper ML assets makes a lot more sense in that context.
And if that's the case, Breslow hangs up the phone. No one is taking Xander's contract off their hands.If I’m San Diego, in order to give the Red Sox Dylan Cease for Kutter Crawford, they’re taking Xander back. I’m sure as hell not adding a reliever that was in the all star game last year that’s only making $10 million.
Great thoughts, and for the record, would love this deal as well.Edit: I almost suggested a Wilyer for Cease/Suarez deal instead of Kutter, as the value is similar according to BTV (same with Casas). That could be something they're more interested in. Or, you add another cheap piece or two to the deal with Kutter. Either way, I think the Sox could take advantage of the Padres needing to save money here.
I bet it gets to something like 7/$196mThey better be willing to pay through the nose if they actually want to sign Fried.
Don’t trade prospects when we have the money to just sign a top arm
I was assuming the Price deal 7/$210. I would do it. If they want to actually sign anyone good, they’re going to have to overpay like every other middle of the pack team that needs starting pitching.I bet it gets to something like 7/$196m
I’m sure he’d rather go to the MFY. They were in the World Series last year, the Red Sox were .500. So they’re going to have to overpay to get him here.I wish that said the Sox were Fried’s top choice instead the other way around
I'm pretty sure Max Scherzer was 7 years/$210 million and David Price was 7 years/$217 million.I was assuming the Price deal 7/$210.
This sounds right. On both points.I'm pretty sure Max Scherzer was 7 years/$210 million and David Price was 7 years/$217 million.
My guess for Fried is 7/$200 million. And Breslow should be ready to pay that.
I believe you are correct now that I think about it. Price was $217.I'm pretty sure Max Scherzer was 7 years/$210 million and David Price was 7 years/$217 million.
My guess for Fried is 7/$200 million. And Breslow should be ready to pay that.
Trading Darvish is probably the move, except he's the biggest reason why they're favorites to get Sasaki. If I'm San Diego, I'd be asking for Houck back instead of Crawford, or find someone that's willing to take on Musgrove.Then San Diego finds a different way to clear money that doesn’t involve trading a top 5 Cy Young finalist from last year for a 4th starter. I’m just trying to look at trade proposals from the other side of the table.
I know he and Giolito are close. Here's hoping that helps.I’m sure he’d rather go to the MFY. They were in the World Series last year, the Red Sox were .500. So they’re going to have to overpay to get him here.
That's historically been the approach, but I suspect they have to do it with at least one of these guys. Getting two 30+ year old additions at Free Agent dollars is probably too risky.Haven't the Red Sox been pretty clear that they aren't looking to sign FA pitchers who are over 30 years old? Both Fried and Burnes are exactly 30 years old right now.
I'm not trying to be cute; I could have sworn that the team singled that out as something they weren't comfortable doing.
They’re probably not comfortable with a half empty ballpark either. It’s the price of doing business. If you can’t grow your own pitching, you gotta pay through the nose for guys in their 30’s, or continue to suck and further tank your brand.Haven't the Red Sox been pretty clear that they aren't looking to sign FA pitchers who are over 30 years old? Both Fried and Burnes are exactly 30 years old right now.
I'm not trying to be cute; I could have sworn that the team singled that out as something they weren't comfortable doing.
Perhaps they’ve decided that they aren’t comfortable finishing between 3rd and last in the division while they wait for their own starters to develop?Haven't the Red Sox been pretty clear that they aren't looking to sign FA pitchers who are over 30 years old? Both Fried and Burnes are exactly 30 years old right now.
I'm not trying to be cute; I could have sworn that the team singled that out as something they weren't comfortable doing.
They have said that. They also said that they can’t rule that out, as recently as Breslow, yesterday. Messaging has been decidedly mixed.Haven't the Red Sox been pretty clear that they aren't looking to sign FA pitchers who are over 30 years old? Both Fried and Burnes are exactly 30 years old right now.
I'm not trying to be cute; I could have sworn that the team singled that out as something they weren't comfortable doing.
That's why the Padres are in such a tough spot right now. They need Darvish if they want to land Sasaki. They can't trade Musgrove right now because he's probably out all season due to his TJ surgery. Cronenworth doesn't have much value. Maybe they could move Arraez, but they seemed to really like what he brought to their lineup last year. They don't have many other realistic trade options to save significant $ except Cease and SuarezTrading Darvish is probably the move, except he's the biggest reason why they're favorites to get Sasaki. If I'm San Diego, I'd be asking for Houck back instead of Crawford, or find someone that's willing to take on Musgrove.
Total home attendance in 2024 was less than 10% down from 2018. If you factor in expanded numbers of fans of other teams coming into Fenway in recent seasons, the ballpark revenue/attendee has likely grown (even beyond inflation). These fans making a once-in-a-lifetime trip to Fenway are less likely to eat outside the ballpark and more likely to load up on extras (tours, souvenirs, photos, and so forth).They’re probably not comfortable with a half empty ballpark either. It’s the price of doing business. If you can’t grow your own pitching, you gotta pay through the nose for guys in their 30’s, or continue to suck and further tank your brand.
That’s not a sustainable business model. They need a fan base. They need a brand. And right now it’s in the toilet.Total home attendance in 2024 was less than 10% down from 2018. If you factor in expanded numbers of fans of other teams coming into Fenway in recent seasons, the ballpark revenue/attendee has likely grown (even beyond inflation). These fans making a once-in-a-lifetime trip to Fenway are less likely to eat outside the ballpark and more likely to load up on extras (tours, souvenirs, photos, and so forth).
I don't think attendance is driving their fear train. JWH would sit on his wallet indefinitely and admire the rings (I get it) if the only downside was a couple thousand seats...likely absorbed by out of towners anyway. I think the fear is NESN360...which can't be good.Total home attendance in 2024 was less than 10% down from 2018. If you factor in expanded numbers of fans of other teams coming into Fenway in recent seasons, the ballpark revenue/attendee has likely grown (even beyond inflation). These fans making a once-in-a-lifetime trip to Fenway are less likely to eat outside the ballpark and more likely to load up on extras (tours, souvenirs, photos, and so forth).
Pretty sure it costs less than $200M to fix the worst app in the business . . .I think the fear is NESN360...which can't be good.
I'm sorry, I tried to read this message, but it said I was out of the Service Area.Pretty sure it costs less than $200M to fix the worst app in the business . . .
Oh you mean people watching even if/when it's fixed?
Not sure if it was mentioned upthread, if so I apologize. Attendance is one thing. Ticket prices are another. You can currently buy tickets to a Patriots game for $30 because the team sucks. Hope Henry is proud that Fenway is filled with fans rooting for visiting teams. I remember when that used to happen in parks when the Sox visited town.That’s not a sustainable business model. They need a fan base. They need a brand. And right now it’s in the toilet.