Red Sox Get Brad Ziegler from Arizona

Sprowl

mikey lowell of the sandbox
Dope
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
34,600
Haiku
Are we no longer considering Tommy Layne a capable LOOGY? If we had another starter that could reliably go six innings we might be able to put him back into that role.
Carson Smith went under the knife, Noe Ramirez failed miserably, so Dombrowski kept at it and finally found a durable, reasonably priced ROOGY. Now maybe Farrell can make more optimal use of Ichabod Layne, who should still be a useful reliever in short doses.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,145
Carson Smith went under the knife, Noe Ramirez failed miserably, so Dombrowski kept at it and finally found a durable, reasonably priced ROOGY. Now maybe Farrell can make more optimal use of Ichabod Layne, who should still be a useful reliever in short doses.
We might want to start thinking about Hembree as a ROOGY, honestly.

Vs RHB: 1.40 ERA, .160 avg, .78 WHIP
Vs LHB: 3.48 ERA, .412 avg, 2.52 WHIP

He doesn't see a whole lot of lefties in the division now, but when rosters expand and they can start throwing them at him off the bench, that ERA should skyrocket.
 

Rough Carrigan

reasons within Reason
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I like the deal. The guy's sort of a slightly lesser Darren O'Day type. I wondered about his splits but last year he held lefties down really well. This year, so far, not quite as well but still without allowing much of any power to them. If he and Koji share the role for a few weeks I could see using Koji for the inning be it the 8th or 9th when the crucial hitters are lefties and Ziegler when they're righties.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,450
“@RyanHannable: Farrell: Koji is our closer. Says Ziegler will be set up man unless Koji needs day off.”
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,810
AZ
I wonder if the fly ball shagging story was a bit of misdirection by the Sox, trying to keep the Kimbrel situation under wraps as long as possible so that Arizona's price didn't go up?
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
And some people wonder why others are seriously questioning Farrell.
There may be reasons to seriously question Farrell, but this isn't one of them. A closer's work is more predictable and easier to regulate, and that's what you want for Koji at this point. Ziegler is a more situational guy, and also probably more amenable to an irregular workload.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,670
Rogers Park
There may be reasons to seriously question Farrell, but this isn't one of them. A closer's work is more predictable and easier to regulate, and that's what you want for Koji at this point. Ziegler is a more situational guy, and also probably more amenable to an irregular workload.
I really like his potential as a guy you bring in to get a ground ball with men on base in a big spot.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,473
Oregon
Scott Lauber ESPN Staff Writer
John Farrell: "Koji's our closer. On days when (Uehara) isn't available, we've got Brad (Ziegler) to turn to." Earlier Saturday, Farrell had indicated Uehara and Ziegler would split Red Sox's closing duties in absence of injured Craig Kimbrel.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,145
I'd much rather that read "On days Uehara's splitter isn't available." I'm worried the payroll budget's really going to tighten when half the fan base dies of heart attacks.
 

Schadenfreude

New Member
Apr 9, 2016
89
Geneva, Switzerland
I am wondering how Kimbrel got injured. This quote of John Farrell I took from an article by Rob Bradford:

The manager added, “Everything that we did early, he was fine. But then felt something while the running was taking place unfortunately during BP while he was shagging. Definitely unavailable tonight and we won’t know more until [Saturday].”

Seems wierd to have the closer shagging flies during BP, especially when one recalls how Rodriguez' knee injury came about. Usually with a pop fly to the infield the pitcher's job is to get safely out of the way so that one of the fielders can take charge and make the play. Is shagging flies a practice priority for a relief pitcher?
 

Byrdbrain

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
8,588
No it isn't priority but players have lots of down time so they go shag fly balls just for something to do.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,810
AZ
I watched Price actually set up in the middle infield during BP a couple of weeks ago from the monster, and he took grounders and liners -- SS for righties and 2B for lefties. Every batter tried to hit it right at him on the first pitch they got. It was kind of scary. But they get bored I guess. He was pretty athletic.
 

