Outs from somewhere: the 2025 bullpen

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
9,777
I really don’t see how we can do better than re-signing Martin on a one-year deal. He’s already said he’s good for one more, and I’d have to think staying in Boston may be attractive or less disruptive than other options.

He was pretty unlucky last year, BABIP’d to death, having a very low (unlucky) LOB%, and allowing 5 home runs allowed when only one was a “no doubter” according to Statcast. He’s also well respected in the clubhouse and has some mentorship qualities (thinking of him teaching Pivetta that sweeper or whatever he calls it).

I don’t think it would preclude other impact acquisitions, like a trade for Doval or signing Estevez, as has been floated. But re-signing Martin would only help.
I wouldn't mind him as the second name either, but I also wouldn't say this year was without concern for him. There was a velocity drop involved with that rise in BABIP, a full mile off his fastball from 2023.

He's never been a low-BABIP guy. This year it was higher, but only 30 points above his career average.

I think he's a good pitcher, but I'm not expecting anything close to a 2023 repeat. Those were the numbers that were way far off career norms for him.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
13,092
I think the question is whether the top half of the rotation is where you want it to be if you just add one starter (let’s say Fried). As you say, the rotation was fine last year. It would be above-average to better if you add one front-line starter, but it could be really good if you could get a Flaherty or Eovaldi as well. Basically the difference between Bello being your No. 3 guy and No. 4 guy.
The starting rotation is already really good, their starter’s ERA was top 10 in MLB last year and they have Giolito returning to replace Pivetta (assuming he’s gone). Two of their starters, as I’ve noted repeatedly, blew way past their career (including MiLB) highs in IP, they should be fine with the 180 inning workload this year. Another frontline starter to pair with Houck and Giolito is fine. Otherwise you’re going to have to trade either Crawford or Bello because they’re not moving to the pen. The one exception here is if Crawford is a required piece for Crochet or as part of a deal for a relief ace. Because other than that Crawford/Bello is a great 4/5 combo in a rotation.
 

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
1,232
Criswell, Fitts, Priester, Dobbins is as good of a group of secondary starters than they have had in a very very long time.
Yes. I hope we won't be seeing the likes of Chase Anderson and Brad Keller going forward. One thing all the guys you mentioned have in common is that there best days should be in front of them, not in the past.
 

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
1,232
2025 Bullpen Update:

Locks:
Slaten
Chapman (L)
Whitlock
Wilson (L)

Lock (if healthy):
Hendriks

Probable:
Guerrero
Winckowski
Kelly?
Weissert?

Depth:
Bernardino (L)
Booser (L)
Penrod (L)
Campbell
Mills
Fulmer?
Shugart?
Olds?

AAA Rotation/Long Relief:
Criswell
Preister
Dobbins
Drohan (L)
Fitts
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,807
As far as bullpens go, I kind of like this one (from a purely baseball standpoint).

I don't think that anyone that is not a proven closer should be spent on (like at all) by a team that has any adherence to the tax thresholds (any team that is not the Dodgers, Yankees, Mets and maybe Philly). Hendriks has been an excellent closer (good spending money here). Chapman has been an excellent closer (good spending money here). Slaten, Guerrero, Weissert are all dirt cheap (good there).

I hate spending even $2m on Wilson, I'd rather have just gone with a league minimum guy. Whitlock is here and that was before Breslow so not much he can do about that, good or bad, though we all admit he has a ton of talent.

The bullpen (and nothing but the bullpen) actually does remind me a little of the 2013 bullpen with Hanrahan, Bailey and Koji (all kinds of talent) and hey, even Craig Breslow is associated with both teams. I have to think that the 'pen is done at this point, and the only spending I hate is on Wilson, which in my world makes it a bullpen that I like.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
15,555
I tend to agree; I think the bullpen is likely done. They’ve got a lot of interesting arms; and only so many roster spots. Figure they’ve replaced Jansen and Martin with Chapman and Hendriks.
 

