Pick #38- Jordan Walsh

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
12,771
around the way
In order to save money they probably would have had to staple a 2nd to Springer & get his 4MM off the books.

So adding, Walker could have saved a few shekels while adding a better offensive player. BUT I suspect they/Cassell like Springer a lot.

Walsh is still pretty far away but he has the entire regular season to figure out if he can be the 10th/11th man.
For the life of me I don't understand why they like Springer, but agreed that they must. I didn't think that Pritchard could be a rotation guy, and here he is. Hope that they're right.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
21,876
Santa Monica
For the life of me I don't understand why they like Springer, but agreed that they must. I didn't think that Pritchard could be a rotation guy, and here he is. Hope that they're right.
You weren't alone on PP. I figured his D would be a problem. BUT credit to Peyton, he got stronger and he can hold up the super athletic WINGs or just hack the BIGs. Plus CJM does a good job of hiding his defense against opposing benches.

Truth be told, my favorite part of the game is when PP/Sam/Luke take the floor with Tatum/White in the middle of Q1/Q3. Winning Time!
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
9,426
Oakland
For the life of me I don't understand why they like Springer, but agreed that they must. I didn't think that Pritchard could be a rotation guy, and here he is. Hope that they're right.
The only optimism remaining on Springer has to be his age (he's younger now in year 4 than Pritchard was as a rookie) but I really don't see it anymore, either.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
31,850
For the life of me I don't understand why they like Springer, but agreed that they must. I didn't think that Pritchard could be a rotation guy, and here he is. Hope that they're right.
Who likes Springer? Mazzulla pulled him early on two separate occasions in the preseason. He’s clearly not a fan (nor should he be).
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
19,966
I don't think that Joe does. But someone does. I mean, they traded for him and kept him.
I thought the reason they kept Springer is that they did not want to simply eat the contract, and the trade market for him was non-existent over the summer. May be a better chance to unload him close to the deadline, as he could replace an injured bench player for a team fighting for a spot in the play-in.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
11,711
I don't think that Joe does. But someone does. I mean, they traded for him and kept him.
Wasn’t it reported that Cassell is the big Springer supporter? I think he coached him in Philly too.

EDIT: and I agree with the chorus here that he looks absolutely awful. Don’t have much hope of him ever becoming playable in any situation let alone a rotation player
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
33,369
I am not defending Springer's play. I get the concept of him - athletic, long, active highly switchable defender who, if he develops at all of a shot or improves his passing is suddenly a discount starter or easy rotation guy given athletic and defensive skills.

But...

The instincts aren't there, the offense isn't there, and it takes a lot of projection to get to that concept from where he is, so....
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
31,850
I don't think that Joe does. But someone does. I mean, they traded for him and kept him.
I didn’t like trading for him but as a flier sure I get it. As far as keeping him…..if you were one of the other 29 teams would you want him to start the season? He’s be much more desirable for a lottery team late in the year to have a look at once they aren’t competing to win any longer.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
32,993
Wasn’t it reported that Cassell is the big Springer supporter? I think he coached him in Philly too.

EDIT: and I agree with the chorus here that he looks absolutely awful. Don’t have much hope of him ever becoming playable in any situation let alone a rotation player
First, yes, Cassell endorsed Springer. Celtics Champion Sam Cassell Endorsed Jaden Springer Trade .

But as to your edit, Springer has played 7 minutes this year and while I've not watched every minute of every game, I'm pretty sure he hasn't played any meaningful minutes. Not sure how anyone can tell how anyone looks in 7 minutes, BOS probably has a better idea from practices. And the idea is that (i) he's young, and (ii) he has already demonstrated he can play NBA on-ball defense. Plus, his salary slot could theoretically be important

But in terms of on-court, I'd much rather Walsh or even Baylor and Springer get any minutes that are available over any NBA vet including LW4. The incremental wins that LW4 might have provided isn't nearly as important as any development the Cs can get out of Walsh in particular but also Baylor and Springer.

Maybe closer to the trade deadline the Cs will figure out they won't need his salary slot and will staple a 2nd round pick to him to save the $10M or so in luxury taxes. Cs have called around gauging trade interest reports say: Celtics gauging trade value of reserve guard (report) - masslive.com
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
31,850
First, yes, Cassell endorsed Springer. Celtics Champion Sam Cassell Endorsed Jaden Springer Trade .

But as to your edit, Springer has played 7 minutes this year and while I've not watched every minute of every game, I'm pretty sure he hasn't played any meaningful minutes. Not sure how anyone can tell how anyone looks in 7 minutes, BOS probably has a better idea from practices. And the idea is that (i) he's young, and (ii) he has already demonstrated he can play NBA on-ball defense. Plus, his salary slot could theoretically be important

But in terms of on-court, I'd much rather Walsh or even Baylor and Springer get any minutes that are available over any NBA vet including LW4. The incremental wins that LW4 might have provided isn't nearly as important as any development the Cs can get out of Walsh in particular but also Baylor and Springer.

