If they can be known as the go to Org for post TJ rehab and development that would be a very big deal.Ah, another sign-them-while-they're-hurt project. I suppose if we do one of these every year, we'll always have someone coming back...
Nope, I am still half awake and read it that way as well.. fun fact, Pablo Sandoval is only 38I can’t be the only poster who read this as “Red Sox sign Pablo Sandoval” right?
Totally. These kinds of signings always get pshawed when people are expecting bigger but this a good path to be on. Sandoval had some interesting things going on in 2021-22 and was in a terrible organization. Makes sense to sign him now rather than trade for a Paxton type in July, and he may look good enough to cleanly slot into Giolito's #4 or #5 starter role in 2026.If they can be known as the go to Org for post TJ rehab and development that would be a very big deal.
It's hardly as if they're the only team that signs these guys.Ah, another sign-them-while-they're-hurt project. I suppose if we do one of these every year, we'll always have someone coming back...
If its all guaranteed $ it's a pretty significant overpay IMO. Hard to believe other teams are lining up to pay close to that so far before he has shown he is back to 2021-2022 stuff.Yeah, not seeing what Breslow sees in those numbers to think he's worth basically $18M for one season in the future- I never expect these guys to be ready when the most optimistic expected start times are set. Maybe... but I doubt it.
That's an awfully expensive dumpster.I don't mind some dumpster diving as long as it is part of the plan, but I pray it is not the whole plan.
Maybe we should see what a 36 year old who has pitched 5 innings in two years actually does for us before we declare this move incredible.The fact we have Liam Hendrix at $5AAV is incredible. We will feel the same about this in 2026.
This. If he rides to the rescue after the ASB, I'll gladly admit I was wrong, but lately all these signings wind up being, "Well, maybe next year..."Yeah, not seeing what Breslow sees in those numbers to think he's worth basically $18M for one season in the future- I never expect these guys to be ready when the most optimistic expected start times are set. Maybe... but I doubt it.
Eh....in this day and age, as a reliever, he really doesn't strike out a ton of guys. Most "strike out" relievers are over 10.0 k/9. But yes he sure does like to walk guys, that's for sure.This man really like to strike 'em out and walk 'em. Those WHIP numbers the past two seasons are atrocious.
View attachment 93493
Then remember Crochet.With signings like this and that POS Chapman, Breslow is definitely making us uncomfortable.
Its 9AAV, which is what matter, if they can get even an average season out of him in 26 it’s a huge steal.Yeah, not seeing what Breslow sees in those numbers to think he's worth basically $18M for one season in the future- I never expect these guys to be ready when the most optimistic expected start times are set. Maybe... but I doubt it.
Have you seen what the rent is in the Fenway district nowadays?That's an awfully expensive dumpster.
I'm with you here. Must see something they think they can fix with him. We'll have to wait and see how the rest of the offseason plays out, but I'm not expecting this to be the final move for the rotation. If anything, perhaps this move gives Breslow a bit more peace of mind if he needs to include one of our rotation arms in a separate, consolidate "wins" move.These deals are always a little annoying because of the lack of instant gratification. But once you get to that second year the AAV always feels like a steal.
The fact we have Liam Hendrix at $5AAV is incredible. We will feel the same about this in 2026.
Zacklee!!! I don't get it. This feels like another "look at the smartest guy in the room over there playing 4-D chess... we're clearly all missing something..." sort of move when the most obvious moves are right there.That outlay gets you Carson Kelly with like 6 million to spare. Just sayin’.
IDK, his 2022 season was worth 3.7 fWAR, which is more than twice as good as our most valuable starter that year. He just turned 28.He's just never been particularly good. One excellent year in 2022, one so-so year in 2021, and the rest has been pretty bad. Not sure why they bothered with this guy, especially at this price.
Except he is not a reliever, he has always been a starting pitcher.Eh....in this day and age, as a reliever, he really doesn't strike out a ton of guys. Most "strike out" relievers are over 10.0 k/9. But yes he sure does like to walk guys, that's for sure.
He's just never been particularly good. One excellent year in 2022, one so-so year in 2021, and the rest has been pretty bad. Not sure why they bothered with this guy, especially at this price.
It’s really not complicated.Zacklee!!! I don't get it. This feels like another "look at the smartest guy in the room over there playing 4-D chess... we're clearly all missing something..." sort of move when the most obvious moves are right there.
Because he walks the ballparkIDK, his 2022 season was worth 3.7 fWAR, which is more than twice as good as our most valuable starter that year. He just turned 28.
He's good at keeping the ball in the ballpark. Here are the best SP home run rates in 2022-23.
