Red Sox in season discussion

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,251
I'd drive either Duran or Dalbec to the airport for Merrfield. Good fit with Yorke's timeline. Mike Minor can become Martin Perez.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
53,841
I'd drive either Duran or Dalbec to the airport for Merrfield. Good fit with Yorke's timeline. Mike Minor can become Martin Perez.
I'm not a huge fan of Merrifield's .317 OBP and sub .400 slugging last year. Is it a decline or a bad year?
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,676
Maine
I'm not a huge fan of Merrifield's .317 OBP and sub .400 slugging last year. Is it a decline or a bad year?
I'd say decline if only because he's entering his age 33 season. He's been durable as anyone the last few years but the trend in his numbers aren't rosy.
 

OCD SS

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Before 2021, this was also basically true of Correa (played in >110 games once), and I’d be pretty happy if we gave him $300 million. Paul Molitor’s another top 3 draft pick who had extremely bad injury luck through his age-27 season.

Buxton’s injuries seem flukey to me. A couple years-old concussions from a HBP and collision, a HBP fractured hand, a HBP wrist contusion, a fractured toe. The only one that seems worrisome is his 2019 left shoulder subluxation, which clearly hasn’t affected his hitting since (.288/.326/.622 for a 152 wRC+, the same wRC+ Shohei Ohtani posted last year).
Molitor is axiomatic to injury prone players coming into free agency the same way Joe Morgan is for short 2Bmen: if your argument requires that the compared player in question follow a HOF career path, the sheer unlikeliness of that outcome is an argument against it as an outcome, rather than for it IMO. Just because somebody wins the Powerball jackpot is no reason to argue that it's likely to be a specific person.

Are there any other players who had such a reputation for poor health and then corrected later in their careers? In this regard how close do you think Molitor is Buxton? I think it's probably worth pointing out that Molitor's reputation for health is set against standards for earlier eras; if you compare games played and PA (1st 7 seasons):
  • Molitor: 765 G/ 3479 PA
  • Correa: 752 G/ 3223 PA
  • Buxton: 493 G/ 1758 PA
Granted 2020 mucks this up a bit, depending on how you want to look at how you want to look at Correa playing in 58 out of 60 games and Buxton playing in only 39, and you have Buxton not getting a full season in 2015, but in the end given the comparison you've set up I don't think it's reasonable to expect that Buxton was going to get healthy and close that gap. (If you just chuck each players 2 worst years the games played is still 688/ 519/ 380).

The bottom line isn't that anyone is arguing that Buxton isn't as talented as anyone in the game when he's on the field, it's that he's just not on the field often enough. I'll leave aside being happy about the Sox giving Correa $300M; I suspect that is going to be subject to a wide variance across the board and I don't think you can use that as a crux for an argument in favor of Buxton. That Buxton's injuries may seem largely flukey also doesn't really matter IMO. These are the sorts of things that happen when one plays baseball, which is what he's going to be expected to do. These things happen to every player and it doesn't necessarily keep them off the field...

A team that is going to sign Buxton to a large contract is not only going to have to try to keep him healthy, they're also going to have to have a plan for what to do when he inevitably isn't. The opportunity cost with Buxton isn't just tying up the money, it's also the roster spot and machinations to get another player on the field in his place, and I'm not sure I can see how to do that.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,660
Molitor is axiomatic to injury prone players coming into free agency the same way Joe Morgan is for short 2Bmen: if your argument requires that the compared player in question follow a HOF career path, the sheer unlikeliness of that outcome is an argument against it as an outcome, rather than for it IMO. Just because somebody wins the Powerball jackpot is no reason to argue that it's likely to be a specific person.

