Red Sox agree to terms with Garrett Crochet, Tanner Houck, and Kutter Crawford for 2025 (and Jarren Duran with a 2026 club option --1/17 update)

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,736
Isle of Plum
I mean, I think they'll settle pretty soon. They're not going to fight over this.

And it's life-changing money, let's be honest. His career earnings are just south of 4 million, so this will double his lifetime earnings. It's got to be very exciting for him and his family.

Think of all the guys we've had come through who faltered just as they were reaching arbitration. Dalbec fell apart before he could reach arbitration. That's got to be disappointing.
Yep, agree completely assuming this gets done. Having that life changing money in the wind while you consider arbitration is also exciting but not awesome :)

Again, it sounds from the feedback that it’s much more sop to sign even at this stage than I thought, so that 500k really is a whisker.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
33,169
Thanks for that, it’s comforting.

On its face it seems borderline ridiculous to drag an MVP candidate performer, and one with public mental health challenges, through what is pretty much an awful process of arbitration for 500k.
I suspect that during the actual negotiations Duran was closer to 5M and the Sox were below the 3.5. Theyll probably figure it out now.

I have little patience for players who suffer a performance setback because of the arbitration process. Ymmv.
 

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
1,333
The penalties for going over the first threshold of the luxury tax do not impact a team's ability to build a roster at all. Not at all. The team does not lose draft picks for going over the first threshold. The team does not lose international bonus pool money. All the team loses is a relatively insignificant portion of its profits. That's it.

From a competitive standpoint, it is in no way, shape, or form, malpractice to go over the first threshold of the luxury tax. Not at all. But John Henry -- a man who multiplied his wealth by buying into a publicly-subsidized industry that deliberately exploits the emotions of its most dedicated consumers and extorts municipal governments -- thanks you for defending his right to keep hoarding that cash.
"The team does not lose draft picks for going over the first threshold." My understanding is that it is a bit more complicated then this, since the team would lose/shift draft picks related to losing or signing a player who as received a Qualifying Offer. I started a thread on this topic a while ago in hopes of nailing down the details- take a look if you're interested and please improve the info if I missed anything. And I am in full support of the Sox paying up to the second tax threshold.

A team who signs a player who rejected a qualified offer, and that exceeded the CBT threshold in the preceding season, will lose its second- and fifth-highest selections in the following year's Draft, as well as $1 million from its international bonus pool for the upcoming signing period. If such a team signs multiple qualifying-offer free agents, it will forfeit its third- and sixth-highest picks as well. If a team does not receive revenue sharing and did not exceed the CBT salary threshold in the previous season, it will lose its second-highest selection in the following year's Draft, as well as $500,000 from its international bonus pool for the upcoming signing period. If one of these teams signs two such players, it will also forfeit its third-highest pick and an additional $500,000.

A team who loses a player who rejected a QO, and that exceeded the CBT threshold, gets a compensatory pick after the fourth round instead of after the 2nd round.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,959
Not here
The penalties for going over the first threshold of the luxury tax do not impact a team's ability to build a roster at all. Not at all. The team does not lose draft picks for going over the first threshold. The team does not lose international bonus pool money. All the team loses is a relatively insignificant portion of its profits. That's it.

From a competitive standpoint, it is in no way, shape, or form, malpractice to go over the first threshold of the luxury tax. Not at all. But John Henry -- a man who multiplied his wealth by buying into a publicly-subsidized industry that deliberately exploits the emotions of its most dedicated consumers and extorts municipal governments -- thanks you for defending his right to keep hoarding that cash.
Please go back and re read the exchange. You’ve misunderstood what I said.

i did not say it was malpractice to go over the first tax cap. I said it was malpractice to not worry about going over. I read “worry” as “pay attention to” and I stand by my statement.

If you’re going to go over a tax threshold you should do it with intent.

If you’re going to try to chastise or insult me, please make sure to do it over something i day and not over something you assume because you’ve misunderstood something i said.
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,753
The penalties for going over the first threshold of the luxury tax do not impact a team's ability to build a roster at all. Not at all. The team does not lose draft picks for going over the first threshold. The team does not lose international bonus pool money. All the team loses is a relatively insignificant portion of its profits. That's it.

