Patriots WRs

Eric Fernsten's Disco Mustache

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
I think Mayo confirmed he was out this week ?

I thought I heard (can't find source now, so: hearsay) that as the final part of his rehab, since he's taking blood thinners, he's not doing strenuous physical activity (e.g. practicing, playing) more frequently than every other day. Once he passes this last part of the rehab he'll presumably back back to being cleared for every-day action.

No idea what this means for whether we see him a (limited?) number of downs on Sunday. I'm sorta assuming "not" until we see otherwise. But hard tellin' not knowin'
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,447
Trading up to draft Tyquan when Pickens was still on the board will forever be one of Bill's worst draft decisions.
Hopefully trading down from McConkey and selecting Polk doesn't look as bad in 3yrs.
 

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,902
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
Trading up to draft Tyquan when Pickens was still on the board will forever be one of Bill's worst draft decisions.
Hopefully trading down from McConkey and selecting Polk doesn't look as bad in 3yrs.
Belichick's blind spot when it comes to assessing WRs was simply epic.
Polk has some issues, but we've seen more flashes from him in this weird drop prone season than we ever did from TT. 1st and 2nd round picks should be highly likely to at least be starters. Since Branch in 2002, his 1st and 2nd round picks were

Bethel Johnson
Chad Jackson
Aaron Dobson
NKeal Harry
Tyquan Thornton
Plus Taylor Price as a 3rd rounder for good measure

Whole lot of ugly. Thank god for the former QB he drafted in the 7th round 2009.
 

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,902
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
FWIW, for all the talk of the Pats lack of quality in the WR room, I firmly believe you add a Tee Higgins level WR1 here, and slot everyone down a spot, and it gets much better much more quickly.

1 Higgins
2 Boutte
3 Douglas
4 Bourne
5 Polk

This is a very credible top 5, and allows you to go OT in rd 1.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
48,613
Here
FWIW, for all the talk of the Pats lack of quality in the WR room, I firmly believe you add a Tee Higgins level WR1 here, and slot everyone down a spot, and it gets much better much more quickly.

1 Higgins
2 Boutte
3 Douglas
4 Bourne
5 Polk

This is a very credible top 5, and allows you to go OT in rd 1.
Boutte, at this point, is like a WR 4. Maybe he keeps developing, but the physical skills seem limited. Douglas is a real nice 3. They’re gonna need to sign a 1 and either sign another WR or hope one of Polk/Boutte/Baker make the leap. With all that cap money, two should be doable.
 

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,473
Pickens is like 5% defensible to me because of the character concerns. Skyy Moore epically busting too doesn’t hurt either. Obviously wish they could have that one back - probably in the top 5 most impactful bad draft decisions of Bill’s run - but it’s not close to as bad as the ones ahead of it to me.
 

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
18,108
FWIW, for all the talk of the Pats lack of quality in the WR room, I firmly believe you add a Tee Higgins level WR1 here, and slot everyone down a spot, and it gets much better much more quickly.

1 Higgins
2 Boutte
3 Douglas
4 Bourne
5 Polk

This is a very credible top 5, and allows you to go OT in rd 1.
Higgins isn’t really a number 1 receiver but regardless I’d sign him anyways as he elevates the WR room by himself.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
53,741
George Pickens doesn't feel like a player who would do well in New England even under the best of circumstances (we know 100% now that Tomlin is good with difficult personalities). Like not with the staff, the media or the fans. He would likely have a pretty spicy thread here too. I'd say that he was basically not draftable for certain teams and the Pats are one of those clubs.
 
Oct 12, 2023
1,273
Boutte, at this point, is like a WR 4. Maybe he keeps developing, but the physical skills seem limited. Douglas is a real nice 3. They’re gonna need to sign a 1 and either sign another WR or hope one of Polk/Boutte/Baker make the leap. With all that cap money, two should be doable.
they’re in the same position as last offseason more or less

their solution was KJ Osborn, re-signing Bourne and reaching for a low upside Polk.