Are there any other players who had such a reputation for poor health and then corrected later in their careers? In this regard how close do you think Molitor is Buxton? I think it's probably worth pointing out that Molitor's reputation for health is set against standards for earlier eras; if you compare games played and PA (1st 7 seasons):
  • Molitor: 765 G/ 3479 PA
  • Correa: 752 G/ 3223 PA
  • Buxton: 493 G/ 1758 PA
Granted 2020 mucks this up a bit, depending on how you want to look at how you want to look at Correa playing in 58 out of 60 games and Buxton playing in only 39, and you have Buxton not getting a full season in 2015, but in the end given the comparison you've set up I don't think it's reasonable to expect that Buxton was going to get healthy and close that gap. (If you just chuck each players 2 worst years the games played is still 688/ 519/ 380).

The bottom line isn't that anyone is arguing that Buxton isn't as talented as anyone in the game when he's on the field, it's that he's just not on the field often enough. I'll leave aside being happy about the Sox giving Correa $300M; I suspect that is going to be subject to a wide variance across the board and I don't think you can use that as a crux for an argument in favor of Buxton. That Buxton's injuries may seem largely flukey also doesn't really matter IMO. These are the sorts of things that happen when one plays baseball, which is what he's going to be expected to do. These things happen to every player and it doesn't necessarily keep them off the field...

A team that is going to sign Buxton to a large contract is not only going to have to try to keep him healthy, they're also going to have to have a plan for what to do when he inevitably isn't. The opportunity cost with Buxton isn't just tying up the money, it's also the roster spot and machinations to get another player on the field in his place, and I'm not sure I can see how to do that.
These are good points. I don’t mean to say that Molitor rebounded from an early injury bug 35 years ago to have a long career, ergo Buxton will. I’m trying to say that all it takes is one healthy year for Buxton to change the narrative.

The question is whether he’s worth the risk. If he were Steven Souza or Devon Travis, to name two relatively promising young players who couldn’t stay healthy, it wouldn’t matter. But Buxton is a superstar. His 4.5 bWAR in 2021 was well worth the annual money he’d be getting in a rumored 7/$125m extension even despite missing 100 games. If he wanted $30 million a year, I’d also balk. But I don’t think an annual salary of $15-18 million is all that much of a gamble, or that crippling to us if it doesn’t work out.

Corey Seager’s another guy who has largely bucked his injury-prone reputation, and he’s gonna land a pretty impressive contract any day now. Buxton’s missed 252 days to injury since 2018, and Seager’s missed 259 days (per Spotrac). I don’t think we’re players for Seager, but I don’t see people looking at him with the same degree of caution.

To your last point, I agree: the team should have a capable back-up CF in place. Kiké is perfect for that in 2022 (and a good extension candidate) and can easily slot into 2B/RF otherwise, but I’m not sure who it’d be going forward.
 
Last edited:

Minneapolis Millers

Wants you to please think of the Twins fans!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,753
Twin Cities
This discussion about Buxton is why I think the Twins are screwed, Buxton will get paid, and it won't be by Boston. Some other team willing and needing to take the high risk/reward gamble will expend the resources necessary to do it. (But as a hedge, I just bought a Buxton shirt at the Twins Target Field store on a Black Friday sale for $13!)
 

Twilight

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2006
122
That Buxton's injuries may seem largely flukey also doesn't really matter IMO.
Further, it's possible they're not. There are lots of HBPs in the injury list upthread. Is that flukey or does it have something to do with his stance or approach?
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
If the Sox decide to pursue an outfielder there's a CF out there that I wouldn't mind seeing the Sox pick up. I'm wondering what it takes to sign Starling Marte. Four man rotation with Kike', Verdugo and Renfroe. Marte's a good on base guy, has some speed, 3x GG OF and has played nearly 600 games in LF. This also lengthens the bench with one of these guys or Arroyo available off the bench everyday.
Well, the Met's got Marte. Not sure if Chaim was interested or not, but I'm sure that 4 years at $78M wasn't doable here.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
11,921
The Semien deal (7/175) seems to establish the kind of money it will take to extend Bogaerts. Do the Sox offer him that deal now, or something similar, in hopes of avoiding him getting to FA? Do they make Devers an offer this off-season as well?

It seems to me like the FA market has gone up pretty dramatically in a year or two and the Sox having very few players under contract after next season went from an opportunity to a potential liability.

