If “independent” coverage means what we’ve gotten from the Globe and the Herald over the years, or what New Yorkers have gotten from the Post and the Daily News, then I’ll pass.Witness the inherent dangers of the broadcast outlet being essentially the house organ for the team. The Orioles hold a 75% stake in MASN. God forbid that the reporters and broadcasters employed by the network do any actual work that puts the team in a less than stellar light (which he actually did not do here - he went over a set of facts in recent team history which pointed to a new winning direction for a formerly moribund organization).
The Orioles were stupid enough to make this a thing when it was nothing more than stating facts. It happened there - and it can and will happen everywhere else that the arrangement is the same, including here with NESN. YES, SNY, Marquee, Sportsnet up in Toronto all spring to mind. It's not broadcasting, it's propaganda, and at the end of the day it's the fans who lose out on objective reporting about their team.
One of the things MLB has done right in the 21st Century has been to fund their own media but keep a very loose rein on editorial content. Sure, there won’t be hard-hitting exposes on the seamy side of the sport, but traditional writers weren’t unearthing those stories anyway — partly because they are, for the most part, not real journalists, but mostly because that’s not what people open the sports page to read. And that’s ok — sports writers don’t need to be the Fourth Estate holding government to account the way their hard-news counterparts are.
This is an Orioles story, not an independent media story.