I don’t know that we should expect them to really do much to substantially improve the unit. But I’m sure we will hear that they made “strong offers” for guys who land elsewhere.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Belichick's blind spot when it comes to assessing WRs was simply epic.
Polk has some issues, but we've seen more flashes from him in this weird drop prone season than we ever did from TT. 1st and 2nd round picks should be highly likely to at least be starters. Since Branch in 2002, his 1st and 2nd round picks were

Bethel Johnson
Chad Jackson
Aaron Dobson
NKeal Harry
Tyquan Thornton
Plus Taylor Price as a 3rd rounder for good measure

Whole lot of ugly. Thank god for the former QB he drafted in the 7th round 2009.
I still wonder if the issue was assessment or coaching. Why couldn't this team coach up anyone at the WR position, considering how well they did in that regard at other position groups, most notably OL (Scar) and DB.
 

RoDaddy

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 19, 2002
3,405
Albany area, NY
Talk about this on your next podcast, Bill
Another overreach and bad pick by BB but you could argue that his QB (Mac Jones) couldn't throw deep and that's Thornton's main potential value. Drake Maye can but still, I haven't seen deep balls to Thornton. Why not? I'm sure the Pats had plenty of reason to cut him but as a fan, I just don't get why they didn't at least try deep balls to a tall receiver with great speed. Quick slants too - get him the ball fast and let him run.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,112
Another overreach and bad pick by BB but you could argue that his QB (Mac Jones) couldn't throw deep and that's Thornton's main potential value. Drake Maye can but still, I haven't seen deep balls to Thornton. Why not? I'm sure the Pats had plenty of reason to cut him but as a fan, I just don't get why they didn't at least try deep balls to a tall receiver with great speed. Quick slants too - get him the ball fast and let him run.
Tony Simmons redux. Fast guy with zero other NFL skills.
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
Another overreach and bad pick by BB but you could argue that his QB (Mac Jones) couldn't throw deep and that's Thornton's main potential value. Drake Maye can but still, I haven't seen deep balls to Thornton. Why not? I'm sure the Pats had plenty of reason to cut him but as a fan, I just don't get why they didn't at least try deep balls to a tall receiver with great speed. Quick slants too - get him the ball fast and let him run.
This is the problem — the NFL isn’t just a track meet. The Thornton pick was too cute by half, reaching for a burner who was always a long shot to be a productive, reliable WR at this level when Pickens was on the board. And why didn’t they try to hit Thornton on deep balls?

Well, they did. And, uh, yeah:

View: https://youtu.be/bFb6mw6K_b0?si=_a8h4jCMSZgKLINQ


Look at his NFL draft profile weaknesses:

Weaknesses
  • Bone thin and likely to stay that way.
  • Strong press coverage could eliminate him for the game.
  • Hands are extremely small for the position.
  • Linear release gets redirected and slowed.
  • The entire route tree will not be available to him.
  • Slow to sink, break and change direction in his patterns.
  • Needs to stack defenders when he gets them beat.
  • Could struggle to hang on through contact.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
37,648
Deep inside Muppet Labs
George Pickens doesn't feel like a player who would do well in New England even under the best of circumstances (we know 100% now that Tomlin is good with difficult personalities). Like not with the staff, the media or the fans. He would likely have a pretty spicy thread here too. I'd say that he was basically not draftable for certain teams and the Pats are one of those clubs.
He's a massive shithead and there's no doubt in my mind he would have busted here.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
20,569
Another overreach and bad pick by BB but you could argue that his QB (Mac Jones) couldn't throw deep and that's Thornton's main potential value. Drake Maye can but still, I haven't seen deep balls to Thornton. Why not? I'm sure the Pats had plenty of reason to cut him but as a fan, I just don't get why they didn't at least try deep balls to a tall receiver with great speed. Quick slants too - get him the ball fast and let him run.
Bill didn’t draft Mac Jones, not his fault at all, the Krafts made him. Mike Lombardi told me it’s true! I don’t know if Lombardi said that but I just assume he did.
 

streeter88

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 2, 2006
2,081
Melbourne, Australia
This is the problem — the NFL isn’t just a track meet. The Thornton pick was too cute by half, reaching for a burner who was always a long shot to be a productive, reliable WR at this level when Pickens was on the board. And why didn’t they try to hit Thornton on deep balls?