Maybe closer to the trade deadline the Cs will figure out they won't need his salary slot and will staple a 2nd round pick to him to save the $10M or so in luxury taxes. Cs have called around gauging trade interest reports say: Celtics gauging trade value of reserve guard (report) - masslive.com
It’s more than just practice. We saw him forced into action in Philly last year when they were decimated with injuries and he looked awful. So awful that they gave him away to their division rival and looked like Gerald Green circa 2006 in the preseason, completely lost and unprepared prior to being pulled twice early by Mazzulla.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
53,161
I am not defending Springer's play. I get the concept of him - athletic, long, active highly switchable defender who, if he develops at all of a shot or improves his passing is suddenly a discount starter or easy rotation guy given athletic and defensive skills.

But...

The instincts aren't there, the offense isn't there, and it takes a lot of projection to get to that concept from where he is, so....
I am seeing the same thing as you. Springer has not shown anything that suggests he should get more minutes. Quite the contrary actually.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
12,771
around the way
First, yes, Cassell endorsed Springer. Celtics Champion Sam Cassell Endorsed Jaden Springer Trade .

But as to your edit, Springer has played 7 minutes this year and while I've not watched every minute of every game, I'm pretty sure he hasn't played any meaningful minutes. Not sure how anyone can tell how anyone looks in 7 minutes, BOS probably has a better idea from practices. And the idea is that (i) he's young, and (ii) he has already demonstrated he can play NBA on-ball defense. Plus, his salary slot could theoretically be important

But in terms of on-court, I'd much rather Walsh or even Baylor and Springer get any minutes that are available over any NBA vet including LW4. The incremental wins that LW4 might have provided isn't nearly as important as any development the Cs can get out of Walsh in particular but also Baylor and Springer.

Maybe closer to the trade deadline the Cs will figure out they won't need his salary slot and will staple a 2nd round pick to him to save the $10M or so in luxury taxes. Cs have called around gauging trade interest reports say: Celtics gauging trade value of reserve guard (report) - masslive.com
Maybe we are (or just I am) being hard on Springer because of only 7 minutes, but it's all we have at this point beside trusting what CJM et al. see in practice. There have been no "good minutes" that other borderline guys flash sometimes.

Good on Walsh for stealing those minutes, which could have gone elsewhere. That's definitely based on what CJM is seeing in practice.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
21,876
Santa Monica
First, yes, Cassell endorsed Springer. Celtics Champion Sam Cassell Endorsed Jaden Springer Trade .

But as to your edit, Springer has played 7 minutes this year and while I've not watched every minute of every game, I'm pretty sure he hasn't played any meaningful minutes. Not sure how anyone can tell how anyone looks in 7 minutes, BOS probably has a better idea from practices. And the idea is that (i) he's young, and (ii) he has already demonstrated he can play NBA on-ball defense. Plus, his salary slot could theoretically be important

But in terms of on-court, I'd much rather Walsh or even Baylor and Springer get any minutes that are available over any NBA vet including LW4. The incremental wins that LW4 might have provided isn't nearly as important as any development the Cs can get out of Walsh in particular but also Baylor and Springer.

Maybe closer to the trade deadline the Cs will figure out they won't need his salary slot and will staple a 2nd round pick to him to save the $10M or so in luxury taxes. Cs have called around gauging trade interest reports say: Celtics gauging trade value of reserve guard (report) - masslive.com
I'm usually yes develop young players (Sox stage now) but when in GFIN mode I'd rather have Brad/Joe be ruthless with talent/minutes

But I understand keeping him around until the trade deadline ($$$ slot). He's already an NBA-ready defender, so there is always a chance that Springer can bang a few 3s (learned skill) and earn some PT.
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
6,754
Cultural hub of the universe
It’s more than just practice. We saw him forced into action in Philly last year when they were decimated with injuries and he looked awful. So awful that they gave him away to their division rival and looked like Gerald Green circa 2006 in the preseason, completely lost and unprepared prior to being pulled twice early by Mazzulla.
I remember a Philly game against us last year where he looked great. 9 points 4/5, 1/1 from 3, 2 Reb, 2 steals, 2 TO's in 20 minutes. Sixers were +20 in his minutes despite losing by 10. https://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/202311150PHI.html

I didn't watch much Philly ball outside of when they played the C's, but my small sample size memory of him is the opposite of yours.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
14,066
SF
The bull case for Springer at this point is that there's another guy they want who costs < $4M and is somehow available at the trade deadline. Then you use Springer to match, and maybe that guy gets paid more if KP is traded in the summer.

