Team USA 2024

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
15,479
Manhattan
I started listening to the podcast but couldn't really get through it all. (The podcast on "Two-Way Forwards" (not wings) was slightly more interesting and they call JT the current apex Two-Way Forward.)

The list you have has a lot of caveats - that they have the players in bands but ended up having to list them 1 through 10; this is just for 2023-24; it ranks players when they were healthy (so yes assuming "health" but not completely assuming health because Ben wasn't going to take Halliburton's first two months and extrapolate over the same year. It was pretty convoluted and frankly not entirely convincing.

Adjusted for health/availability, JT was 6th:

1) Jokic
2) Luka
3) SGA
4) AD
5) Steph
6) Tatum
7) LeBron
8) Edwards
9/10) Embiid/Brunson/KD
The 2-way forwards pod is awesome, and a big reason I'd be comfortable arguing for Tatum as a a top 2 or 3 player.

Thinking Basketball is great, had interesting insights about Tatum's value and backed away at the last second from drawing uncomfortably non-consensus conclusions from that analysis.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
11,348
San Francisco
The 2-way forwards pod is awesome, and a big reason I'd be comfortable arguing for Tatum as a a top 2 or 3 player.

Thinking Basketball is great, had interesting insights about Tatum's value and backed away at the last second from drawing uncomfortably non-consensus conclusions from that analysis.
it was weird hearing them talk about how valuable his switch ability was in the finals and talking about how curry has aged and steadily declined in impact metrics and…. then put curry over tatum.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
29,912
Newton
It's going to be something watching the NBA press realize that Tatum has yet another level next year.

The biggest emotion I saw from him post-championship was relief. He really is good enough. His belief in himself was real. His questions of himself were unfounded. He truly does belong with all of his idols.

That's going to be reinforced 10-fold during the Olympics, where it's going to be clear he's the best player on the team, and he's going to carry that into next season, where he's going to destroy people on the regular. If he's not the pre-season MVP favorite, Vegas isn't paying attention.

That face SGA is making is the face of a man who knows he just got blown by in the MVP race. People who would take Luka over him are high. Embiid? No fucking way that lumbering bull in a china shop is a better player than Tatum or more valuable to a winning team. Giannis? With his sub-28% 3-point percentage? Maybe.

Can't wait for all of the flowers Tatum is going to get in France this summer and then watch his ascendancy to MVP favorite in the fall.
This post pumped me up. Make it so, Jayson!
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
15,479
Manhattan
it was weird hearing them talk about how valuable his switch ability was in the finals and talking about how curry has aged and steadily declined in impact metrics and…. then put curry over tatum.
It's not just the switchability and defense: they were talking about how valuable it is to have a 2-way wing who can create offense, and how Tatum is in a league of his own in that regard.

Tatum is elite at drawing 2 to the ball, especially off drives. He's better at it than Luka imo, and it lets the Celtics have a great offense with a lot of players who are secondary or tertiary creators around him.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
25,153
it was weird hearing them talk about how valuable his switch ability was in the finals and talking about how curry has aged and steadily declined in impact metrics and…. then put curry over tatum.
I thought the same thing. Curry is still a fantastic player, but it's hard to say he is a better player than Tatum at this stage of his career, when you consider the complete nature of Tatum's game, as well as his health and durability while playing high-leverage minutes.

To me, Jokic and maybe Giannis are the only people I'd put ahead of Tatum at the moment. I think @TomRicardo had it right in his tiers--those are the clear three superstars in their prime that have shown they can deliver consistently at the highest level.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
15,479
Manhattan
I don't know. We can appreciate the good work that someone does and still discount them for dumbass takes like putting SGA and Luka above Tatum.
I don't know. We can appreciate the good work that someone does and still discount them for dumbass takes like putting SGA and Luka above Tatum.
It's weird to me how consensus the "Luka as #2" take still is.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
34,451
The 2-way forwards pod is awesome, and a big reason I'd be comfortable arguing for Tatum as a a top 2 or 3 player.

Thinking Basketball is great, had interesting insights about Tatum's value and backed away at the last second from drawing uncomfortably non-consensus conclusions from that analysis.
I thought the "Two-Way" portion was great but the distinction between "Wing" and "Forward" didn't really land for me. I think this year's Cs team showed that it doesn't really matter how big guys are - the more players a team has who are positive on both ends of the floor, the better off the team is, and, insofar as one of their themes go, really make roster-building a lot easier. For example, they wouldn't call DWhite a "Two-Way Forward" but having him on a roster does allow flexibility in putting together the other players. It's when a team has more than one guy who is a problem on either end of the floor that things become problemmatic.

It also seems to me that any player who is positive defensively is going to be able to guard more than one position. Maybe Gobert and some small guard who is great on-ball but not really much else are the exceptions, but most plus defenders are plus defenders because they have versatility.