From a competitive standpoint, it is in no way, shape, or form, malpractice to go over the first threshold of the luxury tax. Not at all. But John Henry -- a man who multiplied his wealth by buying into a publicly-subsidized industry that deliberately exploits the emotions of its most dedicated consumers and extorts municipal governments -- thanks you for defending his right to keep hoarding that cash.
At a minimum they would lose 60 or so draft slots and the related draft pool money if they went into the tax this season from losing Pivetta, potentially more depending on what they do next offseason. You can argue about how valuable all that is, but it's not nothing
 

MFYankees

New Member
Jul 20, 2017
725
Pay Duran the $4M, tell him that you hope he exceeds expectations and puts himself in a great position for Arb2, and then STFU.
 

Manuel Aristides

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 7, 2009
270
It seems misleadingly phrased by Merloni, like of course they’re blind bids (doesn’t seem like the right term) until the other party sees them. But then there must be some time to try to agree before today, otherwise how would so many agreements be reached today?
I've participated in some mock MLB Arbitration stuff* (Mark Feinsand was my judge once!) and you're right to be suspicious of how Merloni said this. It is technically true that the formal numbers submitted by each side to the arb board are "blind." But both sides are basing their submission largely off of past awards-- precedent is big with the arb judges, apparently -- and so it's pretty much known what the range is to all bidders.

But that's the arb process. That's what just began here. Until now, there's been nothing to prevent them from totally normal negotiations, and it would seem obvious to at least attempt such negotiation before moving to the formal proposals. Indeed, that's how the other deals must have been reached.

So Loomer is not wrong-- a $500k arb offer difference does not mean they decided to fight over $500k. If you wanted to look for a more charitable explanation, it seems plausible to me that Duran was pushing for a multiyear deal, maybe even playing hardball and exclusively discussing that, because the loss prospect of ending up with the "bad" arb deal is not that much worse than getting a "good" arb deal, whereas if the tactic works and they extend Duran, he's set for life.

But your intuition is correct: normal bargaining can happen without issue, and everyone knows what the one year deal would look like because its based off precedent, so you all know the neighborhood you're shopping in, so failing to reach a deal is still a reflection of bad work and pinching pennies, IMO. You should come to him at 11:59 and say "sorry we couldn't agree on a 3 year deal, let's just say [number that's a little too high based on precedent]." But that's easy for me to say from outside, there are innumerable ways these conversations can complicate.

Anyway my rambling point is, you're right to be suspicious of Lou's characterization, though he's technically correct. And while failure to reach a one year deal always smells like penny pinching to me, whatever you think of it, it's probably not quite as awful as "we decided to fight him over $500k". It's at least marginally more complicated than that.

I too will be rooting for Duran to win, even though I'm still mad at him about the slur.

*(I haven't done it in three years now so mea culpa in advance if the rules have changed in some way that's not obvious to me and makes me sound dumb here.)
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
33,169
Duran has publicly acknowledge mental health issues. These are real things. I am afraid your patience does not enter the formula as to whether this might affect his performanc.
"Mental Health" is a large area. We have no idea if the arbitration process would be an issue for him, as opposed to some things he has talked about. As for my patience, "give him what he asks for because otherwise he might suck" is bad business, whether its mental health, physical health, or Operation Shutdown

All that said, an arb difference of 500k should be resolvable.
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
36,369
The penalties for going over the first threshold of the luxury tax do not impact a team's ability to build a roster at all. Not at all. The team does not lose draft picks for going over the first threshold. The team does not lose international bonus pool money. All the team loses is a relatively insignificant portion of its profits. That's it.

From a competitive standpoint, it is in no way, shape, or form, malpractice to go over the first threshold of the luxury tax. Not at all. But John Henry -- a man who multiplied his wealth by buying into a publicly-subsidized industry that deliberately exploits the emotions of its most dedicated consumers and extorts municipal governments -- thanks you for defending his right to keep hoarding that cash.
Something about this post bothered me when I first read it, but I only recently realized why.

Your statement is not true - going over the tax at all lowers qualifying offer compensation picks significantly.
 

Bowlerman9

bitchslapped by Keith Law
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 1, 2003
5,236
Isn't it a little weird for Duran to agree to a team option in his 2nd (of 4) years of arbitration?

If he wins the MVP next season, he'll make "$8M+ escalators" in a year he could potentially make $20M.

If he is mediocre, the Sox decline the option, take him to arbitration, pay him well under $8M, and still have him for another 3 seasons.
 

gammoseditor

also had a stroke
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
4,616
Somerville, MA
Isn't it a little weird for Duran to agree to a team option in his 2nd (of 4) years of arbitration?