View attachment 93496
Yeah, not seeing what Breslow sees in those numbers to think he's worth basically $18M for one season in the future- I never expect these guys to be ready when the most optimistic expected start times are set. Maybe... but I doubt it.
Yes, this is a limited risk way of adding a starter. If he rehabs and then sucks then you're out one year's worth of salary with the cap hit spread out over 2 years. If you sign Burnes or Fried and he suddenly sucks or get injured, you're stuck for way more for 8-9 years.It’s really not complicated.
Starting pitching is insanely expensive. Getting good starters on one year deals isn’t really a possibility.
One avenue is to get rehabbing pitchers that you like, and spread their AAV over two years and hope to get a strong season out of them.
The risk is essentially nothing when you look at the cost of starting pitching.
Yeah, I was just looking at his innings and didn't see big numbers of innings and didn't even look at the games column. Totally my bad there.Except he is not a reliever, he has always been a starting pitcher.
He is no ace but over 2022-2023, he put up 293 IP, 3.50 ERA, 121 ERA+, and a 3.63 FIP. That is a pretty good deal for a starter even if you assume the full $18M towards 2026. Even in his injury shortened 2024 season, he had a 3.87 FIP despite a 5 ERA. No guarantees he comes back from the surgery but this is a pretty good gamble IMO.
My twitching left eye suggests that you are not.I can’t be the only poster who read this as “Red Sox sign Pablo Sandoval” right?
I wish the Sox didn't have a budget ceiling, but they clearly do. I don't think it's crazy to see them whiffing on a FA or missing an extension because they were off by a $3M delta per season for a player and then this cost is sitting there soaking up that "we were just off...."Yes, this is a limited risk way of adding a starter. If he rehabs and then sucks then you're out one year's worth of salary with the cap hit spread out over 2 years. If you sign Burnes or Fried and he suddenly sucks or get injured, you're stuck for way more for 8-9 years.
Yet somehow his FIP has always been reasonable. I have yet to see a study that shows that walks are actually worse than hits for a pitcher to allow. (I get that that if you walk alot, you better not give up hits, especially xbh.)Because he walks the ballpark
Sure, and it might work out. I'd definitely prefer 2026 to be a team option and you can see how the rehab/end of 2025 look. TJS is usually successful, but some of these guys never really make it back. It's not a ton of $, but it's still non-trivial money.It’s really not complicated.
Starting pitching is insanely expensive. Getting good starters on one year deals isn’t really a possibility.
One avenue is to get rehabbing pitchers that you like, and spread their AAV over two years and hope to get a strong season out of them.
The risk is essentially nothing when you look at the cost of starting pitching.
Especially with an above-average ground ball rate.Yet somehow his FIP has always been reasonable. I have yet to see a study that shows that walks are actually worse than hits for a pitcher to allow. (I get that that if you walk alot, you better not give up hits, especially xbh.)
I'm grant that the risk is certainly different, but this move is full of risk, namely the risk that you've paid $18 million to a guy who cannot be relied on to be healthy and may not be very good if he is. There's also the risk that if he is good in 2026, he just flies the coop as a free agent, because lord knows we don't want to pay market rates for healthy pitchers any more. Then you're on to the next reclamation project. Rinse and repeat.Yes, this is a limited risk way of adding a starter. If he rehabs and then sucks then you're out one year's worth of salary with the cap hit spread out over 2 years. If you sign Burnes or Fried and he suddenly sucks or get injured, you're stuck for way more for 8-9 years.
Sure, there is risk to every signing, and this is a shorter term and financially limited risk that doesn't effect your cap much or for very long. That is the type or risk you shouldn't mind. It's the long term big cap hit deals that are the risks you worry about. And all pitchers have been shown to be injury risks once they are free agent aged.I'm grant that the risk is certainly different, but this move is full of risk, namely the risk that you've paid $18 million to a guy who cannot be relied on to be healthy and may not be very good if he is. There's also the risk that if he is good in 2026, he just flies the coop as a free agent, because lord knows we don't want to pay market rates for healthy pitchers any more. Then you're on to the next reclamation project. Rinse and repeat.
There's no way they're out on other moves, and I'm willing to bet they land one of Buehler or Flaherty.Its 9AAV, which is what matter, if they can get even an average season out of him in 26 it’s a huge steal.
If this move means they are out on other moves then yea, it’s disappointing.
I’ll wait until February to make come to that conclusion.
If Sandoval has a good year you can give him a QO.I'm grant that the risk is certainly different, but this move is full of risk, namely the risk that you've paid $18 million to a guy who cannot be relied on to be healthy and may not be very good if he is. There's also the risk that if he is good in 2026, he just flies the coop as a free agent, because lord knows we don't want to pay market rates for healthy pitchers any more. Then you're on to the next reclamation project. Rinse and repeat.