NFL: News and transactions

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,550
Who's music is that....WHY, IT'S ERIC WEDDLE! AND HE'S GOT A STEEL CHAIR!
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/33050141/safety-eric-weddle-unretires-joins-los-angeles-rams-playoffs

Surely it'll be easy for Weddle to play center field, but at 37, can he possibly have any gas left in the tank to tackle? I know this is a GFIN season for the Rams, but these are truly desperate measures.
Weddle had already reached the "undersized DB making tackles with his head" stage of his career in 2019.
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,153
Tuukka's refugee camp
Many people said that football was a dying sport with terrible ratings a couple of years ago.
And regular season ratings increased 10% YoY and its best numbers in 6 years. Probably one of the very few things (along with the other major sports) to see an increase in traditional viewership YoY. Interestingly, Fox only saw a 2% increase while CBS had 9%, ESPN and TNF each had a 16% increase.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/33050695/nfl-regular-season-ratings-increase-10-percent-last-season
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,331
Hingham, MA
And they damn well shouldn't. His numbers were good on paper this year. 62.4%, 27 TD: 7 INT, 94.6 rating, etc. - but he was at best a game manager for the Colts and at worst a complete liability. Nearly half (8) of his games was < 200 yards, including 6 of the last 8 games of the season. With Taylor and the rest of that roster, they are a better QB away from being a legit contender. Wentz is holding them back. He's a step down from guys like Mac and Jimmy G (and maybe even Tua?) who can win with good running game and defense.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
And they damn well shouldn't. His numbers were good on paper this year. 62.4%, 27 TD: 7 INT, 94.6 rating, etc. - but he was at best a game manager for the Colts and at worst a complete liability. Nearly half (8) of his games was < 200 yards, including 6 of the last 8 games of the season. With Taylor and the rest of that roster, they are a better QB away from being a legit contender. Wentz is holding them back. He's a step down from guys like Mac and Jimmy G (and maybe even Tua?) who can win with good running game and defense.
Solid use of a 1st…
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,340
Many people said that football was a dying sport with terrible ratings a couple of years ago.
Id be very interested in how many posters here who said they would quit watching football because the NFL is so awful once the Brady / Bb era was done in NE actually are gone.
 

RIrooter09

Alvin
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2008
7,265
Id be very interested in how many posters here who said they would quit watching football because the NFL is so awful once the Brady / Bb era was done in NE actually are gone.
I was one of those posters. I watch maybe 2-3 games a year out of curiosity but don’t really care about the results. I’m out of market so it’s easy to tune out. I’ll watch some of the playoff game if my schedule allows. Fantasy is far more important to me than the Patriots’ success.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,112
Id be very interested in how many posters here who said they would quit watching football because the NFL is so awful once the Brady / Bb era was done in NE actually are gone.
We need to wait until BB is gone, to see, don't we?


(I'm one of those that watched under Rust and McPherson so I don't anticipate leaving, but who knows. I am more of a BB fan than TB fan tbh, but pretty sure that's in the extreme minority view)
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,331
Hingham, MA
I’m one of those posters, still along for the ride with BB. We’ll see after that.

That said, I rarely watch the games live. It’s not appointment viewing like it once was. I think that’s more due to life circumstances than the NFL, though.
 

Over Guapo Grande

panty merchant
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2005
4,502
Worcester
I was one of those posters. I watch maybe 2-3 games a year out of curiosity but don’t really care about the results. I’m out of market so it’s easy to tune out. I’ll watch some of the playoff game if my schedule allows. Fantasy is far more important to me than the Patriots’ success.
My fantasies are very important to me, too. Helps get me through the day.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,470
I don't think the first season of expanded "playoffs" went how the NFL thought it would...

Only two of the WC games were decided by less than 10.. (out of 6 games). Which makes me think they either scrap it, or make changes regarding seeding

Of course this is the NFL so who knows WTF they will do in the offseason if they make changes to the playoffs

Edit: there were ZERO lead changes in the second half off any of the WC games this year.... and were decided by an average of 17.2 points


View: https://twitter.com/ScottKacsmar/status/1483291681634103301
View: https://twitter.com/DanWetzel/status/1483294760488120322
 
Last edited:

ZMart100

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2008
3,213
I don't think the first season of expanded "playoffs" went how the NFL thought it would...

Only two of the WC games were decided by less than 10.. (out of 6 games). Which makes me think they either scrap it, or make changes regarding seeding

Of course this is the NFL so who knows WTF they will do in the offseason if they make changes to the playoffs

Edit: there were ZERO lead changes in the second half off any of the WC games this year.... and were decided by an average of 17.2 points


View: https://twitter.com/ScottKacsmar/status/1483291681634103301
View: https://twitter.com/DanWetzel/status/1483294760488120322
As long as the network checks clear, the NFL will be happy. They don't really care about the quality- see Thursday night football.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,948
Los Angeles, CA
I don't think the first season of expanded "playoffs" went how the NFL thought it would...

