I am shocked Kiper is not killing it ... He is all about when being as important as who( . ) ( . ) and (_!_) said:ESPN analysts seem to love the pick. Is nfln killing it?
Ed Hillel said:Where do you think this dude was when Belichick called him? Getting wasted watching the draft as a fan?
Phragle said:It's hard to believe the shit they do sometimes
dcmissle said:Here is the deal. Usually the knee jerk defense of a wayward pick is, "well somebody could have jumped them ..."
Who???? The fucking guy himself did not expect to be taken till the 5th
Dollar said:Pats took a defensive back who nobody expected them to take? FUCK! I'm done with this shit, instead I'm going to watch Malcom Butler win a Super Bowl on my 3 Games to Glory IV Blu-ray.
There very well could've been a team in the 3rd that wanted him and the Pats got worried he wouldn't be there when they pick again at 96.dcmissle said:Here is the deal. Usually the knee jerk defense of a wayward pick is, "well somebody could have jumped them ..."
Who???? The fucking guy himself did not expect to be taken till the 5th
If that's the case, why do they trade down so much? Why don't they just go down their list?Ed Hillel said:
Belichick just doesn't view the draft that way. They rank players and pick based on that, nothing else.
By his sophomore season, in fact, Richards had such a thorough understanding of the playbook that he got the nickname, “Coach Richards.”
“Because he was so mature and did everything right on and off the field,” Ertz said. “If you had a question, it was, ‘Just ask Coach Richards.’ I think that speaks volumes to the respect people have for him in the program.”
http://www.sacbee.com/sports/nfl/san-francisco-49ers/article10886939.html
ElcaballitoMVP said:There very well could've been a team in the 3rd that wanted him and the Pats got worried he wouldn't be there when they pick again at 96.
LolManzivino said:Good news is we got the random DB portion of the draft over early and the three picks late 3rd/early 4th can go to the OL.
E5 Yaz said:
Okay, but say that's true ... what that means is that the guy they wanted to take at 64 in the first place will likely to be gone by 96-97. So, to save the third round guy they wanted, they sacrifice the second round guy
ElcaballitoMVP said:
Not if the Pats had Richards at the top of their draft board.
E5 Yaz said:
Okay, but say that's true ... what that means is that the guy they wanted to take at 64 in the first place will likely to be gone by 96-97. So, to save the third round guy they wanted, they sacrifice the second round guy
Randy Gregory's representatives made it clear that, whichever team drafts him, needs to have a support system in place that would be expected to include a security person and a personal handler who would follow Gregory at all times. To Gregory and his representatives, it didn't matter where in the draft he went, but where in the NFL he went. He was adamant that it would be with a team that would support him. Dallas has been through similar experiences in the past, providing helpers to wide receiver Dez Bryant after he was drafted. And there are expected to be Gregory Rules and followers in Dallas as well.
Fishercat said:
You lost me on this one. If Belichick had someone higher on his board who was likely to earlier to boot, it seems unlikely he takes the DB there.
tims4wins said:SSF you are mad not because of who, but when. 99% chance he woulda been there at 101 which is why this is frustrating.
You are right we don't. But as with Tavon, if it doesn't work out, BB deserves a lot of criticismDeathofthebambino said:
How can you guys possibly know that?