Offensive depth chart -- down in the trenches

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
12,663
around the way
This makes sense to me as well. Implementing a consistent approach to development and evaluation of lineman (assume this is happening) makes it more likely they find their ceiling as individuals and a unit.

If this remains a proper travishamocracy however, it’s going to be very difficult to look at the resources for the rookie WRs and/or an earlier return from trading Judon (just what the F did they think was going to happen there ?!?) and not think drafting a startable tackle was possible.

In my brain non elite but functional WRs are more fungible than tackles, but maybe that’s not a valid assumption. Still at least 50/50 they are functional as Andrews plus Onwenu side by side could stabilize things. Let’s go!
Yeah agreed on this post. Also some of the others above. Let's wait and see how it goes before panicking. There's a path to the OL not being a slow motion car crash. It's not inconceivable that it's below average mediocre but functional. That's not a great bar but it is year one of the rebuild.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,248
Philly
Looks like the starters might be:

LT: Chuks
LG: Leverett
C: Andrews
RG: Robinson
RT: Onwenu.

That's terrifying. Maybe they can run on the Bengals? And even then it's not like Leverett, Chuks, and Andrews are top notch run blockers.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,285
Isle of Plum
Looks like the starters might be:

LT: Chuks
LG: Leverett
C: Andrews
RG: Robinson
RT: Onwenu.

That's terrifying. Maybe they can run on the Bengals? And even then it's not like Leverett, Chuks, and Andrews are top notch run blockers.
It’s the definition of making a the best of a bad situation:)

I’m actually less worried about them getting smoked around the edges or blown off the ball than I am about the basics/technicalities.

Are they able to succeed lining up, snapping (hopefully a non issue with Andrews), not stepping on feet, missing assignments, not picking up stunts, etc?

That’s the portion that gives me the agita.
 

Over Guapo Grande

panty merchant
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2005
5,062
Worcester
I am wondering how/when Zach Thomas fits in. By all accounts, he had a really good camp with LAR. He can apparently play both G&T - @SMU_Sox (and others)- do you have any thoughts on him?
 

Over Guapo Grande

panty merchant
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2005
5,062
Worcester
Apologies but I did not look at him in the 2022 draft leadup.
What good are you then? :)

No worries at all!! I watched a youtube of him earlier (post waiver claim) that said that he grades out highly as a run blocker, but struggles in pass pro. I think it was in another thread around here that mentioned he gave up 0 pressures this pre-season, though.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,248
Philly
What good are you then?
All these years I suspected my ex-wife had a SOSH burner.

Honestly the guy I really liked was Zach Tom, not Thomas who I was highest on in the draft community IIRC. One of my better prognostications.

One of the things I like about this line is a lot of them are ass kickers in the run game. The issue with that though is if we are playing from behind that is less useful. I feel like they should be able to run on the Bengals though. No more DJ Reader is a huge help (hope I spelled that right).
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
36,767
All these years I suspected my ex-wife had a SOSH burner.

Honestly the guy I really liked was Zach Tom, not Thomas who I was highest on in the draft community IIRC. One of my better prognostications.

One of the things I like about this line is a lot of them are ass kickers in the run game. The issue with that though is if we are playing from behind that is less useful. I feel like they should be able to run on the Bengals though. No more DJ Reader is a huge help (hope I spelled that right).
Nate Tice was talking about this a few days ago (in the context of Rham), basically that he thinks people who don't really watch OL play have jumped all over the Patriots line as worse than it is, he said he has concerns about pass pro for sure, but he thinks this might actually be a good run blocking line, said he wouldn't be surprised if it grades out in the early 20s overall, and it was not one of the couple units he thought looked the worst in pre-season, especially when Andrews plays.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,248
Philly
@Cellar-Door what show? Yahoo fantasy pod? I miss him on the Athletic. I think they will be an above average run blocking line but a bottom 2-4 pass blocking unit. I don’t think much of Lowe or Chuks as run blockers though. It’s that IOL… or if Onwenu plays RT then everyone but Lowe. You know me, I like watching running more than passing. That’s what get my juices flowing. The forward pass is stupid. So hey something to be excited for! Having Maye really opens things up to run too. 11 on 11 truly instead of 10 vs 11.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
36,767
@Cellar-Door what show? Yahoo fantasy pod? I miss him on the Athletic. I think they will be an above average run blocking line but a bottom 2-4 pass blocking unit. I don’t think much of Lowe or Chuks as run blockers though. It’s that IOL… or if Onwenu plays RT then everyone but Lowe. You know me, I like watching running more than passing. That’s what get my juices flowing. The forward pass is stupid. So hey something to be excited for! Having Maye really opens things up to run too. 11 on 11 truly instead of 10 vs 11.
I think so, it came up on youtube after something else, just a quick hitter with Matt Harmon
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
12,663
around the way
Only one game, but it seems that the "not great pass pro, but superior run blocking" predictions are still looking sound. The run blocking was so good and the deception on the screen game so solid, that there wasn't a ton of pressure on JB most of the day. I'm encouraged that this team will play from ahead pretty well.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,248
Philly
I am concerned that when this team has to pass protect when they are not playing with a lead it is going to be ugly...