Does the increased potential of having X for only one more year, which was always a possibility, change the teams plans for this upcoming year or does the first few gyrations off the market not mean anything?
 

OCD SS

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
It only depends on what the new CBT structure will be... the teams making these signings are not edging up close to the tax thresholds.

I can see these deals setting the price for Devers (who will be looking for more than Semien) but the Sox shouldn't be using them to determine a deal with X. If another team wants to pay X like he's still a SS, the Sox would be wise to let them. If the new CBA lets them keep him as the eminence grise of the infield, that's great, but I have no interest in him hamstringing the IF defense for the long term as his number-sake did for the NYY.
 

thepriceisright

New Member
Apr 8, 2018
65
Gausman to Jays for 5/110. Definitely seems to make them the most complete team in the division right now on paper, will be interesting to see if this affects the Sox and their plans as I imagine they had been poking around him.
 

Seels

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
4,948
NH
really no reason to believe that Gausman is anything other than a one year wonder.
 

Apisith

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2007
3,208
Bangkok
Wow, I really did not see this type of market developing. It’s definitely not breaking right for us. Damn.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,715
Gausman to Jays for 5/110. Definitely seems to make them the most complete team in the division right now on paper, will be interesting to see if this affects the Sox and their plans as I imagine they had been poking around him.
Don’t forget TOR lost Semien and likely Ray.
 

jtn46

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 10, 2004
9,757
Norwalk, CT
No reason other than Gausman’s 2021 performance being completely consistent with his previous two years since leaving Atlanta.
Still would scare me that he was so mediocre in the AL East with his stuff and he's had his share of injuries. I think his deal is fair given he was so important to the Giants phenomenal season but I'm surprised he didn't stay in the NL if he had a similar offer there.
 

Diamond Don Aase

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 16, 2001
1,069
Merrimack Valley
Still would scare me that he was so mediocre in the AL East with his stuff and he's had his share of injuries. I think his deal is fair given he was so important to the Giants phenomenal season but I'm surprised he didn't stay in the NL if he had a similar offer there.
Gausman was much better than mediocre during his time in Baltimore with the exception of his last full season for the Orioles, when he was soundly mediocre due in part to a BABIP .030 higher than his career average.

The only AL East opponent that Gausman consistently struggled against was Toronto, which should be of little concern to the Blue Jays. He was effective against the Red Sox and Yankees, just as he has been effective against the Padres, Dodgers, and especially in Coors Field during recent seasons.

Gausman has been on the disabled list twice for non-COVID concerns since 2016 and those 2019 stints were due to Opening Day roster shenanigans and a non-arm injury.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
23,686
Miami (oh, Miami!)
Wow, I really did not see this type of market developing. It’s definitely not breaking right for us. Damn.
We also don't have that much to do to keep a competitive team on the field.

A couple of bullpen arms could do it at this point.

Locks: C (Vazquez), SS (Xander), 3B (Devers), LF (Verdugo), CF (E.Hernandez), RF (Renfroe).​
Quasi-Locks: 1B (Dalbec), 2B (Arroyo).​
Low priority ? marks: UT IF, 4th OF.​
Rotation: Sale, Eo, Pivetta, Houck/Whitlock, Wacha.​
Bullpen: Whitlock(?), Barnes(?), J.Taylor, Darwinzon, Sawamura, Valdez, Brasier, a few MiLe​


So let's put aside a situation where something lands in Bloom's lap (e.g. getting a below market rate prime OF, then flipping one of our 3 starting OF for value.) But if we assume he's basically getting value for value, what would we upgrade? Our main weak points are 2B, C, and 1B depending on Dalbec.

