NFL Free Agent Frenzy

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
All the weirder that he visited the Pats. There's no way the Pats were offering anything higher than like 3 years and $10-12M
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,645
The Browns can't cut him. They don't have the cap space.
how would they not? They're well under the cap right now and Baker has no money on his deal other than the guaranteed base, cutting him has no effect on cap space versus holding him. A trade would likely clear cap space.

I don't see the incentive to cut him, but there is no reason they couldn't from a cap perspective
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
I don't understand why the Panthers aren't interested. The Browns have no leverage so the acquisition cost would be reasonable. And their incumbent is Sam Darnold, who is trash. Mayfield has been hot and cold but why wouldn't you buy low on a former top pick much like you just did with Darnold? Baker is about to turn 27 and has had 2 good years out of 4 and last year probably had some injury-related reasons for his struggles. Scouts must really not like him or perhaps there are leadership concerns.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,645
I don't understand why the Panthers aren't interested. The Browns have no leverage so the acquisition cost would be reasonable. And their incumbent is Sam Darnold, who is trash. Mayfield has been hot and cold but why wouldn't you buy low on a former top pick much like you just did with Darnold? Baker is about to turn 27 and has had 2 good years out of 4 and last year probably had some injury-related reasons for his struggles. Scouts must really not like him or perhaps there are leadership concerns.
I wonder if part of it for some teams is that if you trade assets for him, you basically have to give him an extension, and so for the Panthers for example, they'd rather pay Darnold $18.5M this year, be bad and then have a fresh slate at QB next year, versus either:
1. Paying $37M for Baker and Darnold
OR
2. Paying Darnold $18.5M, and pay Baker for multiple years on top.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
I wonder if part of it for some teams is that if you trade assets for him, you basically have to give him an extension, and so for the Panthers for example, they'd rather pay Darnold $18.5M this year, be bad and then have a fresh slate at QB next year, versus either:
1. Paying $37M for Baker and Darnold
OR
2. Paying Darnold $18.5M, and pay Baker for multiple years on top.
Possible. Just feel like teams like the Giants, Seahawks, and Panthers should all potentially be interested. Lions too although I guess Goff's deal is clogging some of their cap. Will be interesting to see where Baker goes if he has to take a backup role. He becomes a distraction if he goes somewhere and doesn't get a starting gig so you're right that you pretty much have to commit to him if you're trading for him. And it appears nobody is currently willing to do that.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,645
Possible. Just feel like teams like the Giants, Seahawks, and Panthers should all potentially be interested. Lions too although I guess Goff's deal is clogging some of their cap. Will be interesting to see where Baker goes if he has to take a backup role. He becomes a distraction if he goes somewhere and doesn't get a starting gig so you're right that you pretty much have to commit to him if you're trading for him. And it appears nobody is currently willing to do that.
I feel like the Seahawks should be, Panthers maybe, honestly for the Giants I don't see it, Jones is younger and arguably better, and that team is in full rebuild mode.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
I feel like the Seahawks should be, Panthers maybe, honestly for the Giants I don't see it, Jones is younger and arguably better, and that team is in full rebuild mode.
Yeah, Seattle to me is the team that makes sense for me with Baker. They're also the team that makes the most sense for me with Jimmy G, though I can't see SF trading him in the division. I won't be surprised if the 49ers overplayed their hand and wind up cutting Garoppolo though.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,925
Panthers should pick swap 6th rounders or whatever for Baker & sign Josh Rosen & lock up the 1st, 3rd & 10th picks from the 2018 draft as their QB room (you know, the 3 guys who aren't Josh Allen or Lamar Jackson).
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,925
Yeah, Seattle to me is the team that makes sense for me with Baker. They're also the team that makes the most sense for me with Jimmy G, though I can't see SF trading him in the division. I won't be surprised if the 49ers overplayed their hand and wind up cutting Garoppolo though.
I get not wanting to trade within your division (kinda sometimes sorta), but if the Seahawks want to give up something of value for Jimmy G & no one else does it seems like a no-brainer.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,484
Oregon
Panthers should pick swap 6th rounders or whatever for Baker & sign Josh Rosen & lock up the 1st, 3rd & 10th picks from the 2018 draft as their QB room (you know, the 3 guys who aren't Josh Allen or Lamar Jackson).
Dan Patrick floated that notion on his radio show yesterday
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,484
Oregon
I don't understand why the Panthers aren't interested. The Browns have no leverage so the acquisition cost would be reasonable. And their incumbent is Sam Darnold, who is trash. Mayfield has been hot and cold but why wouldn't you buy low on a former top pick much like you just did with Darnold? Baker is about to turn 27 and has had 2 good years out of 4 and last year probably had some injury-related reasons for his struggles. Scouts must really not like him or perhaps there are leadership concerns.
I wonder whether teams are so pissed off at the Browns over the Watson guaranteed money (and what it means for QBs down the road) that there's a non-nod agreement to stick it to Cleveland
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,925
Dan Patrick floated that notion on his radio show yesterday
Now I feel slow.

In my defense, I haven't listened to him in years. I think I'm still mad about Sports Jeopardy.
 