More likely is he gets dumped for a 2nd.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
32,993
It’s more than just practice. We saw him forced into action in Philly last year when they were decimated with injuries and he looked awful. So awful that they gave him away to their division rival and looked like Gerald Green circa 2006 in the preseason, completely lost and unprepared prior to being pulled twice early by Mazzulla.
Springer was getting raves about the way he defended Curry before he was traded

Last night – in his final game with Philly before joining the Celtics – Jaden Springer was tasked with being Steph Curry’s primary defender. Steph scored a total of 5 points on Springer, making just 1 FG on 34.2 possessions. : r/bostonceltics

With regards to trading him, everyone knew PHI was getting rid of everyone and everything to create max cap space. One can argue whether POBOBS should have helped PHI create all of that space but he probably figured someone was going to get him so why not take a flyer on him?
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
31,850
Springer was getting raves about the way he defended Curry before he was traded

Last night – in his final game with Philly before joining the Celtics – Jaden Springer was tasked with being Steph Curry’s primary defender. Steph scored a total of 5 points on Springer, making just 1 FG on 34.2 possessions. : r/bostonceltics

With regards to trading him, everyone knew PHI was getting rid of everyone and everything to create max cap space. One can argue whether POBOBS should have helped PHI create all of that space but he probably figured someone was going to get him so why not take a flyer on him?
Yeah I have no problem taking a flier I just wasn’t anticipating anything to come out of it. I don’t place much weight on a few possessions of defense when the player has never seen that look from a fresh defender. He never been an NBA level player despite having several offseasons to make leaps. I was very high on him coming out of college too.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
11,711
First, yes, Cassell endorsed Springer. Celtics Champion Sam Cassell Endorsed Jaden Springer Trade .

But as to your edit, Springer has played 7 minutes this year and while I've not watched every minute of every game, I'm pretty sure he hasn't played any meaningful minutes. Not sure how anyone can tell how anyone looks in 7 minutes, BOS probably has a better idea from practices. And the idea is that (i) he's young, and (ii) he has already demonstrated he can play NBA on-ball defense. Plus, his salary slot could theoretically be important

But in terms of on-court, I'd much rather Walsh or even Baylor and Springer get any minutes that are available over any NBA vet including LW4. The incremental wins that LW4 might have provided isn't nearly as important as any development the Cs can get out of Walsh in particular but also Baylor and Springer.

Maybe closer to the trade deadline the Cs will figure out they won't need his salary slot and will staple a 2nd round pick to him to save the $10M or so in luxury taxes. Cs have called around gauging trade interest reports say: Celtics gauging trade value of reserve guard (report) - masslive.com
When someone comes into a game when it’s out of reach, and no one looks like they’re playing hard or doing much of anything, and that player still looks completely lost…that’s a major red flag for me.

I hope I’m wrong but I would be stunned if springer amounted to anything at all. He’s a good defender but he’s a major minus on offense. Again, when you are playing meaningless minutes in blow outs and you stick out like a sore thumb because you appear to have no idea where to go or what to do, I am out on that player

EDIT: the salary implications and possible trade permeations are correct but have nothing to do with my post. I was merely commenting oj how bad he has looked in situations where it’s really, really hard to look that bad
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
24,036
Pittsburgh, PA
I don't know much about Springer, but here in the Walsh thread, I came to say that Monday vs the Bucks was the first time I can recall that Walsh looked like he could affect the game and make plays against NBA rotation opposition. Some well-contested rebounds, good pass decisions, made some very athletic drives, plus decent shots.

In that spirit, some bits on Walsh's story arc thus far:

From July / Summer League: https://www.si.com/nba/celtics/top-stories/summer-league-struggles-offer-valuable-lessons-to-boston-celtics-jordan-walsh-01j370fwstfc

From September / Training Camp: https://www.si.com/nba/celtics/top-stories/joe-mazzulla-shares-his-outlook-on-jordan-walsh-training-camp-performance-01j927jf6wyc

Dude might be getting close to becoming an NBA player.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
14,066
SF
I don't know much about Springer, but here in the Walsh thread, I came to say that Monday vs the Bucks was the first time I can recall that Walsh looked like he could affect the game and make plays against NBA rotation opposition. Some well-contested rebounds, good pass decisions, made some very athletic drives, plus decent shots.

In that spirit, some bits on Walsh's story arc thus far:

From July / Summer League: https://www.si.com/nba/celtics/top-stories/summer-league-struggles-offer-valuable-lessons-to-boston-celtics-jordan-walsh-01j370fwstfc

From September / Training Camp: https://www.si.com/nba/celtics/top-stories/joe-mazzulla-shares-his-outlook-on-jordan-walsh-training-camp-performance-01j927jf6wyc

Dude might be getting close to becoming an NBA player.
Some more solid minutes tonight.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
8,323
Walsh coming into a game and immediately hitting two threes is not something that is expected. He’s a smart young man who understands what is needed out of him and what opportunities will be 5ere for him when he gets minutes. He shot that first three with absolute confidence, even though he just entered the game.

