SBLII: What Did the Butler Do?

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,804
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
They gave up 41 pts to a back up QB, only 7 of which came off a short field. That should really end the thread. Rest is just would have could have.
Bill didn't put the team in the best chance to win the game plain and simple.
If Brady had played a game of the same quality of Bill's coaching tonight, I wonder how many here would be coming to defend him. I mean, he's still the greatest coach ever, but to say he wasn't a big part of the loss today is incredible to me.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,846
Deep inside Muppet Labs
SJH, I think you're so far out on the limb on this one, that you can't see the tree. I'll buy that you honestly believe that Bill benched Butler because he thought it gave them the best chance to win. I don't know how you can believe it, but I'll at least give you the benefit of the doubt.

But you can't, with a straight face, tell me that after watching 4 quarters of guys like Rowe, Richards and Bademosi get beat over and over, and Chung got hurt, that you think Bill kept Butler on the bench because he thought it was best for the team. You can't believe that. You don't send Butler out there for one series, and see if he makes a difference?

Half the people on this board thought Bademosi would be inactive this week, and instead, he's playing over Butler? WTF?

I'm livid about this. I'm not even upset about the loss. I'm pissed about the fact that a coaching decision may have cost Brady another ring, just like coaching decisions cost us homefield advantage in 2015 and maybe another ring. It's fucking bullshit.
So why do you believe Butler didn't play? You've been watching this team as long as I have, maybe longer. You see how BB operates. If not because he thought he had the best packaged to match up without him, why? I'd love to hear your guess.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,732
Why wouldn't he match up on Agholor?


Do you think the Eagles OL was holding a lot more than the Patriots OL?
I thought I saw some almost tackles in the first series... far more egregious than things I've seen all year.. a number of times players came up the middle and were held with an arm from behind that allowed Foles to get the ball out. I don't know if the Pats OL held less.. but the Pats offense runs on getting the ball out fast. Foles was def allowed extra seconds all game. TB doesn't usually use those extra seconds.. I'm trying not to be a complete homer. But some of the holds I saw were like the ones you only see allowed at the end of games.. where players are more or less tackled. I could be wrong though.
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
Exactly ...there is more to the story than simply the coaches deciding their best defensive alignments included Butler standing on the sidelines. We are on the outside looking in. Has to be a lot more to the story.
Isn't this the worst possible option, though? If it's a BB ego thing you can at least say ok this was an overly arrogant decision but he does this kind of thing all the time and usually it works out. But if BB was watching this game and legitimately thought that playing Bademosi and Rowe instead of Butler gave them a better chance to win the game then that is almost Grady Little-like stupidity.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
Doesn't Agholor usually line up in the slot?
He does, but Butler has at times in the past. We saw Bademosi playing some slot tonight, which I don't think we've seen all year. Why not Butler?

I do think the Jeffery / Smith pairing presented some problems with Butler's size but I thought the sensible solution was to kick Butler inside on Agholor.
 

troparra

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 3, 2007
1,921
Michigan
Do we believe him when he says it wasn’t disciplinary? If it wasn’t, then BB thought Butler in there would have made things worse. That seems impossible, both that it could have been worse and that BB thought that.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,659
Melrose, MA
Yes, it's crazy to think BB thought he was giving his team the best chance to win, in his opinion. So moronic.

There's a lot of people here who need to sleep this one off.
Richards is terrible. I simply don't know the reasoning for the personnel decisions. What I am saying is that the ONLY reason I believe they made the moves they did is because.....they thought it was their best chance of winning the game. It sure looks like a mistake in judgement now, but I am extremely skeptical it's any more complicated than that.
I almost agree. Coaches and managers and GMs have been fucking their teams by doing stupid shit that they think is in the best interests of their team for as long as there have been coaches and managers and GMs. We've just come to expect better from BB because, well, he's consistently been better. Far better.

This was still a massive fuckup. I think it was a case of penny wise, pound foolish. Maybe he went into the game expecting his defense to be wrecked by Philly and thought he could gain some small advantage by pulling Butler completely out of the game plan. Maybe he thought Butler was such a head case that he couldn't handle a smaller role. No idea.