Look at his NFL draft profile weaknesses:
That entire list came true. How often does that happen that a team literally cannot coach out even one of the evaluated weaknesses?

edit: honestly it’s like BB just intentionally lit money on fire. “You want me to draft a WR? I’ll show you… I’ll draft the crappiest one and he’ll absolutely flail, and then you’ll never ask me again. Fxxk you.”
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
28,249
Unreal America
That entire list came true. How often does that happen that a team literally cannot coach out even one of the evaluated weaknesses?

edit: honestly it’s like BB just intentionally lit money on fire. “You want me to draft a WR? I’ll show you… I’ll draft the crappiest one and he’ll absolutely flail, and then you’ll never ask me again. Fxxk you.”
I have to admit, there have been times I felt like that must have been what BB was doing in that draft.
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,790
Overland Park, KS
Is Polk usable going forward? I guess if you know you are not making the playoffs you should play him but man, he’s just brutal. Plus how bad is Baker?
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,447
Is Polk usable going forward? I guess if you know you are not making the playoffs you should play him but man, he’s just brutal. Plus how bad is Baker?
Yeah I don't understand how they can't get Baker on the field. Looked great on the opening kick off return then nothing? Maye is forced to bring knives to a gun fight week in week out.
 

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,511
If you use Polk as a base line - can't get open, can't catch, and a penalty generators - wouldn't you think there's potential upside in literally every other WR on the roster? Why not try Baker, or one of the two guys on the practice squad, or WRs on other practice squads?

If Mayo isn't even going to attempt to win the games he coaches, he may as well treat them as tryouts to see if he can find a capable receiver?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,915
If you use Polk as a base line - can't get open, can't catch, and a penalty generators - wouldn't you think there's potential upside in literally every other WR on the roster? Why not try Baker, or one of the two guys on the practice squad, or WRs on other practice squads?

If Mayo isn't even going to attempt to win the games he coaches, he may as well treat them as tryouts to see if he can find a capable receiver?
Because Polk was their 2nd round pick, and earlier in the year he was getting open and catching it. He also usually runs the right routes. There is a case to throw Baker out there a bit too, but benching Polk is a panic move that makes no sense given the investment in him, how early it is, and how limited the other WRs on the roster are. Polk's upside is good #2... Bourne/Boutte/Osborn don't have that, and Douglas is a small slot only player. It certainly sounds like reading between the lines that Baker doesn't play because he practices poorly and doesn't know the playbook, Polk does play because he does well in practice/study and they are trying to figure out what the hell goes wrong when he hits the field for real.
 

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,511
Because Polk was their 2nd round pick, and earlier in the year he was getting open and catching it. He also usually runs the right routes. There is a case to throw Baker out there a bit too, but benching Polk is a panic move that makes no sense given the investment in him, how early it is, and how limited the other WRs on the roster are. Polk's upside is good #2... Bourne/Boutte/Osborn don't have that, and Douglas is a small slot only player. It certainly sounds like reading between the lines that Baker doesn't play because he practices poorly and doesn't know the playbook, Polk does play because he does well in practice/study and they are trying to figure out what the hell goes wrong when he hits the field for real.
Sorry, but...the guy who catches less than 40% of his targets and averages less than 3 yards a target has an upside of a "good #2?" While running "the right routes" and "getting open and catching it?"

Man, if that's an every-down started at WR, things are very tough in NE now.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,915
Sorry, but...the guy who catches less than 40% of his targets and averages less than 3 yards a target has an upside of a "good #2?" While running "the right routes" and "getting open and catching it?"

Man, if that's an every-down started at WR, things are very tough in NE now.
He's a prospect, he's been really bad the last 5-6 weeks, but benching him now is like calling a guy up from AAA, he goes 1-22 in a weekend series and you DFA him
 
Oct 12, 2023
1,273
He's a prospect, he's been really bad the last 5-6 weeks, but benching him now is like calling a guy up from AAA, he goes 1-22 in a weekend series and you DFA him
Yeah, the Pats clearly aren’t going anywhere this year. The only argument for benching Polk is if it’s going to harm Maye’s development to have Polk out there over someone like Bourne.

