Red Sox trade deadline rumors

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
8,965
Probably quite a bit, and according to rumors you'd be competing with Dombrowski for him.

Also, whose spot does he take?
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
8,965
O'Neill's, who would also be traded in such a sequence.
I'm not into that. His defense is so bad that even the A's are doing their best to keep him off the field. He's only started 13 games in OF this year.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,421
Portland
The Athletic lists the Nationals as sellers: "In addition to entertaining trade offers for two players on expiring contracts, outfielder Jesse Winker and reliever Dylan Floro, Rizzo is open to moving others who have only one additional year of club control remaining — outfielder Lane Thomas and relievers Kyle Finnegan and Hunter Harvey. (Another potential free agent, righty Trevor Williams, is on the injured list with a right flexor muscle strain.)"

I"m not seeing any of those names as being great fits for the Sox. Also interesting that the Rays have NYY, CLE before the All-Star break followed by NYY then TOR. Lots of interesting names in Tampa if they decide to sell.

EDIT to add that Lane Thomas has put up .338/.407/.563 against lefties and appears to be a good baserunner, so there could be some universe where he is a replacement for ONeill if the latter gets traded. Thomas is 28, in his final year of arbitration next year, and is making $5.45 million this year. His stats have dropped off significantly since last year when he hit 28 home runs and had a SLUG% of .468.
Thomas would be fun to add to the KAOS but I can't see a reason to add him, since they don't really need an outfielder with a year of control beyond this one.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,088
Thomas would be fun to add to the KAOS but I can't see a reason to add him, since they don't really need an outfielder with a year of control beyond this one.
Isn’t the reason to add him to improve the 2024 squad and serve as a nice bridge to when Roman Anthony might be ready?
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,421
Portland
Isn’t the reason to add him to improve the 2024 squad and serve as a nice bridge to when Roman Anthony might be ready?
I'd be assuming that Rafaela would have to play the OF next season with Story returning and that would make a crowded outfield. Refsnyder is fine as a bridge too.
 

BeantownIdaho

New Member
Dec 5, 2005
579
Nampa, Idaho
O'Neill's, who would also be traded in such a sequence.
I'm guessing Dominic Smith when Casas returns.... they are trying to add a right handed bat per Breslow ("The chance to maybe look to add some right-handed offense could make sense.”) - taking O'Neil out would not make sense.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
22,575
Rogers Park
I'm guessing Dominic Smith when Casas returns.... they are trying to add a right handed bat per Breslow ("The chance to maybe look to add some right-handed offense could make sense.”) - taking O'Neil out would not make sense.
It's a push for 2024, and then O'Neill hits FA while Rooker has all three arb years remaining. Presumably you move Yoshida in the offseason, and Rooker becomes the RHH DH to slot between Devers and Casas. This leaves you with a Duran–Rafaela–Abreu/Refsnyder outfield.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
8,965
If we want to spend real capital on a hitter, I think we should go after Isaac Paredes. He's a good RH power bat, he can cover the corners and 2B, he's young and controlled for 3 more years, and he was actually created in a lab to play at Fenway:

while researching O’Neill’s batted ball mix, I decided to figure out which player would be the most Fenway-optimized hitter in baseball. To no one’s surprise, that’d be Isaac Paredes. He makes a living on those lofted pulled fly balls that are decently struck. Per 600-PA season, he hits nearly three times as many balls that Fenway boosts as your average righty. What a hilariously maxed-out archetype of a player. What a delight.
He'd be expensive. I think he might be worth it? The Rays have Junior Caminero to take over at third long term.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
7,427
If we want to spend real capital on a hitter, I think we should go after Isaac Paredes. He's a good RH power bat, he can cover the corners and 2B, he's young and controlled for 3 more years, and he was actually created in a lab to play at Fenway:



He'd be expensive. I think he might be worth it? The Rays have Junior Caminero to take over at third long term.
Tampa will always prioritize pitching in trades and the Sox lack there.
Maybe Fitts or Wikelman added to some IF depth (I could see the Rays liking Meidroth a lot)
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
8,965
They might be interested in Yorke too. They've got a couple option years left on Lowe at 2B, but those are at 10.5 and 11.5m and I don't think they have anyone banging on the door behind him.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
It's a push for 2024, and then O'Neill hits FA while Rooker has all three arb years remaining. Presumably you move Yoshida in the offseason, and Rooker becomes the RHH DH to slot between Devers and Casas. This leaves you with a Duran–Rafaela–Abreu/Refsnyder outfield.
Make Devers/Casas/O'Neill (re-signed)/Rocker/whoever else the DH and just get rid of Yoshida. He's owed $18 Mil per for 3 more years. Let's not pretend that eating a good chunk of that won't effect other financial decisions such as FA signings, extentions or other trades.
 

TheYellowDart5

Hustle and bustle
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2003
9,395
NYC
Teams who have spoken to the Red Sox have heard the team is largely focused on pitching — both rotation adds and bullpen help — and a right-handed hitter, preferably one who can contribute at multiple positions. Luis Rengifo, a super-utility type with Angels, is one target, though the Angels’ stance to date reflects a preference to retain Rengifo, who is under control through 2025. Whether that is mere posturing on the part of the Angels, designed to drive up the asking price, remains to be seen.

Even though the Red Sox are resigned to the fact that first baseman Triston Casas is unlikely to rejoin the team much before Sept. 1, the team is not currently targeting a first baseman per se, believing that a righty bat with additional versatility would be of more value. The recent upswing by Dominic Smith (.798 OPS over his last 37 games) has also eliminated the sense of urgency to find a first baseman, as the Sox believe he can help hold down the position well enough until the return of Casas.

In their search for starting pitching, the team would prefer to land a rotation piece with control beyond the current season. But given the competitive nature of the market when it comes to arms, the Sox aren’t ruling out rental options. A major league source said late last week that the Red Sox had not approached the White Sox about All-Star lefty Garrett Crochet. The asking price on Detroit ace Tarik Skubal is thought to be astronomical, likely requiring the Red Sox to part with two of their “Big Three” prospects (Roman Anthony, Marcelo Mayer and Kyle Teel) — a clear non-starter for Boston.
https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2024/07/as-trade-deadline-approaches-red-sox-players-holding-out-hope-for-additions.html
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,597
Maine
I assume that's to clear space on the 40-man for Kershaw's return?

I guess maybe it's worth kicking the tires from a depth perspective, but his walks are way up and his FIP (4.97) is higher than anyone currently in the Sox rotation. He's not improving on what they have but maybe he can provide competent innings that saves wear and tear on guys like Crawford and Houck.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
8,965
Is 1B a hole? Dom has a 124 wrc+ since the start of June.

He's also been protected from LHP somewhat but currently has a reverse split.

I don't think Mountcastle is the right answer. His cost will be commensurate with his 2.5 years of control when what we really need is a rental, and preferably one who can play somewhere additional to first.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
Orioles looking to move Mountcastle per MLBTR... With Casas looking far from being ready and 1b being a hole, what are thoughts on obtaining him? He's had a pretty decent year so far and he can play some outfield when needed.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/m/mountry01.shtml?utm_medium=linker&utm_source=www.mlbtraderumors.com&utm_campaign=2024-07-23_br
How likely would/should Baltimore be to move move Mountcastle to a division rival with whom they seven remaining games with? And what would Boston be willing to part with considering he's not a FA until '27 and blocked by Casas?
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
How likely would/should Baltimore be to move move Mountcastle to a division rival with whom they seven remaining games with? And what would Boston be willing to part with considering he's not a FA until '27 and blocked by Casas?
I think Baltimore would be just fine trading him to the Sox if the package was right. I think the Sox will have no interest in trading for him, given the price tag and Casas
 

BeantownIdaho

New Member
Dec 5, 2005
579
Nampa, Idaho
[
If we want to spend real capital on a hitter, I think we should go after Isaac Paredes. He's a good RH power bat, he can cover the corners and 2B, he's young and controlled for 3 more years, and he was actually created in a lab to play at Fenway:



He'd be expensive. I think he might be worth it? The Rays have Junior Caminero to take over at third long term.
Agree.... Paredes can play all over the infield and has a good bat. Perfect fit for us as a utility/DH guy with flexibility. It would be an expensive trade- but if it only involved pieces outside of our big 3 prospects, I think it might be worth it.
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
Sox talking to Dodgers about a trade for James Paxton. Sox would only be on the hook for about $1.5 million of his salary.
https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2024/07/red-sox-in-trade-talks-with-dodgers-about-reunion-with-lefty-starter-reports.html
I’m skeptical. There’s a reason the Dodgers DFAed him — he has a 5.28 xFIP and the lowest FB velocity of his career (93 mph, down from 95 last year). He’s also a few innings from exceeding his most IP in a season since 2019.

Always good to have a warm body and the team is familiar with Paxton, but this feels like dumpster diving, not the kind of upgrade to the rotation I’ve been hoping to see (Kikuchi, Fedde, Flaherty, etc.)
 
Last edited:

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
7,957
I’m skeptical. There’s a reason the Dodgers DFAed him — he has a 5.28 xFIP and the lowest FB velocity of his career (93 mph, down from 95 last year). He’s also a few innings from exceeding his most IP in a season since 2019.

Always good to have a warm body and the team is familiar with Paxton, but this feels like dumpster diving, not the kind of upgrade to the rotation I’ve been hoping to see (Kikuchi, Fedde, Flaherty, etc.)
The thing is, he hasn't lost the velocity altogether. He really reached back for an inning or two there to blow away Devers. I think he's maybe still got the velocity but he's trying to be cautious in how he uses it to increase his longevity.

I don't blame the guy, he's had a lot of trouble staying on the field, and whatever he can do to extend his career would be prudent.

That's why I floated the idea of him going into our bullpen mix. If he can throw 96-97 for two or three innings at a time, he could be a weapon. I see the peripherals and I take them seriously, but I'm also thinking that in another role where he can dial it up he might be successful.

All that said... yeah, I don't think he'd be an upgrade on Criswell or anyone else really. Good depth for the bullpen, sure, but not an upgrade like the guys you listed (although I'd add that Kikuchi has a worse xERA than Criswell this year).
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
I’m skeptical. There’s a reason the Dodgers DFAed him — he has a 5.28 xFIP and the lowest FB velocity of his career (93 mph, down from 95 last year). He’s also a few innings from exceeding his most IP in a season since 2019.

Always good to have a warm body and the team is familiar with Paxton, but this feels like dumpster diving, not the kind of upgrade to the rotation I’ve been hoping to see (Kikuchi, Fedde, Flaherty, etc.)
He's not been great this season and there are in fact several reasons why he's been DFAed, two of them being the activation of Kershaw and Glasnow from the IL today. I think Paxton is far from the first choice that any of us might have to help bolster the pitching staff, but he might be the easiest/quickest to get ATM. If this is the best effort that Breslow makes before the deadline I'll be disappointed, but as a first step to get some quick help I'm OK with it, especially if there is something that Bailey can help him out with.
 

Ted Cox 4 president

Member
SoSH Member
He's not been great this season and there are in fact several reasons why he's been DFAed, two of them being the activation of Kershaw and Glasnow from the IL today. I think Paxton is far from the first choice that any of us might have to help bolster the pitching staff, but he might be the easiest/quickest to get ATM. If this is the best effort that Breslow makes before the deadline I'll be disappointed, but as a first step to get some quick help I'm OK with it, especially if there is something that Bailey can help him out with.
There's ATM, and then there's ATM. When I read about trade possibilities and see "ATM," I immediately get nervous.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
56,709
deep inside Guido territory
I’m skeptical. There’s a reason the Dodgers DFAed him — he has a 5.28 xFIP and the lowest FB velocity of his career (93 mph, down from 95 last year). He’s also a few innings from exceeding his most IP in a season since 2019.