So in reverse order, 1B. Bat-signings really hinged on JD. He's staying, so we still have the DH-heavy problem, and that pretty much rules out signing Schwarber, unless we contemplate a mid-season trade. By that I mean, we have JD at DH, Dalbec at 1B and Casas knocking on the door. If Casas comes up this year, we've got the same juggling problem. So why add Schwarber ahead of time (and at much $) so Bloom will have to do a mid-season trade if all 4 of those pieces are hot. I'm also pretty sure he won't trade for a 1B upgrade over Dalbec (this assumes Dalbec's inconsistency at the plate is thought a risk by the Sox.) What do you do with that upgrade 1B guy if Casas is ready? (As it is, Dalbec might find time at 1B/3B/DH/LF, and segue to DH in 2023 when JD is a free agent.)

Part of this hinges on whether we view 2022 as a competitive year. I don't see why we wouldn't. Even so, I just don't see Bloom wanting to create potential log jams, even if only for a year. It's a waste of on-field production and burns out contract years by reducing at-bats of prime players and stalling development (if they're riding pine in the majors.) Then maybe you have to dump someone for next-to-nothing and you lose value. (In 2021, Bloom held onto broken pieces till very late in the season.)


2B. After a potential Dalbecian cold-start, our biggest "hole" is 2B, but we have Arroyo (knock wood) and Downs. If they think Arroyo's something of an illusion, or injury prone, and Downs has plateaued, maybe that's a good upgrade point for a trade or long term signing. No shuffling required. But both Arroyo and Downs have multiple years of control left. . .and given the value holding tendencies. . . I wouldn't rule it out, but I don't think we'd see a primo multi-year 2B signing unless Bloom is convinced both those guys won't be a starting 2B.


The next biggest production hole is C. But that's pretty much a thin market in terms of clearly upgrading without paying through the nose. Also, Vaz is a Cora favorite, and hit a bit in the final months. Plawecki seems the ideal shorter-half starting catcher. Perhaps some of the Vaz problem would be minimized if Cora played Plawecki more, or managed Vaz better, so he does not crater mid-season. I don't see anything being done here. And maybe it does not have to be.


As far as Utility IF/OF guys again, we have them as Arauz, Downs, Duran fill the Iglesias/Santana utility roles. But if the Sox think that crew isn't ready, they'll likely sign a couple of place-holders, like Iglesias and Santana. (They'd strike gold if they managed to get what they thought they were going to get with Santana in 2021.)

We seem fully stocked with break-in prospects (Downs, Duran), lottery tickets, and break-glass guys who can play the positions in case of emergency: Ryan Fitzgerald (SS), Cameron Cannon, etc. Heck, there's even Franchy Cordero who we retained on a 1 year MiL deal.
 
Last edited:

cantor44

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2020
1,637
Chicago, IL
We also don't have that much to do to keep a competitive team on the field.

A couple of bullpen arms could do it at this point.

Locks: C (Vazquez), SS (Xander), 3B (Devers), LF (Verdugo), CF (E.Hernandez), RF (Renfroe).​
Quasi-Locks: 1B (Dalbec), 2B (Arroyo).​
Low priority ? marks: UT IF, 4th OF.​
Rotation: Sale, Eo, Pivetta, Houck/Whitlock, Wacha.​
Bullpen: Whitlock(?), Barnes(?), J.Taylor, Darwinzon, Sawamura, Valdez, Brasier, a few MiLe​


So let's put aside a situation where something lands in Bloom's lap (e.g. getting a below market rate prime OF, then flipping one of our 3 starting OF for value.) But if we assume he's basically getting value for value, what would we upgrade? Our main weak points are 2B, C, and 1B depending on Dalbec.

So in reverse order, 1B. Bat-signings really hinged on JD. He's staying, so we still have the DH-heavy problem, and that pretty much rules out signing Schwarber, unless we contemplate a mid-season trade. By that I mean, we have JD at DH, Dalbec at 1B and Casas knocking on the door. If Casas comes up this year, we've got the same juggling problem. So why add Schwarber ahead of time (and at much $) so Bloom will have to do a mid-season trade if all 4 of those pieces are hot. I'm also pretty sure he won't trade for a 1B upgrade over Dalbec (this assumes Dalbec's inconsistency at the plate is thought a risk by the Sox.) What do you do with that upgrade 1B guy if Casas is ready? (As it is, Dalbec might find time at 1B/3B/DH/LF, and segue to DH in 2023 when JD is a free agent.)