88297

This is truly horrendous from Robinson, Chuks, and Lowe. I pay a lot more attention to true pass sets which are your more traditional drop-backs vs like play-actions, screens, RPOs, etc.
 

Eric Fernsten's Disco Mustache

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I am concerned that when this team has to pass protect when they are not playing with a lead it is going to be ugly...
Yeah, no doubt

To my (less trained than many here) eye our line played relatively well from Andrews-right, and it was the left side that really struggled. With the caveat that you already flagged, that Layden looked a lot better going forward than he did going backward.

And in related news, Rham was clearly looking to cut right on most of his runs. On his one touchdown, for example, he more or less just followed Robinson forward and then took the open lane



 

Over Guapo Grande

panty merchant
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2005
5,062
Worcester
Yeah, no doubt

To my (less trained than many here) eye our line played relatively well from Andrews-right, and it was the left side that really struggled. With the caveat that you already flagged, that Layden looked a lot better going forward than he did going backward.

And in related news, Rham was clearly looking to cut right on most of his runs. On his one touchdown, for example, he more or less just followed Robinson forward and then took the open lane



What also stood out to me in that chart was that all of his big gains were pretty much between the tackles. In many postgame articles, Rham told AVP "let me go downhill", and they went away from outside zone.
 

Eric Fernsten's Disco Mustache

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
So, what have we learned from week 1?

Largely unambiguously good news
  • C - Dave Andrews played at the level of one of his better games last year. If we can get lots of those and fewer of last season's weird off days, that would be good
  • RT - Despite playing everywhere else in preseason, Onwenu was back at RT for 100% of the game and once again a + pass blocker. @SMU_Sox's spiffy stats suggest he had a bad day (for him) in the run, but if that regresses to a happier mean we should be OK.
Mixed blessings
  • RG - The rookie Robinson really moved people where he wanted them on running plays; unfortunately he let his man get to Brissett way too often the rest of the time
  • LG - Michael Jordan had a pulse and successfully filled space for >60 snaps. He wasn't what I'd think of as "good" in either the pass or the run, but he was serviceable. And in week 1 that was enough
  • 1st off the bench - Caeden Wallace came in for a bunch of those power "extra lineman as TE" sets and looked nice pushing slightly smaller people around. (He had the lead block on both of Rham's final two first-down runs). Not sure how much to make of those in the grand scheme of things but I'm glad he's doing well enough that he was the first name called.
*Fart noise*
  • LT - Chuk was destroyed by Trey Hendrickson in our first half dozen pass plays before getting benched for Lowe. Then, obviously, we had to survive Lowe.


Going forward...
  • If Sow comes back healthy and repeats his rookie campaign we'll have better run blocking from the LG RG spot without any worse pass protection. If Sow shows any real improvement in the passing game from his rookie year then we're in even better shape there.
  • We can hope for similar, eventual development from Robinson in the passing game. But even if that's slow coming, having a strong run-blocking four of Sow-Andrews-Layden-Onwenu is not a bad front for Rham to make some noise behind.
  • More generally, between Layden, Caeden, and Sow we have three young lineman with potential fill some of the gaps above. Their issues, to my semi-ignorant eye, are more of technique than physique. Sow especially is really quick for his size and strength. Is Scar ready to re-un-retire yet?
  • LT... I'd love it if Caedan could seize this position and blow us all away, but y'know when you're no higher than third on the LT depth chart behind Chuk and Lowe, well... when's the draft, right?
 
