First off: great post
@Brand Name
Exactly. And Zappe fits our system well. This is another example were punditry ruled the narrative. If we had taken the critics' darling, Sam Howell, this pick would have been lauded. The problem of course is that Howell basically just bombed the ball downfield and was an awful fit for the Patriots, whereas Zappe was a rhythm passer who spread the ball to all parts of the field. The question with Zappe is how he handles pressure, but any QB is going to have questions.
Can we discuss Howell for a second?
Howell ended up going at 144. Willis went at 86. The consensus was wrong this year across the board but I never understood the love for Howell. What exactly did they see in him? Same for Willis. He couldn't process things and made bad decisions in an oversimplified offense. What makes you think he can do better in the NFL? You could say similar things about Howell. I didn't spend much time evaluating the QBs this year but I saw Howell, Willis, and Zappe in the exact same tier of 6.0-6.49:
Flash Starter Tools. Quality Role player and/or Good ST. Emergency Starter.
I didn't write out a report on any of the QBs. I did them last and didn't have time. BUT
SOSH guest Matt Waldman did evaluate him.
Please, if you haven't already, strongly consider buying his work, the
Rookie Scouting Portfolio. Matt is an OG draft evaluator and one of the best in the business. He's also one of the kindest individuals in the space.
Here is what Matt had to say about Zappe. Now because he has said this on his pod and in youtubes I am not going to take anything from behind the RSP paywall. He liked Zappe's platform accuracy, decision making, ability to sense pressure and not overreact (cough Kenny Pickett cough), and scrambling. He also thought he could be a starter!
Waldman had Zappe as his QB5 this year. Of the guys discussed as starters he only had Kenny Pickett and Matt Corral above Zappe.