It’s amazing how little the draft matters this year outside of Qb. So spending a ton of draft capital and using late round picks to flesh out the roster makes a ton of sense.
What a weird time.
What a weird time.
Watson would only cost $10.5m against the cap to a team that would acquire him (& $67.1m to the Texans lol).I have no idea how they'd fit Watson in cap-wise, unless Gilmore was 100% going the other way, which probably would be required anyway, and which BB may already have planned for with the addition of Mills.
So...
2021 1st
2021 2nd
2021 3rd
2022 1st
Gilmore
That's two #1s, a #2, a #3, and a pro-bowl corner still in his prime, for Watson. I still don't know that Houston would do it, but that's not a bad offer at all.
That's not even close to acceptable from Houston's standpoint. The #15 pick, what could be a bottom 10 pick in the first round next year, a second, a third, and one year of Gilmore for Watson, and Houston doesn't come out of the deal with a QB in return?I have no idea how they'd fit Watson in cap-wise, unless Gilmore was 100% going the other way, which probably would be required anyway, and which BB may already have planned for with the addition of Mills.
So...
2021 1st
2021 2nd
2021 3rd
2022 1st
Gilmore
That's two #1s, a #2, a #3, and a pro-bowl corner still in his prime, for Watson. I still don't know that Houston would do it, but that's not a bad offer at all.
Fine. We can throw in Cam.That's not even close to acceptable from Houston's standpoint. The #15 pick, what could be a bottom 10 pick in the first round next year, a second, a third, and one year of Gilmore for Watson, and Houston doesn't come out of the deal with a QB in return?
Well let's be honest...they shouldn't trade him at ALL. He's one of the most valuable pieces in the entire NFL - a stud QB on a reasonable contract and under team control for like 5 more years, who is also young.That's not even close to acceptable from Houston's standpoint. The #15 pick, what could be a bottom 10 pick in the first round next year, a second, a third, and one year of Gilmore for Watson, and Houston doesn't come out of the deal with a QB in return?
Atlanta slams the phone down, not sure whether they take the time to say anything, though.#15 + 2021 2nd + 2022 1st for #4 overall.
Fields or Lance, they’re both great prospects. Who says no?
Agreed but it really just depends on what other offers they get. The scenario where the Pats get Watson is where they make a somewhat competitive offer and either (a) Watson decides he wants to go to NE over other possibilities or (b) no other team is willing to offer something similar. Then Houston is faced with Watson just sitting out for a year+ or at least getting something back by trading him to the Pats.That's not even close to acceptable from Houston's standpoint. The #15 pick, what could be a bottom 10 pick in the first round next year, a second, a third, and one year of Gilmore for Watson, and Houston doesn't come out of the deal with a QB in return?
doubt that gets you 4, but could get you 8 which is probably where the 4th guy has a chance to drop to. The QBs aren't all going top 5, it's always talked up about how 3 or 4 or 5 QBs are going to go in the top few picks, and every time one falls.#15 + 2021 2nd + 2022 1st for #4 overall.
Fields or Lance, they’re both great prospects. Who says no?
Wouldn't Cincinnati be a likelier partner? They're all set with Burrows and have a gazillion other holes to fill.doubt that gets you 4, but could get you 8 which is probably where the 4th guy has a chance to drop to. The QBs aren't all going top 5, it's always talked up about how 3 or 4 or 5 QBs are going to go in the top few picks, and every time one falls.
I'd say the same thing, but about Detroit at 7.Wouldn't Cincinnati be a likelier partner? They're all set with Burrows and have a gazillion other holes to fill.
I don't think Cinci wants to move down, I think they want the chance at their pick of the best non-QB. Maybe they would, but CAR had been rumored as a team that might look to move down.Wouldn't Cincinnati be a likelier partner? They're all set with Burrows and have a gazillion other holes to fill.
Agreed, I think they want the Oregon lineman as a Burrow protector ... or, at least, they shouldI don't think Cinci wants to move down, I think they want the chance at their pick of the best non-QB.
My thinking is something like #15, Gilmore (trade him elsewhere to get the pick you need, if necessary), next year's #1 and a 4th rounder this year and see if ATL will give up the #4 pick. It's a lot to give up, but it doesn't matter if you get the right QB. Take Fields or Lance and let him sit a year behind Cam.#15 + 2021 2nd + 2022 1st for #4 overall.
Fields or Lance, they’re both great prospects. Who says no?
To make the playoffs and maybe win a wildcard game with this team? Sure. Not to actually contend for a title.So...assuming there's no established QB on the radar, and assuming that BB and McD really dont want to start the season with a rookie at QB, they both must really think that the shortage of skill players and all the COVID stuff (from training camp to actually getting sick) kept Cam from being, say, a top 50% QB. (I can't imagine his ceiling is much higher than that, but that is a significant improvement as well.) Is top-half good enough?