Always good to have a warm body and the team is familiar with Paxton, but this feels like dumpster diving, not the kind of upgrade to the rotation I’ve been hoping to see (Kikuchi, Fedde, Flaherty, etc.)
I think he's been better than that xFIP indicates. He looked very good against the Red Sox on Sunday and reached 96 on his FB at times during the start. I'd be OK with him taking the Cooper Criswell role as the number 5 starter. This move doesn't stop Breslow from going out and getting a true upgrade like you mentioned.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
16,183
Gallows Hill
They need innings at this point so they should pick him up. Hopefully they’re willing to pay the $1.5 million remaining so they can just send LA a low A lottery ticket.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
8,965
His fastball lost 2mph and became very bad, but he's actually throwing it slightly more than last year. I'd say Bailey could get him to change his pitch usage but he doesn't actually have any plus pitches to fall back on.
86064
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,501
He's not been great this season and there are in fact several reasons why he's been DFAed, two of them being the activation of Kershaw and Glasnow from the IL today. I think Paxton is far from the first choice that any of us might have to help bolster the pitching staff, but he might be the easiest/quickest to get ATM. If this is the best effort that Breslow makes before the deadline I'll be disappointed, but as a first step to get some quick help I'm OK with it, especially if there is something that Bailey can help him out with.
Exactly. They're going to have to build in some rest for their SPs through the remainder of the season. If the choice comes down to lets say 4 bull pen games and 4 Paxton starts, I'll take 4 Paxton starts.

While I still hope they add with the "long term" in mind and go out and get another starter with term (Taillon remains my choice) and a RH middle of the order bat with term (Paredes, mentioned above, is someone I'd be ok tapping into the ATM ATM ATM for - yes I wanted to use all three at once). If they aren't able to get those type of pieces for the long term, I'm more than fine with them adding ancillary parts on really small prices to show the clubhouse they're trying to add "something." This is where the Paxton's of the world come in to play.

If nothing else, tell them "we believe in you enough to give up this nothing prospect and pay $1.5m to get James Paxton instead of using bullpen games."
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
22,575
Rogers Park
We’re not looking for a playoff starter; we’re adding depth. I’d love Paxton coming back. Possibly also another pitcher?
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
Exactly. They're going to have to build in some rest for their SPs through the remainder of the season. If the choice comes down to lets say 4 bull pen games and 4 Paxton starts, I'll take 4 Paxton starts.

While I still hope they add with the "long term" in mind and go out and get another starter with term (Taillon remains my choice) and a RH middle of the order bat with term (Paredes, mentioned above, is someone I'd be ok tapping into the ATM ATM ATM for - yes I wanted to use all three at once). If they aren't able to get those type of pieces for the long term, I'm more than fine with them adding ancillary parts on really small prices to show the clubhouse they're trying to add "something." This is where the Paxton's of the world come in to play.

If nothing else, tell them "we believe in you enough to give up this nothing prospect and pay $1.5m to get James Paxton instead of using bullpen games."
This is a reasonable point of view, and dumpster diving was too harsh.

It’s always good to have depth, and Paxton could be a solid swingman as well (better than Chase Anderson). I just don’t want him to be the only rotation upgrade.
 
Last edited:

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
We’re not looking for a playoff starter; we’re adding depth. I’d love Paxton coming back. Possibly also another pitcher?
I think we should be looking for both. That doesn't necessarily mean being in GFIN mode and overpaying because the "window" is closing because it's clearly on the cusp of opening. I think Breslow needs to explore all options especially if there is a starter available with some remaining years left. It may not happen, but doesn't mean that it shouldn't be explored.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
15,154
A guy like Paxton may help you get to the playoffs, he seems unlikely to help much once you are there. It all depends on what the Sox goals are here; given the last few years, I think being competitive, having a winning season, and doing what they can to make the post-season is a worthy goal. I wouldn’t pass on a trade just because the upside isn’t high, I think.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
A guy like Paxton may help you get to the playoffs, he seems unlikely to help much once you are there. It all depends on what the Sox goals are here; given the last few years, I think being competitive, having a winning season, and doing what they can to make the post-season is a worthy goal. I wouldn’t pass on a trade just because the upside isn’t high, I think.
Also in regards to Paxton and the playoffs, while his potential role may not be that of a postseason starter I might rather see him as a long guy/innings eater than Anderson.
 

