Suzuki 3000

Flynn4ever

Member
SoSH Member
When I first came to Japan almost 20 years ago Ichiro was a phenom who beat the hated Giants in the Japan Series that year. I never would have imagined that he might someday go to the States and become the 30th person to get 3000 hits in MLB. Are we impressed or do we dismiss him as a slap hitter? (But in batting practice, man he hits it hard.) Thoughts?
 
Last edited:

Tokyo Sox

Baka Gaijin
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 16, 2006
6,167
There
We're impressed. I don't know about the rest of the board, but we're impressed. I can't wait to watch the news when I get home tonight.

Nothing about 3,000 hits can be dismissed, I think. Yes he slapped some of them. Yes he could have taken more walks, or probably could have sacrificed some average for power (though when asked about that once in Seattle he said, "We already have one Richie Sexson on the team")...but he is, as you said, 1 of only 30 guys to join this club, ever. And he's 1 of only 2 (joining Rose) to do it in just 16 seasons. There's nothing cheap about any of it.
 

Was (Not Wasdin)

family crest has godzilla
SoSH Member
Jul 26, 2007
3,741
The Short Bus
I am impressed with Ichiro, and I enjoyed watching him as a player. But I am surprised by how low he is on B-Ref's career WAR table.

He is at 122 by Position Player War, 184 overall, in his 16th season (59.8 WAR)

Some comparables
Jim Edmonds, 17 years, 60.3
Bobby Abreu, 18 years, 59.9
John Olerud, 17 years, 58

I really thought he would be solidly in the top 100 for position players.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,230
Portland
I am impressed with Ichiro, and I enjoyed watching him as a player. But I am surprised by how low he is on B-Ref's career WAR table.

He is at 122 by Position Player War, 184 overall, in his 16th season (59.8 WAR)

Some comparables
Jim Edmonds, 17 years, 60.3
Bobby Abreu, 18 years, 59.9
John Olerud, 17 years, 58

I really thought he would be solidly in the top 100 for position players.
He came over when he was 27 which is the primary reason. That's 3-4 6 WAR seasons
 

SirPsychoSquints

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
5,116
Pittsburgh, PA
l
And he's 1 of only 2 (joining Rose) to do it in just 16 seasons. There's nothing cheap about any of it.
This is true for one's FIRST 16 seasons. I did some play indexing. 3 others(Cobb, Musial, and Jeter) have done so over 16 consecutive seasons. Musial and Jeter did so over 2 overlapping such periods. Cobb did so over 5 such periods. Rose did so over 6 such periods.

For Musial, Jeter and Cobb didn't make it in their first 16 seasons due to late season callups in their first seasons.
 

cardiacs

Admires Neville Chamberlain
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
3,001
Milford, CT
What I really would like to see here is a solid argument on why we shouldn't be impressed.
Similarity scores on B-REF seems to be skewed towards guys who put up good numbers in their mid-late 30's. I would be interested to see what they would look like with Japanese stats included, along with some sort of correction factor (for example, .7)
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,230
Portland
My only knock against him was that he hung on 3 or 4 seasons too long a la BIggio and really hasn't been a useful enough bench player to justify a roster spot (though holding his own this year). 3,000 must have been really important to him and maybe he thought it would seal the Cooperstown deal since the resume (unfairly) seemed light.

He hit the ground running, being an absolute terror on the bases and impossible to pitch to.
He had an MVP caliber year and several first team all-star like performances that I'm sure would have been more if he was over here around age 23 or so.

I can't find the fangraphs chat, but someone asked what Ichiro's tools would have rated, and the response was 8 hit tool, 4 power, 7 field, 7-8 speed and an incredible arm.

Aside from having a superior arm and a bit less in game power,that's basically Rickey Henderson-lite.

He is a no doubt first ballot in my mind.
 
Last edited:

Buzzkill Pauley

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 30, 2006
10,569
He came over when he was 27 which is the primary reason. That's 3-4 6 WAR seasons
This is exactly right. WAR is a glorified counting stat.

