Tatum got the bag(5 years, $195 million)

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,556
Its mutual. I recognize we are guessing whats in his mind, and I also realize that there is likely plenty of projection of our own frustrations regarding this team onto what we think is happening in the players' heads, but also its a message board where else can I make such fun speculations? I am starved for gossip this past year!

That said, we hear plenty of retired players talk about the impact of trusting your teammates. The documentary on the Bulls had heaps of MJ talking about his mindset during the 80's Bulls years. I don't think its crazy to think Tatum sees himself as a star, sees (rightly) a lot of his teammates as scrubs, and alters his play because of it.
I agree with this. The last thing to remind everyone of is that presumably Tatum (and most other NBA players) are being asked to distribute more once they become professionals for obvious reasons. It stands to follow that some of what we see as reticence to pass to one teammate or another could be a function of trust or simply inexperience.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,392
San Francisco
He is absolutely frustrating to watch at times, I wish he’d make quicker decisions and change his shot profile some. But like.....it’s part of the deal lol, only a handful of guys in nba history have led their team to titles or even the finals at Tatum’s age.

He’s one of 6 guys in the league averaging 25/7/4, his efficiency has been climbing by the week, he takes care of the ball at an elite level (last night notwithstanding lol). Of course I wish he’d do things differently and wish he’d get that it would only make it easier on himself, but it takes a long time for players to figure it out, especially when other defenses entire defensive schemes are built to slow him down.

I meant to say pass frequency %, but it’s right here.

https://www.nba.com/stats/team/1610612738/passes-dash/
OK, what is pass frequency? Is this share of the teams total passes? The website glossary doesn't really explain how its computed.
 

RetractableRoof

tolerates intolerance
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2003
3,836
Quincy, MA
@wade boggs chicken dinner Thank you for the charts and the links... now I can muck around the 'passes' area when I think I see things. Teach a guy to fish, etc...

There are tons of ways to interpret the data in those charts and get SOME value from them without 100% inferring the point is wrong. For example, Tatum might have found PP for 56 passes but Brad watches/charts and thinks that he should have found PP for 98 (or even 35) in the same time frame - as in it would have been the correct read according to Brad. (Just theoretical).

I'm not making a big deal about any one play, I don't think anyone is. I don't think anyone is honestly making a big deal on any 10 plays this season where 'Tatum could have/should have...'. We reference them because they stand out, but in the end, it's 10 plays. But we do see a common pattern of Tatum not doing more with his gravity, and in some games the judgement to take a crap shot himself versus an open teammate within hailing range - that's game thread worthy. The data clearly shows he's not ALWAYS ignoring PP, but that doesn't mean that there isn't something of a pattern there as well (previous example with Brad's expectations). One could make an argument from your first passing chart that Tatum and Smart don't do a good job of putting PP in a rhythm of shooting successfully - he has the lowest 3 point conversion percentage receiving the ball from either of them. I'm not going to make that argument, even though the data kinda hints at it if you squint a bit. But in numbers that small the humidity in the arena might be more important, who knows.

Thanks for providing the data (& links), I think there is value in seeing it. In the end, his professional maturity is where it is. We have high hopes for him, and impossibly high expectations. That doesn't mean the next lowest hanging fruit for his development isn't improved passing to those who aren't in what he (or others) consider his stratosphere on the team.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,298
Lynn
OK, what is pass frequency? Is this share of the teams total passes? The website glossary doesn't really explain how its computed.
This is just me guessing, but I think it’s percentage of teams passes.

He catches the ball 51 times a game, and passes it 49 times. Kemba is at 61 catches and 51 passes, Smart 52 catches and 47 passes, Jaylen 42 catches and 30 passes.

I genuinely don’t think he has much of an issue moving the ball, but he absolutely holds onto it too long.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,392
San Francisco
Yea, my feeling about measuring the skill of "moving the ball" is that the implicit signals (general offensive efficiency when they are on the floor, shot distributions as a team, etc) are still way more meaningful than detailed pass tracking data, because the pass data I have seen is all lacking context. But I haven't really looked closely at the granular data NBA has.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,298
Lynn
Yea, my feeling about measuring the skill of "moving the ball" is that the implicit signals (general offensive efficiency when they are on the floor, shot distributions as a team, etc) are still way more meaningful than detailed pass tracking data, because the pass data I have seen is all lacking context. But I haven't really looked closely at the granular data NBA has.
I’m with you on preferring the team impact stats, but they show the same thing in that the offense is far better with him in the game, and goes to hell when he sits. Here is the teams offensive ratings for when the following players are on and off the court.