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
1,232
I tend to agree; I think the bullpen is likely done. They’ve got a lot of interesting arms; and only so many roster spots. Figure they’ve replaced Jansen and Martin with Chapman and Hendriks.
Jordan Romano may be a good buy low guy to have in extended ST 60 day DL type for 2nd half of season when some guys are hurt or ineffective.
 

loneredseat

New Member
Dec 8, 2023
286
I tend to agree; I think the bullpen is likely done. They’ve got a lot of interesting arms; and only so many roster spots. Figure they’ve replaced Jansen and Martin with Chapman and Hendriks.
But wasn't their bullpen awful last year? If we're replacing Martin and Janson with Chapman and Hendricks I don't see how we're in much better shape than we were. Sure, there's Guerrero who pitched well at the end of the season, and hopefully Whitlock can stay healthy, but I don't see enough of an improvement to say we're done here.
 

Rich Garces Belly

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2009
362
I’m hoping for a David Robertson signing. They need one more experienced arm for the back end of the bullpen, one who has experience closing and setting up. Robertson can still strike guys out and will probably sign a one year deal. He seems like the perfect fit.
 

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
1,232
I’m hoping for a David Robertson signing. They need one more experienced arm for the back end of the bullpen, one who has experience closing and setting up. Robertson can still strike guys out and will probably sign a one year deal. He seems like the perfect fit.
+1 to this
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,351
I don't think Wilson's contract is onerous enough that he is a guarantee.
No, agreed. If Booser, Penrod, or Bernardino are outpitching him, he'll get cut. Just like Joely got cut last year after his first disastrous stint. If they operate like they did last year, then likely what will happen is the guy without options will get precedent for roster flexibility reasons, but he shouldn't get a long rope.

Difference between Joely and Wilson, of course, is that Wilson has a track record of success...he just started giving up gopher balls at unprecendented rates despite throwing harder than he has in years. Joely had never had any success really whatsoever.

Wilson is a good bounceback option, IMO, and if he doesn't, well, IMO Booser was very good last year although many around here didn't like him very much.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
27,417
Current bullpen arms:

R - Whitlock
R - Slaten
L - Booser
R - Hendriks
L - Chapman
R - Weissert
R - Campbell
R - Guerrero
R - Kelly
L - Penrod
L - Bernardino
L - Wilson

That's a lot of arms (am I missing anyone? I always seem to). Some will get cut, I imagine, and some will go to AAA. But they should be able to put together a pretty good bullpen out of that group.

* I assume Fitts, Priester, and Winckowski are still considered starters and will either be in the Boston rotation or in AAA.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
7,571
No, agreed. If Booser, Penrod, or Bernardino are outpitching him, he'll get cut. Just like Joely got cut last year after his first disastrous stint. If they operate like they did last year, then likely what will happen is the guy without options will get precedent for roster flexibility reasons, but he shouldn't get a long rope.

Difference between Joely and Wilson, of course, is that Wilson has a track record of success...he just started giving up gopher balls at unprecendented rates despite throwing harder than he has in years. Joely had never had any success really whatsoever.

Wilson is a good bounceback option, IMO, and if he doesn't, well, IMO Booser was very good last year although many around here didn't like him very much.
Wait… why wasn’t Booser liked around here? He was thrust into a role probably a little too heavy for his talent level but he seems a solid mid bullpen guy with some dominant stretches in him.
Adding a healthy Whitlock (yeah…. Uh…) and Criswell and hopefully not exhausting the bullpen by mid July should be very good.
Even a consistent bullpen arm will wear down if they’re pushed as much as like Bernardino was last season
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
9,777
Wait… why wasn’t Booser liked around here? He was thrust into a role probably a little too heavy for his talent level but he seems a solid mid bullpen guy with some dominant stretches in him.
Yeah I think that describes Kelly too, who was really excellent for most of the year as a low lev guy but got pushed into bigger moments than he could handle.
 