Last edited:

Over Guapo Grande

panty merchant
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2005
5,062
Worcester
This could go in a couple of threads,, but I think it is best suited for here. Evan Lazar did his traditional exceptional breakdown- and the first clip he showed was a Stevenson run. Hooper is essentially linked to Wallace - I guess ensuring that they will move in unison? I don't recall ever seeing that before, but it makes a lot of sense, especially on the road, to help avoid a false start

88320
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
6,592
Cultural hub of the universe
More from. Lazar:

The pass protection from the left tackle position was shaky, especially by Chuks Okorafor, who was pulled 12 snaps into the game. Okorafor and Vederian Lowe combined to allow six total pressures and two QB hits. They played with a short corner on the left side all day, with Bengals edge rusher Trey Hendrickson tallying all six pressures on the Pats LTs. In all, 46.2% of the total pressure on the QB came from the left tackle spot – they need to be better.

- RG Layden Robinson's debut went as expected for a rookie. It's a positive sign that Robinson's play strength and anchor in pass protection are translating. For any offensive lineman, that's the biggest hurdle they need to clear. However, Robinson allowed a team-high five pressures with two quarterback hits and three hurries. His two QB hits allowed came on schemed rushes, which isn't surprising given his inexperience, one on a T/E stunt that he didn't pass off and another on a creeper blitz. Robinson also couldn't reach the three-technique on outside zone, leading to a run stuff. There was a lot to like for his first game as a pro but plenty to clean up – again, not surprising.

- RT Mike Onwenu was rock-solid with a clean sheet in pass protection and was his usual self in the run game. Onwenu had the easier matchup against Sam Hubbard, and it was odd that the Pats seemed to help to his side more than the left side, but Onwenu did his thing with a rookie next to him. The same can be said for C David Andrews, who was also clean in pass pro and made a terrific kick-out block on a pin-pull scheme for a +12 run.

- Rookie OT Caedan Wallace can definitely run block in the pros. You can tell why the coaches trust him to be the eligible tackle (18 snaps) while he continues to develop in pass protection. Wallace did a nice job on duo blocks and some backside reaches on outside zone.


https://www.patriots.com/news/after-further-review-breaking-down-jacoby-brissett-the-run-game-and-the-patriots-defense-in-win-over-bengals
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,248
Philly
So, what have we learned from week 1?

Largely unambiguously good news
  • C - Dave Andrews played at the level of one of his better games last year. If we can get lots of those and fewer of last season's weird off days, that would be good
  • RT - Despite playing everywhere else in preseason, Onwenu was back at RT for 100% of the game and once again a + pass blocker. @SMU_Sox's spiffy stats suggest he had a bad day (for him) in the run, but if that regresses to a happier mean we should be OK.
Mixed blessings
  • RG - The rookie Robinson really moved people where he wanted them on running plays; unfortunately he let his man get to Brissett way too often the rest of the time
  • LG - Michael Jordan had a pulse and successfully filled space for >60 snaps. He wasn't what I'd think of as "good" in either the pass or the run, but he was serviceable. And in week 1 that was enough
  • 1st off the bench - Caeden Wallace came in for a bunch of those power "extra lineman as TE" sets and looked nice pushing slightly smaller people around. (He had the lead block on both of Rham's final two first-down runs). Not sure how much to make of those in the grand scheme of things but I'm glad he's doing well enough that he was the first name called.
*Fart noise*
  • LT - Chuk was destroyed by Trey Hendrickson in our first half dozen pass plays before getting benched for Lowe. Then, obviously, we had to survive Lowe.


