Oh for sure, any other year I'd agree, and there is a part of me that wants Sway next game. I just wonder if Monty told them Sway gets 1, Ully 2 and go from thereWe'll see, but I think it'll be Swayman again.
Oh for sure, any other year I'd agree, and there is a part of me that wants Sway next game. I just wonder if Monty told them Sway gets 1, Ully 2 and go from thereWe'll see, but I think it'll be Swayman again.
Yup. Carlo was playing like 2019 against Columbus shutting down Panarin and Lindholm was playing like McAvoy was out last year.
Wait, what?
They’re alternating. Ullmark gets game 2.Oh for sure, any other year I'd agree, and there is a part of me that wants Sway next game. I just wonder if Monty told them Sway gets 1, Ully 2 and go from there
So dumb. Ride the hot hand.They’re alternating. Ullmark gets game 2.
If they rode the hot hand, Ullmark would have started Game 1.So dumb. Ride the hot hand.
This is exactly right and what will indeed happen, game 1 lovefest for Sway’s great play aside. No one was even sure he would start yesterday.If they rode the hot hand, Ullmark would have started Game 1.
It ain’t broke, so they shouldn’t try to fix it. If your plan is to get to the playoffs and suddenly do something completely different than you’ve done all season (and much of the past two seasons), which largely backfired last year as Ullmark wore down physically and mentally, I think that the burden of persuasion is on you to have a really, really good reason.
I thought that the Bs easily could have been up 4-0 in the first period or down 3-1. The reason why it didn't turn out to be the latter was Swayman -- he made some huge stops, which if he doesn't make likely would have changed the outcome of the game.And the Bruins were winning that game either way last night. I know 'NaturalStatTrick' loved the Leafs' game, but that does not pass the eye test to my mind. The Bruins looked like garbage for the first three minutes or so (where the Leafs must have been piling up the data for the advanced metrics it seems) but then it was a Boston night. I think it would have been the same had it been Ullmark's turn.
Hot hand in one game? I agree with continuing to rotate. It's real easy to get caught up in the game 1 performance and expect that every game all the way to The Cup( I am and had to take a step back to reflect on the decision).So dumb. Ride the hot hand.
They were going to check the puck to see if it was underinflated.Wait, what?
Participation souvenir?
Team colors check out.They were going to check the puck to see if it was underinflated.
They lost last year because they stubbornly stuck with a guy who was playing poorly (due to injury, most likely, but whatever). I think that they should ride a guy until he has a bad game, but I guess I'm in the minority (or alone in that opinion).Jesus. Alternate them, for the love of god. Have the last few years taught us nothing?
Swayman looked awesome for most of the game. Congrats kid, nice work out there. See you in game 3.
It was painfully obvious that Sway should have started game 5 after finishing game 4.They lost last year because they stubbornly stuck with a guy who was playing poorly (due to injury, most likely, but whatever). I think that they should ride a guy until he has a bad game, but I guess I'm in the minority (or alone in that opinion).
It feels like something where one team is doing something outside the norm and all of the hockey community, that’s obsessed with routines and superstition and what’s always been done, are reacting against that. Bs should keep doing what works.Jesus. Alternate them, for the love of god. Have the last few years taught us nothing?
Swayman looked awesome for most of the game. Congrats kid, nice work out there. See you in game 3.
Yes, it still frustrates me.It was painfully obvious that Sway should have started game 5 after finishing game 4.
To be fair, they are still learning how to defend the puck
And last year Lindholm and Carlo were severely impacted by injuries in the postseason. Fully healthy versions of themselves on defense is a huge difference.Yup. Carlo was playing like 2019 against Columbus shutting down Panarin and Lindholm was playing like McAvoy was out last year.
They lost last year because they stubbornly stuck with a guy who was playing poorly (due to injury, most likely, but whatever). I think that they should ride a guy until he has a bad game, but I guess I'm in the minority (or alone in that opinion).
Also, the Cup-winning goalie hug will mean much more if they have alternated games along the way. Hell, they can alternate periods in the clinching game.The deeper you go into the playoffs, the more advantage you would have by alternating goalies-- every single game you play, your goalie will be more rested and fresher than the other team's goalie.
Hard to say how much of advantage that might be, but it's not nothing.