Price is right

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
Not sure he was saying that, honestly.
I'm jumping on him here because he always has a new negative narrative. Some part of the team just isn't good enough to get it done, lately it's been the bullpen with him, now it's "they haven't had a real test."

Next time the starters have a mediocre stretch it'll be "this rotation can't possibly stand up in the playoffs." Always the same thing, meanwhile, the entirety of the team keeps on bowling forward like a wrecking ball.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
This is the case for 99.9% of all postseason teams.
Yeah, and so we look at how they perform against other top teams in the regular season to see what we can learn, which I did. That's the substance of this conversation.

I'm jumping on him here because he always has a new negative narrative. Some part of the team just isn't good enough to get it done, lately it's been the bullpen with him, now it's "they haven't had a real test."
Ah OK, well you guys know each other way better than I do.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
Yeah, and so we look at how they perform against other top teams in the regular season to see what we can learn, which I did. That's the substance of this conversation.
Playoffs are a different animal. Managed differently, different rosters, different everything. The regular season is about consistency, the playoffs the foot is always on the gas.
 

uncannymanny

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2007
9,097
I can't really speak for Red October, but I do think he identified the primary concern with the Sox: that this is all for naught if they can't play their best baseball against the best teams. Before this month they were 4-5 vs the Yankees, 2-4 vs the As and 2-2 vs Houston. The split with Houston on the road was a good sign (IMO) but the record vs the Yankees and As was not encouraging.
If they have to play 10 of 13 on the road against HOU and NYY we should be worried.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,449
deep inside Guido territory
I can't really speak for Red October, but I do think he identified the primary concern with the Sox: that this is all for naught if they can't play their best baseball against the best teams. Before this month they were 4-5 vs the Yankees, 2-4 vs the As and 2-2 vs Houston. The split with Houston on the road was a good sign (IMO) but the record vs the Yankees and As was not encouraging.

Then they crushed the Yankees. I still consider them a diminished team and not as dangerous as Cleveland or Houston, for the time being. And I don't think they can straighten out their rotation in time this year. Battling back to a split with Cleveland was about as important to this "pecking order" discussion as a couple regular season games can be, even if they didn't really matter to any standings. I'm confident the players care a bit more about these matchups. And by the time those September showdowns roll around, the Sox will likely be resting guys.

If Red October was arguing that we knew nothing before this series, then no, I'm with you and a few others here in having seen lots of other signs of improved resiliency in this year's team. Not sure he was saying that, honestly.
I certainly wasn't saying that we knew nothing about the Red Sox beforehand. Everybody that knows anything about baseball knows that the Red Sox are a great team. I was never questioning that and no one should. However, I place more importance on games against the other playoff teams as anyone should. I don't think there is much separation at all between the AL playoff teams and any of them can beat the Red Sox in a short series.

I'm jumping on him here because he always has a new negative narrative. Some part of the team just isn't good enough to get it done, lately it's been the bullpen with him, now it's "they haven't had a real test."

Next time the starters have a mediocre stretch it'll be "this rotation can't possibly stand up in the playoffs." Always the same thing, meanwhile, the entirety of the team keeps on bowling forward like a wrecking ball.
When I say something negative about a part of the team such as the pen, it is with a look towards the playoffs. It is within reason to question whether their bullpen will hold up in the playoffs.

I also never said they haven't had a real test. I've said that they've passed every test to this point as their record fully indicates. What started this back and forth was me simply bringing up the fact that I liked how they battled back to split a series after losing the first 2 against a playoff team. Sorely needed may have been a poor choice of words but it was very nice to see them win those 2 games. Can we just agree on the fact that this is a really fun team to watch and hopefully the best is yet to come?
 
Last edited:

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,046
Yeah, and so we look at how they perform against other top teams in the regular season to see what we can learn, which I did. That's the substance of this conversation .
Awesome. They’re like 437 games over .500. I think they passed all tests so far.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
No, they're 8-5 against the MFYs, 2-2 vs CLE and HOU and 2-4 against the As. I'm not saying this tells you everything you need to know but pretending they've slaughtered them all is ridiculous.
Good teams generally don't "slaughter" good teams.

Good teams consistently beat bad teams. Would your opinion change if we were 4-2 against Oak but two full games worse versus the Orioles?

The good team that is more successful winning winnable games over a large sample size is usually better.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,046
No, they're 8-5 against the MFYs, 2-2 vs CLE and HOU and 2-4 against the As. I'm not saying this tells you everything you need to know but pretending they've slaughtered them all is ridiculous.
Yep, and there was no way the Pats could win a Super Bowl after getting beat by 31 points by the Bills.

They’re good. Enjoy it. And don’t look for trends in 4 game series.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,046
Good teams generally don't "slaughter" good teams.