Still, the podcast overall was very good.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
15,479
Manhattan
I thought the "Two-Way" portion was great but the distinction between "Wing" and "Forward" didn't really land for me. I think this year's Cs team showed that it doesn't really matter how big guys are - the more players a team has who are positive on both ends of the floor, the better off the team is, and, insofar as one of their themes go, really make roster-building a lot easier. For example, they wouldn't call DWhite a "Two-Way Forward" but having him on a roster does allow flexibility in putting together the other players. It's when a team has more than one guy who is a problem on either end of the floor that things become problemmatic.

It also seems to me that any player who is positive defensively is going to be able to guard more than one position. Maybe Gobert and some small guard who is great on-ball but not really much else are the exceptions, but most plus defenders are plus defenders because they have versatility.

Still, the podcast overall was very good.
There's something qualitatively different about guys who can credibly (or elitely) guard 1-5 and rebound, like Draymond, JT, Anunoby.

It's usually thought of as a defensive thing, but Tatum takes it even further by being able to occupy tons of different roles on offense.

That versatility is at the heart of basketball, and I think does make that type of guy uniquely valuable, in a way I thought Thinking Basketball did a good job of verbalizing, and that should factor more into raw player value rankings.

(Interestingly, it does show up in impact stats, where Tatum has long been loved).

The epitome of this was Peak LeBron, who had ridiculous, ridiculous impact stat value and won a ton no matter the team. Good team? They win the title. Mediocre team? They're going to the Finals.

Guards, smaller wings, and centers just haven't had that type of impact. Even Jordan needed Pippen, and Pippen was such an elite forward that he nearly took the Bulls back to the Finals when MJ sat out.

It's just a uniquely valuable position, particularly when the forward is also a creator on offense.
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
22,148
Row 14
I thought the "Two-Way" portion was great but the distinction between "Wing" and "Forward" didn't really land for me. I think this year's Cs team showed that it doesn't really matter how big guys are - the more players a team has who are positive on both ends of the floor, the better off the team is, and, insofar as one of their themes go, really make roster-building a lot easier. For example, they wouldn't call DWhite a "Two-Way Forward" but having him on a roster does allow flexibility in putting together the other players. It's when a team has more than one guy who is a problem on either end of the floor that things become problemmatic.

It also seems to me that any player who is positive defensively is going to be able to guard more than one position. Maybe Gobert and some small guard who is great on-ball but not really much else are the exceptions, but most plus defenders are plus defenders because they have versatility.

Still, the podcast overall was very good.
Tatum is the only true two way positionless player in the NBA. In the Finals Tatum was playing point center.
 

mostman

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 3, 2003
20,880
Can someone tell me who the announcer crew was for that Canada v USA game? I’m seriously doubting who I think it was.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
10,798
Oakland
This makes sense (Booker has a much higher ceiling if a slightly lower floor than Booker, while Tatum is probably the best all-around player on the team), but I'd be surprised if these two both start when the real games begin. Even if it's not the ideal starting lineup based on fit and talent, deferring to the vets probably doesn't move the needle in terms of results because the worst possible lineup for team USA is still the best in the world by a decent stretch.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
34,451
Giddy had a PnR and got Edwards on his hip - just like Luka did over and over and over against MIN. Ant must have PTSD by now.

The Embiid/LBJ/JT/Ant/Curry doesn't have a lot of movement.

But JT with the baseline drive to a flush! Who needs movement? :)
 

jmcc5400

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
6,073
Giddy had a PnR and got Edwards on his hip - just like Luka did over and over and over against MIN. Ant must have PTSD by now.

The Embiid/LBJ/JT/Ant/Curry doesn't have a lot of movement.

But JT with the baseline drive to a flush! Who needs movement? :)
Ball sticks a lot with Ant and Embiid.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
34,451
USA outscoring Australia 24-6 from 3P line, which is basically the margin right now.

Australia outscoring US 28-10 in the paint. Jock Landale has 13 for Australia, it's leading scorer so far.
 

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
15,917
Probably not. There's Joker, Giannis, SGA, and the "best player in the NBA"* Luka Doncic for 4 guys who would probably be on that list.

*see his thread for the uninitiated.
Yeah, I was thinking Jokic and Giannis. I would have a hard time picking SGA or Luka over any of those guys, maybe Ant, but I guess most recent MVP voting would disagree. And I'm not going into that Luka thread.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
15,479
Manhattan
It's jarring to come from watching the Celtics' title run to whatever the fuck offense Team USA is running here.
 

JCizzle

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2006
22,985
It looks like LeBron forgets how to dribble with the international ball sometimes.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
10,798
Oakland
Anyone know where I can get a good box score of these games? The only one I've been able to find is from the USA basketball website, which somehow does include individual points (don't make me do math).

I missed most of this game, but good to see Tatum and Holiday lead the team in assists.