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
1,232
Yeah I think that describes Kelly too, who was really excellent for most of the year as a low lev guy but got pushed into bigger moments than he could handle.
this is the way I saw it play out too. There was a point where Kelly was thrust into the 8th inning set up role due to all the injuries. I see him and Booser both starting the season in AAA, but being important pieces at some point during the season. The big league experience they received last year can only help.
 

LeoCarrillo

Do his bits at your peril
SoSH Member
Oct 13, 2008
11,290
Given that Ben Cherington used to work under Theo, I don't think William of Ockham (Occam) would flip out over the guesswork that Theo dialed up the Pittsburgh GM before the Chapman signing to ask about his head and 36-year-old left arm. More interesting would be if Theo kicked the tires on David Bednar, who's getting arb expensive (~$6M) and a free agent in 2027. Bednar's been nails before last season, so it'd make sense for Cherington to hold, let Bednar restore value and trade him at the deadline. Interesting potential bedfellows though, given Cherington's specific link to the Sox farm. He's gotta have some binkies.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
22,749
Rogers Park
Wait… why wasn’t Booser liked around here?
It's not that Booser isn't liked; it's that Booser is a 32-year-old prearb reliever with, if I am reading this right, all three option years intact. You need way more than 8 relievers to get through a season, so that means you want a bunch of optionable relievers (unless they're obvious studs like Slaten) starting in AAA in an up-and-down role. And you want those optionable relievers to be reliable like Booser; otherwise, you're left with waiver wire dregs like Trey Wingenter or Yohan Ramírez when the inevitable injury or ineffectiveness crops up.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
22,408
St. Louis, MO
Given that Ben Cherington used to work under Theo, I don't think William of Ockham (Occam) would flip out over the guesswork that Theo dialed up the Pittsburgh GM before the Chapman signing to ask about his head and 36-year-old left arm. More interesting would be if Theo kicked the tires on David Bednar, who's getting arb expensive (~$6M) and a free agent in 2027. Bednar's been nails before last season, so it'd make sense for Cherington to hold, let Bednar restore value and trade him at the deadline. Interesting potential bedfellows though, given Cherington's specific link to the Sox farm. He's gotta have some binkies.
Cherington has been gone since 2015. Those binkies are either flamed out or playing in the bigs now most likely.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,351
Wait… why wasn’t Booser liked around here? He was thrust into a role probably a little too heavy for his talent level but he seems a solid mid bullpen guy with some dominant stretches in him.
Adding a healthy Whitlock (yeah…. Uh…) and Criswell and hopefully not exhausting the bullpen by mid July should be very good.
Even a consistent bullpen arm will wear down if they’re pushed as much as like Bernardino was last season
There was some sentiment in the probably emotional aftermath of the season that the only guys we had under control in the bullpen worth keeping were Slaten, Whitlock, Hendriks, and that Booser, Weissert Bernie, Winck, and Kelly needed to all be shot into the sun. I'm not going to dig up names, but suffice to say I think that the bullpen looks alright, so long as the depth of Guerrero, Penrod, Fitts, etc. pulls through.
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
17,825
It's not that Booser isn't liked; it's that Booser is a 32-year-old prearb reliever with, if I am reading this right, all three option years intact. You need way more than 8 relievers to get through a season, so that means you want a bunch of optionable relievers (unless they're obvious studs like Slaten) starting in AAA in an up-and-down role. And you want those optionable relievers to be reliable like Booser; otherwise, you're left with waiver wire dregs like Trey Wingenter or Yohan Ramírez when the inevitable injury or ineffectiveness crops up.
How many of these 12 pitchers currently on our 40-man roster could ride the AAA shuttle up and down this year?
According to Sox Prospects, these are the options remaining:
R- Winckowski 1 option
R- Fitts 3 options
R- Priester 3 options
R- Whitlock 3
R- Slaten 3
L- Booser 2
R- Weissert 1
R- Guerrero 3
R- Kelly 3
L - Penrod 3
L - Bernardino 1
L- Murphy 2