Good teams consistently beat bad teams. Would your opinion change if we were 4-2 against Oak but two full games worse versus the Orioles?

The good team that is more successful winning winnable games over a large sample size is usually better.

8-5 against the Yankees is a 100 win pace!!
 

uncannymanny

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2007
9,097
No, they're 8-5 against the MFYs, 2-2 vs CLE and HOU and 2-4 against the As. I'm not saying this tells you everything you need to know but pretending they've slaughtered them all is ridiculous.
I don’t know how much series in April, where they’d just lost their hottest hitter are predictive of what might happen in October. I’d guess very little. One of those Oakland games featured a guy throwing a no hitter opposite Sale. Is that likely to happen in the playoffs?
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Good teams generally don't "slaughter" good teams.

Good teams consistently beat bad teams. Would your opinion change if we were 4-2 against Oak but two full games worse versus the Orioles?

The good team that is more successful winning winnable games over a large sample size is usually better.
So you are arguing that the larger sample is the only useful information or just that it's more useful than a handful of games against Cleveland? Either is supportable and we are well into the realm of speculation. But you won't convince me that the last few days weren't a bit more interesting than another wipeout of the Blue Jays.
I don’t know how much series in April, where they’d just lost their hottest hitter are predictive of what might happen in October. I’d guess very little. One of those Oakland games featured a guy throwing a no hitter opposite Sale. Is that likely to happen in the playoffs?
Yeah, but this reinforces my interest in the Cleveland games. We hear people say all the time that you don't really know what your team is for a few months. Well, we definitely know what our team is, and although 3/5ths of the rotation is missing, this is otherwise the playoff squad. And Cleveland had all of theirs. So sure, the losses to Oakland are just a footnote, but this week has been useful and frankly encouraging.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
So you are arguing that the larger sample is the only useful information or just that it's more useful than a handful of games against Cleveland? Either is supportable and we are well into the realm of speculation. But you won't convince me that the last few days weren't a bit more interesting than another wipeout of the Blue Jays.

Yeah, but this reinforces my interest in the Cleveland games. We hear people say all the time that you don't really know what your team is for a few months. Well, we definitely know what our team is, and although 3/5ths of the rotation is missing, this is otherwise the playoff squad. And Cleveland had all of theirs. So sure, the losses to Oakland are just a footnote, but this week has been useful and frankly encouraging.
Once the playoffs start, all the previous information means nil and it's essentially a coin flip. Out of all the major sports, baseball is probably the least likely to have the best team win the championship. I don't really follow the NHL but it's probably close.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
So you are arguing that the larger sample is the only useful information or just that it's more useful than a handful of games against Cleveland? Either is supportable and we are well into the realm of speculation. But you won't convince me that the last few days weren't a bit more interesting than another wipeout of the Blue Jays.

Yeah, but this reinforces my interest in the Cleveland games. We hear people say all the time that you don't really know what your team is for a few months. Well, we definitely know what our team is, and although 3/5ths of the rotation is missing, this is otherwise the playoff squad. And Cleveland had all of theirs. So sure, the losses to Oakland are just a footnote, but this week has been useful and frankly encouraging.
The larger sample size IS useful information.

You can infer exactly nothing from one 4-game series. Especially one where one team's ace (aka, that guy you'd see two or three times in a postseason series) didn't even pitch.
 

ookami7m

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,678
Mobile, AL
Drilled with a comebacker for what feels like the 4th or 5th time this year, this one looks to have caught him on the pitching side wrist. Not great heading into the post season.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,428
Drilled with a comebacker for what feels like the 4th or 5th time this year, this one looks to have caught him on the pitching side wrist. Not great heading into the post season.
Was wondering what the hell happened.... yeah.... not great. This team is really starting to limp into the postseason
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,543
X-rays were negative, was back in the dugout by the 8th with a brace on.

I hope for day to day and no complications, not out of the woods yet.
 

gedman211

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2016
2,844
He says he wants to make his next start, but it's in Atlanta, so the hitting complicates things.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
He says he wants to make his next start, but it's in Atlanta, so the hitting complicates things.
I would think if hitting was a problem pitching would be more so given its his left wrist. If thats not the case then just concede the outs snd dont swing or bunt when needed

See how quickly it bruised from the snap shot of mlb.tv highlights, its hard to see him throwing in 2 -3 days in preparation for that start but I guess he knows better

AlsoI cant imagine this does his nerve problem any good. I'd DL him and play it safe
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
I would think if hitting was a problem pitching would be more so given its his left wrist.
I assumed gedman211 wasn't talking about difficulty in performing the action so much as the reinjury risk. It's true that it's the right (i.e. correct) wrist as far as that goes--it would be a lot worse if he were a RHH--but I agree that this is one more reason why skipping a start might be a good idea unless he miraculously feels fine by Monday.
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,268
San Andreas Fault