Only two of the WC games were decided by less than 10.. (out of 6 games). Which makes me think they either scrap it, or make changes regarding seeding

Of course this is the NFL so who knows WTF they will do in the offseason if they make changes to the playoffs

Edit: there were ZERO lead changes in the second half off any of the WC games this year.... and were decided by an average of 17.2 points


View: https://twitter.com/ScottKacsmar/status/1483291681634103301
View: https://twitter.com/DanWetzel/status/1483294760488120322
It may be the format, or it may just be statistical variance. The average closing spread for this weekend's games was 5.92 and the median was 5.25 - just for Wild Card Weekend. Here are the mean and median spreads for the past 5 years across all playoff games, including the Conference Championships and Super Bowl. I'm not sure this weekend was historically out of whack at all, despite what the small sample size (6-game) outcome might seem to imply.

48452

The NE/BUF and ARI/LAR matchups both featured teams with very similar DVOAs and spreads of 4.5 and 3 respectively, and both games ended with 30+ point deficits. Sometimes, things just break that way.
 
Last edited:

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,075
New York City
I don't think the first season of expanded "playoffs" went how the NFL thought it would...

Only two of the WC games were decided by less than 10.. (out of 6 games). Which makes me think they either scrap it, or make changes regarding seeding

Of course this is the NFL so who knows WTF they will do in the offseason if they make changes to the playoffs
They had 6 games over 3 days and I would assume all 6 games will be in the top 25 for TV ratings for the entire year of 2022.

It went fine for the NFL. I don't know why you're so reactionary about these things. Most first rounds in the NBA are also a bore, too.
 

trekfan55

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 29, 2004
11,632
Panama
If the playoffs were being played under the old format there would be 4 games this past weekend.

Bengals-Raiders (close enough game with a referee controversy to boot)
Bills-Patriots (sorry guys)
Rams-Cardinmals (blowout)
49ers-Cowboys (the game was not as close as we think it was, but it did come down to the last play)

So 50-50 in terms of "good" and "bad" games.

It's the two additional games that proved to be duds, a #7 seed vs a #2 seed in each case. However, I remember when the 3rd WC was added and people were also in a nutty. I do not see the extra playoff team going anywhere. It took some time for a 6 seed to make it all the way (the Packers won like that, and I think the Steelers did too).
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
If the playoffs were being played under the old format there would be 4 games this past weekend.

Bengals-Raiders (close enough game with a referee controversy to boot)
Bills-Patriots (sorry guys)
Rams-Cardinmals (blowout)
49ers-Cowboys (the game was not as close as we think it was, but it did come down to the last play)

So 50-50 in terms of "good" and "bad" games.

It's the two additional games that proved to be duds, a #7 seed vs a #2 seed in each case. However, I remember when the 3rd WC was added and people were also in a nutty. I do not see the extra playoff team going anywhere. It took some time for a 6 seed to make it all the way (the Packers won like that, and I think the Steelers did too).
If I were the NFL, or any of their network partners, or the owners, I would also be factoring in the additional interest (and thus revenue) that is created by that 7th seed option existing in terms of the final couple games of the regular season as it puts more teams in play longer. It also means that there is more value in being the #1 seed which might keep the final weeks of the top teams in play as well.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,045
Should you desire to watch, here is the arrest video:



Also, not his first run in:

 

axx

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,131
The timing on this is suspicious.
It may just be "preventive maintenance" to ensure the playoffs aren't affected by positive tests. It's not Rodgers since with the old rules he wouldn't be tested again until after the CCG.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,651
It may just be "preventive maintenance" to ensure the playoffs aren't affected by positive tests. It's not Rodgers since with the old rules he wouldn't be tested again until after the CCG.
I'm pretty sure it's a Friday news dump, but that Rodgers is very much on their mind. Having the NFCCG or SB without the presumptive MVP is a disaster for them
 

Pablo's TB Lover

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 10, 2017
5,999
In other Chiefs news, starting LB Willie Gay got booked for criminal destruction of property. Basically he allegedly destroyed a cell phone, vacuum, etc during a confrontation at his kid’s mother’s home.


https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/33107896/kansas-city-chiefs-willie-gay-arrested-misdemeanor-criminal-property-damage-charge?platform=amp
Nothing to see here as usual, says Andy Reid.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/33117687/despite-midweek-arrest-kansas-city-chiefs-lb-willie-gay-play-sunday-says-andy-reid

Can't believe I'll have to root for the Bills this weekend.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,651
As far as the Pats’s nemeses go (now and years past), the Bills are as tame as it gets. No truly hatable players, and their fans have to live in Buffalo, so they know they’ve got one foot in the grave when comes to talking shit.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
46,893
Hartford, CT
Media really took it to Reid after this response, except that they didn’t at all.

"I decided he would play,'' Reid said. "I'm not going to get into the conversations [with Gay]. I decided that after hearing just some of the information there.''