Part of this hinges on whether we view 2022 as a competitive year. I don't see why we wouldn't. Even so, I just don't see Bloom wanting to create potential log jams, even if only for a year. It's a waste of on-field production and burns out contract years by reducing at-bats of prime players and stalling development (if they're riding pine in the majors.) Then maybe you have to dump someone for next-to-nothing and you lose value. (In 2021, Bloom held onto broken pieces till very late in the season.)


2B. After a potential Dalbecian cold-start, our biggest "hole" is 2B, but we have Arroyo (knock wood) and Downs. If they think Arroyo's something of an illusion, or injury prone, and Downs has plateaued, maybe that's a good upgrade point for a trade or long term signing. No shuffling required. But both Arroyo and Downs have multiple years of control left. . .and given the value holding tendencies. . . I wouldn't rule it out, but I don't think we'd see a primo multi-year 2B signing unless Bloom is convinced both those guys won't be a starting 2B.


The next biggest production hole is C. But that's pretty much a thin market in terms of clearly upgrading without paying through the nose. Also, Vaz is a Cora favorite, and hit a bit in the final months. Plawecki seems the ideal shorter-half starting catcher. Perhaps some of the Vaz problem would be minimized if Cora played Plawecki more, or managed Vaz better, so he does not crater mid-season. I don't see anything being done here. And maybe it does not have to be.


As far as Utility IF/OF guys again, we have them as Arauz, Downs, Duran fill the Iglesias/Santana utility roles. But if the Sox think that crew isn't ready, they'll likely sign a couple of place-holders, like Iglesias and Santana. (They'd strike gold if they managed to get what they thought they were going to get with Santana in 2021.)

We seem fully stocked with break-in prospects (Downs, Duran), lottery tickets, and break-glass guys who can play the positions in case of emergency: Ryan Fitzgerald (SS), Cameron Cannon, etc. Heck, there's even Franchy Cordero who we retained on a 1 year MiL deal.
I largely agree with this, though the Sox won't be competitive enough without a couple more blue chip arms, as you say. Even 3 ...a starter and two relievers. Or at least 2 of those. That seems like a must to me.

Meanwhile, argument for a guy like Baez (Semien would have been good too) is as insurance against X signing elsewhere after 2022, while also, of course upgrading the current team.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,660
View: https://twitter.com/jonmorosi/status/1463684795473580037?s=21


Stroman’s reported market as of a few days ago was us, Giants, Cubs, Angels, Mets and Mariners.

Most of those teams have since made additions. It’s possible that the Mets and Mariners are out after today. The Angels are likely still in but have added Lorenzen to their rotation. The Giants added Wood and DeSclafani and were reportedly in heavy discussions with Cobb, but I guess that’s not final. I don’t buy that the Cubs are especially invested given where they are on their win curve, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the Cardinals are lingering, and maybe the Dodgers now that Scherzer happened.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
11,921
So….Seagar at 10/325, how does this impact Bogaerts? Does 8/200 get him to not opt out? Is that a deal the Sox even want to make? (Pretty sure I know the answer).

Same goes for Devers, who has to be thinking about a 10+ year deal with multiple opt outs.

What the heck are the Sox going to do here?

Can someone talk me off the ledge here?
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,660
What ledge? The Red Sox have the third highest franchise valuation in baseball, roughly even with the Dodgers at #2.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
So….Seagar at 10/325, how does this impact Bogaerts? Does 8/200 get him to not opt out? Is that a deal the Sox even want to make? (Pretty sure I know the answer).

Same goes for Devers, who has to be thinking about a 10+ year deal with multiple opt outs.

What the heck are the Sox going to do here?