But there seemed to be an element of unwllingness to admit a fuckup here, when he started running guys like Richerds and Bademosi out there to get burnt.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
They gave up 41 pts to a back up QB, only 7 of which came off a short field. That should really end the thread. Rest is just would have could have.
Bill didn't put the team in the best chance to win the game plain and simple.
Or he did. “We’ll never know” cuts both ways.

Neither team had trouble scoring.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,803
AZ
Which — again — suggests it is not a disciplinary matter.
I really need it to be disciplinary.

Or I need some Xs and Os. Because, while I am not qualified to carry Bill’s pencils, with a one point lead in the fourth quarter, it is impossible to fathom anyone truly believing that a package including Butler could be worse than what we were looking at. It just doesn’t compute.

There is something going on here. I need there to be something going on here. It can’t just be football.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,659
Melrose, MA
SJH, I think you're so far out on the limb on this one, that you can't see the tree. I'll buy that you honestly believe that Bill benched Butler because he thought it gave them the best chance to win. I don't know how you can believe it, but I'll at least give you the benefit of the doubt.

But you can't, with a straight face, tell me that after watching 4 quarters of guys like Rowe, Richards and Bademosi get beat over and over, and Chung got hurt, that you think Bill kept Butler on the bench because he thought it was best for the team. You can't believe that. You don't send Butler out there for one series, and see if he makes a difference?

Half the people on this board thought Bademosi would be inactive this week, and instead, he's playing over Butler? WTF?

I'm livid about this. I'm not even upset about the loss. I'm pissed about the fact that a coaching decision may have cost Brady another ring, just like coaching decisions cost us homefield advantage in 2015 and maybe another ring. It's fucking bullshit.
I'm 100% on board with this rant. I think BB fell in love with his own brilliance.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,732
I mean, it was a one possession game. It was a strip sack from probably being a Pats win. There was good coaching on both sides and bad coaching on both sides. I don't see any clear outcoaching.
Yeah.. if Philly doesn't convert on either of those fourth downs we're talking the complete opposite... and Foles was definitely still moving as the ball was snapped on his TD catch which I thought was illegal motion or at least an illegal formation. If the Pats had made that last drive and tied it we're basically back to what happened last year.

Edit: I meant won it on the penultimate drive.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
At the end of the day, the defense was so bad that I have a hard time believing Butler would have made a difference. He makes a play on third down, fine, the Eagles just go for it on fourth and complete it anyway. The Patriots were not competitive in any respect.
 

thestardawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2005
913
Section 38, Row 13
SJH, I think you're so far out on the limb on this one, that you can't see the tree. I'll buy that you honestly believe that Bill benched Butler because he thought it gave them the best chance to win. I don't know how you can believe it, but I'll at least give you the benefit of the doubt.

But you can't, with a straight face, tell me that after watching 4 quarters of guys like Rowe, Richards and Bademosi get beat over and over, and Chung got hurt, that you think Bill kept Butler on the bench because he thought it was best for the team. You can't believe that. You don't send Butler out there for one series, and see if he makes a difference?

Half the people on this board thought Bademosi would be inactive this week, and instead, he's playing over Butler? WTF?

I'm livid about this. I'm not even upset about the loss. I'm pissed about the fact that a coaching decision may have cost Brady another ring, just like coaching decisions cost us homefield advantage in 2015 and maybe another ring. It's fucking bullshit.
Shh thought the Red Sox should cut Michael kopech when he broke his hand a couple years ago so his opinions should be taken with a large grain of salt
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,544
In a nod towards those who are mad at Belichick, lets say his ego cost them this game. How do you separate that from the same ego that got this team here, won them five other Superbowls and had them within a few freak plays of winning two more?

Again, its entirely fair to question what happened with Butler and to wonder what might have happened had he gone in.

I am not sure the 2017 Butler makes the difference in this one. Foles had good time to throw so receivers were able to break free even after some ok coverage (other coverage sucked of course). And Foles also made some great throws - something we need acknowledge here.

But let's say Belichick did cost the Pats this game because of course Butler would have slowed down the Eagles attack. Should the Patriots fire him? What is the point? This is Belichick and like any family member or athlete or coach of a team that you root for, you either take the good with the bad or cut ties with them.