,
This, and the big plays against the Bucks, has me encouraged. On such a talented team, with such high character stars and great coaching, young talented players have a tremendous opportunity to create value in the league. Open perimeter shots and an uncrowded lane will be available to Walsh pretty much any time he is in the game in non-garbage time minutes. Shoot the ball confidently, and play aggressively near the rim, and he will impact games, even in short minutes.

Since he started getting real minutes:

Bucks: plus 10 in 13 minutes
Pacers: plus 6 in 8 minutes
Hornets: plus 6 in 6 minutes
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
31,850
Walsh coming into a game and immediately hitting two threes is not something that is expected. He’s a smart young man who understands what is needed out of him and what opportunities will be 5ere for him when he gets minutes. He shot that first three with absolute confidence, even though he just entered the game.
That was the next step. He was so far from contributing just months ago and now we are seeing all of these mini-leaps one after another.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
19,966
That was the next step. He was so far from contributing just months ago and now we are seeing all of these mini-leaps one after another.
What I find most encouraging is that he is taking these steps at just the right time. The non-garbage, non-throwaway game minutes will be there for him the first 2-3 months of the season. The more reasons he gives Coach Joe to dole him real minutes, the more likely those mini-leaps coalesce into a real rotational bench player.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
14,066
SF
That was the next step. He was so far from contributing just months ago and now we are seeing all of these mini-leaps one after another.
I was about as bearish as it gets on him before the preseason, but as you say, when a young player starts to take mini-leaps, they have a compounding effect:

- not being lost on defense gets you initial minutes
- screening and spacing properly gets you more minutes
- minutes give you confidence
- confidence has you taking your open shots

...and so on. It all works together and builds.

Walsh seems very likely to follow the Hauser/PP path to being a rotation player now, which is a pretty big deal, since he can play a lot of positions.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
24,036
Pittsburgh, PA
Anyone with a keener eye and more Maine minutes-watched last year want to take a stab at what his key assets as a player are, and key areas to work on?

E.g.,
- Obviously he needs to put on some muscle, but he's young and seems strong for his age, strong enough that Tre Mann couldn't back him down at least.
- good footwork on rim drives, but not a great finisher
- slow to see switches
- poor at reading transition plays

...but that's just from watching his NBA minutes plus the G League playoffs. Anyone got a better take?
 

Just a bit outside

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 6, 2011
8,511
Monument, CO
Might be getting some extended minutes tonight with JB sitting out.

I was super low after summer league and made a comment in the preseason thread it was the first time I thought he looked like he might be an nba player. I am glad to be wrong. He is playing great in his role right now.
 

Imbricus

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 26, 2017
5,035
I'm not sold yet that he's got a three-point shot, though his form looks good and he did sink his first two last night. That's my big question mark on him.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
14,066
SF
I'm not sold yet that he's got a three-point shot, though his form looks good and he did sink his first two last night. That's my big question mark on him.
If a young guy has decent form and confidence, and starts getting consistent reps, it's usually better to take the over on his becoming a 35% shooter in not too long.

Walsh is intriguing because he is already decent at attacking closeouts, so it will be nice if he starts to get more of those to go at.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
9,426
Oakland
If a young guy has decent form and confidence, and starts getting consistent reps, it's usually better to take the over on his becoming a 35% shooter in not too long.

Walsh is intriguing because he is already decent at attacking closeouts, so it will be nice if he starts to get more of those to go at.
Exactly. And if he's on the pritchard/Hauser path, it's important to note that they were 24 and 25 in their second seasons - Walsh is just 20.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
14,066
SF
Exactly. And if he's on the pritchard/Hauser path, it's important to note that they were 24 and 25 in their second seasons - Walsh is just 20.
Yup, just 20. Older than Tatum, but still not bad!

If I'm reading the rules correctly, I think he becomes extension eligible this summer? That would be their best shot to lock him in really cheap if they like him. He's a UFA after this deal, so it's important to be aggressive on an extension early (not that Brad needs any convincing on that front).
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
21,876
Santa Monica
Most young NBA players feel pressure to score to get PT.

Boston runs the inverse, playing good defense will get you burn.

Walsh/Queta just need to be strong/physical/aggressive on-ball, then disrupt passing lanes with their wingspans off-ball.

CJM will have plenty of minutes for these guys (deep bench) over the first half of the regular season.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
32,361
Most young NBA players feel pressure to score to get PT.

Boston runs the inverse, playing good defense will get you burn.

Walsh/Queta just need to be strong/physical/aggressive on-ball, then disrupt passing lanes with their wingspans off-ball.
Presumably, they've watched Kornet become a star/folk hero by being very reliable at the limited number of things he's asked to do by coaches who seem pretty well tuned-into what he's capable of.