Tatum: 114/106.8
Jaylen: 112.5/110.6
Kemba: 112.8/111.6
Smart: 112.3/112.2
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,742
OK, what is pass frequency? Is this share of the teams total passes? The website glossary doesn't really explain how its computed.
"FREQ" is defined as "The number of events that occur that fit the specified criteria based on the number of events overall". So I would imagine it's the players total passes divided by team's total passes.

https://www.nba.com/stats/help/glossary/#freq
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
Interesting. The only players on this list who have won a championship are what I would call "physical freaks of nature" (LBJ, KD, Shaq) or who were paired with the above (Kyrie), which AD and Kobe being in either or both categories depending on you look at them.

The jury is still out on Giannis and McGrady was slowed by injuries.

And I think we can all agree that JT is not a physical freak of nature. I know we've had this discussion before multiple times and I don't mean to rehash it but it will be interesting to see if JT can be the best player on a championship team. I think the odds are against him but it would be great if he beat the odds.
I'm not going to say that JT is or will ever be KD, but KD is the model for how and why peak JT could be that guy. They're length freaks. Or more appropriately length+skill freaks, unlike LBJ and Shaq.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
I’m with you on preferring the team impact stats, but they show the same thing in that the offense is far better with him in the game, and goes to hell when he sits. Here is the teams offensive ratings for when the following players are on and off the court.

Tatum: 114/106.8
Jaylen: 112.5/110.6
Kemba: 112.8/111.6
Smart: 112.3/112.2
Even those numbers are flawed. They don't know what to do with players like TL because there is no way to justify a 140 ORtg and 103 DRtg. This isn't new either, he's been a darling for his whole career using those metrics.

It's all bigs who dunk, block and rebound.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,298
Lynn
Even those numbers are flawed. They don't know what to do with players like TL because there is no way to justify a 140 ORtg and 103 DRtg. This isn't new either, he's been a darling for his whole career using those metrics.

It's all bigs who dunk, block and rebound.
I’m just talking the teams rating when he’s in. They have a 110 offensive rating when Rob plays, and a 112 when he sits.

https://www.nba.com/stats/team/1610612738/onoffcourt-advanced/
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,392
San Francisco
Yeah, they have way different numbers than basketball reference. NBA.com seem more believable to me.

So confusing.
Yea, there is individual ORtg on BB-ref which is computed using box score stats and then doing a regression on team efficiency, which is very confusing because they compute DRtg purely by the team DRtg when the player is on the floor. I remember having this conversation a lot when Kyrie's DRtg was one of the best in the league his first year on the C's, just because he was on a good defensive team.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,298
Lynn
20 of his 25 shots were from three, or in the paint. Pretty sexy stuff.

The volume is still way too low, but he’s shooting 73% within 3 feet. Just for comparisons sake, Jaylen is at 70%. They both just need to get to the rim more.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
20 of his 25 shots were from three, or in the paint. Pretty sexy stuff.

The volume is still way too low, but he’s shooting 73% within 3 feet. Just for comparisons sake, Jaylen is at 70%. They both just need to get to the rim more.
They've clearly been making more of a focus on that lately. Frankly, it was the reason why they pulled out the Knicks game.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,556
Tatum is gonna be really freakin good. Room to grow - he's taken 118 fadeaways and hit 31% of them.
I know he is not perfect and may never be a top X player but he is already elite at scoring. And he still has a bunch of upside.

Its understandable that he is drawing some criticism during a frustrating season but damn its hard not to look at him when he is on and dream really big.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,277
Yeah, I’d like to know what Tatum’s expectations are to be criticized this season. Not coming out every night like it’s a Game 7 isn’t reason to be critical especially in a condensed season. There is also a direct relation to the period when he was sluggish/struggled with his return from Covid.

Tatum was a 3rd Team All-NBA selection last year and will probably be a 2nd Team pick this year despite the teams struggles.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,308
Santa Monica
Yeah, I’d like to know what Tatum’s expectations are to be criticized this season. Not coming out every night like it’s a Game 7 isn’t reason to be critical especially in a condensed season. There is also a direct relation to the period when he was sluggish/struggled with his return from Covid.