Other than trying to figure out what the hell happened with Butler, I am not sure what a witch hunt gets you. And I dont think that makes me an "apologist". If it does, so be it. I stand by my point that while tonight sucks, I will take all that led up to it in a heartbeat after living through the late 80s and early 90s with this franchise.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,048
So why do you believe Butler didn't play? You've been watching this team as long as I have, maybe longer. You see how BB operates. If not because he thought he had the best packaged to match up without him, why? I'd love to hear your guess.
I have no idea. If I had to guess, it's disciplinary, although not disciplinary as in he said to Malcolm "I'm benching you because you missed the team flight..." or whatever. Disciplinary to the extent that clearly Malcolm did something or maybe many somethings that Bill didn't like and finally Bill had enough. This is the same response Bill gave when he traded Jamie Collins last year, and a whole bunch of other times throughout the years "best interests of the team."

The problem is all of those other times (except deferring in fucking overtime in 2015, but I digress), Bill had time to be proven right. He was proven so fucking wrong, over and over and over again tonight, that either he literally lost his mind and forgot that one of his most important players was standing on the sideline, or Malcolm Butler wasn't getting in the game if he was the last healthy guy on the team.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,013
So why do you believe Butler didn't play? You've been watching this team as long as I have, maybe longer. You see how BB operates. If not because he thought he had the best packaged to match up without him, why? I'd love to hear your guess.
When the team gives up a season high in pts and sits there 1B CB, the onus shouldn't be on the fans to figure out why. The better team didn't win tonight and it wasn't particularity close. Pats play their game and they win fairly easily. Brady had all day in the pocket. For PHI to win with 1 sack is mind boggling.
 

genoasalami

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2006
2,582
We can make this a 100 page thread. Problem is. The only answer we will ever get is that "I played the players who gave us the best chance to win" You expecting an "Oops, I screwed that up" admission?
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,732
Or he did. “We’ll never know” cuts both ways.

Neither team had trouble scoring.
right.. if the Pats move the ball on that last drive as they did all game it's an entirely different conversation.

edit: second to last damm it
 

patinorange

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 27, 2006
31,006
6 miles from Angel Stadium
I really need it to be disciplinary.

Or I need some Xs and Os. Because, while I am not qualified to carry Bill’s pencils, with a one point lead in the fourth quarter, it is impossible to fathom anyone truly believing that a package including Butler could be worse than what we were looking at. It just doesn’t compute.

There is something going on here. I need there to be something going on here. It can’t just be football.
I’m with you, and until I hear differently, Butler did something to undermine B.B. or the team. There is no other rational explanation.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,846
Deep inside Muppet Labs
When the team gives up a season high in pts and sits there 1B CB, the onus shouldn't be on the fans to figure out why. The better team didn't win tonight and it wasn't particularity close. Pats play their game and they win fairly easily. Brady had all day in the pocket. For PHI to win with 1 sack is mind boggling.
This is nonsense. I've heard theories in this very thread that BB did it to send a message, for disciplinary reasons, because he wanted to wave his dick around, etc. Don't give me this stuff about "it's not on the fans to figure out why." Everyone else is throwing out reasons, I wanted to hear his.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,048
In a nod towards those who are mad at Belichick, lets say his ego cost them this game. How do you separate that from the same ego that got this team here, won them five other Superbowls and had them within a few freak plays of winning two more?

Again, its entirely fair to question what happened with Butler and to wonder what might have happened had he gone in.

I am not sure the 2017 Butler makes the difference in this one. Foles had good time to throw so receivers were able to break free even after some ok coverage (other coverage sucked of course). And Foles also made some great throws - something we need acknowledge here.

But let's say Belichick did cost the Pats this game because of course Butler would have slowed down the Eagles attack. Should the Patriots fire him? What is the point? This is Belichick and like any family member or athlete or coach of a team that you root for, you either take the good with the bad or cut ties with them.

Other than trying to figure out what the hell happened with Butler, I am not sure what a witch hunt gets you. And I dont think that makes me an "apologist". If it does, so be it. I stand by my point that while tonight sucks, I will take all that led up to it in a heartbeat after living through the late 80s and early 90s with this franchise.
My biggest issue with Butler being on the sidelines wasn't coverage. He's probably the best tackler in the entire secondary. I'm not sure it's even close, and if there was one thing tonight that stood out as the biggest problem for the defense, it was shitty fucking tackling. That's what's killing me about the decision.
 

Jettisoned

Member
SoSH Member
May 6, 2008
1,059
He does, but Butler has at times in the past. We saw Bademosi playing some slot tonight, which I don't think we've seen all year. Why not Butler?