For Ichiro to have lost 4-5 seasons worth of accumulation during his peak years, it's amazing he's as high as he is.

His game was a real throwback, and it was great to see that succeed during the "three true outcomes" heyday of the early 00's.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,140
Beltre looks like he will be next to 3000, next year sometime, he's at 2878 now.
 

DanoooME

above replacement level
SoSH Member
Mar 16, 2008
19,883
Henderson, NV
My only knock against him was that he hung on 3 or 4 seasons too long a la BIggio and really hasn't been a useful enough bench player to justify a roster spot (though holding his own this year). 3,000 must have been really important to him and maybe he thought it would seal the Cooperstown deal since the resume (unfairly) seemed light.

He hit the ground running, being an absolute terror on the bases and impossible to pitch to.
He had an MVP caliber year and several first team all-star like performances that I'm sure would have been more if he was over here around age 23 or so.

I can't find the fangraphs chat, but someone asked what Ichiro's tools would have rated, and the response was 8 hit tool, 4 power, 7 field, 7-8 speed and an incredible arm.

Aside from having a superior arm and a bit less in game power,that's basically Rickey Henderson-lite.

He is a no doubt first ballot in my mind.
Except for the fact that Rickey drew walks like they were going out of style and Ichiro doesn't.

But I do agree he has to go in the HOF. The guy has been a great player all-around.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,140
Except for the fact that Rickey drew walks like they were going out of style and Ichiro doesn't.
And he had almost three times as many HRs, 297 to 113. I love Ichiro, but no one really compares to prime Rickey for a power/speed combo weapon.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,230
Portland
And he had almost three times as many HRs, 297 to 113. I love Ichiro, but no one really compares to prime Rickey for a power/speed combo weapon.
Rickey, you and I agree that Rickey was the greatest, though slugging wasn't all that far off, .415 to .405 (in Safeco) and not having his age 21-26 over in the states.
Rickey-lite.
 
Last edited:

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,429
Miami (oh, Miami!)
What I really would like to see here is a solid argument on why we shouldn't be impressed.
Similarity scores on B-REF seems to be skewed towards guys who put up good numbers in their mid-late 30's. I would be interested to see what they would look like with Japanese stats included, along with some sort of correction factor (for example, .7)
There's a tab on B-Ref for this: http://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.cgi?id=suzuki001ich Unaltered, that's 4278 hits, 231 HR.

If you go with .7 it's 3894 hits, which'd put him #3 after Rose and Cobb.
 

foulkehampshire

hillbilly suburbanite
SoSH Member
Feb 25, 2007
5,100
Wesport, MA
Rickey, you and I agree that Rickey was the greatest, though slugging wasn't all that far off, .415 to .405 (in Safeco) and not having his age 21-26 over in the states.
Rickey-lite.
.35 points of BA makes a big difference.

Henderson's ISO (.140) is nearly .50 more than Ichiro's (.91). That's not insignificant.
Rickey breached over .200 four times during his prime, and averaged .170 for a decade. Ichiro's best ISO was .133.

I'm not saying Ichiro had bad power as a leadoff guy, we've all seen him hit some bombs over the years. But his game was clearly tailored towards hitting the ball on the ground or poking it into opposite field. Henderson had an approach more like a traditional power hitter. Very different profiles here.
 

Bozo Texino

still hates Dave Kerpen
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
11,871
Austin, Texas
I'm not saying Ichiro had bad power as a leadoff guy, we've all seen him hit some bombs over the years. But his game was clearly tailored towards hitting the ball on the ground or poking it into opposite field.
Reminds me of Posnanski's article on Ichiro and Nolan Ryan.

Ichiro definitely could've had more solid power numbers. It just wasn't what he necessarily wanted to do.

EDIT: And yes - I'm impressed. The dude is a surefire hall of famer.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,230
Portland
.35 points of BA makes a big difference.