Merkle's Boner

Well-Known Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2011
4,187
Is 1B a hole? Dom has a 124 wrc+ since the start of June.

He's also been protected from LHP somewhat but currently has a reverse split.

I don't think Mountcastle is the right answer. His cost will be commensurate with his 2.5 years of control when what we really need is a rental, and preferably one who can play somewhere additional to first.
Total aside but I love that every time I see someone mention Dom, my mind reads it as Dorn.
 

Sin Duda

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,147
(B)Austin Texas
Exactly. They're going to have to build in some rest for their SPs through the remainder of the season. If the choice comes down to lets say 4 bull pen games and 4 Paxton starts, I'll take 4 Paxton starts.

While I still hope they add with the "long term" in mind and go out and get another starter with term (Taillon remains my choice) and a RH middle of the order bat with term (Paredes, mentioned above, is someone I'd be ok tapping into the ATM ATM ATM for - yes I wanted to use all three at once). If they aren't able to get those type of pieces for the long term, I'm more than fine with them adding ancillary parts on really small prices to show the clubhouse they're trying to add "something." This is where the Paxton's of the world come in to play.

If nothing else, tell them "we believe in you enough to give up this nothing prospect and pay $1.5m to get James Paxton instead of using bullpen games."
Nicely phrased BPMS. For those who haven't been reading every post, "(Paredes is someone I'd be ok tapping into the ATM ATM ATM for...) means Paredes is someone BPMS would be okay with "tapping into the Anthony/Teel/Mayer Automated Teller Machine at the moment..." l, or ATM ATM ATM. Again, well phrased BPMS.
 

ElcaballitoMVP

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 19, 2008
4,075
If you pick up Paxton, you're going to ride that bike until the wheels fall off. And he isn't going to stop you from bringing in a front of the rotation type before the deadline.

If he's cooked, you can easily cut him and go back to Criswell. I'm not really seeing a downside to bringing him in and seeing if he can give you 5-6 innings of solid enough pitching to give you a chance to win some games.

And the playoff rotation has nothing to do with Paxton. You bring him in to help get you to the playoffs and keep the innings in check for the kids, you're not worried about him starting a playoff game.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,088
What do we think the cost, in Sox prospect terms, for Rengifo would be? Figure there would be a lot of teams interested in him given his versatility.
 

BringBackMo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,456
I think we should be looking for both. That doesn't necessarily mean being in GFIN mode and overpaying because the "window" is closing because it's clearly on the cusp of opening. I think Breslow needs to explore all options especially if there is a starter available with some remaining years left. It may not happen, but doesn't mean that it shouldn't be explored.
A hearty endorsement of trying to get Paxton here at some kind of reasonable cost. However, I don't think we'll be able to get any kind of decent starter who has multiple years of control left without overpaying, given how many teams are buying and how few are selling. I agree that any such opportunity should be explored, and I'm confident that it will be, but I suspect that we're more likely to try to grab back-of-the-rotation starters and middle relievers, hopefully acquiring them with some of our decent minor leaguers who will be part of the 40-man crunch this offseason.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,501
A hearty endorsement of trying to get Paxton here at some kind of reasonable cost. However, I don't think we'll be able to get any kind of decent starter who has multiple years of control left without overpaying, given how many teams are buying and how few are selling. I agree that any such opportunity should be explored, and I'm confident that it will be, but I suspect that we're more likely to try to grab back-of-the-rotation starters and middle relievers, hopefully acquiring them with some of our decent minor leaguers who will be part of the 40-man crunch this offseason.
To me it all depends on what the "overpay" is. Just as an example of two guys that I really like (Taillon and Bassitt), I think that either of those players would be attainable without dipping into the ATM Campbell, Montgomery (obviously PTBNL and 6 months and stuff aside). So while something built around a deal of something like 3 of 6 from the Bleis, Yorke, Jordan, Zanetello, Gonzalez, Castro group would probably be an "overpay" it's one that I think would help the Sox and make a lot of sense. Not only for this year, but for the next couple of seasons as well as both players have term. Would I dip into the ATM (CM) pieces for them - no, certainly not. Would I overpay in terms of pieces outside of those - yes. But only for guys with more than this year (or put another way, yes for Taillon and Bassitt but not for Flaherty).