Tatum was a 3rd Team All-NBA selection last year and will probably be a 2nd Team pick this year despite the teams struggles.
I think COVID sapped a lot out of Tatum (and he may have rushed back).

I'd say it's a coin toss he makes 3rd team... 2nd team would mean a huge finish to the season, which would be FAN-tastic
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,277
I think COVID sapped a lot out of Tatum (and he may have rushed back).

I'd say it's a coin toss he makes 3rd team... 2nd team would mean a huge finish to the season, which would be FAN-tastic
Coin toss for 3rd team? After Giannis, LeBron and Kawhi I have the second F slot on the 2nd Team going to either Tatum or Randle. Who else would be in play for 2nd Team?
 

HowBoutDemSox

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2009
10,131
Coin toss for 3rd team? After Giannis, LeBron and Kawhi I have the second F slot on the 2nd Team going to either Tatum or Randle. Who else would be in play for 2nd Team?
Durant, Zion, and Paul George seem like contenders, though Durant may lose votes for missing too many games.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,181
Imaginationland
Coin toss for 3rd team? After Giannis, LeBron and Kawhi I have the second F slot on the 2nd Team going to either Tatum or Randle. Who else would be in play for 2nd Team?
Paul George, Jimmy Butler, Tatum, Zion. Impressive as Randle has been I don't see him as a serious competitor for 2nd team. The guard spots will get crowded - Doncic, Harden, Lillard, Curry, Paul, Kyrie. It wouldn't be the greatest shock to see five of those guys make 1st/2nd team (and Embiid/Jokic are locks for the center spots), leaving just 3 slots for forwards.

*edit - I think ultimately Tatum is right where he was at the end of last year - just on outside of the top 10. Which is fine. The only guy in his age range clearly ahead of him is Luka, who amazingly enough also has tons of room to grow as a player.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,308
Santa Monica
Coin toss for 3rd team? After Giannis, LeBron and Kawhi I have the second F slot on the 2nd Team going to either Tatum or Randle. Who else would be in play for 2nd Team?
Its always tricky to figure how they comprise these teams by position but Jokic, Giannis, Bron Kawhi, Luka take 1st team

Then you need to throw Embiid, Rudy, KAT, Curry, Harden, Kyrie, Dame, Zion, Mitchell, Beal, George, Butler, Paul, Booker, Lavine, Simmons into the mix for 2nd and 3rd team.

20 games left, which is ~30% of the season

AD/Durant probably too injured?
 
Last edited:

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,277
Paul George, Jimmy Butler, Tatum, Zion. Impressive as Randle has been I don't see him as a serious competitor for 2nd team. The guard spots will get crowded - Doncic, Harden, Lillard, Curry, Paul, Kyrie. It wouldn't be the greatest shock to see five of those guys make 1st/2nd team (and Embiid/Jokic are locks for the center spots), leaving just 3 slots for forwards.

*edit - I think ultimately Tatum is right where he was at the end of last year - just on outside of the top 10. Which is fine. The only guy in his age range clearly ahead of him is Luka, who amazingly enough also has tons of room to grow as a player.
Tatum finished well ahead of George and Butler last year so I don’t view them as fsctors. Durant hasn’t played much: I did forget about Zion along with Tatum and Randle so yeah, 2nd Team may be right but I can’t see him falling outside the 3rd.

Edit: Stop trusting memory. Tatum barely beat out Butler but the latter has missed a ton of games this year.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,181
Imaginationland
Tatum finished well ahead of George and Butler last year so I don’t view them as fsctors. Durant hasn’t played much: I did forget about Zion along with Tatum and Randle so yeah, 2nd Team may be right but I can’t see him falling outside the 3rd.
Yeah I didn't mention Durant, he's missed way too much time to be considered for any of this. George/Butler are both quite a bit older so we don't think about them as improving, but they've both had much better seasons. George went from averaging 21.5/5.7/3.9 with a TS% of .589 to averaging 22.8/6.3/5.3 with a TS% of .615. Butler is averaging 21.6/7.4/7.2 (all improvements) while leading the league in steals and has a TS% of .601.