But what if Caserio loves some of the picks he made for the Pats the last few years? The two TEs? Harry? Wino? Sony? Jackson instead of Gilmore? Maybe a few players who are now expendable along with draft picks are enough to entice him?That's not even close to acceptable from Houston's standpoint. The #15 pick, what could be a bottom 10 pick in the first round next year, a second, a third, and one year of Gilmore for Watson, and Houston doesn't come out of the deal with a QB in return?
My thinking is something like #15, Gilmore (trade him elsewhere to get the pick you need, if necessary), next year's #1 and a 4th rounder this year and see if ATL will give up the #4 pick. It's a lot to give up, but it doesn't matter if you get the right QB. Take Fields or Lance and let him sit a year behind Cam.
If Gilmore is valued as a mid-2nd round pick, I think you've got a pretty solid offer, esp. if ATL thinks Gilmore can help their defense and give Matty Ice another year or two to compete. ATL could still target someone like Mac Jones at #15 if they wanted a long-term replacement for Ryan.
If Gilmore would fetch a 2nd rounder I think he’d already be gone. He’s a good player, but he’s set to earn $17m in 2021 and is an UFA after that. You can get the 2021 cap number down with an extension, but that’s a big bet on an aging CB coming off an injury. Unless he needs to go for cap reasons, I think Gilmore will be back; he’s worth more as a player than as a trade chip.My thinking is something like #15, Gilmore (trade him elsewhere to get the pick you need, if necessary), next year's #1 and a 4th rounder this year and see if ATL will give up the #4 pick. It's a lot to give up, but it doesn't matter if you get the right QB. Take Fields or Lance and let him sit a year behind Cam.
If Gilmore is valued as a mid-2nd round pick, I think you've got a pretty solid offer, esp. if ATL thinks Gilmore can help their defense and give Matty Ice another year or two to compete. ATL could still target someone like Mac Jones at #15 if they wanted a long-term replacement for Ryan.
Thing about Cam is, he wouldn't need to be THAT much better to be a positive given his salary. The big difference would be if he can push the ball down-field a bit more, and if he can get more positive plays. Those should be helped a lot by significant upgrades at 4 pass catching spots. His rushing value was good last year, he completed passes at an acceptable rate, INT% was generally acceptable. The big problem was other than a few chunk plays, his completions were often short and we didn't have the passcatchers who could make anything happpen with a 3 yard pass. Also, short and to his left was a real problem, he needs to clean up his footwork on those throws more than anything. If he had completed those like he did the same to his right he'd have been a much better QB.So...assuming there's no established QB on the radar, and assuming that BB and McD really dont want to start the season with a rookie at QB, they both must really think that the shortage of skill players and all the COVID stuff (from training camp to actually getting sick) kept Cam from being, say, a top 50% QB. (I can't imagine his ceiling is much higher than that, but that is a significant improvement as well.) Is top-half good enough?
His cap hit is over 15M, but he only stands to make a shade under 7.5M in cash (salary and roster bonus). And any team trading for him wouldn’t absorb the cap dollars attributable to bonus/restructuring; that would stay with the Pats. Anyone trading for Gilmore is looking at about 7.5M in new cap commitment before any extension.If Gilmore would fetch a 2nd rounder I think he’d already be gone. He’s a good player, but he’s set to earn $17m in 2021 and is an UFA after that. You can get the 2021 cap number down with an extension, but that’s a big bet on an aging CB coming off an injury. Unless he needs to go for cap reasons, I think Gilmore will be back; he’s worth more as a player than as a trade chip.
Would he bring a 3rd round comp pick back with this FA orgy currently underway?Not sure why Gilmore getting paid $7.3m in new cash this year is "unrealistic". It just means he's already collected most of the $ in his 5/$65m - which is a good thing for him.
It also means if the Pats trade him, they have about $7.7m dead & save $7.3m.
Next year I'm pretty sure they'll be back to the normal ways & expecting a 3rd round comp pick if he walks, so definitely no point in trading him unless you're getting a good haul.
I could certainly see a team thinking that's a great rental opportunity, too at a controlled cost - or a team trading for him & overpaying him but keeping the 1st year hit low, either way.
He would leave after 2021, so it would be impacted by next year's FA cropWould he bring a 3rd round comp pick back with this FA orgy currently underway?
Yep, you’re right. Buchholz.He would leave after 2021, so it would be impacted by next year's FA crop
Fair point. I guess I'm not sure what his market value would be after the season & what the market as a whole will be. I would expect he'd be worth at least a 4th, though.Would he bring a 3rd round comp pick back with this FA orgy currently underway?
T4W corrected me. This year’s spending means probably no comp. picks in the 2022 draft. SG would be leaving after the 21-22 season so he would factor into the comp pick formula in the 2023 draft.Fair point. I guess I'm not sure what his market value would be after the season & what the market as a whole will be. I would expect he'd be worth at least a 4th, though.
