I find myself hoping that he smacks forty homers next year and decides to go one more season after that. His retirement is going to hurt.I'm going to miss David Ortiz.
Well, if he sucks for Boston, you will still be correct.The whole David price thing still seems weird to me. Never in my life thought he would pitch for the Sox. When he shut the door on our '08 season I assumed he would torture us for his career.
He's also given up an ungodly 29.5% LD rate (3rd worst in MLB) and 41.8% Hard rate (worst in MLB). So I don't think we can write off the .362 as seeing-eye singles. I think our best source of comfort is the reflection that it's still early, and he has tended to start slow in the past (though not this slow).His BABIP was .362 before today, and appears to have gone up. That's the highest BABIP of any AL pitcher who's thrown 30+ innings. What's going on?
The guy picked up on waivers who was signed to a relatively reasonable one year deal? Depends on your definition, I suppose.Could he out-Tony Clark Tony Clark?
Globe quote in CHB piece, "Not to pile on...but Jon Lester has allowed only seven runs in six starts for the Cubs"... Ouch, almost kicked the dogWhatever that number is plus two weeks.
I think we have found President Trump's press secretaryGlobe quote in CHB piece, "Not to pile on...but Jon Lester has allowed only seven runs in six starts for the Cubs"... Ouch, almost kicked the dog
The Cubs are ridiculous.Globe quote in CHB piece, "Not to pile on...but Jon Lester has allowed only seven runs in six starts for the Cubs"... Ouch, almost kicked the dog
Or it's just he built the exact teams to win three times (essentially) and no GM is infallible, and the plan can only work for so long. Impossible to say he could have done it again in Boston.And incidentally cementing (like concrete shoes at the bottom of the Charles River) Lucchino's, if in fact Lucky was the one who drove him away from Boston.
This is asinine. Lucchino's legacy in Boston is cemented and it's excellent.And incidentally cementing (like concrete shoes at the bottom of the Charles River) Lucchino's, if in fact Lucky was the one who drove him away from Boston.
Or anywhere. He hasn't "done it" in Chicago yet, if by "doing it" you mean winning a championship and not just building an impressively stacked team.Impossible to say he could have done it again in Boston.
This is asinine. Lucchino's legacy in Boston is cemented and it's excellent.
Fair enough. I mean just building a team up to put them in a position to win. There's nothing the GM can do other than find the pieces.Or anywhere. He hasn't "done it" in Chicago yet, if by "doing it" you mean winning a championship and not just building an impressively stacked team.
I was thinking more about Theo Epstein's quote that Tony Clark killed us at the plate when he was wearing a Red Sox uniform and very nearly killed us at the plate in a NYY uniform in the last AB of Game 6.The guy picked up on waivers who was signed to a relatively reasonable one year deal? Depends on your definition, I suppose.
So what's the over-under on when the Shaughnessy column comes out and talks about how Astro came to Boston and brought his dog with him?
That AB took years off my life. I was beyond convinced Tony F-ing Clark was going to hit the walkoff HR to end the comeback bid.I was thinking more about Theo Epstein's quote that Tony Clark killed us at the plate when he was wearing a Red Sox uniform and very nearly killed us at the plate in a NYY uniform in the last AB of Game 6.
This isn't entirely true in todays game when the GM's typically are meeting with the manager on a game-to-game basis to discuss lineups and strategy. IIRC this is something Theo and Tito did regularly.Fair enough. I mean just building a team up to put them in a position to win. There's nothing the GM can do other than find the pieces.
I assume because he gets to watch every pitch from an infield perspective? Don't know.My question: why is Pedroia finding (other than the fact he is awesome) this and not a coach/org person?
I tweeted pretty much that exact ERA-FIP comparison last night. Finished a Fangraphs/Rotographs post on it this AM which should run on the site in the next day or two. Buchholz multiple standard deviations beyond precedent with regard to difference between ERA and peripherals.
Even if you are argue he is tipping his pitches, you'd expect to see it in either LD% or Hard% (i.e., well above average values because batters are raking balls they are contacting), neither of which is the case.
If Clay Buchholz is really as bad as his ERA has been this year, he's probably the biggest outlier among all pitchers in any pitching peripheral stat over the last couple decades. The more plausible explanation is he's gotten at least a little unlucky (his xBABIP is right at league average and just south of .300 where it should be) and should be better going forward. I am not saying you can't make the argument that his peripherals are somewhat unsustainable given his previous marks -- his K%, K%-BB%, and SwStr% are well above his career averages. But he would have to completely lose the ability to strike ANYONE out (and walk everyone else) to post an xFIP/SIERA/whatever north of 5.00.