I do think the Jeffery / Smith pairing presented some problems with Butler's size but I thought the sensible solution was to kick Butler inside on Agholor.
I would also think that, but it isn't crazy to me that they wouldn't have him in the game plan is all.

The whole zero snaps on defense is pretty weird though. You would think even if he wasn't in the gameplan but dressed he'd get at least a few.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,544
I’m with you, and until I hear differently, Butler did something to undermine B.B. or the team. There is no other rational explanation.
I agree that this is the likely real story. Butler did something that we likely won't learn about from the team and it cost him playing meaningful snaps in the game.
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,531
We can make this a 100 page thread. Problem is. The only answer we will ever get is that "I played the players who gave us the best chance to win" You expecting an "Oops, I screwed that up" admission?
Someone in the media will get some type of vague scoop we'll dissect this week. but yes, nothing definitive will ever come out.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,659
Melrose, MA
At the end of the day, the defense was so bad that I have a hard time believing Butler would have made a difference. He makes a play on third down, fine, the Eagles just go for it on fourth and complete it anyway. The Patriots were not competitive in any respect.
Bademosi makes that one tackle and it is maybe a different kind of night for us. Butler can tackle and once in a while he can rip the ball out after a catch. The defense WAS awful, but, just a tiny bit less awful (but still awful) might have been enough.
 

streeter88

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 2, 2006
1,807
Melbourne, Australia
My biggest issue with Butler being on the sidelines wasn't coverage. He's probably the best tackler in the entire secondary. I'm not sure it's even close, and if there was one thing tonight that stood out as the biggest problem for the defense, it was shitty fucking tackling. That's what's killing me about the decision.
Yep. So many missed tackles in key spots. Butler can’t fail to have helped.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,048
In a nod towards those who are mad at Belichick, lets say his ego cost them this game. How do you separate that from the same ego that got this team here, won them five other Superbowls and had them within a few freak plays of winning two more?

Again, its entirely fair to question what happened with Butler and to wonder what might have happened had he gone in.

I am not sure the 2017 Butler makes the difference in this one. Foles had good time to throw so receivers were able to break free even after some ok coverage (other coverage sucked of course). And Foles also made some great throws - something we need acknowledge here.

But let's say Belichick did cost the Pats this game because of course Butler would have slowed down the Eagles attack. Should the Patriots fire him? What is the point? This is Belichick and like any family member or athlete or coach of a team that you root for, you either take the good with the bad or cut ties with them.

Other than trying to figure out what the hell happened with Butler, I am not sure what a witch hunt gets you. And I dont think that makes me an "apologist". If it does, so be it. I stand by my point that while tonight sucks, I will take all that led up to it in a heartbeat after living through the late 80s and early 90s with this franchise.
To be clear, I'm not calling for BB's head. Far from it. The worst decisions he's ever made still result in him being the greatest coach of all time. That said, I'm allowed to be pissed tonight, and I'm allowed to think that Tom Brady, the team and the fans got fucked by a decision that never should have been made.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,732
My biggest issue with Butler being on the sidelines wasn't coverage. He's probably the best tackler in the entire secondary. I'm not sure it's even close, and if there was one thing tonight that stood out as the biggest problem for the defense, it was shitty fucking tackling. That's what's killing me about the decision.
I agree on this.. seems like he's really fast to the ball.. and having him out there could have shut down some of those third or fourth down plays.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,013
In a nod towards those who are mad at Belichick, lets say his ego cost them this game. How do you separate that from the same ego that got this team here, won them five other Superbowls and had them within a few freak plays of winning two more?

Again, its entirely fair to question what happened with Butler and to wonder what might have happened had he gone in.

I am not sure the 2017 Butler makes the difference in this one. Foles had good time to throw so receivers were able to break free even after some ok coverage (other coverage sucked of course). And Foles also made some great throws - something we need acknowledge here.

But let's say Belichick did cost the Pats this game because of course Butler would have slowed down the Eagles attack. Should the Patriots fire him? What is the point? This is Belichick and like any family member or athlete or coach of a team that you root for, you either take the good with the bad or cut ties with them.