Henderson's ISO (.140) is nearly .50 more than Ichiro's (.91). That's not insignificant.
Rickey breached over .200 four times during his prime, and averaged .170 for a decade. Ichiro's best ISO was .133.

I'm not saying Ichiro had bad power as a leadoff guy, we've all seen him hit some bombs over the years. But his game was clearly tailored towards hitting the ball on the ground or poking it into opposite field. Henderson had an approach more like a traditional power hitter. Very different profiles here.
Fair enough.
Plus Rickey had a bat drop after a home run, and Ichiro had more of a flip.
 

Flynn4ever

Member
SoSH Member
.35 points of BA makes a big difference.

Henderson's ISO (.140) is nearly .50 more than Ichiro's (.91). That's not insignificant.
Rickey breached over .200 four times during his prime, and averaged .170 for a decade. Ichiro's best ISO was .133.

I'm not saying Ichiro had bad power as a leadoff guy, we've all seen him hit some bombs over the years. But his game was clearly tailored towards hitting the ball on the ground or poking it into opposite field. Henderson had an approach more like a traditional power hitter. Very different profiles here.
Yeah, I agree with Foulke, they aren't really a great comparison. Rickey was unique in ways that I don't think we'll see in the 21st century. (I'm going by eye test moreso than by stats.)
 

HriniakPosterChild

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 6, 2006
14,841
500 feet above Lake Sammammish
I know the thread is about Ichiro (who I loved seeing play for my hometown M's), but consider how much better Rickey would have been had he batted from dominant (LH) side. I've read that when he was little, he saw all the kids batting righty and thought it was a rule that you had to stand on that side of the plate.

Throws left, bats right, is a pretty unusual combination. Who did it besides Rickey, Randy Johnson, and GHWB?
 

SumnerH

Malt Liquor Picker
Dope
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
32,003
Alexandria, VA
I know the thread is about Ichiro (who I loved seeing play for my hometown M's), but consider how much better Rickey would have been had he batted from dominant (LH) side. I've read that when he was little, he saw all the kids batting righty and thought it was a rule that you had to stand on that side of the plate.

Throws left, bats right, is a pretty unusual combination. Who did it besides Rickey, Randy Johnson, and GHWB?
Cody Ross and Ryan Ludwick in recent memory. The notorious Hal Chase.

http://www.hardballtimes.com/bats-right-throws-left-the-best-players-in-major-league-history/ has a list; it's pretty thin.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,881
Maine
I know the thread is about Ichiro (who I loved seeing play for my hometown M's), but consider how much better Rickey would have been had he batted from dominant (LH) side. I've read that when he was little, he saw all the kids batting righty and thought it was a rule that you had to stand on that side of the plate.

Throws left, bats right, is a pretty unusual combination. Who did it besides Rickey, Randy Johnson, and GHWB?
Former Sox Cody Ross and Dave McCarty. Hall of Famers Sandy Koufax and Carl Hubbell. Tommy John.
 

Just a bit outside

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 6, 2011
8,005
Monument, CO
Yeah, I agree with Foulke, they aren't really a great comparison. Rickey was unique in ways that I don't think we'll see in the 21st century. (I'm going by eye test moreso than by stats.)
I think Mookie might be closest to Rickey. A little more power and a little less speed but Mookie would steal a ton more bases if he played in the 80s.
 

jmm57

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,486
I think Mookie might be closest to Rickey. A little more power and a little less speed but Mookie would steal a ton more bases if he played in the 80s.
I have seen this said multiple places, but I don't think its that apt a comparison. Rickey's walk rate was almost 3x Mookie's in his age 23 season. And his ISO was about half Mookie's. I don't think there is really anyone today even close to the same mold as Rickey as a player. Oddly, the closest statistically to Rickey this year is probably Bryce Harper.

I think the comp for Mookie is Gary Sheffield. Sheffield struck out less, but the power numbers/walk rate/shift to the outfield are pretty similar.