But the whole "let's DFA him" thing is a better narrative for Eric Wilbur.
Pretty much exactly a year ago, Clay Buchholz had an ERA about 3 runs higher than his xFIP or FIP. czar told everybody to relax. Price's ERA is almost 4 runs higher than his xFIP or FIP. czar, please tell us to relax about David Price.Over his last 5 starts (or, more aptly, the last time people were running around screaming "peripherals mean nothing with Clay!!!11"), Buchholz has a 1.95 ERA in 37 IP with a 30/8 K/BB.
His FIP over that same stretch is 2.83. His FIP in April was 2.58.
I know things like the meltdown narrative are more fun, but sometimes pitching well and getting unlucky with results is *actually* a thing.
I don't feel this is different than in other sports when smart/savvy players are more in tune then the coaches as that top tier of IQ in their respective sports aren't shared by their coaches.@MikeSilvermanBB
My question: why is Pedroia finding (other than the fact he is awesome) this and not a coach/org person?
Our manager used to be a pitching coach. So Pedroia must be wrong. (But I hope he's not.)@MikeSilvermanBB
My question: why is Pedroia finding (other than the fact he is awesome) this and not a coach/org person?
I hope everybody sees what you did here to bolster an argument that doesn't make a lot of sense.Think about it in terms of other sports players vs coaches and who you feel understands the game more......Tom Brady or Josh McDaniels?
What doesn't make a lot of sense.....that elite players aren't more knowledgeable about the game then many of their coaches? Many of these coaches just finished up their playing careers and are on the same level (or below) as the players they now coach. It's common in all sports.I hope everybody sees what you did here to bolster an argument that doesn't make a lot of sense.
I recall something last year when Ortiz picked up on something in JBJ's(?) swing.....or maybe that was also Pedroia I don't recall specifically.Not two weeks ago, Chris Young could tell from the outfield that Henry Owens was tipping his pitches, not to the batter, but to baserunners. Sometimes the position players are the ones who spot something first.
Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I thought it was something with Napoli and Pedroia.What doesn't make a lot of sense.....that elite players aren't more knowledgeable about the game then many of their coaches? Many of these coaches just finished up their playing careers and are on the same level (or below) as the players they now coach. It's common in all sports.
I recall something last year when Ortiz picked up on something in JBJ's(?) swing.....or maybe that was also Pedroia I don't recall specifically.
You are not mistaken. Pedey is going to be a baseball lifer.Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I thought it was something with Napoli and Pedroia.
I read that Pedroia has faced Price the third most that any batter has faced Price in his career. Said he was studying video of all left handers he has faced., and when Prices popped up on the video, he said something stuck out to him....et voila.Pedroia has studied Price on video for years and has faced him a ton. He saw something and pointed it out. Doesn't mean it will work but batters can pick things out easily in a pitcher's delivery they've faced for years.
14/38(.368) in the 12 games following that flight.How'd that work out for Nap?
I thought he said, it was nothing "physical," as in an injuryFarrell categorically said last night it was "Nothing mechanical" - FIRE HIM (Just kidding)
So after reading this I'm wondering what the Hell Pedroia is seeing in Price's delivery while playing behind him that Farrell and Willis aren't seeing in warm ups, bullpen sessions or from watching him pitch from dugouts on either side of the field.@MikeSilvermanBB
David Price, w an assist from Pedroia, has detected a flaw, related to his front leg, in his delivery. "I'm going to be all right."
@DanShaughnessy
"It explains a lot,'' Price said. "It's all with my hands . . . My hands and right knee are supposed to be connected by a string.''
@DanShaughnessy
"For me, it's an easy fix,'' said Price, who is scheduled to pitch Thursday at Fenway vs. 'Stros.
My question: why is Pedroia finding (other than the fact he is awesome) this and not a coach/org person?
Then I read this and understand how much sense it makes. So much more to this game than any of us realize.Pedroia has studied Price on video for years and has faced him a ton. He saw something and pointed it out. Doesn't mean it will work but batters can pick things out easily in a pitcher's delivery they've faced for years.
I'd let him take a crack at straightening out Buchholz and Kelly.Pedroia for new pitching coach?