Other than trying to figure out what the hell happened with Butler, I am not sure what a witch hunt gets you. And I dont think that makes me an "apologist". If it does, so be it. I stand by my point that while tonight sucks, I will take all that led up to it in a heartbeat after living through the late 80s and early 90s with this franchise.
Flip side of this is we lose to SEA and ATL, two outcomes that were more probable than not, and we are approaching Bills territory
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,013
To be clear, I'm not calling for BB's head. Far from it. The worst decisions he's ever made still result in him being the greatest coach of all time. That said, I'm allowed to be pissed tonight, and I'm allowed to think that Tom Brady, the team and the fans got fucked by a decision that never should have been made.
Agree 100%
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
I would also think that, but it isn't crazy to me that they wouldn't have him in the game plan is all.

The whole zero snaps on defense is pretty weird though. You would think even if he wasn't in the gameplan but dressed he'd get at least a few.
It would make a lot more sense if Jonathan Jones was healthy and they liked his matchup on Agholor or something.

Bademosi makes that one tackle and it is maybe a different kind of night for us. Butler can tackle and once in a while he can rip the ball out after a catch. The defense WAS awful, but, just a tiny bit less awful (but still awful) might have been enough.
Bademosi tackled really well when he played CB early in the year when Gilmore was out. He plays a ton of special teams, where usually guys have to tackle well. That was an unfortunate, lousy play.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,544
To be clear, I'm not calling for BB's head. Far from it. The worst decisions he's ever made still result in him being the greatest coach of all time. That said, I'm allowed to be pissed tonight, and I'm allowed to think that Tom Brady, the team and the fans got fucked by a decision that never should have been made.
Hell yeah. I don't care what anyone says about all their trophies. This one hurt as bad as the other two Superbowl losses because, like them, this was a winnable game. Unlike others here, I am just not sure that Butler playing is the delta between winning and losing. And I would prefer not to torture myself wondering about it too.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,610
Gallows Hill
This is Tony Mazz level trolling. You have no clue whether Butler’s contract situation had anything to do with anything. And I am saying this as someone who thinks it is very strange Butler didn’t play.

For the record, though, your opinion is that Bill Belichick benched Malcolm Butler in the Super Bowl because Malcolm Butler wanted too much money and Bill Belichick wanted to prove that he could win without him.

I’m done with you now.
Oh so I'm Tony Mazz now because I have a legit criticism? Awesome work. No my opinion is, they've been in a beef over money for two years and something happened this week that was the boiling point. And Bill should've taken a step back and played his best guys. Because seriously, there is no logical reason for Butler to not play tonight. So it's either an injury or something illogical.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,776
Hell yeah. I don't care what anyone says about all their trophies. This one hurt as bad as the other two Superbowl losses because, like them, this was a winnable game. Unlike others here, I am just not sure that Butler playing is the delta between winning and losing. And I would prefer not to torture myself wondering about it too.

2007 was for an undefeated season. I think last year’s comeback should ease the pain of this one.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
46,890
Hartford, CT
Oh so I'm Tony Mazz now because I have a legit criticism? Awesome work. No my opinion is, they've been in a beef over money for two years and something happened this week that was the boiling point. And Bill should've taken a step back and played his best guys. Because seriously, there is no logical reason for Butler to not play tonight. So it's either an injury or something illogical.
They're not in a contract dispute, and haven't been for over 6 months.
 

Bongorific

Thinks he’s clever
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,444
Balboa Towers
Flip side of this is we lose to SEA and ATL, two outcomes that were more probable than not, and we are approaching Bills territory
You can't play that game. It's also more probable than not that Tyree and Manningham don't make ridiculous catches and the Pats are 7-0 in Super Bowl going into tonight.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,013
Hell yeah. I don't care what anyone says about all their trophies. This one hurt as bad as the other two Superbowl losses because, like them, this was a winnable game. Unlike others here, I am just not sure that Butler playing is the delta between winning and losing. And I would prefer not to torture myself wondering about it too.
They gave up 41 fucking points
They gave up 41 fucking points
They gave up 41 fucking points
Pretty sure they never gave up 41 pts with Butler starting
 

streeter88

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 2, 2006
1,807
Melbourne, Australia
I know we will probably never get a proper football level explanation. Wish we could, but in the end coaches’ decisions - and why they get paid.

Unfortunately the decision to keep #21 off the defense failed spectacularly. And in a one possession game, can’t afford many bad decisions.