Can someone talk me off the ledge here?
Cheer for the laundry and not the players?
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,276
For those here that have complained about the sox not spending/throwing money at every top tier FA.

the DODGERS, are claiming "fiscal responsibility" after pretty much failing to sign all of their FA this year
View: https://twitter.com/Joelsherman1/status/1465436130413879296
The #Dodgers wanted to retain both Scherzer and Seager. But their were financial areas that the #Mets #Rangers would go, that LAD would not. Trea Turner can now move to SS, Gavin Lux to 2b. But the LAD have a lot of work to do with the rotation. Plus Turner is a FA after ’22.
As I have said before, MLB may claim there is no salary cap in baseball, but the Luxury tax and penalties that go with it, pretty much make it a Salary cap
 

allmanbro

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
362
Portland, Maine
The Rangers won 60 games last year. Just as a fun napkin calculation: if each of Seager, Semien, Gray, and Calhoun all match their career highs by fWAR, and you assume they are replacing exactly replacement-level production (and WAR translates directly to wins), that gets them to . . . 82 wins. If you add their Steamer projected WAR it gets to 72 wins (rounding up). I don't mind that those players are going to a team I don't think is likely to compete.

As far as what the numbers mean for the market going forward, it's not clear that we can project, because the deadline set by the CBA makes this week a pretty unique negotiating environment. I am surprised it has worked out so well for the players, but I think we'll just have to see how the rest of the offseason goes.
 
Last edited:

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,676
Maine
So….Seagar at 10/325, how does this impact Bogaerts? Does 8/200 get him to not opt out? Is that a deal the Sox even want to make? (Pretty sure I know the answer).

Same goes for Devers, who has to be thinking about a 10+ year deal with multiple opt outs.

What the heck are the Sox going to do here?

Can someone talk me off the ledge here?
If Bogaerts wants to pursue free agency because he wants Seager/Lindor type money, then 8/200 will be laughed out of the room. It's going to take Seager/Lindor money to keep him.

Devers is still two years from free agency so I fail to see the urgency. It'd be nice to lock him up long term but if it's going to take market value to do it, then what's the difference between doing it now or a year from now (or two years from now when he hits the market)? Best they can do is keep the dialogue going and hope they find a common ground.
 

MuellerToldHisTale

New Member
Oct 29, 2018
395
New Jersey
If Bogaerts wants to pursue free agency because he wants Seager/Lindor type money, then 8/200 will be laughed out of the room. It's going to take Seager/Lindor money to keep him.
Will it though? X is 2 years older than both at time of signing, and not necessarily considered to be long for the SS position (although frankly I'd love to know how to diplomatically convince him of that while trying to resign him).
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,676
Maine
Will it though? X is 2 years older than both at time of signing, and not necessarily considered to be long for the SS position (although frankly I'd love to know how to diplomatically convince him of that while trying to resign him).
If he's intent on opting out, yes, that's what it will take because if it wasn't, he wouldn't be opting out. Unless you're suggesting that his age and "not being long for SS" will suppress his market, in which case why not let him opt out if he's going to and if he doesn't find what he wants, re-sign him to a more reasonable (defined however you want) deal.

There's no reason to not keep the lines of communication open with him in the meantime, though. Maybe they can hit upon the magic numbers to rip up his remaining deal and lock him up with no opt-outs for the next 5-6 years.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
11,921
Multiple reports suggest the Sox reached out to Ray and expressed interest. Haven’t seen any that say they made an offer but who really knows. So far, it’s been reported that they made offers to Matz and Heaney (and obviously Wacha), haven’t seen anything concrete on anyone else.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
19,863
St. Louis, MO
Multiple reports suggest the Sox reached out to Ray and expressed interest. Haven’t seen any that say they made an offer but who really knows. So far, it’s been reported that they made offers to Matz and Heaney (and obviously Wacha), haven’t seen anything concrete on anyone else.
Stroman seems pretty concrete. Mentioned multiple times.
 