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,364
Possible. Just feel like teams like the Giants, Seahawks, and Panthers should all potentially be interested. Lions too although I guess Goff's deal is clogging some of their cap. Will be interesting to see where Baker goes if he has to take a backup role. He becomes a distraction if he goes somewhere and doesn't get a starting gig so you're right that you pretty much have to commit to him if you're trading for him. And it appears nobody is currently willing to do that.
I hadn't considered the Lions, but the Lions with 2020 Baker would be easy to root for. Cap machinations aside, for some of these teams where it's clear the incumbent is not the future (Lions and Panthers in particular), there has to be a point where the trade price is low enough that it's worth it just as a lottery ticket to see if you can solve QB without the draft. I'm admittedly less done on Baker than some, though - of course if you're confident he sucks it's not worth anything.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,925
There is a potential for comp pick arbitrage with Baker.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
I feel like the Seahawks should be, Panthers maybe, honestly for the Giants I don't see it, Jones is younger and arguably better, and that team is in full rebuild mode.
I have a pretty low opinion of Daniel Jones, which colors my analysis. It'd be more about bringing competition to a guy who hasn't done anything to really impress in his first few years but I recognize he's a tough one to evaluate given how much of a mess it is around him and maybe they want to give him one more year as "the guy" before deciding on a long-term contract.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,645
I have a pretty low opinion of Daniel Jones, which colors my analysis. It'd be more about bringing competition to a guy who hasn't done anything to really impress in his first few years but I recognize he's a tough one to evaluate given how much of a mess it is around him and maybe they want to give him one more year as "the guy" before deciding on a long-term contract.
I think to me it's basically that you need to make an up/down decision on Jones this year, and he looked the best he has for a portion of last year before his entire pass catching corps got hurt, then he got hurt, and all while playing behind the worst line in the league. He may stink again, but if I was going to pick one of the two to get a look at for this one year, it's probably Jones, and it's definitely Jones if he's already on my roster and I don't have to trade an asset and eat $18.5M for the look.

If Mayfield gets released on the other hand..... NYG should definitely give him a look then.
 

DanoooME

above replacement level
SoSH Member
Mar 16, 2008
19,882
Henderson, NV
Yeah, Seattle to me is the team that makes sense for me with Baker. They're also the team that makes the most sense for me with Jimmy G, though I can't see SF trading him in the division. I won't be surprised if the 49ers overplayed their hand and wind up cutting Garoppolo though.
Seahawks won't trade draft capital for a QB this year. Especially Baker Mayfield. Mayfield doesn't fit into Pete's running philosophy. Jimmy G could fit, but the Seahawks will just wait it out and sign him if he gets released. Another factor for the Seahawks is they only have about $11M in cap room, so they couldn't fit either Mayfield or Jimmy G under the cap with their existing deals. They are loathe to restructuring deals to clear cap room and they don't really have any deals they could do that with anyway. They have so much dead money ($45M) eating the cap space they had. Their top cap number right now is DT Poona Ford at a little over $10M.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,075
New York City
Seahawks won't trade draft capital for a QB this year. Especially Baker Mayfield. Mayfield doesn't fit into Pete's running philosophy. Jimmy G could fit, but the Seahawks will just wait it out and sign him if he gets released. Another factor for the Seahawks is they only have about $11M in cap room, so they couldn't fit either Mayfield or Jimmy G under the cap with their existing deals. They are loathe to restructuring deals to clear cap room and they don't really have any deals they could do that with anyway. They have so much dead money ($45M) eating the cap space they had. Their top cap number right now is DT Poona Ford at a little over $10M.
Baker Mayfield is at his best running play action, (e.g. his 2020 season) so I think he would definitely fit into Pete's philosophy.

Baker was miserable this year. Nobody can argue otherwise, there were games where he was AWFUL and could barely complete a 5 yard out. And in a bunch of big games he was better at completing passes to the other team. And his performance in the first half of that Monday night game against Pittsburgh in Week 17 set the NFL back 40 decades.

But he was also injured pretty badly and shouldn't have been playing at all. Baker is good. He's not exceptional but he would be a good QB for any team to pick up.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,441
Breer reported that Browns were looking for a first round pick for Baker after the Watson trade. If true, they are/were delusional. I think a late round pick is more likely and Cleveland might need to eat some salary.

Not many options left. Atlanta, Indy and NO all went in other directions. Panthers reportedly are not interested.

I think Seattle would be a good fit. NYG might work. Either way it's a one year tryout at QB and Baker has had better seasons than Jones. But Jones is cheaper and more familiar. Lions are a possibility but might be a tight fit with Goff contract.
If 1st round ask is true then Houston might still have some interest at a low cost but indications are they are going with Mills.

If I was Cleveland, I'd listen if the Steelers called. While I think Mayfield could be a solid QB, I wouldn't have any 2nd thoughts about trading him within the division.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,645
Breer reported that Browns were looking for a first round pick for Baker after the Watson trade. If true, they are/were delusional. I think a late round pick is more likely and Cleveland might need to eat some salary.

Not many options left. Atlanta, Indy and NO all went in other directions. Panthers reportedly are not interested.

I think Seattle would be a good fit. NYG might work. Either way it's a one year tryout at QB and Baker has had better seasons than Jones. But Jones is cheaper and more familiar. Lions are a possibility but might be a tight fit with Goff contract.
If 1st round ask is true then Houston might still have some interest at a low cost but indications are they are going with Mills.

If I was Cleveland, I'd listen if the Steelers called. While I think Mayfield could be a solid QB, I wouldn't have any 2nd thoughts about trading him within the division.
yeah, a 1st given the contract isn't happening. I think his value is probably a 3rd.... BUT... there are few suitors, the Browns badly burned their bridges, and they are gonna take a huge cap hit, so they won't get that.
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,223
CA

Old Fart Tree

the maven of meat
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2001
14,101
Boulder, CO
That’s a tough 1-2, no question.
I just hate Hill with a passion so it’s hard for me to think objectively about him.