Going forward...
  • If Sow comes back healthy and repeats his rookie campaign we'll have better run blocking from the RG spot without any worse pass protection. If Sow shows any real improvement in the passing game from his rookie year then we're in even better shape there.
  • We can hope for similar, eventual development from Robinson in the passing game. But even if that's slow coming, having a strong run-blocking four of Sow-Andrews-Layden-Onwenu is not a bad front for Rham to make some noise behind.
  • More generally, between Layden, Caeden, and Sow we have three young lineman with potential fill some of the gaps above. Their issues, to my semi-ignorant eye, are more of technique than physique. Sow especially is really quick for his size and strength. Is Scar ready to re-un-retire yet?
  • LT... I'd love it if Caedan could seize this position and blow us all away, but y'know when you're no higher than third on the LT depth chart behind Chuk and Lowe, well... when's the draft, right?
Great post! I don't have a lot to add but I think you summarized this perfectly!
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,248
Philly
Picking up twists and stunts is something that he (Robinson) struggled with in college (same for Sow) and that doesn't always get better. In theory you can coach up a lot of things! This is a particular issue that isn't an easy fix. If you aren't mentally aware of it or if you just don't process this stuff well you aren't going to improve. I think the issue is that some pass protectors struggle with lateral moves or moves across their faces, like Robinson and Sow, and twists and stunts can easily be confused with someone trying to get around you which you are already vulnerable to.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,248
Philly
Btw that’s just a pet theory of mine. I don’t think it’s a 1:1 or a complete causal. Just a partial explanation. If anyone here played or coached OL and want to get into it please by all means. I could 100% be way off base.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
12,663
around the way
FWIW, SMU, I wonder if some of that stunt stuff can be improved with communication & continuity. Wishcasting perhaps, but there's some handoff stuff that can be done to mitigate stunts that maybe isn't worked out yet since it has been musical chairs basically since April.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,248
Philly
It absolutely can. The potential issue is it takes both guys to recognize that a stunt is happening. Maybe one guy can call it out but will the other have time to correct? Not sure. You have to have both guys recognize it and play it at the right depth is my guess. But this is more of a coaching point vs identifying what went wrong and I am in the dark on as to how they coach this.
 

P'tucket rhymes with...

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2006
11,930
The Coney Island of my mind
I mean he was just benched last week mid-game, and had issues related to benching last season for calling out his own coach.

Edit - There you go.
His PFF pass defense grade last week was zero. It's like the Pats played with four linemen until they put Lowe in the game.

It will be interesting to see if he doesn't want to play football at all, or just not for the Pats because it hasn't gone the way he thought it might.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
46,908
Melrose, MA
Maybe is is a good sign that Mayo has one of these guys. For a while BB used to have a veteran pack it in during camp every year, and thngs worked out for BB.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,285
Isle of Plum
Maybe is is a good sign that Mayo has one of these guys. For a while BB used to have a veteran pack it in during camp every year, and thngs worked out for BB.
Was going to say something very similar. Feels like this used to happen in the Scar days: some guy who was thinking he had another year would show up and realize every day is going to be a world of pain.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
94,131
Oregon
Reiss on Okorafor:

Okorafor financial impact: Veteran left tackle Chukwuma Okorafor, who was pulled after 12 snaps in the season opener and didn't return, was placed on the exempt/left squad list Saturday. That means the team receives a roster exemption until Okorafor's status is finalized, with sources close to the situation not expecting him to play for the Patriots this season.
As for the financial impact, Okorafor had signed a one-year contract with a base value of $4 million in March, which included a $2 million signing bonus ($600,000 of which was deferred until March 31, 2025). His base salary of $1.125 million was also guaranteed, so there could be some negotiating between the sides on how much of the $3.125 million in guarantees Okorafor ultimately receives.
It's a moot point now, but Okorafor also could have earned an additional $4.25 million in incentives, which would have paid him $850,000 for hitting 50% of the snaps, then another $850,000 for 60%, 70%, 80% and 90%.
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
6,592
Cultural hub of the universe
Lazar's After Further Review has this to say about the OL week 2:

- RT Mike Onwenu struggled with four QB pressures allowed including a QB hit and a hurry that led to a sack. Onwenu also let the edge defender backdoor him on an outside zone run stuff. Onwenu was playing with a short corner because he was consistently opening his hips early, shortening the path to the QB. Tackles typically do that when they feel threatened by speed rushers and don't trust their foot speed. Onwenu's footwork issues can be corrected, but he's built like a guard, and that limits his movement skills when he's on an island in pass protection. This tape was toward the weaker end of the spectrum for Onwenu, but it's not abnormal for him to have pass pro issues at right tackle.

- Rookie RG Layden Robinson allowed a sack and two hurries in pass protection but had some standout run blocks, especially on Gibson's 19-yard outside zone run. Robinson plays through the whistle with excellent play strength. However, he gets too aggressive in his pass sets and needs to refine his hand technique to secure blocks and keep guys from getting on his edges. Overall, Robinson plays with force in the run game and has a stout anchor – you'll take that.

