NopeThis starts at 2:30pm and while Roger doesn't prefer to answer a question with a substantive response, some news should be generated. Hopefully Rachel Nichols is able to ask a question.
Rachel Nichols' employer not doing everything humanly possible to have her at a Goodell press conference is an injustice to humanity.Nope
“@Rachel__Nichols: I’m back in LA doing rehearsals for The Jump today - but you know I will have this up on the monitors… https://t.co/CruGxdoJ7C”
To be fair, I think it's the same reason that autism rates are "up". It's the diagnosis that is getting more refined. In the case of the NFL, that's a good thing, since players are less likely to go back out onto the field.re: concussions, how come nobody asked the follow up "if you're rule adjustments are working, why are concussions at an all time high"
WFAN (the Francesa show) is carrying the pc live, you can hear it onlineI tried to watch this press conference online, but it's only available to those with NFL Network. Shouldn't such a press conference be made widely available?
Thanks...I'm in!WFAN (the Francesa show) is carrying the pc live, you can hear it online
Curren said basically after deflategate, you meaursed the balls and said that no rules were broken. But won't release the numbers. In the effort to be transparent, will you release the numbers and are you saying that no balls all year long were measured and came in under the legal psiThanks...I'm in!
Can anyone summarize the questions from Curran?
Also, Goodell sounds awful...stammering all over the place as if he's really hung over.
Cool and RG's reply?Curren said basically after deflategate, you meaursed the balls and said that no rules were broken. But won't release the numbers. In the effort to be transparent, will you release the numbers and are you saying that no balls all year long were measured and came in under the legal psi
My man! And Goodell said "we're still evaluating the data"?Curren said basically after deflategate, you meaursed the balls and said that no rules were broken. But won't release the numbers. In the effort to be transparent, will you release the numbers and are you saying that no balls all year long were measured and came in under the legal psi
which wasn't even an answerTyring to match up the question -- What is a violation, and does that mean you didn't find any balls being under 12.5,
with the answer: we can't tell you that because then our spot checks would not have deterrence value.
WHAT. THE. FUCK.Tyring to match up the question -- What is a violation, and does that mean you didn't find any balls being under 12.5,
with the answer: we can't tell you that because then our spot checks would not have deterrence value.