I think Tatum is probably very slightly ahead of those two right now, but it's close and there's still about 20 games left. Also worth noting that while Butler technically finished behind Tatum last year they both made 3rd team. Saying Tatum got more votes is really just semantics, especially considering Butler literally finished 1 spot behind Tatum (12th overall). George ultimately didn't have a shot because he missed too much time (24 games last year vs just 4 missed games this year). Honestly I don't think Tatum finishing ahead of them last year ends up being much of an advantage this year.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,308
Santa Monica
Tatum finished well ahead of George and Butler last year so I don’t view them as fsctors. Durant hasn’t played much: I did forget about Zion along with Tatum and Randle so yeah, 2nd Team may be right but I can’t see him falling outside the 3rd.

Edit: Stop trusting memory. Tatum barely beat out Butler but the latter has missed a ton of games this year.
I wouldn't be surprised if they use the classic PG/SG format and they are casual with defining guards.

PG/SG
1st Team: Luka/Dame
2nd Team: Harden/Curry
3rd Team: Irving/Mitchell or Beal

Center: Jokic, Embiid, Kat or Rudy

PF/SF
1st Team: Giannis/Bron
2nd Team: Kahwi/ ?
3rd Team: ? / ?

For those 3 spots, it probably comes down to Tatum, Zion, Randle, George, Butler, even Booker gets some consideration with Phoenix playing so well

AD and Durant will probably sop up those forward spots next season
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,652
Bird sure was a fan of March.
In one of those two games by McHale, McHale set the team record with 56 points in a game. Bird said afterwards that McHale "should have gone for 60". Bird then broke the new record by dropping 60 points in the next game a few games later (which was one of the two games of his best two-game effort).

EDIT: Upon further review, it actually wasn't the next game that Bird broke the new record. McHale scored his 56 on March 3rd, and Larry dropped 60 nine days later, on March 12th.

https://www.nba.com/news/legendary-moments-larry-bird-60-points-vs-hawks
 
Last edited:

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
14,293
Nice feature in the Athletic on some of the adjustments Tatum's made in the last couple of weeks, with good video examples:

https://theathletic.com/2516000/2021/04/13/how-did-jayson-tatum-tweak-his-game-to-win-nba-player-of-the-week/

For those without a sub:

- Smart is a big plus for him, getting him more catch-and-shoots and helping him reset at the top of the key
- More passes to the corners on drives (it's sorta funny that the examples of this include some clangs, but no one hits every shot)
- Less settling for fadeaways and jump shots
- He missed Theis for a little while and has created some different action with TL and TT, instead of the "snake seal" or whatever they called that
- Consciously not working as hard to set up his step-back, since it involves so much "in his bag" stuff that he knows wastes time

Very encouraging analysis.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,051
Nice feature in the Athletic on some of the adjustments Tatum's made in the last couple of weeks, with good video examples:

https://theathletic.com/2516000/2021/04/13/how-did-jayson-tatum-tweak-his-game-to-win-nba-player-of-the-week/

For those without a sub:

- Smart is a big plus for him, getting him more catch-and-shoots and helping him reset at the top of the key
- More passes to the corners on drives (it's sorta funny that the examples of this include some clangs, but no one hits every shot)
- Less settling for fadeaways and jump shots
- He missed Theis for a little while and has created some different action with TL and TT, instead of the "snake seal" or whatever they called that
- Consciously not working as hard to set up his step-back, since it involves so much "in his bag" stuff that he knows wastes time

Very encouraging analysis.
Good stuff.

The FT/game is interesting:

Dec: 3.0
Jan: 4.1
Feb: 5.9
Mar: 3.7
Apr: 6.0

He started slow (short offseason?) built nicely, then COVID, now he's back attacking.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,742
Nice feature in the Athletic on some of the adjustments Tatum's made in the last couple of weeks, with good video examples:

https://theathletic.com/2516000/2021/04/13/how-did-jayson-tatum-tweak-his-game-to-win-nba-player-of-the-week/
edit: last paragraph from the article has these numbers (underline added): "It’s no surprise that Tatum has gone from drawing two or three fouls a game a few weeks ago to at least five a night on the team’s recent winning stretch. He’s also taking 2.7 more catch-and-shoots per game in April, shooting a whopping 18.2 percentage points better than in the aforementioned March period, per Second Spectrum. He’s dialing it up in the most high-value looks in the game and, shockingly, it’s working."
Maybe JT has been reading SOSH. :cool:

Thanks for posting. Just for amusement's sake, here's the first video from that link. Note MJ Porter's "defense". Never seen anyone who doesn't even try on defense.