Might as well play him and see what they have. I have to think that Polk will be here for one more year at least. It would be rare to give up on an early 2nd rounder so soon
 

Granite Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2003
5,231
The Granite State
Baker muffed a kickoff standing in the end zone, and he fumbled the ball into the field of play. He hesitated, and was smacked down deep in Pats territory. It was a boneheaded play that got him a seat on the bench. The next kickoff saw Gibson and Hasty back deep. Blech.
 
Oct 12, 2023
1,273
Baker muffed a kickoff standing in the end zone, and he fumbled the ball into the field of play. He hesitated, and was smacked down deep in Pats territory. It was a boneheaded play that got him a seat on the bench. The next kickoff saw Gibson and Hasty back deep. Blech.
I don’t know why they even have Baker returning kicks. He never did it in college and I don’t remember him doing it in preseason.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
13,919
São Paulo - Brazil
Yeah, the Pats clearly aren’t going anywhere this year. The only argument for benching Polk is if it’s going to harm Maye’s development to have Polk out there over someone like Bourne.

Might as well play him and see what they have. I have to think that Polk will be here for one more year at least. It would be rare to give up on an early 2nd rounder so soon
I think there's an argument to be made that Polk is pressing so much that the compounding mistakes week after week could harm his development. Maybe he needs a mental timeout.
 

Garshaparra

New Member
Feb 27, 2008
676
McCarver's Mushy Mouth
I think there's an argument to be made that Polk is pressing so much that the compounding mistakes week after week could harm his development. Maybe he needs a mental timeout.
I guess they could just have Polk inactive week by week, and start...Osborn? Baker? The trouble is that his backups are trash or young too, so options are super limited.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
13,919
São Paulo - Brazil
I guess they could just have Polk inactive week by week, and start...Osborn? Baker? The trouble is that his backups are trash or young too, so options are super limited.
I think starting Osborn is fine, he'd very likely contribute more and he plays a similar role. As for Baker I don't have any clue if he's anywhere near ready yet.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,929
People are so willing to throw Polk to the wolves, but he's a rookie you invested in. If Maye has a bad stretch of games and you bench him, people would think you were fucking with his confidence. That's true for WRs, too.

So far, blech results. But this is a bottom 5 team, so he gets plenty of rope this season. Less rope next.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
3,340
I would give Polk leeway but that's a two way street. He needs to show maturity (stay out of it on social media) and, critically, improvement. He's out there making mistakes way too often. And it seems to be compounding from where he was earlier in the year. This is the highest level. Cant just be rolling a guy out there that's detrimental to the team (and your QBs development) for the sake of it.
 

Eric Fernsten's Disco Mustache

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
I would give Polk leeway but that's a two way street. He needs to show maturity (stay out of it on social media) and, critically, improvement.
Question about the bolded part: what has Polk posted on social media that doesn't show maturity?

I just went and looked at his Twitter account and he has two posts since July. One of the WR group hyping each other up before a game, and the second of him seeming to make a difficult catch between two defenders on the sideline (the refs ruled it an incompletion)

What am I missing?
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,112
I would give Polk leeway but that's a two way street. He needs to show maturity (stay out of it on social media) and, critically, improvement. He's out there making mistakes way too often. And it seems to be compounding from where he was earlier in the year. This is the highest level. Cant just be rolling a guy out there that's detrimental to the team (and your QBs development) for the sake of it.
Yeah, and it’s not even really about Polk for me. They had McConkey sitting in their laps and they clearly misevaluated him. He is on pace for 1,045 yards and looks really good. He obviously wouldn’t have that here but, man, watching him last night hurt.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,142
Hingham, MA
Question about the bolded part: what has Polk posted on social media that doesn't show maturity?

I just went and looked at his Twitter account and he has two posts since July. One of the WR group hyping each other up before a game, and the second of him seeming to make a difficult catch between two defenders on the sideline (the refs ruled it an incompletion)

What am I missing?
He had an Insta story after the not getting 2 feet in play