- LT Vederian Lowe sustained a knee injury in the game while tying for the team-high four quarterback pressures (QB hit, three hurries). Lowe can use his length and a solid anchor to hold up on the left side, but quick changes of direction cause him to lose his technique. When he's asked to mirror twitchy edge rushers like Boye Mafe, his feet get stuck sometimes when those guys give him an inside fake and burst outside to corner the edge.

- Pressures allowed: Lowe (QB hit, three hurries), Onwenu (QB hit, three hurries), Robinson (sack, two hurries), Jordan (sack), Andrews (two hurries), Hooper (hurry).


https://www.patriots.com/news/after-further-how-can-the-patriots-get-their-passing-game-going-and-other-film-observations-from-loss-to-seahawks
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
46,908
Melrose, MA
It is probably not great to have to play Robinson next to the newly enlarged and less mobile Mike Onwenu. Onwenu has to be viewed as a major disappointment, since he cashed in on big bucks and let himself go physically in the same offseason.
 

Pxer

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2007
1,801
Brissett avoiding sacks has somehow been understated. The line seems to be as bad as advertised in the pass game. Still hoping to get Sow back and see some progress from Robinson or Wallace on the right side.

Wallace may not get the game opportunities you'd like to see.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
37,555
306, row 14
Brissett avoiding sacks has somehow been understated. The line seems to be as bad as advertised in the pass game. Still hoping to get Sow back and see some progress from Robinson or Wallace on the right side.

Wallace may not get the game opportunities you'd like to see.
There is a good chance Wallace starts at LT on Thursday. Lowe was a DNP yesterday and Okorafor gone.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
19,655
There is a good chance Wallace starts at LT on Thursday. Lowe was a DNP yesterday and Okorafor gone.
The DNP is a bit of a "fake" report, as the team did not practice, and the team is required to submit a report assuming an actual practice. Teams tend to report all injuries sustained on Sunday to cover themselves as the practice weeks for Thursday night games are always weird, and they don't want to get in trouble for not reporting injuries.

Doesn't make your first sentence incorrect, as Lowe would likely need to be healthy enough for at least Wednesday's walk through in order to be active, and that seems unlikely at the moment.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,285
Isle of Plum
The OLine is on skates most of the time anyway...
Stuck like a Triple Salchow!


Here's Bedard's breakdown of the problems in the passing game:



To him, there was a breakdown on 3/4 of the passing plays and more than half of the time it was the line.
watching a little all 22 this morning, anything but work, and I saw a couple screens where the back just didn't leak out either because he blew the play or because he got caught up in the wash
 

Over Guapo Grande

panty merchant
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2005
5,062
Worcester
Stuck like a Triple Salchow!



watching a little all 22 this morning, anything but work, and I saw a couple screens where the back just didn't leak out either because he blew the play or because he got caught up in the wash
I remember one in .... I guess the 3rd Q? (The pats were going left to right across your radio dial -- miss you Gil ) - where Rham was (legally) held up trying to sneak out. The D-Lineman recognized the screen , and forced JB to spike it .
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
35,312
Brissett avoiding sacks has somehow been understated. The line seems to be as bad as advertised in the pass game. Still hoping to get Sow back and see some progress from Robinson or Wallace on the right side.

I expect Brissett to get wrecked and not finish the game Thursday night.
 
Oct 12, 2023
978
Okorafor, Watts and Takitaki not really providing much value for their collective ~$10M. Probably would have been better off giving that money to Eluemunor who has been mediocre but significantly better than Lowe and Okorafor (and clearly the “he wants to play for a winner” schtick doesn’t apply to him as some argue with other guys)
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,248
Philly
Going to the game tonight. Will be concentrating on OL. This should be a relatively easy game for our OTs but the IOL has a mountain of a challenge to climb. Good game for Wallace to play in as the Jets currently don’t have an effective edge pass rusher!
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
36,767
Reiff, Anderson, Orafor….really nailing those acquisitions for the line lately.
finding cheap OT is hard, I'd guess most of the league is similar (and 2 of the 3 were injury/illness career enders) in terms of getting very little from cheap OL punts. Okorafor is the biggest miss, just a weird one, he was not good last year but he was capable, no injury issues, no age concerns, just stopped wanted to play football it appears.