But god forbid he sit a struggling corner in the Super Bowl, then the screws will really get put on him. Well, maybe?
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,486
Oregon
As far as the Pats’s nemeses go (now and years past), the Bills are as tame as it gets. No truly hatable players, and their fans have to live in Buffalo, so they know they’ve got one foot in the grave when comes to talking shit.
Their coach comes off as a jerk, but otherwise you're right
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,651
Their coach comes off as a jerk, but otherwise you're right
I was going to mention him, but they’ve had to contend with bigger jerk coaches amongst their greatest enemies: Rex Ryan, Eric Mangini, Jim Harbaugh, Tony Dungy, Jeff Fisher, and if you go way back, the biggest asshole of them all, Don Shula.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
As far as the Pats’s nemeses go (now and years past), the Bills are as tame as it gets. No truly hatable players, and their fans have to live in Buffalo, so they know they’ve got one foot in the grave when comes to talking shit.
Cole Beasley says hello. Otherwise, I pretty much agree.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,442
As far as the Pats’s nemeses go (now and years past), the Bills are as tame as it gets. No truly hatable players, and their fans have to live in Buffalo, so they know they’ve got one foot in the grave when comes to talking shit.
We haven’t fully experienced the chirpy, superior, entitled version of the Bills and their fans. Give them time! (Allen is great though; demeanor, likeability as a human actually reminds me of Bledsoe.)
 

Granite Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2003
5,062
The Granite State
Oh… I don’t know… Cole Beasley, Dawson Knox, Jerry Hughes are three complete jackwagons for starters. Allen complains to the refs every other play, as good as he is. The two safeties are lauded, but they’re pretty prickish. Stefan Diggs is a diva. McDermott is an epic red ass.

I’m rooting for Buffalo the rest of the way (it would be a great story), but calling them a bunch of likeable guys is a bit of a stretch.

(Note: of course the Pats continuously have an equal number of toolbag)
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,651
Oh… I don’t know… Cole Beasley, Dawson Knox, Jerry Hughes are three complete jackwagons for starters. Allen complains to the refs every other play, as good as he is. The two safeties are lauded, but they’re pretty prickish. Stefan Diggs is a diva. McDermott is an epic red ass.

I’m rooting for Buffalo the rest of the way (it would be a great story), but calling them a bunch of likeable guys is a bit of a stretch.

(Note: of course the Pats continuously have an equal number of toolbag)
I don't know who you're responding to exactly, but I said "not truly hatable", which isn't nearly the same as "likable."

Here are some hatable players from Pats nemeses (current and past):

Tyreek Hill
Richie Incognito
Bart Scott
Terrell Suggs
Joey Porter
Bernard Pollard
Ray Lewis
Travis Kelce
Ray Rice
T.J. Ward
Ben Rothlisberger
Ndamukong Suh

The guys you name aren't in the same category. Beasley's vaccine stance is ignorant and criminal, but on the field he's far from the biggest douche the Pats have faced. That he's the most easily hated guy on that team supports my point.
 
Last edited:

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,816
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
The Bills haven't won enough for me to truly hate them. KC has. It's really that simple for me. I mean, the amount of shit Pats fans (and media as well) talked after that win in Buffalo was ridiculous too, of course their fanbase will be riled up after destroying this nemesis in the playoffs. Let's just hope it becomes a rivalry from here on out. But I'll agree that Bills fans are waaaay too cocky for a team that hasn't really done a lot apart from not sucking the past few years.
 

Soxy

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2008
6,095
I'm probably biased by some Buffalo fans I've befriended along the way, but they have a fatalism to their fandom which I can empathize with. It's not all that unlike Red Sox fans who remember what it was like pre-2004. The Bills fans I know fully expect their season to end the same way it always does: with pain and suffering. Of course, the ones I know are all old enough to have seen them lose four Super Bowls in a row, as well as the Music City Miracle (which they may get a chance to avenge this year). They're hoping for the best and planning for the worst, but I think they feel pretty good about their chances, all things considered. And they probably should. Their season likely will end in pain and suffering, because that's usually how it ends for everyone, but I think they've got as good a shot as anybody this year. It also seems like a real tough field. Other than maybe Cinci, it's a bunch of usual suspects that everybody thought would be in the mix. No easy outs.
 

Willie Clay's Big Play

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 30, 2017
327
That’s put pretty well. I have a good friend that’s a Bill’s fan and I’ve always felt bad for him when watching games, wh I always found odd because he’s kind of a prick. Now I understand my empathy.

Also, in 2010 I went to a pats bills game in Buffalo with my brother and sister. The fans were great, gave us booze they snuck in and gave a few assholes tons of shit when they started screaming at us. They also asked us what it was like to be a Pats fan and wondered what it would be like to have a great team to root for, so I really enjoyed embellishing the answer to that question to further sadden them.
Also, fuck the chiefs.

edit: spelling
 
Last edited:

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,651
The city of Buffalo has two major sports teams, the Bills and Sabres, that have over 110 seasons between them and has never seen a championship. Their fans are predominantly fatalistic and it will be interesting to see how they act if/when they do hoist the Cup or a Lombardi.