Winck and Whit probably have too much service time? Most of the others probably could though I would think. Campbell isn't on the 40-man but will be a possibility and is listed as having 1 option on sox prospects. Dobbins and even Wikelman will be in the minors to start the season but could come up and down if they could help too. Mata isn't on the 40-man and is a huge question mark, but possibly could come up and pitch if he was looking good, but has no options left.
That's a LOT of flexibility for the bullpen that we have not had in recent years.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
22,749
Rogers Park
That's a LOT of flexibility for the bullpen that we have not had in recent years.
I'd toss in Wikelman Gonzalez, too, whom I expect to be transitioned to relief soon.

But yeah. This should really help us avoid giving meaningful innings to Joely Rodriguez/Brad Keller/Chase Anderson. There's no reason to stick with guys who aren't effective; they get it together in AAA.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,900
Maine
How many of these 12 pitchers currently on our 40-man roster could ride the AAA shuttle up and down this year?
According to Sox Prospects, these are the options remaining:
R- Winckowski 1 option
R- Fitts 3 options
R- Priester 3 options
R- Whitlock 3
R- Slaten 3
L- Booser 2
R- Weissert 1
R- Guerrero 3
R- Kelly 3
L - Penrod 3
L - Bernardino 1
L- Murphy 2

Winck and Whit probably have too much service time? Most of the others probably could though I would think. Campbell isn't on the 40-man but will be a possibility and is listed as having 1 option on sox prospects. Dobbins and even Wikelman will be in the minors to start the season but could come up and down if they could help too. Mata isn't on the 40-man and is a huge question mark, but possibly could come up and pitch if he was looking good, but has no options left.
That's a LOT of flexibility for the bullpen that we have not had in recent years.
Criswell also has an option remaining. I know he'll more likely be called up to start but he could certainly be a bullpen option if need be.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,807
Given that Ben Cherington used to work under Theo, I don't think William of Ockham (Occam) would flip out over the guesswork that Theo dialed up the Pittsburgh GM before the Chapman signing to ask about his head and 36-year-old left arm. More interesting would be if Theo kicked the tires on David Bednar, who's getting arb expensive (~$6M) and a free agent in 2027. Bednar's been nails before last season, so it'd make sense for Cherington to hold, let Bednar restore value and trade him at the deadline. Interesting potential bedfellows though, given Cherington's specific link to the Sox farm. He's gotta have some binkies.
The real question is did Theo Epstein build a time machine and go back and get information from himself back in 2016 about Chapman's head when he traded (at the time) uber prospect Gleyber Torres for 2 months of him because he realized "if I'm going to win a World Series here in Chicago, I need a version of Keith Foulke or Jonathan Papelbon because Hector Rodon sure as **** isn't the answer."

Because of the immensely high regard in which I hold Theo, my answer in an unequivocal yes, he did.

More proof that Theo isn't the "uber nerd" that people want to make him out to be. Sure, he gets analytics and says stuff like "bullpen by committee works" and "closer is a job description, not a skill", then when it's actually time to win the World Series and not that year's fWAR competition, he gets Keith Foulke or Aroldis Chapman when he doesn't have that guy. Which is why I'm so bullish on Breslow (and why I think Texas absolutely crushed it hiring Chris Young. Smart enough to understand and use analytics, absolutely. Knows enough about the game of baseball to "lose" an fWAR trade to win a World Sereis, absolutely - or at leat in the case of Breslow coming from the Theo tree, I strongly suspect / hope so).
 
Last edited:

iddoc

New Member
Nov 17, 2006
202
Criswell also has an option remaining. I know he'll more likely be called up to start but he could certainly be a bullpen option if need be.
He was much better as a starter last year. He seemed to get knocked around a bit in the first inning and then settle down. Same pattern as a reliever, except without the opportunity to settle down.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,351
View: https://twitter.com/PatSullivan05/status/1860371947692933576


One thing I'd really like to see the media cover with Bailey is "hey, a ton of pitchers had injury problems pretty soon after starting your pitching plan, is that purely coincidence, and if not how are you addressing that going forward?"