David Price stayed behind in Boston to get his wrist checked out by a specialist. On his way to Chicago now. Tests came out well. Chance he makes his next start on Monday, but Cora likely to play it carefully.
Pete Abe’s first sentence there made my heart sink. Then, much better. Next time, get the good news up front!
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
If this is accurate, the injury gods owe us nothing. How that shot did not break a bone, I’m not sure. Look at the replay.
 

effectivelywild

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
466
Price says he doesn't plan to opt out at the end of the season:
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/24652813/david-price-not-opt-boston-red-sox-contract-go-lesser-team

Which is basically a non-story, but hey, ESPN needs to put out content
Yeah, I initially read that and thought "oh well, it was nice to dream about him opting out so we would have more money for Sale/Mookie/Xander/JBJ (maybe). But then I thought about how INCREDIBLY STUPID it would be to be talking to a New England media outlet in the midst of a dominant regular season and say "yeah, this has been great and all, but I'm still keeping my options open." He would get butchered, absolutely destroyed by every Red Sox fan. I know Price isn't the mose media-savvy player, but he's not a moron.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,470
Screen Shot 2018-09-12 at 6.50.12 PM.png

and that includes the yankee blowup game (and does NOT include todays game)

1.82 ERA in his last 10 starts. 1.56 ERA in 9 starts since the All-Star break.

his stats since the NYY blowup

Screen Shot 2018-09-12 at 6.54.58 PM.png
 
Last edited:

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
16,853
Price has stepped up carried this team for about two months now, with Sale mostly out and the other starters pitching fewer innings and taxing the bullpen more. He's been huge.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,105
I'm not so sure he shouldn't be game 1 starter.

In fact. I'm almost positive he should be game 1 starter.

Hes made such an adjustment. The change up has become a legitimate weapon and helps the cutter and 2 seam that much more affective. Hes out there dotting corner with conflicting movements and changing speeds.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
I'm not so sure he shouldn't be game 1 starter.

In fact. I'm almost positive he should be game 1 starter.

Hes made such an adjustment. The change up has become a legitimate weapon and helps the cutter and 2 seam that much more affective. Hes out there dotting corner with conflicting movements and changing speeds.
He deserves a ton of credit for fixing himself and being legitimately awesome the past couple months.

That being said, no. Hell no.

Chris Sale is our #1.
 

Sin Duda

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
840
(B)Austin Texas
Come Saturday morning Chris Sale will no longer be leading the American League in ERA. His name will be gone from the stats leaders completely, not because he will have given up a bushel basket of runs Friday night, but because his innings total will have dropped below the Red Sox games played. And it is unlikely to return for the rest of the season, with Cora saying he'll only pitch another 10-12 innings vs. 14 more games to be played that time. Maybe, thanks to the hurricane, we'll get 3 rainouts that we can't make up. I think it'll matter to him if he and team win the World Series, but it sure would be nice to be rewarded for such a dominant season with a Cy Young Award and some writers will make a big deal of a starter not even qualifying for the ERA title and down ballot him for Cy Young.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
Come Saturday morning Chris Sale will no longer be leading the American League in ERA. His name will be gone from the stats leaders completely, not because he will have given up a bushel basket of runs Friday night, but because his innings total will have dropped below the Red Sox games played. And it is unlikely to return for the rest of the season, with Cora saying he'll only pitch another 10-12 innings vs. 14 more games to be played that time. Maybe, thanks to the hurricane, we'll get 3 rainouts that we can't make up. I think it'll matter to him if he and team win the World Series, but it sure would be nice to be rewarded for such a dominant season with a Cy Young Award and some writers will make a big deal of a starter not even qualifying for the ERA title and down ballot him for Cy Young.
I dont disagree with you . I have always attached importance to IP.

However, if he can stay ahead in bWAR he can still take it since some writers consider it. Also if a closer can win the Cy Young and a couple have, why not a starter with 160 IP and nobody really close in terms of ERA, K/9 and K/BB.

Of course he cant give up a ton of runs and keeping the ERA under 2 would help. Also it doesnt hurt that most of the games he has missed have come after the Red Sox have pretty much locked up the division/WC , even if not mathematically so

Lets hope Kluber, Verlander and Snell have a stinker or two as well
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,339
It's pretty amazing that after everything, based on WAR Price is going to end up coming close to being worth the $90m he's made since the Sox signed him. Before today's start he was at 71.5 million based on fangraphs value calculations, probably more like 75 now with a couple starts left.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,105
He deserves a ton of credit for fixing himself and being legitimately awesome the past couple months.

That being said, no. Hell no.

Chris Sale is our #1.
Given the situation I just feel better with Price in a game 1. Especially because I think Sale has the potential to put much more stress on the bullpen in game 1. I guess at the end of the day though, the fact it's even plausible is a testament to Price's performance.