However, I agree (I think) that the most likely path is to go after rentals with pieces that are more in the "Eddinson Paulino and below" tier (and depending on the player in question, a good bit below).

Even going out and getting pieces that should cost basically nothing - lets say they go out and get Paxton or Patrick Corbin, Tommy Pham and something that is a relief pitcher and I'm not going through every RP name ostensibly on the market - would at least show the team that they're "investing" in them with known MLB players that could help them get to the playoffs.

That would at least allow them a "modified" 6 man rotation where you get the opportunity to skip a turn for Houck, Crawford and Bello without a) the white flag that is often a bullpen game and b) without overtaxing said bullpen.

For instance, say they get James Paxton. They could then line up as:

7/24 - Pivetta
7/25 - off day
7/26 - Bello
7/27 - Crawford
7/28 - Paxton
7/29 - Criswell
7/30 - Pivetta
7/31 - Bello
8/1 - off day
8/2 - Houck (has missed one start but gotten 10 days of rest)
8/3 - Paxton
8/4 - Criswell
8/5 - Pivetta
8/6 - Bello
8/7 Crawford (has missed one start but gotten 10 days of rest)
8/8 - off day
8/8 - Houck
8/9 - Paxton
8/10 - Pivetta
8/11 - Criswell
8/12 - Crawford
8/13 - Houck
8/14 - Paxton
8/15 - Pivetta
8/16 - Bello (has missed one start but gotten 10 days of rest)

...and so on and so forth for the remainder of the season. That could be hugely important with Houck, Crawford and Bello set to blow through their prior career high in innings pitched.


Also - thanks @Sin Duda, I was proud of that.
 
Last edited:

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,597
Maine
They need innings at this point so they should pick him up. Hopefully they’re willing to pay the $1.5 million remaining so they can just send LA a low A lottery ticket.
There's a bit of irony in that we're talking about bringing in Paxton to eat some innings when a big part of the argument against bringing him back last winter was that he couldn't be counted on to give them a ton of innings. He's one good start (6.2) away from matching his innings total from last year. I think he's probably good to go 140-150 innings in total for the year, barring injury of course, so I don't really doubt he can eat innings. My hesitation with bringing him in now is he'd be the sixth best starter on the roster. I'd prefer to see them bring in someone with better numbers than Criswell if they're going to bump Criswell to the pen.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
15,154
I don’t disagree with that in theory- but there’s a really desperate need for a RH in the pen- could Criswell be that guy? He doesn’t have much of a split (actually tougher on LH), If he could be a Whitlock 2021 type weapon in the pen, than the combo of Paxton / Criswell could be more useful than Criswell / Horn.

Then again, if Paxton stinks you could be making the rotation much worse, which will put more pressure on the pen. So can see both sides.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,597
Maine
I don’t disagree with that in theory- but there’s a really desperate need for a RH in the pen- could Criswell be that guy? He doesn’t have much of a split (actually tougher on LH), If he could be a Whitlock 2021 type weapon in the pen, than the combo of Paxton / Criswell could be more useful than Criswell / Horn.

Then again, if Paxton stinks you could be making the rotation much worse, which will put more pressure on the pen. So can see both sides.
What made Whitlock a weapon out of the pen was his velocity (which made his changeup even better by contrast). Criswell doesn't have that. I don't see him being all that effective as a "weapon" out of the pen. He can eat innings in a blowout or if the starter gets chased, but he's not a guy you can bring into a game when you need a K and expect to get it. The only starters they have who could be that 2021 Whitlock kind of weapon are the guys you don't want to move out of the rotation at all (Houck, Crawford, Bello).