So, this new guy, Pedroia; what's he got? What are we going to get going forward? And for how long?
He looked pretty slow getting down to first yesterday, but hopefully that is because he’s babying the knee. That can’t last a long time though or he’d be one of the slowest guys in the league. No potentially signature Pedroia plays at second yesterday. I imagine when those happen, he’ll forget about it and bust it more to make the play. I think it’s going to be fingers crossed all year when he goes all out, like Gordon Hayward with the Celtics, who, knock on wood....Didn't watch the whole game but it didn't look like he was moving around too well. I suspect he was activated for opening day as it seems silly asking him to play in this weather after 3 rehab games. Of course the Orioles are like minor league competition so he probably hangs around for that series. I hope I am wrong since a healthy Pedrioa is an upgrade over Nunez/Holt
We will get the old Pedey at bat once he settles in (And he put the ball in play 4 times yesterday with no K's or Pop-ups). I suspect his range won't be what it was. Now "How long" is really the question. Impossible to predict something like that. He could blow it out again in a couple of games or he could play 3 more years with a reduced workload. I can't even hazard a guess at that. Just keeping fingers crossed.So, this new guy, Pedroia; what's he got? What are we going to get going forward? And for how long?
Yes it was bases empty but it was also leading off the 9th in a close game, it wasn't like it was a meaningless at bat.He got a hit yesterday, which was encouraging, but it wasn't until the bases were empty. He drove in a run on a GIDP, which killed a rally, and then killed at least one more.
No, not meaningless, just poorly timed and cause to wonder if it was because the defense was aligned differently or because of who was pitching.Yes it was bases empty but it was also leading off the 9th in a close game, it wasn't like it was a meaningless at bat.
He didn't look great but it's one game if he stays healthy he'll be better than what they had. I'd be very surprised if he stayed healthy though.
Pedroia has two years after this season, at $13m and $12m. That is quite a bit of money to give up.I expect an intermittent 50-60 games played around a few nagging injuries, a .625 OPS, and a retirement announcement sometime around the all star break.
He's been an amazing member of the Red Sox for a long time, and likely will be a part of the organization forever. If he decides it's time to retire--which I personally don't think will happen--I would bet that the Sox will find a way to be extremely fair with his money.True.
But Pedroia has never done anything to suggest it's all about the money. I agree with the hypothesis that he would retire if he felt he couldn't play to his level anymore
Might this just be an ARod situation where he is cut/retires so he gets the full amount due to him and can retire somewhat gracefully?Pedroia has two years after this season, at $13m and $12m. That is quite a bit of money to give up.
I don't think the money is a concern for the Sox, so insurance doesn't matter. As others have suggested, given the relationship between Pedey and the team, they'd want to take care of him financially regardless of how the end comes about. Where the concern would be is luxury tax implications. If he retires, he doesn't get paid the remainder of his deal but it also takes his salary off the luxury tax count. If he's released, he gets paid 100% of his remaining contract and still counts on the payroll for the life of the original deal (like Sandoval does). The middle ground would probably be a retirement with an agreement to pay him his money as part of a front office or coaching/advisor role in the future.Might this just be an ARod situation where he is cut/retires so he gets the full amount due to him and can retire somewhat gracefully?
Is there an Albert Belle scenario where insurance is picking up a big chunk of the contract for the Sox?
Agreed. I understand the concern about his knee, but holy shit guys can we get a reasonable sample size? It's not like he has to do a hell of a lot to outperform Nunez.Wow, can the guy play in a game above 45 degrees before we debate how to gracefully get rid of him?
I mean, last year he could not. So we'll see whether he actually has that ability.Wow, can the guy play in a game above 45 degrees before we debate how to gracefully get rid of him?
Sorry, first thing that popped into my head was "Fuck You"I expect an intermittent 50-60 games played around a few nagging injuries, a .625 OPS, and a retirement announcement sometime around the all star break.
I'm not DRS, but my understanding was the surgery was something that only two other baseball players have had. One is Steven Wright and the other is Daniel Murphy, so there's no real precedent on which to base expectations of recovery. They're all pretty much at the same stage (certainly Pedroia and Murphy, Wright I think is a few months ahead of them).I'd like to hear DRS' comments about the injury, length of rehab he took and his thoughts on Pedroia's chances of holding up and not re-injuring it permanently. I know the injury was a very unusual one known to be difficult from which to recover.
He's going to be a classic case of the (Bill James?) quote "It's what you do in your thirties that gets you into the Hall of Fame" in that he's got the highlights of a HOF career (MVP award, ROY, World Series championships, Gold Gloves, etc...) but injuries have robbed him of the playing time he's needed to accumulate enough career counting stats to make it.I'd rate his career as wildly successful, though I think it's valid to question whether he'll make the HOF.
Man, Mazeroski is in the HOF with a BWAR of 36.5, no time lost to any war. Must have been all on that homer against the Yankees.Pedroia has the 23rd best B-WAR for all-time second basemen, ahead of 6 Hall of Famers, so I think, by some measures, he's had a HOF career. If he gets 3 more WAR he'd pass two other HOF 2Bers.