MtPleasant Paul

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2015
168
Will it though? X is 2 years older than both at time of signing, and not necessarily considered to be long for the SS position (although frankly I'd love to know how to diplomatically convince him of that while trying to resign him).
I'm with you on signing Bogaerts for 8 years at 200 mill. He has also indicated recently that he is open to moving out of shortstop in the future. I continue to believe that Bogaerts and Devers want to stay together in Boston. The Sox should guarantee them at least five years here. The deal with Bogaerts and $250 mill to Devers for 10 with an opt out after five should get it done. This package should be their priority this winter. Who knows? Maybe Chaim is working on that now.
 

Sox Puppet

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2016
724
Take a look at [Robbie Ray's] stats by year. With the exception of two seasons, those ERA and WHIP numbers don't scream $23M per season to me.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/rayro02.shtml
This is a fair point -- though by today's standards, it's hard to argue against $23M per for the reigning Cy Young winner. But you're right, he has some pretty mediocre seasons mixed in with those two stellar ones.

For the record, his 2021: 2.84 ERA, 1.05 WHIP and 248/53 K/BB ratio across 193 1/3 innings (32 starts). That's pretty solid production.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
This is a fair point -- though by today's standards, it's hard to argue against $23M per for the reigning Cy Young winner. But you're right, he has some pretty mediocre seasons mixed in with those two stellar ones.

For the record, his 2021: 2.84 ERA, 1.05 WHIP and 248/53 K/BB ratio across 193 1/3 innings (32 starts). That's pretty solid production.
One might say it's Cy Young worthy LOL. So the $115M question is, Can Ray continue to preform close to this level for the next few years or was it a one off? I've no idea, but heading into the 2021 season Ray pitched in 161 games, 157 of them as a starter. His career ERA at that point was 4.29 and his career WHIP was 1.44.
 
Last edited:

sean1562

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 17, 2011
3,620
I'm with you on signing Bogaerts for 8 years at 200 mill. He has also indicated recently that he is open to moving out of shortstop in the future. I continue to believe that Bogaerts and Devers want to stay together in Boston. The Sox should guarantee them at least five years here. The deal with Bogaerts and $250 mill to Devers for 10 with an opt out after five should get it done. This package should be their priority this winter. Who knows? Maybe Chaim is working on that now.
If Xander is signed long term to eventually move to 3B, why sign Devers to be a 1B with Casas in line to be that guy? It seems more likely that we have another few years with Devers and Xander, then we are looking at a Casas/Yorke/Mayer core, maybe Duran in CF if he pans out. Devers has been a great but not transcendent offensive player. He is an alright 3B but not particularly good at it.
 

NDame616

will bailey
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
2,313
I'm with you on signing Bogaerts for 8 years at 200 mill. He has also indicated recently that he is open to moving out of shortstop in the future. I continue to believe that Bogaerts and Devers want to stay together in Boston. The Sox should guarantee them at least five years here. The deal with Bogaerts and $250 mill to Devers for 10 with an opt out after five should get it done. This package should be their priority this winter. Who knows? Maybe Chaim is working on that now.
Of course *you'd* like him at 8/200. That's a no brainer from the team's standpoint. I can't fathom any scenario where that is entertained as a serious offer. Maybe he doesn't get 10 year's like Seager, but I think he gets 8/280 or somewhere in that range.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
One might say it's Cy Young worthy LOL. So the $155M question is, Can Ray continue to preform close to this level for the next few years or was it a one off? I've no idea, but heading into the 2021 season Ray pitched in 161 games, 157 of them as a starter. His career ERA at that point was 4.29 and his career WHIP was 1.44.
Fun fact... Eduardo Rodriguez has pitched in 159 games, 153 of them as a starter. His career ERA is 4.16 and his career WHIP is 1.39. May not mean a whole lot, but I found it interesting
 

Sox Puppet

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2016
724
One might say it's Cy Young worthy LOL. So the $155M question is, Can Ray continue to preform close to this level for the next few years or was it a one off?
Not to be nitpicky, but you mean the $115M question ... If we were talking $155M, I'd definitely be out (that is, if I had several hundred million dollars lying around :)