Soxfan in Fla

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2001
7,187
I don't understand how it is possible for someone to be this willfully ignorant.
You've been willfully ignorant on the subject the entire season, so you shouldn't be surprised if I refer to pot's calling kettle's black.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,541
FOR FUCKS SAKE, PITCHERS HAVE BEEN SHAGGING FLIES SINCE BEFORE YOU KNEW WHAT BASEBALL WAS. AND YOU AND YOU AND YOU.
 

mauidano

Mai Tais for everyone!
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2006
35,915
Maui
Obviously many have never been to batting practice before any game. A lot,of pitchers are out in the field shagging. I remember watching John Smoltz literally play like a center fielder chasing down balls. He was competitive as most pro athletes. It was a freak accident it happens. Move on.
 

Soxfan in Fla

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2001
7,187
Obviously many have never been to batting practice before any game. A lot,of pitchers are out in the field shagging. I remember watching John Smoltz literally play like a center fielder chasing down balls. He was competitive as most pro athletes. It was a freak accident it happens. Move on.
Smoltz was well known for that. I don't like that Kimbrell was injured but don't think anything was done wrong either.
 

dwainw

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,405
Minneapolis, MN
No it isn't priority but players have lots of down time so they go shag fly balls just for something to do.
Don't athletes need to stay relatively active between and before games to stay loose and maintain their--you know--athleticism? Seems like pitchers shagging flies which, as mentioned, has been done since caveman times, is the perfect, relatively physically stress-free activity to accomplish this. It's more than just "something to do" to relieve boredom.

And isn't it more than likely that whatever structural condition that led to Kimbrel's injury was bound to happen eventually, regardless? I mean, what are they supposed to do between outings, live in a bubble?
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,376
Miami (oh, Miami!)
In this division, with the power RHH that Toronto and Baltimore have, you need someone who can come in with runners on and get a tough out in late innings. You just have to have it or you aren't going to win this thing.

This is that guy. Have to love the move.
Agreed. Hopefully Farrell won't just say "you're my pitcher for inning 8," dust his hands, and walk away.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
And some people wonder why others are seriously questioning Farrell.
The manager needs 3-4 relievers whom he trusts to get outs in close-and-late situations. It doesn't matter much which of those guys is the "closer." Other posters have made good points about Ziegler being better suited to come in with runners on base, but even if Farrell's decision was based solely on Uehara's tenure with the team and history as our closer, I'm fine with it.
 

quint

Caught Looking
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
2,512
a really good source
DD was pretty clearly given carte blanche and an open checkbook to get this team back to contender status. You can't completely absolve him of criticism on the pitching and blame it all on BC. He could have signed Shark or Cueto. He could have signed more RP. He made the call to go into the season with the staff he did. He chose not to throw money at the problem. Let's see how he scrambles. It could be interesting.
He didn't throw resources at pitching during the offseason? Do you even consider what you post, or is it some joy of yours to throw shit at a wall and see how much sticks?
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,657
He didn't throw resources at pitching during the offseason? Do you even consider what you post, or is it some joy of yours to throw shit at a wall and see how much sticks?
Last I checked, DD threw $217 million at David Price, and then traded for Craig Kimbrel and Carson Smith.

That's quite an investment to improve the pitching staff.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
He didn't throw resources at pitching during the offseason? Do you even consider what you post, or is it some joy of yours to throw shit at a wall and see how much sticks?
Did I say he didn't throw any resources at pitching? Ummm, let's see. No, I didn't. I said he chose to go into the season with the staff he had. Which included the craptastic shitshow that is Buchholz and Kelly. Both of which offered nothing to be confident in. That we are even where we are at - which isn't a great place - is because Stephen Wright came out of nowhere. The bullpen is fine and he can't be blamed for Smith or Kimbrel getting hurt. Not that I was commenting to that, but you know that.

But that wasn't really point anyway. If you bother to read the post I responded to, the point was that you can't blame this staff on BC. You can blame Pablo on him or Castillo or Craig or a bunch of other shit, but I find it difficult to dispute the concept that DD was told "fix this shit and don't worry about payroll". And then chose to rely on Clay and Kelly when, even without relying on 20/20 hindsight, he probably shouldn't have.