If he wins the MVP next season, he'll make "$8M+ escalators" in a year he could potentially make $20M.

If he is mediocre, the Sox decline the option, take him to arbitration, pay him well under $8M, and still have him for another 3 seasons.
I’m assuming “+ escalators” means if he wins MVP the option year goes up from $8M.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,627
I'm gonna spend the next 2 hours trying to figure out this structure and why they felt it necessary. Very unordinary
 

allmanbro

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
392
Portland, Maine
Duran probably felt bad for all the fans and didn't want us to have to go through that again next year (or, that basic idea, but for himself).
 

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
1,232
This is a smart move by both parties. Duran has some motivation to ball out again, which will help both himself and the Red Sox.
 

JBJ_HOF

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2014
552
Duran is not a free agent until after his age 31 season, and according to Masslive and the Globe, the Sox have never approached him about a long term contract, and I don't see why people are anxious for them to do so. This feels to me like protection if Anthony and Campbell bust, and since it voids with a trade, an easy way to move next winter if the kids hit.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,902
Maine
Ha! Yeah the Section 10 guys kind of lost their minds reacting to some assumption that the Sox were out tojust screw over Duran for no reason.

Hopefully a longer extension is in the works.
I don't see a longer extension in the cards. He's due to hit free agency entering his age 32 season. I can't see the Sox looking to pay him past age 33-34 and his chances of cashing in on the market are a lot better as a 32 year old-to-be than a 35 or 36 year old-to-be.
 
Hopefully a longer extension is in the works.
Despite being a Duran optimist and major proponent of early extensions, I've gotta disagree with you on this one. Duran is about the only major piece that I don't really want to see the Sox extend given that they have him until he's 31 already. I guess if the deal is quite team friendly I wouldn't mind an extension that goes through age 33 or so, ideally with team options int he last year or two. But aside from that, with his skillset there's a very good chance he's in serious decline before he hits FA.
 

play4real

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
27
They now have a Duran deal in place @ $3.75M 2025 with a club option for 2026 @ $8M. For good will with their young homegrown star, I don't think they should have lowballed him or should be haggling over $250K. They should have given him the $4M he requested and built a trust relationship between himself and the club. I hope this is not something that remains in his mind when they want to resign him to a long term contract.
 

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
1,232
They now have a Duran deal in place @ $3.75M 2025 with a club option for 2026 @ $8M. For good will with their young homegrown star, I don't think they should have lowballed him or should be haggling over $250K. They should have given him the $4M he requested and built a trust relationship between himself and the club. I hope this is not something that remains in his mind when they want to resign him to a long term contract.
You may want to read some of the comments above in regards to a long term deal. As a late relatively late bloomer with a skill set based a lot around speed, a long term deal for a guy already in his 30's is probably bad business. Especially when you have Anthony close, followed by possibly the Password and Bleis in next few years.
 
Last edited:

Hank Scorpio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 1, 2013
8,124
Salem, NH
I like this for the Red Sox - but I'm confused as to why Duran would agree to it.

Worst case was, he loses arbitration, and gets $3.5m.
Then maybe he has another strong season in 2025, and gets upwards of $12-20M in 2026.
Or he's terrible/injured/cooked and gets non-tendered.

Now the worst case is he gets $3.85m in 2025, is terrible, and gets non-tendered.
Best case is he gets $12M - but $8-10M is most likely.

If the $8M club option was guaranteed money, this makes a lot more sense for him. Or if the buyout was something like $2-3M or whatever.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
96,263
Oregon
They now have a Duran deal in place @ $3.75M 2025 with a club option for 2026 @ $8M. For good will with their young homegrown star, I don't think they should have lowballed him or should be haggling over $250K. They should have given him the $4M he requested and built a trust relationship between himself and the club. I hope this is not something that remains in his mind when they want to resign him to a long term contract.
As has been discussed, this is where your argument falters. Duran is no longer "young" in MLB terms. He won't be eligible for free agency until he is 32, which is the point where "long term" deals no longer are a sure thing. If he has another season this year like he did in 2024, then maybe a 2-3 year contract makes sense; but there's just non reason to do it until then, if at all.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
They now have a Duran deal in place @ $3.75M 2025 with a club option for 2026 @ $8M. For good will with their young homegrown star, I don't think they should have lowballed him or should be haggling over $250K. They should have given him the $4M he requested and built a trust relationship between himself and the club. I hope this is not something that remains in his mind when they want to resign him to a long term contract.
Do you think he doesn’t trust them even though he just signed a two year deal that most likely DOES get him that $4 million plus the chance to cash in nicely next year?
 