Yeah, I saw, so I didn't bother to also correct you & just discussed the substantive point which I found valid that he might not garner a 3rd round comp in the year he would derive one for us as the market could be very strong next year as the cap bounces back.T4W corrected me. This year’s spending means probably no comp. picks in the 2022 draft. SG would be leaving after the 21-22 season so he would factor into the comp pick formula in the 2023 draft.
I think this has been bit of an under-reported element of this spending spree. BB likely knew that, other than Thuney, there weren't many outgoing FA's likely to sign big-money deals, so the comp pick haul was likely starting at a low bar anyway. Plus, in that same vein, it makes more sense to put all your own big-money FA signings into one offseason to mitigate their effect on future comp picks. (I seem to recall MLB went thru this a few years back, where the system incentivized teams to sign multiple Tier One guys in a single year, rather than going after one every year.)T4W corrected me. This year’s spending means probably no comp. picks in the 2022 draft. SG would be leaving after the 21-22 season so he would factor into the comp pick formula in the 2023 draft.
If he's a placeholder for a player yet to be drafted then I think that part of the Cam equation has to be the fact that they don't have to start from scratch with another vet. A year under BB and Josh within the Patriot's system has a certain value to it. So now the question is what will it take to trade up with Atlanta? The Pats certainly have enough draft capitol to get a deal done, but given the activity of the past two days, the sense of urgency might up the price. I'm also curious if any combo of Gilmore, draft picks and another NFL ready piece could bring Watson to Foxborough.So...assuming there's no established QB on the radar, and assuming that BB and McD really dont want to start the season with a rookie at QB, they both must really think that the shortage of skill players and all the COVID stuff (from training camp to actually getting sick) kept Cam from being, say, a top 50% QB. (I can't imagine his ceiling is much higher than that, but that is a significant improvement as well.) Is top-half good enough?
Dont tease me Jeff...Even after all this spending, the Patriots have more than enough cap space to take on Deshaun Watson and add more in free agency, if such a move were ever in the cards. These contracts were very soundly structured to mirror the exploding salary cap with the impending TV deals.
Oh and it looks like Houston just brought in Tyrod Taylor
It's especially dumb considering we already know the guarantees and that it's a pretty standard backup deal.Pats writers seem to be enjoying this tease.
View: https://twitter.com/tomecurran/status/1371936940602298368?s=20
Tua, #3, and another pick go for Watson, and the Texans turn around and deal #3 to New England just to stick it to Miami. As well as a bunch of picks for the rebuild.I can’t see Tua going anywhere except Houston.
Not disagreeing with your point, but on the flip side, should The Texans move Watson they'll need a replacement and if you can get that for backup $$$ don't you do that deal? I'm also guessing that the possibility of being a starter was part of Taylor's thinking in signing with Houston.It's especially dumb considering we already know the guarantees and that it's a pretty standard backup deal.
Sure, but considering Watson has said he's not going to play, you needed a high end backup either way. Taylor signing has no impact on the likelihood of a Watson trade.Not disagreeing with your point, but on the flip side, should The Texans move Watson they'll need a replacement and if you can get that for backup $$$ don't you do that deal? I'm also guessing that the possibility of being a starter was part of Taylor's thinking in signing with Houston.
How to get page hits.What does Jeff know?
View: https://twitter.com/jeffphowe/status/1371959667564425216
Unless Watson says, "Jets? No way am I going to that shitshow."I just don't see why the Jets or other teams would let themselves be outbid
But Jeff isn’t known to do clickbait stories like this. Or am I wrong?Sure, but considering Watson has said he's not going to play, you needed a high end backup either way. Taylor signing has no impact on the likelihood of a Watson trade.
How to get page hits.
Doubtful considering the Jets were on the leaked list of teams he's be interested in (along with 3 other teams that all have more to offer than us).Unless Watson says, "Jets? No way am I going to that shitshow."
Don't know. It's really a story about how the Patriots have built out and left room, the Watson part is just wild conjecture that quickly glosses over the two key issues:But Jeff isn’t known to do clickbait stories like this. Or am I wrong?
I would venture to say that Watson would be a hell of a lot more interested in the Patriots than he was 48 hours ago.Doubtful considering the Jets were on the leaked list of teams he's be interested in (along with 3 other teams that all have more to offer than us).
Don't know. It's really a story about how the Patriots have built out and left room, the Watson part is just wild conjecture that quickly glosses over the two key issues:
1. Watson didn't list NE on the teams he's interested in
2. It just handwaves the acquisition cost and other teams that have a lot more to offer.
True, and that is a good thing, but the problem with Watson has never really been about convincing him, it's that the Patriots don't have any good assets to trade. I mean we have been discussing how they might trade into the top 6 to get a QB, all the other suitors already have those picks plus a whole lot more.I would venture to say that Watson would be a hell of a lot more interested in the Patriots than he was 48 hours ago.