Yeah, but he's also behind several others like Lou Whittaker and Bobby Grich who aren't in either.Pedroia has the 23rd best B-WAR for all-time second basemen, ahead of 6 Hall of Famers, so I think, by some measures, he's had a HOF career. If he gets 3 more WAR he'd pass two other HOF 2Bers.
Agreed. Not a slam dunk by any means but I would guess he stays on the ballot for awhile. Cano is the best 2B of this era, but he's got the PED suspension. The you go down to Utley, Pedey and Kinsler. I would guess 2 of those 4 get in.Yeah, but he's also behind several others like Lou Whittaker and Bobby Grich who aren't in either.
Seems like a position where a lot of subjectivity comes into play.
It was nice to see him hit the high heat last night. The previous pitch he definitely measured up the high fastball and I commented to my wife how if he saw that pitch again he was going to send it off the wall. Alas, I think that was the Pedey of old, but I'm equally as excited to see his game change and have him send those pitches the other way. I'm pretty high on Pedroia finding a way to contribute to this season in a meaningful way.Looking so forward to seeing Pedey hit a high, inside piece of cheese over the Monstah.......
According to Jay Jaffe, 2000 hits is a big separator between HoFers and those who fall just shy. Pedroia's just under 200 short of that right now, but given how the past couple of years have gone for him, it's not necessarily a guarantee. Cano's already there and Kinsler will probably get there this year - I was surprised to see he was ahead of Pedroia, actually. Utley retired last year having not made it.Agreed. Not a slam dunk by any means but I would guess he stays on the ballot for awhile. Cano is the best 2B of this era, but he's got the PED suspension. The you go down to Utley, Pedey and Kinsler. I would guess 2 of those 4 get in.
Kinsler's played about 300 more games than Pedroia, the equivalent of almost two full seasons. That he's 145 hits ahead shouldn't be that surprising.According to Jay Jaffe, 2000 hits is a big separator between HoFers and those who fall just shy. Pedroia's just under 200 short of that right now, but given how the past couple of years have gone for him, it's not necessarily a guarantee. Cano's already there and Kinsler will probably get there this year - I was surprised to see he was ahead of Pedroia, actually. Utley retired last year having not made it.
Yeah, my faulty memory - thought he debuted a couple of years after Pedroia for some reason.Kinsler's played about 300 more games than Pedroia, the equivalent of almost two full seasons. That he's 145 hits ahead shouldn't be that surprising.
Yeah...Kinsler was more steady than Pedey career wise. I think Laser Show was better early on (and on track to be a HoFer,) but as he got older and injured he just couldn't keep up that 2007-2011 pace. They're both firmly in the Hall of Very Good.Kinsler's stats are better than I remember them (especially in the power department), but he seems like a pretty poor HOF candidate. Never finished in the top ten in MVP voting, only in the top twenty once, never lead the league in anything other than At Bats and Plate Appearances. His defense was pretty good, but he only won two gold gloves, so lazy Joe Sportswriter might not give him much credit for that. If I'm remembering correctly, his most biggest play in the postseason was a catastrophic one.
Maz was also the consensus best defensive second baseman in the history of the game. I realize that’s theoretically captured in his WAR, but there’s something about being the best at something that’s going to capture voters’ imagination beyond its tangible contribution to winning baseball games. It probably still doesn’t get him in without hitting arguably the biggest HR in the history of the sport, but Maz’s case isn’t well captured by statistics.Man, Mazeroski is in the HOF with a BWAR of 36.5, no time lost to any war. Must have been all on that homer against the Yankees.
The Maz-Rizzuto-Ashburn interregnum.Also, iirc Maz was a Vets’ Committee selection back when they were applying a markedly more relaxed standard than the BBWAA
When? During the '50s? The '80s? Today? How do you rate fielders you've never seen, especially when some played before there was field lighting or when teams groomed fields to fit their club (longer grass in the infield, grass near the foul lines in the infield that were "slanted" to encourage balls to roll foul or stay fair), divisions that had lots of artificial turf vs. grass, etc.? Even StatCast, I don't think, is not evaluating infielders as well as outfielders.Maz was also the consensus best defensive second baseman in the history of the game.
I’m not saying that assessment of Maz’s defense was backed by empirical evidence. I’m saying it was the consensus view at the time of his election — Maz was to second base what Brooks Robinson is to third base and Ozzie Smith is to shortstop. Seems to me that’s a critical part of understanding why a guy with 30-odd career WAR got elected to the Hall (even by the VC); obviously, the big HR is part of the story too.When? During the '50s? The '80s? Today? How do you rate fielders you've never seen, especially when some played before there was field lighting or when teams groomed fields to fit their club (longer grass in the infield, grass near the foul lines in the infield that were "slanted" to encourage balls to roll foul or stay fair), divisions that had lots of artificial turf vs. grass, etc.? Even StatCast, I don't think, is not evaluating infielders as well as outfielders.