But yeah, I just throw shut at the wall dude. Good observation. Let's just lay this at the feet of BC on top of all the other crap we want to blame him for.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,145
Did I say he didn't throw any resources at pitching? Ummm, let's see. No, I didn't. I said he chose to go into the season with the staff he had. Which included the craptastic shitshow that is Buchholz and Kelly. Both of which offered nothing to be confident in. That we are even where we are at - which isn't a great place - is because Stephen Wright came out of nowhere. The bullpen is fine and he can't be blamed for Smith or Kimbrel getting hurt. Not that I was commenting to that, but you know that.

But that wasn't really point anyway. If you bother to read the post I responded to, the point was that you can't blame this staff on BC. You can blame Pablo on him or Castillo or Craig or a bunch of other shit, but I find it difficult to dispute the concept that DD was told "fix this shit and don't worry about payroll". And then chose to rely on Clay and Kelly when, even without relying on 20/20 hindsight, he probably shouldn't have.

But yeah, I just throw shut at the wall dude. Good observation. Let's just lay this at the feet of BC on top of all the other crap we want to blame him for.
Clay had a 130 ERA+ and a 2.68 FIP last year. Were you expecting those to drop to 77 and 6.05 this year? Were you expecting Kelly's total collapse after he pulled it together at the end of the year? Did you anticipate Edro's injury and disastrous return? Congratulations, you're psychic! Can I pick your brain about some horse races?
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Did I say he didn't throw any resources at pitching? Ummm, let's see. No, I didn't.
You said "he chose not to throw money at the problem."

I said he chose to go into the season with the staff he had.
With the staff he had when, exactly?

I mean, if your point is that he shouldn't have stopped at spending over $200M on an ace and non-trivial talent costs for two top relievers, OK, but implying that he decided to stand pat on pitching last winter is alternate-universe stuff.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
You said "he chose not to throw money at the problem."



With the staff he had when, exactly?

I mean, if your point is that he shouldn't have stopped at spending over $200M on an ace and non-trivial talent costs for two top relievers, OK, but implying that he decided to stand pat on pitching last winter is alternate-universe stuff.
You're right, I should have said "more" money. If you think I'm trying to say he "stood pat" on the pitching staff, when obviously he spent on Price and traded for Kimbrel and Smith, then you're not reading my words or I'm not typing them effectively. And I think I clearly have stated I'm talking about the rotation.

To be clear - the post I responded to was blaming BC for the pitching staff. DD has been the GM for close to a calendar year now. He made the choice to go into the season relying on Clay and Kelly (and the AAA fodder behind them). You can't blame him for ERod getting hurt, but you also can't give him credit for Wright, so those wash out in my opinion. Ymmv.

Clay is what he is. He's hurt and good, or healthy and sucks. Not a new development.

Kelly looked good his final handful of starts last year and was a decent gamble. It crapped out.

Either way - right, wrong or indifferent - the pitching staff is the direct result of DD's decisions in the offseason. It is not the result of anything BC did, which is what I was replying to. If you want to cherry pick and ignore the rather obvious and stated point - and make it seem like I am suggesting he fiddled while Rome burned - knock yourself out.

But yes, he could have signed another starter with more reliability or made another trade. There's a perfectly reasonable argument to be made that he should or should not have. That's not my point. My point is and was that the current state of pitching is not to be laid on the shoulders of Ben Cherington. It is Dave Dombrowski that is responsible, as he was the one running the show and could do what he wanted. He chose this staff and its results are his to own. There were avenues to address it and he didn't. That was a choice he made - a reasonable one - but not something he was forced into by his predecessor.
 

richgedman'sghost

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2006
1,878
ct
You're right, I should have said "more" money. If you think I'm trying to say he "stood pat" on the pitching staff, when obviously he spent on Price and traded for Kimbrel and Smith, then you're not reading my words or I'm not typing them effectively. And I think I clearly have stated I'm talking about the rotation.

To be clear - the post I responded to was blaming BC for the pitching staff. DD has been the GM for close to a calendar year now. He made the choice to go into the season relying on Clay and Kelly (and the AAA fodder behind them). You can't blame him for ERod getting hurt, but you also can't give him credit for Wright, so those wash out in my opinion. Ymmv.

Clay is what he is. He's hurt and good, or healthy and sucks. Not a new development.

Kelly looked good his final handful of starts last year and was a decent gamble. It crapped out.