View: https://twitter.com/celtics/status/1381333950673559556
 
Last edited:

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,181
Imaginationland
Thanks for posting. Just for amusement's sake, here's the first video from that link. Note MJ Porter's "defense". Never seen anyone who doesn't even try on defense.
Yeah that's...not great from MPJ. When I watch him I can see what gets people so excited - on offense he occasionally looks like a taller Tatum, but his defense will hold him back. A fully realized version of Denver has to include both Gordon and Porter playing well above average wing defense to cover up for Jokic and Murray. For better or worse Denver likely won't be a legit title contender until 2023 (when Murray is 100%), so MPJ has time to improve.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
Yeah that's...not great from MPJ. When I watch him I can see what gets people so excited - on offense he occasionally looks like a taller Tatum, but his defense will hold him back. A fully realized version of Denver has to include both Gordon and Porter playing well above average wing defense to cover up for Jokic and Murray. For better or worse Denver likely won't be a legit title contender until 2023 (when Murray is 100%), so MPJ has time to improve.
That'll never happen for Porter. He's ghastly at everything on defense and can't pass like at all. He's a much better shooting Kuzma.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,657
That'll never happen for Porter. He's ghastly at everything on defense and can't pass like at all. He's a much better shooting Kuzma.
I mean, sure in the way that Steph Curry is a better shooting Dana Barros. MPJ is 22 and already an elite scorer, he's more current Jayson Tatum than Kuzma on that end. The passing needs work (true of most young scorers, his rookie AST% was basically the same as Tatum's and better than Jaylen's), but beyond that he's an incredible offensive talent, especially for a guy in his 2nd year. His defense is bad, and it looks bad because a lot of it is not knowing where to be... it's not ghastly, he's a better defensive producer than a lot of bad defending stars (Lillard, Young, etc.).
I doubt MPJ will ever be good on defense, or as a passer, but he doesn't need to be. If he's just below average on D and mediocre at passing he's a really good player. And passing often takes the longest to develop. Jaylen is an interesting comp... he was a terrible passer for a good 4 years before breaking out. Give me the guy who flirts with 50/40/90 on good usage and is a solid rebounder any day, I can teach him to not embarrass himself on D and playmake (part of that is his offense too, the offense runs through Jokic, MPJ's role is to make the shots Jokic helps set up).
 

Spelunker

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
11,945
I think it's telling that the bad defending stars that you're comparing him to are small guards.

I think it's different being that bad on defense when you're a 6'10 forward.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,742
His defense is bad, and it looks bad because a lot of it is not knowing where to be... it's not ghastly, he's a better defensive producer than a lot of bad defending stars (Lillard, Young, etc.).
It's not just that MPJ doesn't know where to be, it is also that he doesn't give any effort. Like the play below, where he first has a half-hearted double team and JT could have easily thrown it to TL for a dunk over the guard but then he watches JT beat Gordon and takes only one slow shuffle step to help.

View: https://twitter.com/celtics/status/1381356000507138050?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1381356000507138050%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheathletic.com%2F2516000%2F2021%2F04%2F13%2Fhow-did-jayson-tatum-tweak-his-game-to-win-nba-player-of-the-week%2F
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
Yeah I don't mean to imply that MPJ isn't a valuable player. He shoots and rebounds well, and being a very good shooter at 6'10" is an awesome thing to have. But folks wishing on his projection are going to be wishing on it indefinitely. He's tall and very skilled, but there's not much chance of growth. He has a bad body for an NBA player imo.
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
5,947
Cultural hub of the universe
Yeah I don't mean to imply that MPJ isn't a valuable player. He shoots and rebounds well, and being a very good shooter at 6'10" is an awesome thing to have. But folks wishing on his projection are going to be wishing on it indefinitely. He's tall and very skilled, but there's not much chance of growth. He has a bad body for an NBA player imo.
That's an interesting take. He's 6'10 and mobile. That's a pretty good start. He could stand to get both stronger and more flexible, but he's no Jokic.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,277
That's an interesting take. He's 6'10 and mobile. That's a pretty good start. He could stand to get both stronger and more flexible, but he's no Jokic.
Yeah I think Porter’s body is ideal for an NBA wing/forward. Bol Bol is what I would call a bad body, not Porter.