Giolito, Murphy, Campbell, Bello, Pivetta, Whitlock, Sims and Garcia. That's a lot on one staff.
It also coincided with a lot of these guys trying out a new pitch, the sweeper, didn't it? The injuries hit pretty quickly after that, IIRC. I think that was the case for at least Giolito, Piveta, Murphy, and Whitlock.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
9,777
Yeah, I don't know if was new pitches, changing pitch mixes, mechanical or what but whatever it was I want to find another way.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,351
Yeah, I don't know if was new pitches, changing pitch mixes, mechanical or what but whatever it was I want to find another way.
Yeah it would be brutal to head into spring training again, only to see three guys hit the DL the second they start to ramp up. Giolito, Murphy and Campbell collectively threw like 8 innings of horrible baseball for us last year, and Whitlock only got through 4 starts. That's a lot of innings immediately shelved.
 

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
1,232
Yeah it would be brutal to head into spring training again, only to see three guys hit the DL the second they start to ramp up. Giolito, Murphy and Campbell collectively threw like 8 innings of horrible baseball for us last year, and Whitlock only got through 4 starts. That's a lot of innings immediately shelved.
I'm bullish on Whitlock this year. He got hurt early enough in the season to have had plenty of time to rehab. More importantly, it seems like there is about a zero chance he is being considered as a SP going into 2025. When you look at his numbers as a reliever, they are elite. He misses bats, gives up weak contact for the most part, and doesn't walk guys. I wouldn't be surprised if he was one of the higher leverage, late inning guys.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
15,113
I tend to agree; I think the bullpen is likely done. They’ve got a lot of interesting arms; and only so many roster spots. Figure they’ve replaced Jansen and Martin with Chapman and Hendriks.
So, names going out and the newer names (injuries, free agency, etc) to replace the innings:

92981
 

allmanbro

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
392
Portland, Maine
So, names going out and the newer names (injuries, free agency, etc) to replace the innings:

View attachment 92981
75 More innings at a lower FIP looks like a huge improvement; an additional 0.3 WAR does not. Hoping the first one is closer to the truth. Whitlock should be able to beat that innings projection by a bit if he's healthy.

(I still think they bring in at least one more arm, which may be someone established, or may be a cheaper upside play)
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,351
You can also add the guys who made their first appearances at the end of the year -- Guerrero and Fitts -- to the possible replacements, though Fitts will likely be SP depth. And also the returning Chris Murphy.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
15,555
Oh, ok - now is the part of the offseason where they pretend guys like Fullmer are starters, and they never actually wanted one anyways.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
74,958
Definitely announce this guy that you're hoping squeaks through Rule 5 has upside as a starter. Definitely no other teams are gonna see that and bump him up their chart.
I also thought that was really odd timing with the rule 5 draft happening tomorrow.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
9,777
It would be funny if they're not happy with his progress and actually just trying to dump his contract ($1.5m +$2m in incentives) by hyping him up for the draft.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
9,777
Whitlock confirmed for the bullpen, some quotes from Bailey about his usage: https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2025/01/red-sox-garrett-whitlock-definitive-on-role-as-he-starts-his-year-of-health.html

“He’s a guy you can hand the ball off to and have him go a couple innings late in a game and give the back-end guys a rest,” Bailey said. “He’s a multi-inning force back there. He gives us another way to finish games.”

A multi-inning high leverage role had been rumored before but seems pretty locked in now.

Cotillo also mentions the prospect of him opening but that's not sourced so I'm assuming it's his own speculation.

One thing I wonder is whether this puts to bed the idea of a six man rotation. We know multi-inning Whitlock has traditionally needed a day off for every inning pitched; could a 7 man pen actually afford to have guys that can't regularly go on back to back days?