Either way - right, wrong or indifferent - the pitching staff is the direct result of DD's decisions in the offseason. It is not the result of anything BC did, which is what I was replying to. If you want to cherry pick and ignore the rather obvious and stated point - and make it seem like I am suggesting he fiddled while Rome burned - knock yourself out.

But yes, he could have signed another starter with more reliability or made another trade. There's a perfectly reasonable argument to be made that he should or should not have. That's not my point. My point is and was that the current state of pitching is not to be laid on the shoulders of Ben Cherington. It is Dave Dombrowski that is responsible, as he was the one running the show and could do what he wanted. He chose this staff and its results are his to own. There were avenues to address it and he didn't. That was a choice he made - a reasonable one - but not something he was forced into by his predecessor.
You keep saying Dave Dombromski is responsible. He is not the GM. Mike Hazen is the GM so technically HE is the one responsible. How come he always gets left out of the picture? I mean DD is consistently quoted in the media. If you had to make assess responsibility for the Red Sox current situation how much credit/blame goes to Ben Cherrington Dave Dombromski and Mike Hazen? Does Hazen have the authority to do trades on his own or is he just a puppet and scrapecoat for DD if things go wrong?
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,473
Oregon
You keep saying Dave Dombromski is responsible. He is not the GM. Mike Hazen is the GM so technically HE is the one responsible. How come he always gets left out of the picture? I mean DD is consistently quoted in the media. If you had to make assess responsibility for the Red Sox current situation how much credit/blame goes to Ben Cherrington Dave Dombromski and Mike Hazen? Does Hazen have the authority to do trades on his own or is he just a puppet and scrapecoat for DD if things go wrong?
Hazen isn't going to do anything that doesn't have Dombrowski's approval. It's the new world order in baseball.
 

AbbyNoho

broke her neck in costa rica
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
12,179
Northampton, Massachusetts
I always got the impression that it was title creep and DD is filling the role that would be called GM 10 years ago and Hazen is filling the role Assistant GM would have been.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,494
Not here
Either way - right, wrong or indifferent - the pitching staff is the direct result of DD's decisions in the offseason. It is not the result of anything BC did, which is what I was replying to. If you want to cherry pick and ignore the rather obvious and stated point - and make it seem like I am suggesting he fiddled while Rome burned - knock yourself out.

But yes, he could have signed another starter with more reliability or made another trade. There's a perfectly reasonable argument to be made that he should or should not have. That's not my point. My point is and was that the current state of pitching is not to be laid on the shoulders of Ben Cherington. It is Dave Dombrowski that is responsible, as he was the one running the show and could do what he wanted. He chose this staff and its results are his to own. There were avenues to address it and he didn't. That was a choice he made - a reasonable one - but not something he was forced into by his predecessor.
Once all the deals were done, the rotation candidates were Price, Porcello, Rodriguez, Wright, Kelly, Owens, Johnson, Elias, Buchholz.

That's nine guys.

One of them has performed at expectations. One of them has performed above expectations. Six of them have performed below. One of them has barely performed at all.

The fact that this rotation hasn't performed well isn't on Cherington or Dombrowski. It's on the shit ton of crap that has happened. What does this team look like if Rodriguez just doesn't get hurt? Surely he's at least a solid four man. What if Johnson doesn't get carjacked?
 

Flunky

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 3, 2009
1,918
CT
Clay is what he is. He's hurt and good, or healthy and sucks. Not a new development.

Kelly looked good his final handful of starts last year and was a decent gamble. It crapped out.
With Clay, there is something that is undefinable (like, analytically) about how he performs which I think was probably not fully apparent to DD as he took the reigns of the team. Kelly continues to be a not quite a starting pitcher I am not sure why the Red Sox continue to hammer the square peg into the round hole. Across 2 pitching coaches now.

I agree that it is an organizational failure to not have done something about either of them before the season, but that's on LL/BC. I give DD a pass on both but not if something's not done before spring training 2017.
 
Last edited:

Darnell's Son

He's a machine.
Moderator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,581
Providence, RI

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,105
What a brilliant and timely move this was.

Just hoping they don't overwork him the next few days until Taz gets back (who knows a little bit about that)