play4real

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
27
You may want to reaqd some of the comments above in regards to a long term deal. As a late relatively late bloomer with a skill set based a lot around speed, a long term deal for a guy already in his 30's is probably bad business. Especially when you have Anthony close, followed by possibly the Password and Bleis in next few years.
The Red Sox have a history of doing this to their better talent. Don't get hung up on the term "long term deal" All teams will look at age and decide what the term should be. My point was more that we haggle over $250K now, which is nothing in the scheme of things, and players feel under valued and are reluctant to come back to that team. Even if you don't care if Duran is resigned, it is more the historical practice that is inherent which is not good. We already see that better players are not attracted to the Red Sox in it's current culture. It is because of the kind of thing that they did with Duran here.
 

Hank Scorpio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 1, 2013
8,124
Salem, NH
You may want to reaqd some of the comments above in regards to a long term deal. As a late relatively late bloomer with a skill set based a lot around speed, a long term deal for a guy already in his 30's is probably bad business. Especially when you have Anthony close, followed by possibly the Password and Bleis in next few years.
Yeah, we already have him for his age 28, 29, 30, and 31 seasons - and then he's a free agent. He's a guy you evaluate in 2028-2029, and then maybe extend him three more years if he fits with where the team is at the time. Or maybe you trade him after his age 30 season.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
The Red Sox have a history of doing this to their better talent. Don't get hung up on the term "long term deal" All teams will look at age and decide what the term should be. My point was more that we haggle over $250K now, which is nothing in the scheme of things, and players feel under valued and are reluctant to come back to that team. Even if you don't care if Duran is resigned, it is more the historical practice that is inherent which is not good. We already see that better players are not attracted to the Red Sox in it's current culture. It is because of the kind of thing that they did with Duran here.
You did see in the title of the thread that they agreed to deals with the other three eligible players, right? And that Duran can easily get the $4 million he asked for, didn’t you?
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,671
From a trade value standpoint, this feels pretty team friendly to me. Does this make Duran more valuable as a trade commodity if they decide to do so? I feel like it might help a little?
 

play4real

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
27
Do you think he doesn’t trust them even though he just signed a two year deal that most likely DOES get him that $4 million plus the chance to cash in nicely next year?
I am not sure if he trusts them or not. Red Sox were under final control through arbitration. He doesn't have the security of a 2 year deal, he has a one year deal with the club option for the next year. I am saying this type of treatment over $250K may impact his next contract decision. He was obviously underpaid for the 2024 season, the Sox should have given him the $4M he requested. That would have gone a long want in him feeling valued by the team.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
96,263
Oregon
I am not sure if he trusts them or not. Red Sox were under final control through arbitration. He doesn't have the security of a 2 year deal, he has a one year deal with the club option for the next year. I am saying this type of treatment over $250K may impact his next contract decision. He was obviously underpaid for the 2024 season, the Sox should have given him the $4M he requested. That would have gone a long want in him feeling valued by the team.
Please provide evidence that Duran expressed that he didn't feel valued by the team
 

Bowlerman9

bitchslapped by Keith Law
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 1, 2003
5,236
I am not sure if he trusts them or not. Red Sox were under final control through arbitration. He doesn't have the security of a 2 year deal, he has a one year deal with the club option for the next year. I am saying this type of treatment over $250K may impact his next contract decision. He was obviously underpaid for the 2024 season, the Sox should have given him the $4M he requested. That would have gone a long want in him feeling valued by the team.
This is pure speculation and not based on any actual evidence from Duran or any current/past Sox players.

Arbitration hearings hurt relations. Negotiating arbitration contracts do not.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,902
Maine
Please provide evidence that Duran expressed that he didn't feel valued by the team
Or that he's been mistreated in any way. Filing for arbitration is not evidence of an impasse. It's a pre-determined deadline at which time both sides had to file something. For all we know, the negotiations up to that point had Duran asking for a number significantly higher than $4M. $4M was the best figure that he and his agents thought the arbiter would give him, not the peak of what he was asking for.